[1]唐茂翔,李斌,闫芳芳,等.促生抗旱微生物对烟草抗旱性的调控作用[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(12):2315-2325.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.004]
 TANG Maoxiang,LI Bin,YAN Fangfang,et al.Drought-resistance regulatory mechanism of plant growth-promoting and drought-tolerant microorganisms in tobacco under drought stress[J].,2025,(12):2315-2325.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.004]
点击复制

促生抗旱微生物对烟草抗旱性的调控作用()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2025年12期
页码:
2315-2325
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2025-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Drought-resistance regulatory mechanism of plant growth-promoting and drought-tolerant microorganisms in tobacco under drought stress
作者:
唐茂翔1李斌2闫芳芳3李鹏1李建鹏1韩勤1高永翔1刘东阳4邱忠平1
(1.西南交通大学生命科学与工程学院,四川成都610031;2.四川省烟草公司泸州市公司,四川泸州646699;3.四川省烟草公司攀枝花市公司,四川攀枝花617000;4.四川省烟草公司凉山州公司,四川凉山615000)
Author(s):
TANG Maoxiang1LI Bin2YAN Fangfang3LI Peng1LI Jianpeng1HAN Qin1GAO Yongxiang1LIU Dongyang4QIU Zhongping1
(1.School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;2.Luzhou Branch of Sichuan Provincial Tobacco Company, Luzhou 646699, China;3.Panzhihua Branch of Sichuan Provincial Tobacco Company, Panzhihua 617000, China;4.Liangshan Branch of Sichuan Provincial Tobacco Company, Liangshan 615000, China)
关键词:
干旱胁迫烟草促生抗旱微生物植株抗旱性土壤酶活
Keywords:
drought stresstobaccogrowth-promoting and drought-resistant microorganismsplant drought resistancesoil enzyme activity
分类号:
S572
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为缓解干旱胁迫对烟草生长的影响,本研究从干旱烟草根际土壤中筛选无拮抗作用的促生抗旱微生物,对其进行鉴定,并以无菌水为对照(CK),通过促生抗旱微生物单独及复配的灌根试验,分析其对干旱胁迫下烟草生理生化指标及土壤微生物群落结构的影响。结果表明,共鉴定得到7株具有溶磷、产吲哚乙酸(IAA)、产铁载体和产1-氨基环丙烷-1-羧酸(ACC)脱氨酶能力的菌株,其中菌株L5N1促生能力最强,菌株S2-1抗旱能力最强。L5N1菌株和S2-1菌株经鉴定分别为居中克吕沃尔氏菌(Kluyvera intermedia)和亚麻假单胞菌(Pseudomonas lini)。促生抗旱微生物可改善烟草农艺性状,降低烟叶丙二醛含量,提升烟草抗氧化能力,其中菌株L5N1和S2-1复配处理的效果最为显著。干旱胁迫21 d,L5N1和S2-1复配处理土壤含水率较CK提高63.20%,土壤蔗糖酶活性、脱氢酶活性、脲酶活性和酸性磷酸酶活性分别较CK提高457.14%、416.91%、53.54%和93.80%,假单胞菌属(Pseudomonas)、出芽菌属(Gemmata)、酸杆菌属(Acidibacter)细菌的相对丰度显著高于CK。综上,本研究筛选得到的促生菌株L5N1和抗旱菌株S2-1复配能有效提升烟草在干旱胁迫下的生长性能和适应能力。
Abstract:
In order to alleviate the effects of drought stress on the growth of tobacco, non-antagonistic growth-promoting and drought-resistant microorganisms from the rhizosphere soil of drought-stressed tobacco were screened and identified in this study, and sterile water was used as control (CK), the effects of drought-resistant microorganisms on physiological and biochemical indices of tobacco and soil microbial community structure under drought stress were analyzed by root irrigation experiments with single and compound drought-resistant microorganisms. The results showed that a total of seven strains with the ability to dissolve phosphorus, produce indoleacetic acid (IAA), produce siderophore and produce 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase were identified. Among them, strain L5N1 had the strongest growth-promoting ability, and strain S2-1 had the strongest drought resistance. L5N1 and S2-1 were identified as Kluyvera intermedia and Pseudomonas lini respectively. The growth-promoting and drought-resistant microorganisms could improve the agronomic traits of tobacco, reduce the malondialdehyde content of tobacco leaves, and improve the antioxidant capacity of tobacco. Among them, the combination of strains L5N1 and S2-1 had the most significant effect. After 21 days of drought stress, the soil moisture content of L5N1 and S2-1 combined treatment was 63.20% higher than that of CK, and the soil enzyme activities of sucrase, dehydrogenase, urease and acid phosphatase were 457.14%, 416.91%, 53.54% and 93.80% higher than those of CK, respectively. The relative abundance of Pseudomonas, Gemmata and Acidibacter was significantly higher than that of CK. In summary, the combination of the growth-promoting strain L5N1 and the drought-resistant strain S2-1 screened in this study can effectively improve the growth performance and adaptability of tobacco under drought stress.

参考文献/References:

[1]李佳,刘涛,马菊莲,等. 烟草响应干旱胁迫与抗旱遗传育种研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(8):34-43.
[2]HU Z R, HE Z X, LI Y Y, et al. Transcriptomic and metabolic regulatory network characterization of drought responses in tobacco[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2023,13:1067076.
[3]陆晓娟,王芝兰,张金玉,等. 海温和MJO对2023年西南春旱的协同影响[J]. 干旱气象,2024,42(2):166-179.
[4]WANG P T, LIU W C, HAN C, et al. Reactive oxygen species:multidimensional regulators of plant adaptation to abiotic stress and development[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology,2024,66(3):330-367.
[5]BOGATI K, WALCZAK M. The impact of drought stress on soil microbial community,enzyme activities and plants[J]. Agronomy,2022,12(1):189.
[6]伍国强,于祖隆,魏明. PGPR调控植物响应逆境胁迫的作用机制[J]. 草业学报,2024,33(6):203-218.
[7]白冬,陈杰,陈建辉,等. 不同干旱年份增施磷对小麦籽粒灌浆动态、蛋白质组分及水分利用率的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2024,45(4):65-73.
[8]马雪晴,冀傲冉,郑娇莉,等. 植物根际促生菌促生机制及其应用研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报(中英文),2025,27(2):13-23.
[9]吴翔,甘炳成,唐亚,等. 四川烟草主栽区根际促生菌筛选及促生菌系构建[J]. 烟草科技,2019,52(3):1-9.
[10]ZHANG H, SUN X P, DAI M Q. Improving crop drought resis-tance with plant growth regulators and rhizobacteria:mechanisms,applications,and perspectives[J]. Plant Communications,2022,3(1):100228.
[11]ALI S,KHAN N. Delineation of mechanistic approaches employed by plant growth promoting microorganisms for improving drought stress tolerance in plants[J]. Microbiological Research,2021,249:126771.
[12]KAUSHAL M, WANI S P. Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria:drought stress alleviators to ameliorate crop production in drylands[J]. Annals of Microbiology,2016,66(1):35-42.
[13]SHAFFIQUE S, KHAN M A, IMRAN M, et al. Research progress in the field of microbial mitigation of drought stress in plants[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2022,13:870626.
[14]ADMASSIE M, WOLDEHAWARIAT Y, ALEMU T, et al. The role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in alleviating drought stress on pepper plants[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2022,272:107831.
[15]班宜辉,莫显通,王安悦,等. 甘草根系解磷DSE菌株的分离、鉴定及其解磷特性[J].西北农业学报,2025,34(7):1334-1345.
[16]黄天姿,李同祥,汤薇,等. 大豆根际土壤产ACC脱氨酶细菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 南方农业,2022,16(6):1-3.
[17]杨森,孙高利,董兆麟,等. 一株Burkholderia细菌的抗植物病源真菌及生物学特性的研究[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版),2008,38(5):779-782.
[18]WHITMAN W B, RAINEY F A, KMPFER P, et al. 伯杰氏古菌和细菌系统学手册 [M/OL]. Hoboken: Wiley, 2015. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781118960608.
[19]SAITOU N, NEI M. The neighbor-joining method:a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution,1987,4(4):406-425.
[20]国家烟草专卖局. 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法: YC/T 142-2010 [S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
[21]王学奎. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 2版. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
[22]鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[23]关松荫. 土壤酶与土壤肥力[J]. 土壤通报,1980,11(6):41-44.
[24]WALTERS W, HYDE E R, BERG-LYONS D, et al. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys[J]. mSystems,2015,1(1):e00009-15.
[25]CALLAHAN B J, MCMURDIE P J, ROSEN M J, et al. DADA2:High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data[J]. Nature Methods,2016,13(7):581-583.
[26]PANDA S K, DAS S. Potential of plant growth-promoting microbes for improving plant and soil health for biotic and abiotic stress ma-nagement in mangrove vegetation[J]. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology,2024,23(3):801-837.
[27]YANG B, WEN H W, WANG S S, et al. Enhancing drought resistance and yield of wheat through inoculation with Streptomyces pactum Act12 in drought field environments[J]. Agronomy,2024,14(4):692.
[28]胡倡,李慧明,伍惠,等. 解磷菌和根瘤菌复合接种对大豆和紫云英共生固氮的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报,2020,39(4):38-45.
[29]REHMAN M M U, ZHU Y, ABRAR M, et al. Moisture-and period-dependent interactive effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and AM fungus on water use and yield formation in dryland wheat[J]. Plant and Soil,2024,502(1):149-165.
[30]田方,陈锡,王普昶,等. 微生物菌剂对白刺花苗期抗旱酶系及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 植物生理学报,2022,58(2):435-446.
[31]LI X P, XIAO R X, TAO Y F. Enhancing plant stress resilience and agricultural sustainability through rhizosphere microbiome optimization[J/OL]. Plant and Soil
[2025-03-10]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07359-w.
[32]郑昕雨,陈鹏,韩金吉,等. 冻融循环对土壤团聚体与微生物特性影响研究进展[J]. 江苏农业学报,2023,39(4):1080-1088.
[33]邓心婕,魏赛金. 内生菌提高宿主植物抗旱性研究进展[J]. 生物灾害科学,2025,48(1):128-133.
[34]聂梦果,李朋发,蒋建东. 根际微生物协助植物抵御极端土壤水分胁迫研究进展[J/OL]. 应用与环境生物学报
[2025-03-10]. https://doi.org/10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2024.11022.

相似文献/References:

[1]佚名 佚名 佚名.三才期刊采编系统文章正在整理中…[J].江苏农业学报,2005,(01):5.
 XIE Xin,ZHAO Zhong.三才期刊采编系统文章正在整理中…[J].,2005,(12):5.
[2]佚名 佚名 佚名.三才期刊采编系统文章正在整理中…[J].江苏农业学报,2006,(01):5.
 XIE Xin,ZHAO Zhong.三才期刊采编系统文章正在整理中…[J].,2006,(12):5.
[3]姜 骁,吴拥军,杨 亚,等.烟草钾外流通道基因NTORK1的启动子克隆及激素诱导分析[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(02):274.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.02.006]
 JIANG Xiao,WU Yong-jun,YANG Ya,et al.Cloning and phytohormone induction of the promotor of potassium outward channel gene NTORK1 from tobacco[J].,2016,(12):274.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.02.006]
[4]熊洁,邹晓芬,邹小云,等.干旱胁迫对不同基因型油菜农艺性状和产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(03):494.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.03.005]
 XIONG Jie,ZOU Xiao-fen,ZOU Xiao-yun,et al.Effects of drought stress on agronomic traits and yield of different rapeseed genotypes[J].,2015,(12):494.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.03.005]
[5]肇莹,杨镇,杨涛,等.植物内生菌醇提取物对草坪草抗旱性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(01):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.006]
 ZHAO Ying,YANG Zhen,YANG Tao,et al.Influence of plant endophyte extract on turfgrass drought tolerance[J].,2015,(12):39.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.006]
[6]孟力力,张俊,闻婧.干旱胁迫对彩叶草光合特性及叶片超微结构的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(01):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.028]
 MENG Li-li,ZHANG Jun,WEN Jing.Changes of photosynthetic characteristics of Coleus blumei and mesophyll cell ultrastructure in response to drought stress[J].,2015,(12):180.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.028]
[7]张丽丽,徐碧玉,刘菊华,等.MaASR1基因通过乙烯途径提高拟南芥抗旱性的作用机制[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(03):511.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.005]
 ZHANG Li-li,XU Bi-yu,LIU Ju-hua,et al.The regulation mechanism of MaASR1 gene for improving the drought resistance of Arabidopsis by ethylene pathway[J].,2018,(12):511.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.005]
[8]麻云霞,李钢铁,张宏武,等.外源硅对酸枣生长和生理生化特征的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(05):1113.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.021]
 MA Yun-xia,LI Gang-tie,ZHANG Hong-wu,et al.Effects of exogenous silicon on growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics of zizyphus jujube plant[J].,2018,(12):1113.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.021]
[9]葛道阔,曹宏鑫,杨余旺,等.干旱胁迫下油菜栽培模拟优化决策系统(Rape-CSODS)的订正及其检验[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(01):56.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.01.008]
 GE Dao-kuo,CAO Hong-xin,YANG Yu-wang,et al.Modification and verification of Rape-CSODS under drought stress[J].,2019,(12):56.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.01.008]
[10]陈丽,焦健,朱绍丹,等.油橄榄对牧草间作与干旱胁迫交互作用的根系生理响应[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(06):1434.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.06.024]
 CHEN Li,JIAO Jian,ZHU Shao-dan,et al.Root physiological response of olive to the interaction of pasture intercropping and drought stress[J].,2019,(12):1434.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.06.024]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2025-03-11基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(52570179);中国烟草总公司四川省公司科技专项(SCYC202409);西南交通大学博士创新项目(CX2025YB17)作者简介:唐茂翔(2000-),男,四川宜宾人,硕士研究生,主要从事农业微生物研究。(E-mail)mxtang2000@163.com通讯作者:邱忠平,(E-mail)zhpqiu@home.swjtu.edu.cn;刘东阳,(E-mail)9038823@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-01-20