[1]李晓航,盛坤,蒋志凯.基于多层次模糊评判法对小麦调亏沟灌方式的分析[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(03):635-641.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.03.008]
　LI Xiao-hang,SHENG Kun,JIANG Zhi-kai.Analysis of regulated deficit furrow irrigation mode of wheat based on fuzzy evaluation[J].,2022,38(03):635-641.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.03.008]
点击复制

基于多层次模糊评判法对小麦调亏沟灌方式的分析()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
38
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
635-641
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2022-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of regulated deficit furrow irrigation mode of wheat based on fuzzy evaluation
作者:
李晓航1; 2; 盛坤1; 2; 蒋志凯1
（1.河南省新乡市农业科学院，河南新乡453002；2.中国农业科学院农田灌溉研究所，河南新乡453002）
Author(s):
LI Xiao-hang1; 2; SHENG Kun1; 2; JIANG Zhi-kai1
（1.Xinxiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China;2.Farmland Irrigation Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinxiang 453002, China）
关键词:
小麦; 调亏沟灌; 水分利用效率; 模糊综合评判; 熵权法
Keywords:
wheat; regulated deficit furrow irrigation; water use efficiency; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation; entropy weight method
分类号:
S274.3
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.03.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为选择适宜的冬小麦农田沟灌方式实现水分高效利用，本研究运用多层次的模糊综合评判法，通过构建多层次多因素的指标体系对不同沟灌方式进行评价。在主观求取权重的基础上，运用熵权法进行修正，使得权重结果更符合实际情况，提高评判结果的准确性。本研究设置隔沟交替灌溉和常规沟灌2种沟灌方式，同时设置60%、70%、80% 3个水分控制下限，研究不同处理对冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的影响，筛选出兼顾冬小麦产量和水分利用效率的调亏沟灌方式。结果表明，随着水分控制下限的增加，冬小麦在2种沟灌方式下产量亦随之增加，但水分利用效率和经济系数在水分控制下限为80%时降低。常规沟灌和隔沟交替灌溉2种沟灌方式下，水分控制下限为70%时冬小麦水分利用效率最大（分别为1.86 kg/m3和1.90 kg/m3）。说明，适度水分亏缺有利于水分利用效率的提高，隔沟交替灌溉可大幅降低灌溉耗水总量，因此在灌溉水充足的地区推荐采用常规沟灌，在水资源紧缺的地区则适合使用隔沟交替灌溉方式。
Abstract:
In order to select appropriate furrow irrigation methods for winter wheat and achieve efficient water use, the multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate different furrow irrigation modes by constructing a multi-level and multi-factor index system. On the basis of subjective weighting, the entropy weight method was used to make corrections, so that the weighting results were more in line with the actual situation, and the accuracy of evaluation results was increased. In this study, two furrow irrigation methods were applied, including the conventional furrow irrigation and alternative furrow irrigation. Meanwhile, three lower limits of soil moisture (60%，70%， 80%） were set. Effects of different treatments on winter wheat yield and water use efficiency were studied to screen out the regulated deficit furrow irrigation method considering the yield, and water use efficiency. The results showed that the winter wheat yield increased with the increase of irrigation amount under two irrigation methods，but the water use efficiency and economic coefficient decreased when the lower limit of soil moisture was 80%. When the lower limit of soil moisture was 70% , the water use efficiency of winter wheat was the highest under conventional furrow irrigation and alternative furrow irrigation (1.86 kg/hm3 and 1.90 kg/hm3, respectively). The moderate water deficit is beneficial to the improvement of water use efficiency, and the alternative furrow irrigation can greatly reduce the total irrigation water consumption. Therefore, conventional furrow irrigation is recommended in areas with sufficient irrigation water, and alternative furrow irrigation is suitable in areas with scarce water resources.

参考文献/References:

[1]周宝元. 黄淮海冬小麦-夏玉米资源优化配置及其节水高产技术模式研究[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2017.
[2]马文军,程琴娟,宇振荣. 试验站和农户管理水平下冬小麦水分利用效率比较[J].资源科学,2010,32(10):1896-1901.
[3]刘俊明,高阳,司转运,等. 栽培方式对冬小麦、耗水量、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J].水土保持学报,2020,32(1):210-216.
[4]满建国,王东,于振文,等. 不同带长微喷带灌溉对土壤水分布与冬小麦耗水特性及产量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(8):2186-2196．
[5]张雪玲. 沟垄集雨种植和灌溉对关中灌区小麦产量及水肥利用效率的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018．
[6]WANG F H, WANG X Q, SAYRE K.Comparison of conwentional, flood irrigated,flat planting with furrow irrigated,raised bed planting for winter wheat in China[J].Filed Crops Research,2004,87(1):35-42.
[7]马丽,刘天学,韩德果,等. 垄作对冬小麦、夏玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响[J].核农学报，2010,24(5):1062-1067.
[8]DU T S，KANG S Z， SUN J S，et al. An improved water use efficiency of cereals under temporal and spatial deficit irrigation in north China[J]. Agr Water Manage， 2010, 197(1):66-74.
[9]张新民,孙克翠,高雅玉，等. 春小麦垄作沟灌灌水质量评价指标的改进与应用[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(3):39-43,65.
[10]陈伟. 小麦垄作高产栽培技术[J].农技服务,2007, 24(7):16-17.
[11]张友昌,张教海,王孝纲,等. 垄作的生理生态效应研究进展[J].棉花科学,2012,34(6): 3-8
[12]谢建明. 垄作小麦栽培优势分析[J].农业工程技术,2017,37(14):75.
[13]康绍忠. 控制性交替灌溉 —— 一种新的农田节水调控思路[J].干旱地区农业研究,1997, 15(1): 1-6.
[14]刘永贤,李伏生,农梦玲. 烤烟不同生育时期分根区交替灌溉的节水调质效应[J].农业工程学报,2009, 25(1):16-20.
[15]杜太生,康绍忠,王振昌,等. 隔沟交替灌溉对棉花生长、产量和水分利用效率的调控效应[J].作物学报,2007, 33(12): 1982-1990.
[16]梁宗锁,康绍忠,石培泽,等. 隔沟交替灌溉对玉米根系分布和产量的影响及其节水效益[J].中国农业科学,2000, 33(6):26-32.
[17]DAVIES W J, ZHANG J H. Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil[J].Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,1991, 42: 55-76.
[18]SHAHNAZARI A, LIU F,ANDERSEN M N, et al. Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield,tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions[J].Field Crops Research,2007,100: 117-124.
[19]DU T S,KANG S Z,ZHANG J H,et al.Water use and yield responses of cotton to alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation in the arid area of north-west China[J]. Irrigation Science，2008,26(2): 147-159.
[20]武永军,刘红侠,梁宗锁,等. 分根区干湿交替对玉米光合速率及蒸腾速率的影响[J].西北植物学报,1999,19(4): 605-611.
[21]段爱旺,肖俊夫,张寄阳,等. 控制交替沟灌中灌水控制下限对玉米叶片水分利用效率的影响[J].作物学报,1999, 25(6): 766-771.
[22]刘小飞,李彪,孟兆江,等. 隔沟调亏灌溉对冬小麦旗叶生理特性与产量形成的影响[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(9):320-328.
[23]孙景生,康绍忠,蔡焕杰,等. 交替隔沟灌溉提高农田水分利用效率的节水机理[J].水利学报,2002,33(3):64-68．
[24]李红峥,曹红霞,郭莉杰,等. 沟灌方式和灌水量对温室番茄综合品质与产量的影响[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(21):4179-4191．
[25]BLACKMAN P G,DAVIES W J.Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,1985, 36: 39-48.
[26]唐立松,张建龙,李彦,等. 植物对土壤水分变化的响应与控制性分根交替灌溉[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(1): 90-93.
[27]BOAST C W,ROBERSTON T M. A ‘micro-lysimeter’ method for determining evaporation from bare soil:description and laboratory evaluation[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1982,46:689-696.
[28]张永胜,成自勇,张芮,等. 控制性交替隔沟灌溉对甜椒农田蒸散特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):223-227.
[29]KANG S Z, HU X T, DU TS, et al. Transpiration coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of pear tree (Pyrus communis L.) under alternative partial rootzone drying condition[J].Hydrol Processes,2003, 17(6): 1165-1176.
[30]王健,蔡焕杰,康燕霞,等. 夏玉米棵间土面蒸发与蒸发蒸腾比例研究[J].农业工程学报,2007, 23(4):17-22.
[31]董志强,张丽华,吕丽华等. 不同灌溉方式对冬小麦光合速率及产量的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(6):1-7.
[32]杨慧,曹红霞,李红峥,等. 基于空间分析法研究温室番茄优质高产的水氮模式[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(5):896-905．
[33]邹志红,孙靖南,任广平. 模糊评价因子的熵权法赋权及其在水质评价中的应用[J].环境科学学报,2005, 25(4):552-556．
[34]龚雪文,刘浩,刘东鑫,等. 基于模糊算法的温室番茄调亏滴灌制度综合评判[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(14):144-151．
[35]胡文泽,何珂,金诚谦,等. 基于模糊综合评判的农业机械FMECA方法研究[J].农业机械学报,2018,49(增刊):332-337．
[36]李强,谢里阳,李海洋,等. 基于模糊综合层次评判法的精密齿轮制造工艺优化优先度分析[J].兵工学报,2017,38(4):750-757．
[37]HUANG G H,COHEN S J,YIN Y Y,et al.Incorporation of inexact dynamic optimization with fuzzy relation analysis for integrated climate change impact study[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1996,48(1):45-68．
[38]汪顺生,刘东鑫,孟鹏涛,等. 不同种植模式冬小麦产量与耗水量的模糊综合评判[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(10):161-166.
[39]张智,和志豪,洪婷婷,等. 基于多层次模糊评判的樱桃番茄综合生长水肥耦合调控[J].农业机械学报,2019,50(12):279-287.
[40]李峰,孙波,王轩,等. 层次分析法结合熵权法评估农村屋顶光伏系统电能质量[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(11):159-166.
[41]薛会琴. 多属性决策中指标权重确定方法的研究[D].兰州：西北师范大学,2008.

相似文献/References:

[1]伍 宏,朱昌华,夏 凯,等.叶面喷施激动素对小麦品种济麦22品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(02):299.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.02.010]
　WU Hong,ZHU Chang-hua,XIA Kai,et al.Effect of foliar application of kinetin on quality of Triticum aestivum L. Jimai 22[J].,2016,(03):299.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.02.010]
[2]蒋正宁,别同德,赵仁惠,等.受条锈菌诱导的小麦丝氨酸苏氨酸激酶基因TaS/TK的克隆与表达[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):980.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.004]
　JIANG Zheng-ning,BIE Tong-de,ZHAO Ren-hui,et al.Cloning and expression analysis of a Serine/Threonine protein kinase gene TaS/TK in wheat in response to stripe rust fungal infection[J].,2016,(03):980.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.004]
[3]丁彬彬,张旭,吴磊,等.小麦3B 短臂染色体抗赤霉病主效 QTL 区域候选基因的表达[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(01):6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.002 ]
　DING Bin-bin,ZHANG Xu,WU Lei,et al.Expression of candidate genes on the region of a major QTL for the resistance to Fusarium head blight on the short arm of chromosome 3B in wheat[J].,2017,(03):6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.002 ]
[4]周淼平,姚金保,张鹏,等.小麦幼苗纹枯病抗性评价新方法[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(01):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.010 ]
　ZHOU Miao-ping,YAO Jin-bao,ZHANG Peng,et al.New method for the resistance evaluation of wheat sharp eyespot in seedling[J].,2017,(03):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.010 ]
[5]吴磊,姜朋,张瑜,等.苏麦3号小麦穗部病毒诱导的基因沉默（VIGS）体系的建立及验证[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(02):248.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.002]
　WU Lei,JIANG Peng,ZHANG Yu,et al.Construction and validation of virus-induced gene silencing(VIGS) system in spike of wheat variety Sumai 3[J].,2017,(03):248.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.002]
[6]邵继锋,陈荣府,董晓英,等.利用分根技术研究小麦铝磷交互作用[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.012 ]
　SHAO Ji-feng,CHEN Rong-fu,DONG Xiao-ying,et al.Aluminum-phosphorus interaction in wheat grown in a split-root device[J].,2016,(03):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.012 ]
[7]叶景秀.小麦籽粒蛋白质双向电泳体系的优化[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(05):957.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.002]
　YE Jing-xiu.Optimization of two-dimensional electrophresis system for grain protein in spring wheat[J].,2015,(03):957.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.002]
[8]郑舒文,徐其隆,邹华文.脱落酸对涝渍胁迫下小麦产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(05):967.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.004]
　ZHENG Shu-wen,XU Qi-long,ZOU Hua-wen.Yield of waterlogged wheat in response to ABA application[J].,2015,(03):967.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.004]
[9]张玉萍,马占鸿.不同施氮量下小麦遥感估产模型构建[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(06):1325.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.020]
　ZHANG Yu-ping,MA Zhan-hong.Yield estimation model of wheat based on remote sensing data under different nitrogen supply conditions[J].,2015,(03):1325.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.020]
[10]张卓亚,王晓琳,许晓明,等.腐植酸对小麦扬花期水分利用效率及灌浆进程的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(04):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.003]
　ZHANG Zhuo-ya,WANG Xiao-ling,XU Xiao-ming,et al.Effect of humic acid on water use efficiency and grouting process of wheat at flowering[J].,2015,(03):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-08-03基金项目：国家小麦产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-3-2-35)；国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFD0300700）作者简介：李晓航（1987-），女，河南安阳人，博士研究生，主要从事作物节水栽培技术研究。（E-mail）:li.xiaohang@163.com通讯作者：蒋志凯，（E-mail）：13598613170@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-07