[1]王月平,徐剑文,赵君,等.棉花抗旱性综合评价及其相关性分析[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(01):1-13.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.01.001]
 WANG Yue-ping,XU Jian-wen,ZHAO Jun,et al.Comprehensive evaluation and correlation analysis of drought resistance of cotton[J].,2024,(01):1-13.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.01.001]
点击复制

棉花抗旱性综合评价及其相关性分析()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
1-13
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2024-01-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comprehensive evaluation and correlation analysis of drought resistance of cotton
作者:
王月平1徐剑文2赵君2刘剑光2王宁山3程俊凌1冯国礼3艾尼江3陈全家1肖松华12
(1.新疆农业大学农学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830052;2.江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所/农业农村部长江中下游棉花和油菜重点实验室,江苏南京210014;3.石河子农业科学研究院,新疆石河子832000)
Author(s):
WANG Yue-ping1XU Jian-wen2ZHAO Jun2LIU Jian-guang2WANG Ning-shan3CHENG Jun-ling1FENG Guo-li3Ainijiang3CHEN Quan-jia1XIAO Song-hua12
(1.College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;2.Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Cotton and Rapeseed, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China;3.Shihezi Agricultural Science Research Institute, Shihezi 832000, China)
关键词:
棉花抗旱性抗旱鉴定抗旱性综合评价抗旱指标相关性分析
Keywords:
cottondrought resistancedrought resistance identificationcomprehensive evaluation of drought resistancedrought resistance indexcorrelation analysis
分类号:
S562
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.01.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为综合评价棉花种质资源的抗旱性,筛选优异抗旱品种(品系),并建立成株期产量抗旱预测模型。对50份棉花种质资源在苗期进行干旱处理,调查其表型性状并测定其生理指标,根据各性状/指标差异的显著性筛选抗旱指标,并计算抗旱系数和抗旱指数,利用主成分分析法和隶属函数法计算综合抗旱系数、综合抗旱指数、综合抗旱隶属函数值、加权抗旱性系数和抗旱性综合度量值,对棉花抗旱性进行综合评价和分级。进一步将苗期评价分级结果与成株期干旱胁迫下产量和纤维品质性状进行比较,以分析苗期抗旱鉴定模型对成株期预测的精度。苗期生理性状在提高抗旱鉴定模型精度上具有重要作用,基于苗期生理指标建立的抗旱鉴定模型能够很好地预测成株期的抗旱性。
Abstract:
To comprehensively evaluate the drought resistance of cotton germplasm resources, select excellent drought resistant varieties (lines), and establish drought resistant prediction model of yield in adult stage, drought treatment was carried out on 50 cotton germplasm resources at seedling stage, and their phenotypic traits and physiological indices were investigated. Drought resistance indices were screened according to the significance of trait differences, and the drought resistance coefficient and drought resistance index were calculated. The comprehensive drought resistance coefficient, comprehensive drought resistance index, comprehensive drought resistance membership function value, weighted drought resistance coefficient and comprehensive drought resistance measurement value were calculated by principal component analysis and membership function method, and the drought resistance of cotton was comprehensively evaluated and graded. The results of seedling evaluation and classification were further compared with the yield and fiber quality traits in adult stage under drought stress to analyze the accuracy of seedling drought resistance identification model in predicting adult plant stage. Physiological traits at seedling stage play important roles in improving the accuracy of drought resistance identification model. The drought resistance identification model based on physiological indices at seedling stage can predict the drought resistance at adult plant stage well.

参考文献/References:

[1]刘维. 基于优质棉基地建设的新疆棉花产业高质量发展实现路径研究[D]. 石河子:石河子大学,2021.
[2]MOSHELION M . The dichotomy of yield and drought resistance: translation challenges from basic research to crop adaptation to climate change[J]. EMBO Reports,2020,21(12):e51598.
[3]李海明. 棉花抗旱品种筛选及相关性状的关联分析[D]. 保定:河北农业大学,2019.
[4]KAMAL K, MANISH N R, ALIREZA N. Recent progress in germplasm evaluation and gene mapping to enable breeding of drought-tolerant wheat[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2020,11:1149.
[5]ZHU Q, FANG W Y, LI Y R, et al. Comparison of rice yield and evaluation methods for drought resistance under drought stress in the whole growth period and flowering period[J]. Agricultural Biotechnology,2022,11(3):22-28.
[6]ZOU J, WEI H U, LI Y X, et al. Screening of drought resistance indices and evaluation of drought resistance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2020,19(2):495-508.
[7]ASGHAR MA, JIANG H K, SHUI Z W, et al. Interactive effect of shade and PEG-induced osmotic stress on physiological responses of soybean seedlings[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2021,20(9):2382-2394.
[8]SAHAYS, ROBLEDO-ARRATIA L, GLOWACKA K, et al. Root NRT, NiR, AMT, GS, GOGAT and GDH expression levels reveal NO and ABA mediated drought tolerance in Brassica juncea L.[J]. Scientific Reports,2021,11(1):7992.
[9]AYALEWH, LIU H, BRNER A, et al. Genome-wide association mapping of major root length qtls under peg induced water stress in wheat[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2018,9:1759.
[10]MUSCOLO A, SIDARI M, ANASTASI U, et al. Effect of PEG-induced drought stress on seed germination of four lentil genotypes[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions,2014,9(1):354-363.
[11]QIAO Y J, REN J H, YIN L N, et al. Exogenous melatonin alleviates PEG-induced short-term water deficiency in maize by increasing hydraulic conductance[J]. BMC Plant Biology,2020,20(1):218.
[12]王焱. 紫花苜蓿种质资源表型性状鉴定及抗旱性评价[D]. 银川:宁夏大学,2018.
[13]张雪妍,刘传亮,王俊娟,等. PEG胁迫方法评价棉花幼苗耐旱性研究[J]. 棉花学报,2007,19(3):205-209.
[14]王晨. 干旱胁迫对棉花生理代谢及棉蚜种群发生的影响[D]. 扬州:扬州大学,2022.
[15]王延琴,杨伟华,许红霞. 水分胁迫对棉花种子萌发的影响[J]. 棉花学报,2009,21(1):73-76.
[16]KHANZADAH, WASSAN G M, HE H H, et al . Differentially evolved drought stress indices determine the genetic variation of Brassica napus at seedling traits by genome-wide association mapping[J]. Journal of Advanced Research,2020,24:447-461.
[17]韩永亮,李世云,路正营,等. 62份陆地棉种质资源苗期抗旱性综合评价及耐旱种质筛选[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2021,39(6):28-38.
[18]李亚猛. 陆地棉野生种系耐旱性初步评价[D]. 保定:河北农业大学,2019.
[19]SUN F L, CHEN Q, CHEN Q J, et al. Screening of key drought tolerance indices for cotton at the flowering and boll setting stage using the dimension reduction method[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2021,12:619926.
[20]GOUR P, KANSAL S, AGARWAL P, et al. Variety-specific transcript accumulation during reproductive stage in drought- stressed rice[J]. Physiologia Plantarum,2022,174(1):e13585.
[21]赵丽英. 陆地棉干旱胁迫鉴定与早期应答蛋白质组学研究[D]. 邯郸:河北工程大学,2021.
[22]KAPOOR D, BHARDWAJ S, LANDI M, et al. The impact of drought in plant metabolism: how to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production[J]. Applied Sciences,2020,10(16):5692.
[23]MORALES M, S MUNN-BOSCH. Malondialdehyde: facts and artifacts[J]. Plant Physiology,2019,180:1246-1250.
[24]邹琦. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[25]刘光辉,陈全家,吴鹏昊,等. 棉花花铃期抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2016,17(1):53-62.
[26]UZILDAY B, TURKAN I, SEKMEN A H, et al. Comparison of ROS formation and antioxidant enzymes in Cleome gynandra (C4) and Cleome spinosa (C3) under drought stress[J]. Plant Science,2012,182:59-70.
[27]WANG R, JI S, ZHANG P, et al. Drought effects on cotton yield and fiber quality on different fruiting branches[J]. Crop Science,2016,56(3):1265-1276.
[28]ZHANG P, BAI J, LIU Y, et al. Drought resistance of ten ground cover seedling species during roof greening[J]. PLoS One,2020,15(6):e0220598.
[29]DOSSA K, YEHOUESSI L, LIKENG-LI-NGUE B, et al. Comprehensive screening of some west and central african sesame genotypes for drought resistance probing by agromorphological, physiological, biochemical and seed quality traits[J]. Agronomy,2017,7(4):83.
[30]陈玉梁,石有太,罗俊杰,等. 甘肃彩色棉花抗旱性农艺性状指标的筛选鉴定[J]. 作物学报,2012,38(9):1680-1687.
[31]冯方剑,宋敏,陈全家,等. 棉花苗期抗旱相关指标的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 新疆农业大学学报,2011,34(3):211-217.
[32]程林梅,张原根,阎继耀,等. 干旱和复水对棉花叶片几种生理指标的影响[J]. 中国棉花,1996(2):17-18.
[33]母洪娜,王炜,樊蕾,等. 印度梨形孢对干旱胁迫下桂花生长及抗旱性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,47(2):101-106.
[34]邹成林,吕巨智,翟瑞宁,等. 广西玉米品种萌芽期生理生化特性及其抗旱性综合评价[J]. 南方农业学报,2022,53(3):785-794.
[35]胡根海,董娜,晁毛妮,等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对不同抗逆性棉花的生理特性的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2017,35(5):223-228.
[36]田又升,范术丽,庞朝友,等.全生育期干旱胁迫对棉花形态、生理、光合作用和产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2017,32(5):224-231.
[37]NIU J, ZHANG S P, LIU S D, et al. The compensation effects of physiology and yield in cotton after drought stress[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology,2018,224:30-48.
[38]姜梦辉. 棉花陆海杂交重组自交系抗旱性鉴定及抗旱基因挖掘[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2020.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵亮,狄佳春,陈旭升.棉花基因组数据库中CPS&KS 基因的查找与分析[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.004 ]
 ZHAO Liang,DI Jia-chun,CEHN Xu-sheng.Analysis of ent-copalyl diphosphate aynthase and ent-kaurene synthase (CPS&KS) gene family in cotton genome databases[J].,2016,(01):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.004 ]
[2]赵君,刘剑光,吴巧娟,等.棉花种质种仁含油量测定及其遗传多样性分析[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(05):975.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.006]
 ZHAO Jun,LIU Jian-guang,WU Qiao-juan,et al.Kernel oil content and genetic diversity of upland cotton germplasm[J].,2015,(01):975.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.006]
[3]杨长琴,刘瑞显,张国伟,等.花铃期干旱对棉纤维素累积及纤维比强度的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(06):1218.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.005]
 YANG Chang-qin,LIU Rui-xian,ZHANG Guo-wei,et al.Cellulose accumulation and fiber strength affected by drought during flowering and bolling stage in cotton[J].,2015,(01):1218.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.005]
[4]杨长琴,刘瑞显,张国伟,等.花铃期渍水对棉铃对位叶光合速率、物质累积及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(04):732.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.004]
 YANG Chang-qin,LIU Rui-xian,ZHANG Guo-wei,et al.Photosynthesis of subtending leaves of bolls, dry matter accumulation and cotton yield in response to waterlogging during flowering and boll-forming stage[J].,2015,(01):732.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.004]
[5]刘雅辉,王秀萍,鲁雪林,等.棉花耐盐相关序列扩增多态性(SRAP)分子标记筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(03):484.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.03.003]
 LIU Ya-hui,WANG Xiu-ping,LU Xue-lin,et al.Selection of sequence-related amplified polymorphism molecular marker associated with salt tolerance of cotton[J].,2015,(01):484.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.03.003]
[6]王为,叶泗洪,潘宗瑾,等.棉花分子标记冗余性检测与评价的方法[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(02):247.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.004]
 WANG Wei,YE Si-hong,PAN Zong-jin,et al.An approach to detecting and evaluating molecular marker redundancy in cotton[J].,2015,(01):247.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.004]
[7]郭琪,徐珍珍,黄芳,等.棉花HKT基因家族的全基因组分析[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(05):975.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.003]
 GUO Qi,XU Zhen-zhen,HUANG Fang,et al.Genome-wide analysis of high-affinity potassium transporter gene family in cotton[J].,2017,(01):975.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.003]
[8]黄芳,徐珍珍,孟珊,等.盐胁迫下棉花LTR-反转座子的转录激活及在耐盐相关基因发掘中的应用[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(06):1220.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.004]
 HUANG Fang,XU Zhen-zhen,MENG Shan,et al.The identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) with transcription activity under salt stress and its application in screening the candidate genes related to salt-tolerant in cotton[J].,2017,(01):1220.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.004]
[9]徐剑文,孔杰,赵君,等.盐胁迫下棉花萌发、成苗和产量相关性状的QTL定位[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(05):972.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.002]
 XU Jian-wen,KONG-Jie,ZHAO Jun,et al.Identification of QTLs conferring the traits related to germination, seedling survival and production of cotton under salt stress[J].,2018,(01):972.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.002]
[10]韦陈华,邓国强,颜超,等.高密度重化控技术对小麦后直播棉花成铃时空分布的调控[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(05):1022.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.008]
 WEI Chen-hua,DENG Guo-qiang,YAN Chao,et al.Impact of high planting density with heavy chemical regulation technique on boll spatio-temporal distribution of cotton under direct seeding modes after wheat harvested[J].,2018,(01):1022.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-12-07基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31701475、31971904);江苏省重点研发计划项目(BE2022364);新疆生产建设兵团重点领域科技攻关计划项目(2021AB010);八师重点领域科技攻关计划项目(2023NY10);新疆生产建设兵团“兵团英才“第一层次人才选拔培养工程项目作者简介:王月平(1997-),女,内蒙古赤峰人,硕士研究生,主要从事作物遗传育种研究。(Tel)025-84390363;(E-mail)wyp15750410827@163.com。徐剑文为共同第一作者。通讯作者:肖松华,(Tel)025-84390363,(E-mail)njxsh@sina.com;陈全家,(Tel)13999120578,(E-mail)chenqjia@126.com;艾尼江,(Tel)18997886626,(E-mail)anjmmt@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-03-17