[1]王琳琳,钟洋敏,缪叶旻子,等.基于主成分和聚类分析的鲜食蚕豆农艺与品质性状综合评价[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(03):788-797.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.020]
 WANG Lin-lin,ZHONG Yang-min,MIAO Ye-min-zi,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of vegetable faba bean in agronomic and quality traits by principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J].,2023,(03):788-797.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.020]
点击复制

基于主成分和聚类分析的鲜食蚕豆农艺与品质性状综合评价()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
788-797
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2023-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comprehensive evaluation of vegetable faba bean in agronomic and quality traits by principal component analysis and cluster analysis
作者:
王琳琳钟洋敏缪叶旻子马瑞芳刘庭付
(丽水市农林科学研究院,浙江丽水323002)
Author(s):
WANG Lin-linZHONG Yang-minMIAO Ye-min-ziMA Rui-fangLIU Ting-fu
(Lishui Institute of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Lishui 323002, China)
关键词:
鲜食蚕豆农艺性状品质性状主成分分析聚类分析
Keywords:
vegetable faba beanagronomic traitsquality traitsprincipal component analysiscluster analysis
分类号:
S643.6
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以15份鲜食蚕豆品种(系)为研究对象,对12个主要农艺性状和6个品质性状进行测定,采用主成分分析法、聚类分析法对各表型进行分析,为鲜食蚕豆的综合评价及品种筛选奠定材料基础与理论依据。本研究结果表明,18个性状变异系数为3.98%~56.09%,鲜荚长、鲜荚宽、鲜籽粒长、鲜籽粒宽、水分含量等5个性状遗传较稳定,株高、单株荚数、维生素C含量和淀粉含量的变异较丰富。相关性分析发现,鲜荚、鲜籽粒表型性状与品质性状之间存在较强的相关性。粗蛋白含量与鲜籽粒长呈显著负相关,与鲜百粒质量呈极显著负相关;粗脂肪含量与鲜荚长、鲜籽粒宽和鲜百粒质量呈显著负相关,与鲜籽粒长呈极显著负相关;维生素C含量与鲜籽粒宽呈极显著正相关。对18个性状进行主成分分析,将其归结为6个主成分,累计贡献率为86.348%,其中,第1主成分与籽粒外观品质和营养品质有关,第2主成分与产量和品质性状有关,第3主成分与鲜荚大小有关,第4主成分与始荚节位和有效分枝数有关,第5主成分与可溶性固形物含量和淀粉含量有关,第6主成分与主茎节数有关。综合评价Y2224的得分最高,F值为2.274。聚类分析将15份鲜食蚕豆品种(系)划分为3个类群,第Ⅰ类群为高粗蛋白含量、高粗脂肪含量、株型较高、每荚粒数较多的中粒型蚕豆品种(系);第Ⅱ类群为高淀粉含量、分枝性和结荚性较强、大粒型蚕豆品种(系);第Ⅲ类群为高维生素C含量、荚形宽大的超大粒型蚕豆品系。
Abstract:
Twelve agronomic traits and six quality traits in 15 vegetable faba bean varieties (lines) were measured in this study. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis were used to analyze the phenotypes, which provided the material and theoretical basis for scientific evaluation and variety selection of vegetable faba bean. The results showed that the variation coefficients of 18 characters ranged from 3.98% to 56.09%. Fresh pod length, fresh pod width, fresh seed length, fresh seed width and moisture content remained relatively stable, while plant height, pod number per plant, vitamin C content and starch content had significant variations. Results of the correlation analysis showed that the phenotypic traits of fresh pods and seeds were correlated with quality traits. Crude protein content was significantly negatively correlated with fresh seed length and extremely significantly negatively correlated with fresh hundred-seed weight. The crude fat content was significantly negatively correlated with fresh pod length, fresh seed width and fresh hundred-seed weight, and was extrenely significantly negatively correlated with fresh seed length. Vitamin C content was significantly positively correlated with fresh pod width. The cumulative contribution of the top six principal factors reached 86.348% in principal factors analysis. The first principal component was related to seed appearance quality and nutritional quality,the second principal component was related to yield and quality-related traits, the third principal component was related to the size of fresh pod, the fourth principal component was related to the first pod node and number of effective branches, the fifth principal component was related to soluble solids content and starch content, and the sixth principal component was related to the number of nodes on main stem. The score of Y2224 was the highest in the comprehensive evaluation, with an F value of 2.274. The 15 vegetable faba bean varieties (lines) were divided into three groups using cluster analysis. Among them, group Ⅰ belonged to middle-seed varieties (lines) with high crude protein content, high crude fat content, taller plant type, and more seeds per pod. Group Ⅱ belonged to large-seed varieties (lines) with high starch content, strong branching and podding properties. Group Ⅲ belonged to huge-seed lines with high vitamin C content and broad pods.

参考文献/References:

[1]叶茵. 中国蚕豆学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2003.
[2]HU H Y,LI H,HAO M M,et al. Nitrogen fixation and crop productivity enhancements co-driven by intercrop root exudates and key rhizosphere bacteria[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2021,58(10): 2243-2255.
[3]LI L,YANG T,LIU R,et al,Food legume production in China[J]. The Crop Journals,2017,5 (2): 115-126.
[4]刘玉玲,张红岩,滕长才,等. 蚕豆SSR标记遗传多样性及与淀粉含量的关联分析[J]. 作物学报,2022,48(11): 2786-2796.
[5]杨访问,吕春雨,廖芳丽,等. 41份非洲和湖北蚕豆种质资源SSR遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2020,18(8): 2619-2625.
[6]张红岩,郭兴莲,杨涛,等. 利用 SSR 标记分析蚕豆品种(品系)与优异种质的遗传多样性[J]. 中国蔬菜,2018(2): 34-41.
[7]WANG H F,ZONG X X,GUAN J P,et al. Genetic diversity and relationship of global faba bean (Vicia faba L.) germplasm revealed by ISSR markers[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 2012,124 (5): 789-797.
[8]LIZARAZO C I,LAMPI A M,LIU J,et al. Nutritive quality and protein production from grain legumes in a boreal climate[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2015,95(10): 2053-2064.
[9]LONGOBARDI F,SACCO D,CASIELLO G,et al. Chemical profile of the C arpino broad bean by conventional and innovative physicochemical analyses[J]. Journal of Food Quality,2015,38(4): 273-284.
[10]SHARAN S,ZANGHELINI G,ZOTZEL J,et al. Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) for food applications: From seed to ingredient processing and its effect on functional properties,antinutritional factors,flavor,and color[J]. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety,2021,20(1): 401-428.
[11]VIOQUE J,ALAIZ M,GIRON-CALLE J. Nutritional and functional properties of Vicia faba protein isolates and related fractions[J]. Food Chemistry,2012,132(1): 67-72.
[12]NEME K,BULTOSA G,BUSSA N. Nutrient and functional properties of composite flours processed from pregelatinised barley,sprouted faba bean and carrot flours[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology,2015,50(11): 2375-2382.
[13]KHAZAEI H,O’SULLIVAN D,MSTODDARD F L,et al. Recent advances in faba bean genetic and genomic tools for crop improvement[J]. Legume Science,2021,3(3): e75.
[14]MAALOUF F,HU J,O’SULLIVAN D M,et al. Breeding and genomics status in faba bean (Vicia faba)[J]. Plant Breeding,2019,138(4): 465-473.
[15]刘秋员,周磊,田晋钰,等. 长江中下游地区常规中熟粳稻氮效率综合评价及高产氮高效品种筛选[J]. 中国农业科学,2021,54(7): 1397-1409.
[16]徐澜,秦秀娟,安伟,等. 基于主成分分析的南引小麦品种综合评价[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2022,57(3): 32-41.
[17]杨涛,黄雅婕,李生梅,等. 海岛棉种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2021,54(12): 2499-2509.
[18]卞能飞,孙东雷,巩佳莉,等. 花生烘烤食用品质评价及指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学,2022,55(4): 641-652.
[19]王思威,孙海滨,常虹,等. 基于主成分分析综合评价白糖罂荔枝果实品质[J]. 果树学报,2022,39(4): 610-620.
[20]于海天,王丽萍,吕梅媛,等. 早熟鲜食秋蚕豆主要农艺性状与鲜食产量相关及通径分析[J]. 西南农业学报,2020,33(4): 711-717.
[21]赵娜,缪亚梅,姚梦楠,等. 蚕豆种质资源籽粒表型与营养品质性状的多样性分析[J]. 江苏农业学报,2022,38(3): 597-604.
[22]陈宏伟,李莉,刘昌燕,等. 129份湖北蚕豆地方种质的籽粒外观及品质性状分析[J]. 湖北农业科学,2016,55(24): 6377-6380,6384.
[23]于海天,王丽萍,吕梅媛,等. 早熟鲜食秋蚕豆主要农艺性状与鲜食产量相关及通径分析[J]. 西南农业学报,2020,33(4): 711-717.
[24]庄应强,屠娟丽,费伟英,等. 不同鲜食蚕豆品种产量性状及营养成分比较[J]. 安徽农业科学,2018,46(32): 52-54.
[25]欧阳裕元,余东梅,杨梅. 蚕豆主要农艺性状与单株产量的相关及通径分析[J]. 江苏农业学报,2016,32(4): 763-768.
[26]刘长风,王椰,段士鑫,等. 铬胁迫下紫花苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生理响应的主成分分析[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(19):176-182.
[27]黄海,段军娜,刘荣,等. 芒果不同砧穗组合早期嫁接亲和性综合评价[J].南方农业学报,2022,53(5):1216-1226.
[28]邹成林,黄开健,翟瑞宁,等. 基于隶属函数法和主成分分析评价玉米萌发期抗旱性[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(13):7-13.
[29]陈含,王东升,白冰,等. 21份木槿栽培品种表型多样性评价[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,46(3):117-126.
[30]吴琴燕,朱建飞,陈宏州,等. LC-MS测定不同品种小麦中氨基酸含量及PCA分析[J].生物加工过程,2021,19(1):91-98.
[31]段九菊,梁峥,贾民隆,等. 山西省萱草属野生资源的表型多样性分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2021,30(6):29-38.
[32]曾郅涵,李庆卫,遆羽静. 甘肃省张掖市野生沙枣的表型多样性及观赏性分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2021,30(4):12-21.
[33]杨生华,邵扬,李文俊,等. 国内春蚕豆种质资源种子表型性状多样性分析[J]. 贵州农业科学,2022,50(10): 1-6.
[34]吕春雨,廖芳丽,陈宏伟,等. 41份非洲地区和我国湖北蚕豆种质资源产量性状的鉴定与评价[J]. 南方农业学报,2018,49(12): 2356-2363.
[35赵凌霄,邓逸桐,衡曦彤,等. 106份特色甘薯品种资源品质性状评价与分析[J]. 江苏农业学报,2021,37(4): 839-847.
[36]王薇薇,郭军,梅燚,等. 大蒜种质资源的综合评价与聚类分析[J]. 江苏农业学报,2017,33(2): 397-403.
[37]徐泽俊,齐玉军,邢兴华,等. 黄淮海大豆种质农艺与品质性状分析及综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2022,23(2): 468-479.
[38]辛佳佳,张南峰,程华萍,等. 江西省地方蚕豆种质资源遗传多样性分析及优异资源挖掘[J]. 江苏农业学报,2022,38(1): 20-29.

相似文献/References:

[1]何虎翼,谭冠宁,何新民,等.63 份马铃薯品种(系)资源农艺性状的主成分与聚类分析[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(01):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.005 ]
 HE Hu-yi,TAN Guan-ning,HE Xin-min,et al.Principal component and cluster analysis for agronomic traits of 63 potato varieties or clones[J].,2017,(03):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.005 ]
[2]邵初阳,何晓兰,徐照龙,等.甜高粱种质资源多样性及主要农艺参数聚类分析[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(05):984.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.007]
 SHAO Chu-yang,HE Xiao-lan,XU Zhao-long,et al.Genetic diversity of sweet sorghum germplasm resources and clustering of major agronomical traits[J].,2015,(03):984.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.007]
[3]王小虎,钟卫国,李标,等.江苏省杂交粳稻与常规粳稻新品种主要性状比较[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(04):729.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.04.002]
 WANG Xiao-hu,ZHONG Wei-guo,LI Biao,et al.Comparative analysis of major traits of new varieties between japonica hybrid rice and conventional japonica rice in Jiangsu province[J].,2017,(03):729.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.04.002]
[4]郭文琦,张培通,李春宏,等.大蒜苗期农艺性状与青蒜产量的关系[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1319.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.017]
 GUO Wen-qi,ZHANG Pei-tong,LI Chun-hong,et al.The relationship between main agronomic traits and yield of garlic sprout during garlic seedling stage[J].,2018,(03):1319.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.017]
[5]石建斌,周红,王宁,等.陆地棉纤维品质与主要农艺性状的相关性分析[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(04):770.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.003]
 SHI Jian bin,ZHOU Hong,WANG Ning,et al.Correlation analysis between fiber quality and main agronomic traits of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J].,2019,(03):770.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.003]
[6]丁俊男,于少鹏,李鑫,等.生物炭对大豆生理指标和农艺性状的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(04):784.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.005]
 DING Jun nan,YU Shao peng,LI Xin,et al.Effects of biochar application on soybean physiological indices and agronomic traits[J].,2019,(03):784.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.005]
[7]周志林,唐君,曹清河,等.淀粉专用型甘薯品质形成规律及其与主要农艺性状的相关性[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(02):277.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.004]
 ZHOU Zhi-lin,TANG Jun,CAO Qing-he,et al.Formation laws of quality characters in starch sweetpotato cultivars and its correlation with main agronomic characters[J].,2020,(03):277.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.004]
[8]张倩男,杨彩玲,买自珍,等.百合种质资源农艺与营养品质性状分析及综合评价[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(04):721.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.04.016]
 ZHANG Qian-nan,YANG Cai-ling,MAI Zi-zhen,et al.Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic and nutritional quality traits of lily germplasm resources[J].,2024,(03):721.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.04.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-11-24 基金项目:丽水市科技计划项目(2022GYX13);浙江省自然科学基金探索项目(Q23C020008);浙江省农业(蔬菜新品种选育)新品种选育重大科技专项(2021C02065-6-4)作者简介:王琳琳(1989-),女,辽宁本溪人,博士,助理研究员,研究方向为作物遗传育种。(E-mail)wanglinlin4585@163.com 通讯作者:刘庭付,( E-mail )12920515@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-07-11