[1]徐晶,张正峰.农机社会化服务对农地流转的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(05):1310-1319.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.029]
　XU Jing,ZHANG Zheng-feng.Effects of agricultural machinery socialization service on farmland transfer[J].,2021,(05):1310-1319.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.029]
点击复制

农机社会化服务对农地流转的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
1310-1319
栏目:
农业经济·农业信息
出版日期:
2021-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of agricultural machinery socialization service on farmland transfer
作者:
徐晶; 张正峰
（中国人民大学公共管理学院，北京100872）
Author(s):
XU Jing; ZHANG Zheng-feng
(School of Public Administration and Policy, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
关键词:
农机社会化服务; 农地流转; 小农户; 规模经营
Keywords:
agricultural machinery socialization service; farmland transfer; small farmers; appropriate scale of agricultural operation
分类号:
F323.6
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
传统农业劳动力的流失以及现代农业的普及推动了农业机械在农业生产领域的广泛使用。当前，小农户经营格局的限制导致多数农业经营者购买农业机械的难度较大，由此促进了农机社会化服务的出现和发展。农机社会化服务通过替代农业生产劳动力、普及生产技术以及降低生产成本，从而对农业生产和农地流转发挥了重要作用。基于中国家庭金融调查（CHFS）2015年的微观农户数据，运用Probit模型和Tobit模型实证研究了农机社会化服务对农地转出和农地转入的影响，同时还通过对样本分组开展了异质性分析。结果表明：1）农机社会化服务的推广对农地转出和转入均产生了显著影响。其中农机社会化服务对农户的农地转出行为和转出规模产生了显著的负向影响，对农地转入行为和转入规模则产生了显著的正向影响。2）农机社会化服务在不同年龄类型农户以及不同生产区域的农户中所发挥的影响也具有差异。因此，应大力发展农机社会化服务，完善农业社会化服务体系，培育农机租赁服务主体；基于不同类型农户的发展特征，实施多元化的农机服务和技术保障；针对不同农业生产区域的发展情况，因地制宜地加强农机租赁推广和技术帮扶力度；提高小农户在农业生产中的组织化水平。
Abstract:
The loss of traditional agricultural labor force and the popularization of modern agriculture promote the extensive use of agricultural machinery in the field of agricultural production. At present, the restriction of small-scale farming pattern makes it more difficult for most agricultural operators to buy agricultural machinery, which promotes the emergence and development of agricultural machinery socialization service. The agricultural machinery socialization service plays an important role in agricultural production and farmland transfer by replacing agricultural labor, popularizing production technology and reducing production cost. Based on the data of China Household Finance Survey (CHFS) in 2015, Probit model and Tobit model were used to empirically analyze the impact of agricultural machinery socialization service on farmland transfer, and heterogeneity analysis was carried out through sample grouping. The results showed that the promotion of agricultural machinery socialization service had a significant impact on the farmland transfer out and transfer in. The agricultural machinery socialization service had a significant negative impact on the behavior and scale of rural land transfer out, and a significant positive impact on farmland transfer in. In addition, the impacts of agricultural machinery socialization service were also different in various age types and production areas. Therefore, the agricultural machinery socialization service should be fully developed and diversified agricultural machinery services and technical support should be implemented. In addition, we should strengthen the promotion of agricultural machinery service and technical assistance according to local conditions and improve the organization level of small farmers in agricultural production.

参考文献/References:

[1]UNITED NATIONS. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development [R]. New York: United Nations, 2015:1-41.
[2]HAZELL P, POULTON C, WIGGINS S, et al. The future of small farms: trajectories and policy priorities[J]. World Development,2010, 38 (10):1349-1361.
[3]ZHANG X, RASHID S, AHMAD K, et al. Escalation of real wages in Bangladesh: is it the beginning of structural transformation？[J]. World Development, 2014, 64: 273-285.
[4]RIGG J, SALAMANCA A, THOMPSON E. The Puzzle of East Asia′s persistent smallholder[J].Journal of Rural Studies,2016, 43 (1):118-133.
[5]YAMAUCHI F. Rising real wages, mechanization and growing advantage of large farms: Evidence from Indonesia[J]. Food Policy, 2016, 58: 62-69.
[6]ELAHI E, ABID M, ZHANG L, et al. Agricultural advisory and financial services; farm level access, outreach and impact in a mixed cropping district of Punjab, Pakistan[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 71:249-260.
[7]杨子,饶芳萍,诸培新. 农业社会化服务对土地规模经营的影响——基于农户土地转入视角的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2019(3):82-95.
[8]OSHIRO K K. Mechanization of rice production in Japan[J]. Economic Geography, 1985, 61(4):323-331.
[9]KHONDOKER A M, TIMOTHY J K, OLAF E. Factors associated with small-scale agricultural machinery adoption in Bangladesh: Census findings[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 46: 155-168.
[10]JUSTICE S, BIGGS S. The spread of smaller engines and markets in machinery services in rural areas of South Asia[J]. Journal of Rural Studies,2020, 73(1):10-20.
[11]韩春虹,张德元. 小农户与现代农业衔接的服务组织模式:机理及效应评价[J].广东财经大学学报,2020,35(2):82-92.
[12]罗必良. 小农经营、功能转换与策略选择——兼论小农户与现代农业融合发展的"第三条道路"[J].农业经济问题,2020(1):29-47.
[13]HUANG J, WANG X, QIU H. Small-scale farmers in China in the face of modernisation and globalisation[R]. London:International Institute for Environment and Development, 2012.
[14]方师乐,史新杰,高叙文. 非农就业、农机投资和农机服务利用[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(1):139-149.
[15]林本喜,邓衡山. 农业劳动力老龄化对土地利用效率影响的实证分析——基于浙江省农村固定观察点数据[J].中国农村经济,2012(4):15-25.
[16]方师乐,黄祖辉. 新中国成立70年来我国农业机械化的阶段性演变与发展趋势[J].农业经济问题,2019(10):36-49.
[17]韩庆龄. 村社统筹:小农户与现代农业有机衔接的组织机制[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(3):34-43.
[18]MAINUDDIN M, KIRBY M. National food security in Bangladesh to 2050[J]. Food Security. 2015, 7 (3):633-646.
[19]BINAM J N, TONYE J, WANDJI N, et al. Factors affecting the technical efficiency among smallholder farmers in the slash and burn agriculture zone of cameroon[J]. Food Policy, 2004, 29(5): 531-545.
[20]ALWARRITZI W, NANSEKI T, CHOMEI Y, et al. Analysis of the factors influencing the technical efficiency among oil palm smallholder farmers in indonesia[J]. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2015, 28: 630-638.
[21]钟真,胡珺祎,曹世祥. 土地流转与社会化服务：“路线竞争”还是“相得益彰”？——基于山东临沂12个村的案例分析[J].中国农村经济,2020(10):52-70.
[22]钟甫宁. 正确认识粮食安全和农业劳动力成本问题[J].农业经济问题,2016,37(1):4-9.
[23]OLMSTEAD A L, RHODE P W. Reshaping the landscape:The impact and diffusion of the tractor in American agriculture, 1910-1960[J]. The Journal of Economic History, 2001, 61 (3):663-698.
[24]BALOCH M A, THAPA G B. The effect of agricultural extension services: Date farmers’ case in Balochistan,Pakistan[J].Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 17:282-289.
[25]程令国,张晔,刘志彪. 农地确权促进了中国农村土地的流转吗？[J]管理世界,2016(1): 88-98.
[26]胡新艳,洪炜杰. 劳动力转移与农地流转:孰因孰果？[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(1):137-145,169.
[27]钱忠好. 非农就业是否必然导致农地流转——基于家庭内部分工的理论分析及其对中国农户兼业化的解释[J].中国农村经济,2008(10):13-21.
[28]王雨濛,张效榕,张清勇. 社会关系网络能促进新型农业经营主体流转土地吗？——基于河北、安徽和山东三省的调查[J].中国土地科学,2018,32(1):51-57.
[29]冀县卿,钱忠好. 如何有针对性地促进农地经营权流转？——基于苏、桂、鄂、黑四省(区)99村、896户农户调查数据的实证分析[J].管理世界,2018,34(3): 87-97.
[30]CAO Y, ZOU J, FANG X Q. Effect of land tenure fragmentation on the decision-making and scale of agricultural land transfer in China[J].Land Use Policy, 2020, 99: 104996.
[31]MCMILLAN J, WHALLEY J, ZHU L. The impact of China’s economic reforms on agriculture productivity growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 97(4):781-807.
[32]DEININGER K, JIN S. Securing property rights in transition: lessons from implementation of China’s rural land contracting law[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2009, 70 (12):22-38.
[33]SCHULTZ T W. Transforming traditional agriculture[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.
[34]HE C, YE J. Lonely sunsets: Impacts of rural-urban migration on the left-behind elderly in rural China[J]. Population, Space and Place,2014, 20(4):352-369.
[35]PAN Z H, DONG W Z. Can money substitute adult children’s absence？ Measuring remittances’ compensation effect on the health of rural migrants′ left-behind elderly parents[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2020, 79:216-225.
[36]康晨,刘家成,徐志刚. 农业生产外包服务对农村土地流转租金的影响[J].中国农村经济,2020(9):105-123.
[37]芦千文,高鸣. 中国农业生产性服务业支持政策的演变轨迹、框架与调整思路[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(5):142-155.
[38]吴一恒,徐砾,马贤磊. 农地“三权分置”制度实施潜在风险与完善措施——基于产权配置与产权公共域视角[J].中国农村经济,2018(8):46-63.
[39]RUBIN D B. Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies[J].Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974, 66: 688-701.
[40]KRISTENSEN L S, THENAIL C, KRISTENSEN S P. Landscape changes in agrarian landscapes in the 1990: the interaction between farmers and the farmed landscape. A case study from Jutland, Denmark[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 71:231-244.
[41]HE Y F, XIE H L, PENG C Z. Analyzing the behavioural mechanism of farmland abandonment in the hilly mountainous areas in China from the perspective of farming household diversity[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 99:104826.
[42]连玉君,廖俊平. 如何检验分组回归后的组间系数差异？[J].郑州航空工业管理学院学报,2017,35(6):97-109.
[43]陈超，徐飘. 桃农规模经营行为影响因素实证研究:江苏例证[J]. 江苏农业科学，2019，47（5）：273-277.

相似文献/References:

[1]张振宇,田明华,李建军,等.农地流转中农户行为决策及其福利效应[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(04):1060.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.036]
　ZHANG Zhen-yu,TIAN Ming-hua,LI Jian-jun,et al.Decision-making of peasant households and its welfare effect in farmland transfer[J].,2020,(05):1060.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.036]
[2]陈甲,徐静文,吉星,等.无偿转入农地对保护性耕作技术采纳的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1392.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.027]
　CHEN Jia,XU Jing-wen,JI Xing,et al.Influence of renting in farmland for free on the adoption of conservation tillage technology[J].,2022,38(05):1392.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.027]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-05-20基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（71874196）；中国人民大学2020年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划项目作者简介：徐晶（1994-），女，山东潍坊人，博士研究生，研究方向为土地利用。(E-mail)xujing_ruc@ruc.edu.cn通讯作者：张正峰，(E-mail)zhangzhengfeng@ruc.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-11-09