[1]刘红江,裴晓芳,丁雯丽,等.江苏优质稻区土壤理化性状对稻米品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(04):956-965.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.005]
　LIU Hong-jiang,PEI Xiao-fang,DING Wen-li,et al.Effect of soil physical and chemical properties on rice quality in high quality rice producing areas of Jiangsu province[J].,2023,(04):956-965.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.005]
点击复制

江苏优质稻区土壤理化性状对稻米品质的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年04期
页码:
956-965
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2023-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect of soil physical and chemical properties on rice quality in high quality rice producing areas of Jiangsu province
作者:
刘红江1; 裴晓芳2; 3; 丁雯丽2; 郭智1; 张岳芳1; 盛婧1; 周炜1; 黄胜东4
（1.江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/农业农村部长江下游平原农业环境重点实验室，江苏南京210014；2.南京信息工程大学电子与信息工程学院，江苏南京210044；3.无锡学院电子信息工程学院,江苏无锡214105；4.江苏省农业科学院粮食作物研究所，江苏南京210014）
Author(s):
LIU Hong-jiang1; PEI Xiao-fang2; 3; DING Wen-li2; GUO Zhi1; ZHANG Yue-fang1; SHENG Jing1; ZHOU Wei1; HUANG Sheng-dong4
(1.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nangjing 210014, China;2.School of Electronic & Information Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;3.School of Electronic & Information Engineering, Wuxi University, Wuxi 214105, China;4.Institute of Food Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nangjing 210014, China）
关键词:
优质稻区; 土壤; 理化性状; 产量; 稻米品质
Keywords:
rice producing areas of high quality; soil; physical and chemical properties; yield; rice quality
分类号:
S511
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.005
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了探索优良食味粳稻稻米品质与土壤理化性状之间的关系，本研究在江苏省镇江市句容市后白镇圩区随机选取种植南粳46、南粳3908、南粳5055和南粳9108的11个具有代表性的水稻种植主体， 2020年和2021年度对其土壤理化性状和稻米品质进行取样检测，并分析主要指标之间的相关性。结果表明，2个试验年度，11个水稻种植主体土壤理化性状主要指标中，总氮含量和总磷含量平均值分别为160 g/kg和056 g/kg；速效氮含量、速效磷含量、速效钾含量平均值分别为1105 mg/kg、1142 mg/kg、1334 mg/kg；有机质含量平均值为2664 g/kg，不同水稻种植主体土壤肥力状况差异显著。2季水稻平均产量以南粳46最低，为9 2481 kg/hm2，以南粳3908最高，达到9 8128 kg/hm2；2021年水稻平均产量与2020年差异不显著。南粳46的稻米品质指标总体优于其他3个水稻品种，综合食味值也最高，品质较优,但该品种垩白度和垩白粒率偏高。相关性分析结果表明，土壤有机质含量高的水稻种植主体的稻田，稻米整精米率、峰值黏度和热浆黏度高，胶稠度大，蛋白质含量低，米质较好。综上，就不同水稻品种而言，南粳46稻米品质最优，在肥力水平较高的土壤上种植南粳46能进一步提高其稻米品质,但南粳46的产量总体偏低,而南粳3908则相对兼顾了水稻产量和稻米品质。
Abstract:
To explore the relationship between grain quality of japonica rice with good eating quality and soil physical and chemical properties, 11 representative rice planters who planted Nanjing 46, Nanjing 3908, Nanjing 5055 and Nanjing 9108 were randomly selected in the polder area of Houbai Town, Jurong City, Zhenjiang City of Jiangsu province in this study Soil physical and chemical properties and rice qualities were sampled and tested in 2020 and 2021, and the correlation between the main factors was analyzed The results showed that, among the main indexes of soil physical and chemical properties of 11 rice planters, total nitrogen content and total phosphorus content were 160 g/kg, 056 g/kg respectively in the two experimental years The average contents of available nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium were 1105 mg/kg, 1142 mg/kg, 1334 mg/kg respectively, and average organic matter content was 2664 g/kg Differences of paddy soil nutrient conditions were significant between different rice planters In the two seasons, the lowest average yield of rice was in Nanjing 46, which was 9 2481 kg/hm2, and the highest average yield of rice was in Nanjing 3908, which reached 9 8128 kg/hm2 The difference of average rice yield between 2021 and 2020 was not significant The quality indexes of Nanjing 46 were better than the other three rice varieties on the whole, and the comprehensive taste value of Nanjing 46 was the highest The quality of Nanjing 46 was relatively high, but both of its chalkiness degree and chalky grain rate were slightly high Results of correlation analysis showed that, rice farm with high soil organic matter content had high head rice rate, peak viscosity and hot paste viscosity, and had high gel consistency of rice and low protein content, which showed good rice quality All of above, Nanjing 46 grain had the best quality among different rice varieties, and planting Nanjing 46 in soil of high fertility can further improve its rice quality However, the yield of Nanjing 46 was generally low, while Nanjing 3908 performed well in both rice yield and rice quality

参考文献/References:

[1]殷敏，刘少文，褚光，等．长江下游稻区不同类型双季晚粳稻产量与生育特性差异[J]．中国农业科学，2020，53(5): 890-903．
[2]李杰，杨洪建，邓建平．稻作科技进步对江苏省水稻单产提升的分析[J].中国稻米，2013，19(2): 27-30．
[3]方福平，程式华．水稻科技与产业发展[J].农学学报，2018，8(1): 92-98．
[4]姚姝，陈涛，张亚东，等．利用分子标记辅助选择聚合水稻Pi-ta、Pi-b 和 Wx-mq基因[J].作物学报，2017，43(11): 1622-1631．
[5]吴玉红，王吕，崔月贞，等．轮作模式及秸秆还田对水稻产量、稻米品质及土壤肥力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，2021，27(11): 1926-1937．
[6]DORAN J W, SAFLEY M. Defining and assessing soil healthy and sustainable productivity [M].New York: CAB International, 1997.
[7]高威，陶晓婷，王远玲，等．养猪场养殖废水与化肥配施对小麦中微量元素含量和品质的影响[J].应用生态学报，2014，25 (2): 433-440．
[8]EDMEADES D C. The long-term effects of manures and fertilizers on soil productivity and quality: a review [J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2003, 66: 165-180.
[9]魏晓东，张亚东，宋雪梅，等．硅镁锌肥改善稻米品质的研究进展[J].江苏农业学报，2021，37(3): 783-788．
[10]WANG Y W, ZHANG B B, JIANG D E, et al. Silicon improves photosynthetic performance by optimizing thylakoid membrance protein components in rice under drought stress [J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2019(158): 117-124.
[11]李文博，刘少君，叶新新，等．稻虾共作对水稻氮素累积及稻米品质的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报，2021，37(5): 661-667．
[12]李文博，刘少君，叶新新，等．不同稻田综合种养模式下水稻产量形成特点及其稻米品质和经济效益差异[J].作物学报，2021，47(10): 1953-1965．
[13]徐红星，郑许松，田俊策，等．我国水稻害虫绿色防控技术的研究进展与应用现状[J].植物保护学报，2017，44(6): 925-939．
[14]马晓慧，车喜庆，王井士，等．稻蟹共作与常规稻田蜘蛛群落组成及多样性分析[J].中国生态农业学报（中文版），2019，27(8): 1157-1162．
[15]高东．稻田生物多样性构建的生态效应[J].生态环境学报，2010，19(8): 1999-2003．
[16]彭卫福，吕伟生，黄山，等．土壤肥力对红壤性水稻土水稻产量和氮肥利用效率的影响[J].中国农业科学，2018，51(18): 3614-3624．
[17]李洪亮，孙玉友，曲金玲，等．土壤类型对东北粳稻光合物质生产特征及稻米品质的影响[J].中国水稻科学，2013，27(3): 287-296．
[18]中华人民共和国农业部种植业管理司．农业行业标准—南方地区耕地土壤肥力诊断与评价：NY/T 1749-2009[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2009.
[19]唐瑞明，龙伶俐，朱之光，等．国家标准-优质稻谷：GB/T 17891-2017[S].北京：中国标准出版社，2017.
[20]孙波，张桃林，赵其国．我国东南丘陵山区土壤肥力的综合评价[J].土壤学报，1995，32(4): 362-369．
[21]刘淑军，李冬初，高菊生，等．长期施肥红壤稻田肥力与产量的相关性及县域验证[J].植物营养与肥料学报，2020，26(7): 1262-1272．
[22]范立慧，徐珊珊，侯朋福，等．不同地力下基蘖肥运筹比例对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响[J].中国农业科学，2016，49(10): 1872-1884．
[23]王秋菊，刘峰，迟凤琴，等．秸秆还田及氮肥调控对不同肥力白浆土氮素及水稻产量影响[J].农业工程学报，2019，35(14): 105-111．
[24]宓文海，吴良欢，马庆旭，等．有机物料与化肥配施提高黄泥田水稻产量和土壤肥力[J].农业工程学报，2016，32(13): 103-108．
[25]高菊生，徐明岗，董春华，等．长期稻-稻-绿肥轮作对水稻产量及土壤肥力的影响[J].作物学报，2013，39(2): 343-349．
[26]张宏根,张昌泉,许作鹏,等. 优质外观优良食味早熟晚粳稻新品种广陵优粳的选育[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(9):66-69.
[27]谢裕林,于雅洁,董明辉,等. 茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物积累运转与稻米品质对播期和行距配置的响应[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(8):93-100.
[28]李旭,付立东,王宇,等. 利用稻米淀粉特性进行食味品质辅助选择[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(7):178-183.
[29]LANNING S B, SIEBENMORGEN T J, COUNCE P A, et al. Extreme nighttime air temperatures in 2010 impact rice chalkiness and milling quality [J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 124: 132-136.
[30]宋维民,王丽艳,郭永霞,等. 秸秆还田条件下固氮蓝藻复合菌剂与促生细菌SM13对水稻产量及稻米品质的影响[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(3):762-768.
[31]蒋明金,徐文波,王荣基,等. 减氮对机插杂交籼稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J].南方农业学报,2022,53(1):104-114.
[32]徐珂珂,李新月,鲁焕,等. 干旱胁迫下杂草稻和栽培稻种子萌发及幼苗根的部分生长和生理生化指标的比较[J].植物资源与环境学报,2022,31(1):86-88.
[33]秦猛,刘丽华,康楷,等. 不同除草剂对寒地水稻穗部性状及产量和品质的影响[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(1):115-122.
[34]严奉君，孙永健，马均，等．不同土壤肥力条件下麦秆还田与氮肥运筹对杂交稻氮素利用、产量及米质的影响[J].中国水稻科学，2015，29(1): 56-64．
[35]石吕，张新月，孙惠艳，等．不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系及后期氮肥的效应[J].中国水稻科学，2019，33(6): 541-552．
[36]赵春芳，岳红亮，黄双杰，等．南粳系列水稻品种的食味品质与稻米理化特性[J].中国农业科学，2019，52(5): 909-920．
[37]王赟，徐昌旭，周国朋，等．连续种植翻压紫云英减施化肥对江西早稻产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，2021，27(10): 1735-1745．
[38]王飞，林诚，李清华，等．长期不同施肥对南方黄泥田水稻籽粒品质性状与土壤肥力因子的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报，2011，17(2): 283-290．
[39]赵建宁，沈其荣，冉炜．太湖地区侧渗水稻土连续施磷处理下稻田磷的径流损失[J].农村生态环境，2005，21(3): 29-33．

相似文献/References:

[1]彭云霄,彭炜东,余江,等.大田与盆栽条件下重金属镉赋存形态差异[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(06):1368.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.06.014]
　PENG Yun-xiao,PENG Wei-dong,YU Jiang,et al.Differences of heavy metal cadmium fractions in field-pot planting[J].,2019,(04):1368.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.06.014]
[2]朱淑鑫,杨宸,顾兴健,等.K均值算法结合连续投影算法应用于土壤速效钾含量的高光谱分析[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(02):358.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.015]
　ZHU Shu-xin,YANG Chen,GU Xing-jian,et al.K-means algorithm combined with successive projection algorithm for hyperspectral analysis of soil available potassium content[J].,2020,(04):358.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.015]
[3]杨雍康,药栋,李博,等.微生物群落在修复重金属污染土壤过程中的作用[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(05):1322.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.032]
　YANG Yong-kang,YAO Dong,LI Bo,et al.Effect of microbial community in the process of remediation of heavy metal pollution in soil[J].,2020,(04):1322.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.032]
[4]彭玉娇,崔学宇,邵元元,等.不同树龄沙田柚果园土壤肥力、叶片养分和土壤细菌群落的特征[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(02):348.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.02.010]
　PENG Yu-jiao,CUI Xue-yu,SHAO Yuan-yuan,et al.Characteristic of soil fertility, leaf mineral nutrients and bacterial community in Shatian pomelo orchards of different tree ages[J].,2021,(04):348.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.02.010]
[5]王娟娟,胡珈玮,狄霖,等.秸秆还田与氮肥运筹对水稻不同生育期土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(06):1460.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.013]
　WANG Juan-juan,HU Jia-wei,DI Lin,et al.Effects of straw returning and nitrogen management on soil microbial community structure at different rice growth stages[J].,2021,(04):1460.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.013]
[6]王倩倩,龚兰,朱磊,等.典型兽用抗生素在土壤-叶用莴苣中的转运及风险评估[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(06):1575.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.027]
　WANG Qian-qian,GONG Lan,ZHU Lei,et al.Transport and risk assessment of typical veterinary antibiotics in soil-lettuce[J].,2021,(04):1575.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.027]
[7]杨听雨,杨邦保,闫小龙,等.三种农药拌种后在土壤-水稻系统中的迁移和分布[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(02):405.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.02.013]
　YANG Ting-yu,YANG Bang-bao,YAN Xiao-long,et al.Migration and distribution of three pesticides in soil-rice system after seed dressing[J].,2023,(04):405.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.02.013]
[8]蓝志鹏,童鑫,黄宇,等.土壤中磺胺甲口恶唑吸附-解吸反应[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(04):996.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.009]
　LAN Zhi-peng,TONG Xin,HUANG Yu,et al.Adsorption-desorption of sulfamethoxazole in soils[J].,2023,(04):996.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.009]
[9]李祥,张永春,王磊,等.基于文献计量的近30年国内外种植甘薯土壤研究进展分析[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(06):1323.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.06.007]
　LI Xiang,ZHANG Yong-chun,WANG Lei,et al.Analysis of research on sweetpotato planting soil at home and abroad in the past 30 years based on bibliometrics[J].,2023,(04):1323.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.06.007]
[10]李晓龙,马军,褚燕南,等.宁夏引黄灌区果园生草处理对土壤理化性质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(07):1227.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.07.009]
　LI Xiaolong,MA Jun,CHU Yannan,et al.Effects of orchard grass cultivation treatment on physicochemical properties of soils in the Yellow River irrigation zone of Ningxia[J].,2024,(04):1227.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.07.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-08-02 基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(20)2002]；南京信息工程大学无锡校区研究生创新实践项目（WXCX202010）作者简介：刘红江(1979-)，男，江苏建湖人，博士，副研究员，主要从事农业生态和稻麦栽培生理生态研究。（E-mail）Liuhongjiang2004@sohu.com。裴晓芳为共同第一作者。通讯作者：黄胜东，（E-mail）543796386@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-12