[1]翟亚明,魏丽萍,杨倩.不同调控方式对设施盐渍化土壤特性和番茄产量及品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(04):871-876.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.025]
　ZHAI Ya-ming,WEI Li-ping,YANG Qian.Effects of regulatory measures on characters of greenhouse saline soil and tomato yield and quality[J].,2015,(04):871-876.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.025]
点击复制

不同调控方式对设施盐渍化土壤特性和番茄产量及品质的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年04期
页码:
871-876
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2015-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of regulatory measures on characters of greenhouse saline soil and tomato yield and quality
作者:
翟亚明12; 魏丽萍3; 杨倩4
（1.河海大学南方地区高效灌排与农业水土环境教育部重点实验室，江苏南京210098；2.河海大学水利水电学院，江苏南京210098；3.绍兴市水利局，浙江绍兴312000；4.河南农业职业学院园艺园林系，河南郑州451450）
Author(s):
ZHAI Ya-ming12; WEI Li-ping3; YANG Qian4
(1.Key Laboratory of Efficient Irrigation-drainage and Agricultural Soil-water Environment in Southern China, Ministry of Education, Nanjing 210098, China;2.College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China;3.Water Conservancy Bureau of Shaoxing, Shaoxing 312000, China;4.Department of Gardening, Henan Vocational College of Agriculture, Zhengzhou 451450, China)
关键词:
盐渍化; 番茄; 产量; 品质; 投影寻踪
Keywords:
salinization; tomato; yield; quality; projection pursuit
分类号:
S626.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.025
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对南方地区设施土壤盐渍化问题，通过连续3年的定位观测，研究了不同调控方式对设施盐渍化土壤特性和番茄产量及品质的影响。结果表明，秸秆覆盖、土壤结构调理剂和保水剂3种调控方式均有效降低了耕层土壤盐分，脱盐效果的优劣次序为秸秆覆盖＞土壤结构调理剂＞保水剂。3种调控方式均不同程度地提高了土壤有机质含量，其中秸秆覆盖处理各时期土壤有机质含量均明显高于其他调控方式。3种调控方式下土壤速效氮含量呈上升趋势，而土壤结构调理剂不利于保留土壤中的速效磷和速效钾。各时期秸秆覆盖处理番茄产量最高。然而，各时期番茄品质均以对照最佳，土壤保水剂处理次之，秸秆覆盖处理前2年番茄品质较差，第3年有较大改善。投影寻踪分类模型计算结果表明，秸秆覆盖处理为综合效益最优的调控方式，投影值达2.450 6，保水剂处理综合效益相对较差。
Abstract:
Aiming at greenhouse soil salinization in south of China, different regulatory methods were applied to study the characters of greenhouse saline soils and tomato yield and quality through a 3-year continuous field experiment in fixed position. Results showed that three regulatory methods including straw mulching, soil structure conditioner and water-retaining agent decreased the surface soil salinity, and the desalinization effects was the best by straw mulching. All three regulatory measures elevated surface soil organic matter, straw mulching outperforming other two. Available N content was improved by three regulatory measures, and soil structure conditioner could not effectively retain soil available P and K. Tomato yield with straw mulching treatment at all time was the highest. However, CK presented the best tomato quality during experimental periods, followed by water-retaining agent treatment. Tomato quality with straw mulching treatment in the first two years was poor and improved dramatically in the third year. Calculation results of projection pursuit model showed that the straw mulching was the excellent regulatory method for its comprehensive performance with the projection value reaching 2.450 6.

参考文献/References:


[1]ABDEL L A A H, HE C X. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth, mineral nutrition, antioxidant enzymes activity and fruit yield of tomato grown under salinity stress[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2011, 127(3): 228-233.
[2]SHENG M, TANG M, CHEN H, et al. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress[J]. Mycorrhiza, 2008, 18(6-7): 287-296.
[3]SUN Y, HU K L, FAN Z B, et al. Simulating the fate of nitrogen and optimizing water and nitrogen management of greenhouse tomato in North China using the EU-Rotate_N model[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2013, 128: 72-84.
[4]QIU R J, SONG J J, DU T S, et al. Response of evapotranspiration and yield to planting density of solar greenhouse grown tomato in northwest China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2013, 130: 44-51.
[5]MAGN J J, GALLARDO M, THOMPSON R B, et al. Effects of salinity on fruit yield and quality of tomato grown in soil-less culture in greenhouses in Mediterranean climatic conditions[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95(9): 1041-1055.
[6]SHAO X H, HOU M M, CHEN J N. Effects of EM-calcium spray on Ca uptake, blossom-end rot incidence and yield of greenhouse tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum)[J]. Research on Crops, 2013, 14(4): 1159-1166.
[7]HANSON B, MAY D. Effect of subsurface drip irrigation on processing tomato yield, water table depth, soil salinity, and profitability[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2004, 68(1): 1-17.
[8]SHAO X H, HOU M M, CHEN L H, et al. Evaluation of subsurface drainage design based on projection pursuit[J]. Energy Procedia, 2012, 16: 747-752.
[9]ZHANG J, CHANG T T, SHAO X H. Improvement effect of subsurface drainage on secondary salinization of greenhouse soil and tomato yield[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2012, 28(3): 81-86.
[10]JORDN A, ZAVALA L M, GIL J. Effects of mulching on soil physical properties and runoff under semi-arid conditions in southern Spain[J]. Catena, 2010, 81(1): 77-85.
[11]ASGHARI S, ABBASI F, NEYSHABOURI M R. Effects of soil conditioners on physical quality and bromide transport properties in a sandy loam soil[J]. Biosystems Engineering, 2011, 109(1): 90-97.
[12]WELFARE K, FLOWERS T J, TAYLOR G, et al. Additive and antagonistic effects of ozone and salinity on the growth, ion contents and gas exchange of five varieties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Environmental Pollution, 1996, 92(3): 257-266.
[13]金菊良,刘永芳,丁晶,等. 投影寻踪模型在水资源工程方案优选中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用, 2004(1): 81-84.
[14]金菊良,汪明武,魏一鸣. 客观组合评价模型在水利工程方案选优中的应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004(12): 111-116.
[15]刘广明,杨劲松,吕真真,等. 不同调控措施对轻中度盐碱土壤的改良增产效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 4 (9): 164-169.
[16]邵光成,郭瑞琪,蓝晶晶,等. 避雨栽培条件下番茄灌排方案熵权系数评价[J]. 排灌机械工程学报, 2012, 30(6): 733-737, 744.
[17]YURTSEVEN E, KESMEZ G D, NLKARA A. The effects of water salinity and potassium levels on yield, fruit quality and water consumption of a native central anatolian tomato species (Lycopersicon esculantum) [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 78(1-2): 128-135.
[18]BABAOGLU I, FINDIK O, BAYRAK M. Effects of principle component analysis on assessment of coronary artery diseases using support vector machine[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(3): 2182-2185.
[19]朱成立,陈婕,冯宝平,等. 基于投影寻踪的滨海盐碱地改良综合效应评价[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2013(2): 20-25.
[20]HOU S, WENTZELL P D. Fast and simple methods for the optimization of kurtosis used as a projection pursuit index[J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2011, 704(1-2): 1-15.
[21]郑九华,冯永军,于开芹,等. 秸秆覆盖条件下微咸水灌溉棉花试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2002, 6 (4): 26-31.
[22]王学征. 设施环境盐分胁迫对番茄生长发育及膜系统影响的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2004.
[23]QIN J T, HU F, ZHANG B, et al. Role of straw mulching in non-continuously flooded rice cultivation[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 83(3): 252-260.
[24]鲁少尉,齐飞,李天来. 盐胁迫对番茄果实糖含量及蔗糖代谢的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2012 (20): 56-61.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵丽萍,李永灿,赵统敏,等.灰霉菌毒素诱导番茄抗性突变体及相关防御酶活性[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(03):631.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.03.023]
　ZHAO Li-ping,LI Yong-can,ZHAO Tong-min,et al.Resistant mutant induced by toxin of Botrytis cinerea in tomato and the activities of related defensive enzymes[J].,2016,(04):631.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.03.023]
[2]李亚茹,王银磊,赵丽萍,等.番茄ty-5和 Mi-1基因多重 PCR 体系的建立[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):869.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.024]
　LI Ya-ru,WANG Yin-lei,ZHAO Li-ping,et al.Identification of ty-5 gene and Mi-1 gene by multiplex PCR in tomato[J].,2016,(04):869.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.024]
[3]吕敏,苏建坤,白和盛,等.桃蚜取食和机械损伤对番茄和辣椒 PAL、LOX 和 PPO 活性的诱导作用[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1273.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.013]
　Lv?Min,SU Jian-kun,BAI He-sheng,et al.The activities of PAL, LOX and PPO in tomato and pepper plants induced by aphid herbivory and mechanical damage[J].,2016,(04):1273.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.013]
[4]姜静,王银磊,赵丽萍,等.番茄qRT-PCR内参基因的筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(02):389.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.024]
　JIANG Jing,WANG Yin-lei,ZHAO Li-ping,et al.Selection of tomato reference genes for qRT-PCR[J].,2017,(04):389.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.024]
[5]罗伟君,唐琳,周佳丽,等.纳米锌肥对番茄果实锌含量与品质的强化[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.028 ]
　LUO Wei-jun,TANG Lin,ZHOU Jia-li,et al.Improvement of zinc concentration and quality of tomato fruit by nano zinc fertilizer[J].,2016,(04):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.028 ]
[6]乔俊卿,陈志谊,梁雪杰,等.枯草芽孢杆菌Bs916在番茄根部的定殖[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(06):1278.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.013]
　QIAO Jun-qing,CHEN Zhi-yi,LIANG Xue-jie,et al.Colonization of Bacillus subtilis Bs916 on tomato root[J].,2015,(04):1278.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.013]
[7]杨玛丽,赵统敏,余文贵,等.转基因 RNAi 技术在番茄研究中的应用[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(01):217.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.034]
　YANG Ma-li,ZHAO Tong-min,YU Wen-gui,et al.Progress in RNA interference technique applied in tomato[J].,2015,(04):217.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.034]
[8]唐玉新,曲萍,陆岱鹏,等.适合机械化移栽的番茄穴盘育苗基质配方筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(06):1342.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.021]
　TANG Yu-xin,QU Ping,LU Dai-peng,et al.Screening of tomato plug seedling substrates proportion suitable for mechanized transplanting[J].,2017,(04):1342.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.021]
[9]姜静,王银磊,李亚茹,等.江苏省及其他地区番茄黄化曲叶病毒的分子鉴定及序列分析[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(01):238.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.035]
　JIANG Jing,WANG Yin-lei,LI Ya-ru,et al.Molecular identification and sequence analysis of tomato yellow leaf curl virus in Jiangsu province and its peripheral area[J].,2018,(04):238.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.035]
[10]周蓉,赵统敏,赵丽萍,等.高光泽番茄育种及果实表面光泽度[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1437.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.033]
　ZHOU Rong,ZHAO Tong-min,ZHAO Li-ping,et al.High-glossiness tomato breeding and fruit surface glossiness[J].,2018,(04):1437.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.033]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2014-12-28 基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（E090203）；江苏省自然科学基金项目（BK20130838） 作者简介：翟亚明（1982-），男，江苏姜堰人，博士，讲师，从事盐碱地改良方面的研究。（E-mail）njzhaiyaming@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-08-31