[1]安珍,张茹艳,周春涛,等.铁肥对马铃薯生理特性、产量及品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(04):931-938.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.04.009]
 AN Zhen,ZHANG Ru-yan,ZHOU Chun-tao,et al.Effects of iron fertilizer on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of potato[J].,2022,38(04):931-938.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.04.009]
点击复制

铁肥对马铃薯生理特性、产量及品质的影响()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
38
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
931-938
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2022-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of iron fertilizer on physiological characteristics, yield and quality of potato
作者:
安珍张茹艳周春涛张卫娜石铭福康益晨张俊莲秦舒浩
(甘肃农业大学园艺学院,甘肃兰州730070)
Author(s):
AN ZhenZHANG Ru-yanZHOU Chun-taoZHANG Wei-naSHI Ming-fuKANG Yi-chenZHANG Jun-lianQIN Shu-hao
(College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)
关键词:
马铃薯铁肥生理特性产量品质
Keywords:
potatoiron fertilizerphysiological characteristicsyieldquality
分类号:
S532
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.04.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探明不同类型铁肥对马铃薯生理特性、产量及品质的影响,本研究以马铃薯品种大西洋为试验材料,设6个处理:对照(等量清水)、T1(36 mg/L硫酸铁)、T2(20 mg/L硫酸亚铁)、T3(15 mg/L柠檬酸+36 mg/L硫酸铁)、T4(15 mg/L柠檬酸+20 mg/L硫酸亚铁)和T5(6 mg/L螯合铁)。在块茎成熟期,与CK相比, T5处理马铃薯株高、茎粗增幅最大。在马铃薯块茎膨大期,T5处理叶片超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性较对照(CK)分别增加42.06%、49.66%和40.41%,丙二醛(MDA)、脯氨酸(Pro)含量与CK相比分别降低了16.55%、40.64%。T5处理块茎产量最高,为62 537.22 kg/hm2,与CK相比增加34.68%,T3处理的块茎产量次之。此外,T5处理马铃薯块茎的各项品质指标均优于其他处理,淀粉、还原糖、维生素C(Vc)、蛋白质含量分别较CK增加39.35%、21.34%、24.91%、30.72%。相关分析结果表明,马铃薯产量与株高、茎粗、SOD活性、POD活性、CAT活性、小薯质量、中薯质量、中薯个数、大薯质量、大薯个数、淀粉含量、还原糖含量、VC含量、蛋白质含量均呈正相关。T5处理和T3处理可促进马铃薯生长,增加抗氧化酶活性,提高产量,改善块茎品质。综合考虑,螯合铁肥效最佳,柠檬酸配施硫酸铁效果次之,本研究结果可为改善马铃薯施肥制度提供理论依据。
Abstract:
In order to explore the effects of different types of iron fertilizers on the physiological characteristics, yield and quality of potatoes, the potato variety Atlantic was used as the experimental material in this study, and six treatments were set up: CK (equal water), T1 (36 mg/L ferric sulfate), T2 (20 mg/L ferrous sulfate), T3 (15 mg/L citric acid + 36 mg/L ferric sulfate), T4 (15 mg/L citric acid +20 mg/L ferrous sulfate) and T5 (6 mg/L chelated iron). At tuber maturity stage, the plant height and stem diameter of the potato under T5 treatment were significantly higher than those under other treatments. During the tuber bulking stage, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) and catalase (CAT) in leaves under T5 treatment increased by 42.06%, 49.66% and 40.41% compared with CK, while the contents of malondialdehyde (MDA) and proline (Pro) decreased by 16.55% and 40.64%. The tuber yield was highest in T5 treatment, which was 62 537.22 kg/hm2, increased by 34.68% compared with CK, followed by T3 treatment. In addition, the quality indicators of potato tubers under T5 treatment were better than those under other treatments, and the contents of starch, reducing sugar, vitamin C and protein increased by 39.35%, 21.34%, 24.91% and 30.72% compared with CK. The results of correlation analysis showed that potato yield was positively correlated with plant height, stem diameter, SOD activity, POD activity, CAT activity, weight of small tuber, weight of medium tuber, number of medium tuber, weight of large tuber, number of large tuber, starch content, reducing sugar content, vitamin C content and protein content. T5 and T3 treatments can promote potato growth, increase antioxidant enzyme activity, increase yield, and improve tuber quality. Therefore, chelated iron has the best effect, followed by citric acid combined with ferric sulfate, which can provide a theoretical basis for improving the fertilization system of potato.

参考文献/References:

[1]QIN S, YEBOAH S, CAO L, et.al. Breaking continuous potato cropping with legumes improves soil microbial communities, enzyme activities and tuber yield[J]. PLoS One, 2017,12(5): e0175934.
[2]张淑敏,宁堂原,刘振,等.不同类型地膜覆盖的抑草与水热效应及其对马铃薯产量和品质的影响[J].作物学报, 2017,43(4): 571-580.
[3]范立春,孙磊,王丽华,等.不同施肥量配合纳米碳肥料增效剂对马铃薯产量和品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2021(4): 208-212.
[4]何梓彬. 外源锌、铁、磷叶片喷施对有色稻籽粒矿质营养及其生物有效性的影响[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2020.
[5]汪丹丹,李海超,盛浩,等.叶面喷施铁和镁微肥对玉米幼苗碳代谢及生长的影响[J].西北农学报,2017,26(2):192-200.
[6]汪洪,金继运. 铁、镁、锌营养胁迫对植物体内活性氧代谢影响机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(5): 738-744.
[7]RUI M, MA C, HAO Y, et al. Iron oxide nanoparticles as a potential iron fertilizer for peanut (Arachis hypogaea)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7:815.
[8]梁怡,卢明,姚智,等. 钙镁辣椒配方肥对辣椒生产及品质的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2021(1): 109-116.
[9]郝兴顺,姜雨含,吴玉红,等. 汉中地区籼稻锌、铁、锰营养基因型差异及叶面喷锌对籽粒锌含量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019,25(4): 74-77.
[10]顾博文,杨劲峰,鲁晓玲,等.连续施用生物炭对花生不同生育时期叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021,54(21): 4552-4561.
[11]马兴华,于振文,梁晓芳,等.施氮量和底追比例对小麦氮素吸收利用及籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(2): 150-155.
[12]李艳,贾袭伟,李欣苗,等. 螯合铁肥对当归生长及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2021,40(3): 47-51.
[13]吴洮男. 滴灌条件下不同水肥组合对温室番茄产量、品质及其生理特性的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2019.
[14]冯密,向书迪,黄雪娇,等.叶面补铁对喀斯特土壤小白菜生长、土壤养分及微生物的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020(5): 220-226.
[15]李凯,张国辉,郭志乾,等. 叶面喷施铁锌锰微肥对马铃薯生长、品质与产量的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2018,32(1): 28-30,34.
[16]YUAN Z, VANBRIESEN J M. The formation of intermediates in EDTA and NT a biodegradation [J]. Environmental Engineering Science,2006, 23(3):533-544.
[17]邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2007: 159-165.
[18]任雪. 切割方式及烹饪环节对马铃薯维生素和抗氧化活性的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2020.
[19]王丽,王万兴,索海翠,等. 马铃薯块茎酶促褐变及与相关生理指标的关系[J]. 园艺学报, 2019,46(8): 1519-1530.
[20]杨娜娜,吴娜,刘吉利,等. 间作模式对马铃薯叶片保护酶活性及产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(6): 138-144.
[21]魏婷,罗辰瑶,李红,等. 外源茉莉酸甲酯对番茄幼苗生长及镉抗性的影响[J]. 陕西科技大学学报, 2021,39(4): 15-20.
[22]梁玲玲. 不同化肥减施技术对马铃薯产量、养分累积及品质的影响[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2020.
[23]周春涛,张茹艳,石铭福,等. 铁肥形态对马铃薯块茎内源激素、产量及品质的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022,50(4): 42-49.
[24]邢宇俊,陈黎明,孟东峰,等.0.02%二氢卟吩铁可溶粉剂在烟草上的应用效果[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(24):91-94.
[25]龙光霞. 铁、锰对广西宿根甘蔗幼苗黄化的影响[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(8):1939-1945.
[26]覃英,韦江璐,陈炯宇,等. 影响甘蔗内生成团泛菌XD20生长和促生特性的因子分析[J].南方农业学报,2020,51(4):781-789.
[27]梁芳,刘冰,檀小辉,等.红花玉蕊新梢发育过程中矿质元素含量的时空变化特性[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(21):133-139.
[28]石铭福.不同类型肥料追施对马铃薯生长特征、产量构成及品质的影响[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2018.
[29]廖佳丽,徐福利,赵世伟. 宁南山区施肥对马铃薯生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009(4): 48-52.
[30]赵明,周宝元,马玮,等.粮食作物生产系统定量调控理论与技术模式[J]. 作物学报, 2019,45(4): 485-498.
[31]宋佳承,王天,闫士朋,等. 不同种植模式对土壤质量及马铃薯生长的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2020,57(2): 490-499.
[32]RENS L R, ZOTARELLI L, CANTLIFFE D J, et al. Biomass accumulation, marketable yield, and quality of Atlantic potato in response to nitrogen[J]. Agronomy Journal, 2015,107(3): 931-942.
[33]BOROWSKI E, MICHALEK S. The effect of foliar fertilization of French bean with iron salts and urea on some physiological processes in plants relative to iron uptake and translocation in leaves[J]. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Hortorum Cultus, 2011, 10(2): 183-193.
[34]兴荣荣,马丽娅·马木提,张保军,等.锌铁微肥对冬小麦籽粒产量及其微量元素含量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38(12): 1490-1495.
[35]GOURKHEDE P H, PATIL V D, ADKINE S A. Effect of foliar feeding of gluconate and EDTA chelated plant nutrients on yield chlorophyll content and nitrate reductase enzyme of Bt cotton under rainfed ecosystem of marathawada [J].International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry,2020,21(10):41-49.

相似文献/References:

[1]何虎翼,谭冠宁,何新民,等.63 份马铃薯品种(系)资源农艺性状的主成分与聚类分析[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(01):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.005 ]
 HE Hu-yi,TAN Guan-ning,HE Xin-min,et al.Principal component and cluster analysis for agronomic traits of 63 potato varieties or clones[J].,2017,(04):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.005 ]
[2]徐玉伟,印敬明,白潇,等.马铃薯 StPYL1 和 StPYL8 基因的分子克隆与表达分析[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(01):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.004]
 XU Yu-wei,YIN Jing-ming,BAI Xiao,et al.Molecular cloning and expression analysis of potato StPYL1 and StPYL8 genes[J].,2015,(04):23.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.004]
[3]亢艳莉,申双和,张学艺,等.气候变化对宁夏南部山区马铃薯产量的影响及马铃薯水分供需特征分析[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(05):1056.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.015]
 KANG Yan-li,SHEN Shuang-he,ZHANG Xue-yi,et al.Effect of climate change on potato yield of Ningxia southern mountainous area and analysis of characteristics of water supply and demand in potato[J].,2017,(04):1056.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.015]
[4]王卓卓,何英彬,罗善军,等.基于冠层高光谱数据与马氏距离的马铃薯品种识别[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(05):1036.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.010]
 WANG Zhuo-zhuo,HE Ying-bin,LUO Shan-jun,et al.Variety identification of potatoes based on canopy hyperspectral data and Mahalanobis distance[J].,2018,(04):1036.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.010]
[5]许伟栋,赵忠盖.基于卷积神经网络和支持向量机算法的马铃薯表面缺陷检测[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1378.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.025]
 XU Wei-dong,ZHAO Zhong-gai.Potato surface defects detection based on convolution neural networks and support vector machine algorithm[J].,2018,(04):1378.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.025]
[6]黄强,郑顺林,郭函,等.氮增效剂对马铃薯叶片及土壤氮的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(05):1087.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.05.013]
 HUANG Qiang,ZHENG Shun-lin,GUO Han,et al.Effects of nitrogen synergist on nitrogen in potato leaves and soil[J].,2019,(04):1087.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.05.013]
[7]许建民,颜志明,史培华,等.不同光谱及其组合对马铃薯干物质积累和分配的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(01):32.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.005]
 XU Jian-min,YAN Zhi-ming,SHI Pei-hua,et al.Effects of different spectra and their combinations on dry matter accumulation and distribution in potato[J].,2020,(04):32.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.005]
[8]许建民,刘艳,颜志明,等.不同光谱对马铃薯种薯品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(05):1105.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.005]
 XU Jian-min,LIU Yan,YAN Zhi-ming,et al.Effects of different spectra on quality of seed potato[J].,2020,(04):1105.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.005]
[9]杨茜,刘吉利,贺锦红,等.栽培模式对宁南地区马铃薯生理特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(03):555.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.03.002]
 YANG Qian,LIU Ji-li,HE Jin-hong,et al.Effects of cultivation pattern on physiological characteristics and yield of potatoes planted in southern Ningxia[J].,2021,(04):555.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.03.002]
[10]肖熙鸥,林文秋,陈卓,等.马铃薯抗青枯病育种研究进展[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(05):1344.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.033]
 XIAO Xi-ou,LIN Wen-qiu,CHEN Zhuo,et al.Research advances in potato breeding for bacterial wilt resistance[J].,2021,(04):1344.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.033]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-12-05基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(32060441);国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0200803);马铃薯产业技术体系项目(CARS-09-P14);甘肃农业大学科技创新基金——公招博士科研启动基金项目(GAU-KYQD-2020-10);甘肃省自然科学基金项目(21JR7RA827)作者简介:安珍(1996-),女,甘肃天水人,硕士研究生,主要从事蔬菜栽培及土壤生理生态研究。(E-mail)2429831522@qq.com通讯作者:秦舒浩,(E-mail)qinsh@gsau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-06