[1]陈甲,徐静文,吉星,等.无偿转入农地对保护性耕作技术采纳的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1392-1401.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.027]
　CHEN Jia,XU Jing-wen,JI Xing,et al.Influence of renting in farmland for free on the adoption of conservation tillage technology[J].,2022,38(05):1392-1401.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.027]
点击复制

无偿转入农地对保护性耕作技术采纳的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
38
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
1392-1401
栏目:
农业经济·农业信息
出版日期:
2022-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influence of renting in farmland for free on the adoption of conservation tillage technology
作者:
陈甲1; 徐静文2; 吉星1; 张红霄1
（1.南京林业大学经济管理学院，江苏南京210037；2.无锡职业技术学院财经学院，江苏无锡214121）
Author(s):
CHEN Jia1; XU Jing-wen2; JI Xing1; ZHANG Hong-xiao1
（1.College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China;2.College of Finance and Economics, Wuxi Institute of Technology,Wuxi 214121, China）
关键词:
农地流转; 无偿; 保护性耕作技术; 劳动节约型; 劳动密集型
Keywords:
farmland transfer; free of charge; conservation tillage technology; labor saving; labor intensive
分类号:
F304.4
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.027
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于2020年中国土地经济调查（CLES）在江苏省调查的527个地块尺度数据，运用负二项回归、泊松内生处理效应模型（ETPR）和内生转换模型（ESR），验证无偿转入农地对转入方采纳保护性耕作技术行为的影响。结果显示：1）相比于有偿转入农地的转入方，无偿流转不利于转入方采纳测土配方施肥等4种保护性耕作技术，二者相比，无偿流转的转入方的总体技术采纳数量减少了1.356个，替换因变量的检验结果证实这一结果是稳健的。2）对不同类型技术的异质性分析结果表明，无偿流转的转入方对施用高效低毒低残留农药这一劳动节约型保护性耕作技术的采纳数量减少了0.183个，对测土配方施肥等3类劳动密集型耕作技术的采纳数量则减少了2.496个，无偿流转对转入方采纳劳动密集型保护性耕作技术的抑制作用更强。因此，应通过持续推进新一轮农地确权和加快完善流转中介服务平台，逐渐改变当前流转弱市场化的交易格局；应根据各地流转市场化程度的差异，因地制宜地推广不同劳动力属性的保护性耕作技术；同时结合技术的应用特点，对农户进行宣传和培训，开展高水平农田建设。
Abstract:
Based on the scale data of 527 plots surveyed by China Land Economic Survey (CLES) in Jiangsu province in 2020, the impact of free farmland transfer on the behavior of adopting conservation tillage technology by the transferees was verified by employing Negative Binomial Regression (NBR), Poisson Regression with Endogenous Treatment Effects (ETPR) and Endogenous Switching Regression (ESR). The results showed that, firstly, compared with the transferees who rented in farmland with compensation, free transfer was not conducive to the transferees’ adoption of four conservation tillage technologies including soil testing and formula fertilization. The total number of technology adoptions by transferees who rented in farmland for free decreased by 1.356. The inspection result was verified to be stable after replacing the dependent variable. Secondly, results of heterogeneity analysis on different types of technologies showed that, the number of adopting labor-saving conservation tillage technologies such as using pesticides with high efficiency, low toxicity and low residue adopted by the transferees in free transfer decreased by 0.183, and the number of adopting three labor-intensive tillage technologies including soil testing and formula fertilization decreased by 2.496. Thus, free transfer had a stronger inhibitory effect on the transferees’ adoption of labor-intensive conservation tillage technologies. Therefore, we should continue to promote a new round of farmland tenure confirmation and accelerate the improvement of transfer intermediary service platform to gradually change the current weak market-oriented transaction pattern. We should promote conservation tillage technologies with different labor attributes according to differences of market-oriented degree of the circulation market. Besides, we should conduct propaganda and training oriented to the farmers to carry out high-level farmland construction, combined with the application characteristics of technology.

参考文献/References:

[1]王亚辉,李秀彬,辛良杰. 山区土地流转过程中的零租金现象及其解释——基于交易费用的视角[J].资源科学,2019,41(7):1339-1349.
[2]TANG L, MA X L, ZHOU Y P, et al. Social relations, public interventions and land rent deviation: Evidence from Jiangsu Province in China[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019, 86:406-420.
[3]WANG H, RIEDINGER J, JIN S. Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: panel evidence from China[J]. China Economic Review,2015,36: 220-235.
[4]陈奕山. 人情:中国的一种农地租金形态[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科版),2018,17(5):94-103.
[5]田先红,陈玲. 地租怎样确定?——土地流转价格形成机制的社会学分析[J].中国农村观察,2013(6):2-12,92.
[6]王亚楠,纪月清,徐志刚，等. 有偿VS无偿:产权风险下农地附加价值与农户转包方式选择[J].管理世界,2015(11):87-94,105.
[7]钱龙,洪名勇. 为何选择口头式、短期类和无偿型的农地流转契约——转出户控制权偏好视角下的实证分析[J].财贸研究,2018,29(12):48-59.
[8]速水佑次郎. 农业发展的国际分析[M].郭熙保译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2000:86-88.
[9]魏后凯. 中国农业发展的结构性矛盾及其政策转型[J].中国农村经济,2017(5):2-17.
[10]仇焕广,苏柳方,张祎彤,等. 风险偏好、风险感知与农户保护性耕作技术采纳[J].中国农村经济,2020(7):59-79.
[11]张建,诸培新,南光耀. 不同类型农地流转对农户农业生产长期投资影响研究——以江苏省四县为例[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(3):96-104,158-159.
[12]KURKALOVA L,KLING C,ZHAO J. Green subsidies in agriculture: Estimating the adoption costs of conservation tillage from observed behavior[J]. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics ,2006,54:247-267.
[13]郜亮亮,黄季焜. 不同类型流转农地与农户投资的关系分析[J].中国农村经济,2011(4):9-17.
[14]徐志刚,张骏逸,吕开宇. 经营规模、地权期限与跨期农业技术采用——以秸秆直接还田为例[J].中国农村经济,2018(3):61-74.
[15]舒尔茨. 改造传统农业[M]. 梁小民，译.北京:商务印书馆,1987:108-109.
[16]钟甫宁,纪月清. 土地产权、非农就业机会与农户农业生产投资[J].经济研究,2009,44(12):43-51.
[17]WU Y R. Chemical fertilizer use efficiency and its determinants in China’s farming sector: implications for environmental protection[J]. China Agricultural Economic Review, 2011, 3(2):117-130.
[18]魏佳朔,高鸣,宋洪远. 无偿转入土地对粮食生产效率的影响：福利还是负担?[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021(3):83-92,187.
[19]曹慧,赵凯. 农户非农就业、耕地保护政策认知与亲环境农业技术选择——基于产粮大县1422份调研数据[J].农业技术经济,2019(5):52-65.
[20]陈奕山,钟甫宁,纪月清. 有偿VS无偿:耕地转入户的异质性及其资源配置涵义[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(6):94-106,159.
[21]李文欢,王桂霞. 互联网使用有助于农户参与黑土地质量保护吗?[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(7):27-34.
[22]毛慧,曹光乔. 作业补贴与农户绿色生态农业技术采用行为研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(1):49-56.
[23]钱龙,冯永辉,卢华. 地权稳定性对农户耕地质量保护行为的影响——基于新一轮确权颁证调节效应的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2021,21(2):104-115.
[24]杨志海. 老龄化、社会网络与农户绿色生产技术采纳行为——来自长江流域六省农户数据的验证[J].中国农村观察,2018(4):44-58.
[25]仇童伟,罗必良,何勤英. 农地流转市场转型:理论与证据——基于对农地流转对象与农地租金关系的分析[J].中国农村观察,2019(4):128-144.

相似文献/References:

[1]张振宇,田明华,李建军,等.农地流转中农户行为决策及其福利效应[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(04):1060.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.036]
　ZHANG Zhen-yu,TIAN Ming-hua,LI Jian-jun,et al.Decision-making of peasant households and its welfare effect in farmland transfer[J].,2020,(05):1060.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.036]
[2]徐晶,张正峰.农机社会化服务对农地流转的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(05):1310.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.029]
　XU Jing,ZHANG Zheng-feng.Effects of agricultural machinery socialization service on farmland transfer[J].,2021,(05):1310.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.029]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-12-19基金项目：国家自然科学青年基金项目（7200030610）；江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究项目（2021SJA0936）；江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目（SJKY19-0903）；无锡职业技术学院校级课题（BS202101）作者简介：陈甲（1991-），男，安徽宿州人，博士研究生，主要从事农林经济政策绩效评价。(E-mail)jchen@njfu.edu.cn通讯作者：张红霄，(E-mail)njhxzh@njfu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-07