[1]张振宇,田明华,李建军,等.农地流转中农户行为决策及其福利效应[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(04):1060-1067.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.036]
　ZHANG Zhen-yu,TIAN Ming-hua,LI Jian-jun,et al.Decision-making of peasant households and its welfare effect in farmland transfer[J].,2020,(04):1060-1067.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.036]
点击复制

农地流转中农户行为决策及其福利效应()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
1060-1067
栏目:
农业经济·农业信息
出版日期:
2020-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Decision-making of peasant households and its welfare effect in farmland transfer
作者:
张振宇1; 2; 田明华1; 李建军2; 杨娱3; 王芳1
(1.北京林业大学经济管理学院,北京100083;2.山西农业大学农业资源与经济研究所,山西太原030006；3.天津农学院经济管理学院,天津300384）
Author(s):
ZHANG Zhen-yu1; 2; TIAN Ming-hua1; LI Jian-jun2; YANG Yu3; WANG Fang1
(1.School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China;2.School of Agricultural Economics and Management, Shanxi Agricultural University， Taiyuan 030006， China;3.School of Economics and Management, Tianjin Agricultural College, Tianjin 300384, China)
关键词:
农地流转; 农户福利效应; 倾向得分匹配法; 双重差分倾向得分匹配法
Keywords:
farmland transfer; farmers′ welfare effect; propensity score matching(PSM) method; propensity score matching-difference in difference(PSM-DID) method
分类号:
F301.24
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.036
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从农户视角出发，基于中国家庭追踪调查数据(CFPS)，应用Logit模型分析农地流转决策的影响因素，进而通过倾向得分匹配法(PSM)和双重差分倾向得分匹配法(PSM-DID)测算和比较分析农地流转农户的福利效应。研究发现，农户非农收入比重、村庄经济环境、城市居民收入水平等是农户转出农地的重要诱因，农地价值、农机价值和农业补贴等显著正向影响农户转入土地。用PSM控制样本农户禀赋差异后，分析结果表明农地转出对农户人均收入、人均非食品消费、户主健康有改善作用；农地转入对农户人均收入有改善作用，对农户人均非食品消费和户主健康的影响不显著。用PSM-DID进一步控制经济社会条件变化趋势差异后，分析结果表明农地转出对农户人均收入、人均非食品消费仍有改善作用，但对户主健康有负向影响；农地转入对农户人均收入仍有改善作用，对农户人均非食品消费和户主健康的影响仍不显著。建议在关注农地流转户增收问题的同时，应采取针对性措施改善进城务工农户和留村农地流转农户的健康、消费支出等福利。
Abstract:
From the perspective of peasant households, based on the data of China Family Panel Studies(CFPS), the logit model was used to analyze the influencing factors of decision in farmland transfer, and the welfare effect of peasant households was calculated and compared through propensity score matching(PSM) method and propensity score matching-difference in difference(PSM-DID) approach. The results showed that the value of farmland and agricultural machinery, and agricultural subsidies were the main incentives to transfer in farmland for peasant households. The proportion of non-agricultural income of farmers, the economic environment of villages and the urban residents income level had a significant positive impact on transferring out farmland for peasant households. After the endowment differences of the sample farmers were controlled by PSM, the welfare of the farmers from the income per capita, non-food consumption per capita and the health of peasant householders was significantly improved by transferring out farmland. In addition, the income per capita of peasant households was improved by transferring in farmland, but the changes of non-food consumption per capita and the health of peasant householders were not significant. After the trend differences of economic and social conditions were controlled by PSM-DID, the income per capita and the non-food consumption per capita of peasant households were significantly improved by transferring out farmland, but the health welfare of peasant householders was reduced. Moreover, the income per capita of peasant households was improved by transferring in farmland, but the changes of non-food consumption per capita and the health of peasant householders were not significant. It is suggested that the income increase of peasant households in farmland transfer should be paid attention to, and targeted measures should be taken to improve the multi-dimensional welfare such as health and consumption of peasant households working in cities or staying in villages.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈良,张云. 农村土地规模经营问题探析——以苏北为例[J]. 农村经济, 2009(3):39-42.
[2]陈治国,李成友,辛冲冲. 农户土地流转决策行为及其福利效应检验——基于CHIP2013数据的实证研究[J]. 商业研究, 2018(5):163-171.
[3]徐志刚,谭鑫,郑旭媛,等. 农地流转市场发育对粮食生产的影响与约束条件[J]. 中国农村经济, 2017(9):26-43.
[4]史清华,贾生华. 农户家庭农地要素流动趋势及其根源比较[J]. 管理世界, 2002(1):71-77.
[5]JIN S, DEININGER K. Land rental markets in the process of rural structural transformation: Productivity and equity impacts from China [J]. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2009, 37(4):629-646.
[6]闫小欢,霍学喜. 农民就业、农村社会保障和土地流转——基于河南省479个农户调查的分析[J]. 农业技术经济, 2013(7):34-44.
[7]杨佳. 湖北省农村土地承包经营权流转市场研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2009.
[8]陈飞,翟伟娟. 农户行为视角下农地流转诱因及其福利效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2015(10):163-177.
[9]刘玥汐,许恒周. 农地确权对农村土地流转的影响研究——基于农民分化的视角[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(5):25-29.
[10]ANAND P, KRISHNAKUMAR J, TRAN N B. Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2011,95(3):205-215.
[11]戚焦耳,郭贯成,陈永生. 农地流转对农业生产效率的影响研究——基于DEA-Tobit模型的分析[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(9):1816-1824.
[12]李庆海,李锐,王兆华. 农户土地租赁行为及其福利效果[J]. 经济学(季刊), 2011, 10(1):269-288.
[13]廖沛玲,赵健,夏显力. 农地转出前后农户福利变化及差异研究——以关天经济区政府主导型农地流转为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(7):1354-1364.
[14]游和远,吴次芳,鲍海君. 农地流转、非农就业与农地转出户福利——来自黔浙鲁农户的证据[J]. 农业经济问题, 2013(3):16-25.
[15]王雪琪,曹铁毅,邹伟.地方政府干预农地流转对生产效率的影响——基于水稻种植户的分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(9):133-141.
[16]刘凤芹.农业土地规模经营的条件与效果研究:以东北农村为例[J].管理世界,2006(9):71-79，171-172.
[17]JIN S, JAYNE T S. Land rental markets in Kenya: Implications for efficiency, equity, household income, and poverty[J]. Land Economics, 2013, 89(2):246-271.
[18]苑会娜. 进城农民工的健康与收入——来自北京市农民工调查的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2009(5):56-66.
[19]陆文昊. 农地经营权资本化对农户福利效应的影响[D].咸阳:西北农林科技大学,2018.
[20]ALMOND D, LI H, ZHANG S. Land reform and sex selection in China[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2013(127):560-585.
[21]夏显力,贾书楠,蔡洁,等. 农地流转中转出户的福利效应——基于政府主导与市场主导两种模式的比较分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版）, 2018,18(2):79-85.
[22]ARIF G M, NAZLI H, HAQ R, et al. Rural non-agriculture employment and poverty in Pakistan[J]. The Pakistan Development Review, 2000,39(4):1089-1110.
[23]BERTRAND M, DUFLO E, MULLAINATHAN S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2004, 119(1):249-275.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐晶,张正峰.农机社会化服务对农地流转的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(05):1310.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.029]
　XU Jing,ZHANG Zheng-feng.Effects of agricultural machinery socialization service on farmland transfer[J].,2021,(04):1310.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.029]
[2]陈甲,徐静文,吉星,等.无偿转入农地对保护性耕作技术采纳的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1392.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.027]
　CHEN Jia,XU Jing-wen,JI Xing,et al.Influence of renting in farmland for free on the adoption of conservation tillage technology[J].,2022,38(04):1392.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.027]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2020-02-26基金项目：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(2019YC20);山西省软科学研究项目(2018041071-3)；山西省哲学社科规划项目(2019B436)；山西省农业科学院其他项目(YCX2018D2R01)作者简介：张振宇(1984-），男，山西忻州人，博士研究生，研究方向为土地经济与农户福利。(Email)penjv84@163.com通讯作者：田明华,(Email)tmhbjfu@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-08