[1]尚云秋,童士贤,付保保,等.不同耕作和播种模式对砂姜黑土区小麦产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2026,42(07):1370-1377.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.07.008]
　SHANG Yunqiu,TONG Shixian,FU Baobao,et al.Effects of different tillage and sowing patterns on wheat yield in lime concretion black soil areas[J].,2026,42(07):1370-1377.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.07.008]
点击复制

不同耕作和播种模式对砂姜黑土区小麦产量的影响()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
42
期数:
2026年07期
页码:
1370-1377
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2026-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different tillage and sowing patterns on wheat yield in lime concretion black soil areas
作者:
尚云秋1; 2; 童士贤3; 付保保3; 胡梦娇3; 丁永刚1; 2; 陈欢1; 2; 乔玉强1; 2; 张向前1; 4; 李玮1; 2
(1.安徽省农业科学院作物研究所,安徽合肥230001;2.农作物品质改良安徽省重点实验室，安徽合肥230001;3.安徽省农垦集团夹沟农场有限公司,安徽宿州234000;4.西北农林科技大学作物抗逆与高效生产全国重点实验室,陕西杨凌712100)
Author(s):
SHANG Yunqiu1; 2; TONG Shixian3; FU Baobao3; HU Mengjiao3; DING Yonggang1; 2; CHEN Huan1; 2; QIAO Yuqiang1; 2; ZHANG Xiangqian1; 4; LI Wei1; 2
(1.Crop Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230001, China;2.Anhui Provincial Key Laboratory of Crop Quality Improvement, Hefei 230001, China;3.Anhui Agricultural Reclamation Group Jiagou Farm Co., Ltd., Suzhou 234000, China;4.State Key Laboratory for Crop Stress Resistance and High-Efficiency Production, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, Yangling 712100, China)
关键词:
小麦; 砂姜黑土; 耕作方式; 播种机; 产量
Keywords:
wheat; lime concretion black soil; tillage method; seeder; yield
分类号:
S512.1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.07.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本研究以皖垦麦22为材料,设置深耕+旋耕+无驱动耙条播机(W1)、深耕+旋耕+立轴式驱动耙条播机(W2)、深耕+旋耕+横轴式驱动耙旋播施肥一体机(W3)和横轴式驱动耙旋播施肥一体机直接播种(W4) 4种处理,系统分析了不同耕作和播种模式对砂姜黑土区小麦出苗质量、群体数量、农田耗水量及产量的影响。结果表明,W1处理、W2处理和W4处理小麦播种深度为3.0～5.0 cm,小麦出苗质量较高;W3处理小麦播种深度过深,导致田间出苗率和基本苗数显著低于其他处理(P＜0.05)。但是W3处理小麦开花期平均单茎干物质积累量和穗粒数显著高于W1处理(P＜0.05),导致W3处理小麦产量显著高于W1处理(P＜0.05)。W4处理小麦产量与W1处理无显著差异(P＞0.05)。相关性分析结果表明,播种深度过深时,群体数量降低,但开花期平均单茎干物质积累量提高,从而导致穗粒数与产量增加。因此以高产为目标时,宜采用深耕+旋耕+横轴式驱动耙旋播施肥一体机模式。若以稳产和作业效率为主要目标,宜采用横轴式驱动耙旋播施肥一体机直接播种模式。本研究为砂姜黑土区小麦种植技术体系构建提供了理论依据。
Abstract:
In this study, Wankenmai 22 was used as the test wheat variety. Four treatments were established: deep tillage + rotary tillage combined with non-driven rake drill seeder (W1), deep tillage + rotary tillage combined with vertical shaft driven rake drill seeder (W2), deep tillage + rotary tillage combined with horizontal shaft driven rake rotary seeding and fertilization integrated machine (W3), and direct sowing with horizontal shaft driven rake rotary seeding and fertilization integrated machine (W4). The effects of different tillage and sowing modes on wheat seedling emergence quality, population quantity, grain yield and farmland water consumption in lime concretion black soil areas were systematically analyzed. The results showed that the sowing depth of W1, W2 and W4 treatments was 3.0-5.0 cm, with high seedling emergence quality. The sowing depth of W3 treatment was excessively deep, which significantly reduced the field emergence rate and basic seedling number compared with other treatments (P＜0.05). However, W3 treatment presented significantly higher average dry matter accumulation per stem and grain number per spike at the anthesis stage than W1 treatment (P＜0.05), ultimately resulting in a notably higher grain yield in W3 treatment (P＜0.05). There was no significant difference in wheat yield between W4 and W1 treatments (P＞0.05). Correlation analysis indicated that excessive sowing depth reduced crop population quantity, but increased average dry matter accumulation per stem at anthesis, thereby improving grain number per spike and grain yield. Therefore, the mode of deep tillage + rotary tillage combined with horizontal shaft driven rake rotary seeding and fertilization integrated machine is recommended to achieve high yield. For the goals of stable yield and high operation efficiency, the direct sowing mode adopting horizontal shaft driven rake rotary seeding and fertilization integrated machine is preferable. This study provides a theoretical basis for the construction of wheat cultivation technology systems in lime concretion black soil regions.

参考文献/References:

[1]李德成,张甘霖,龚子同. 我国砂姜黑土土种的系统分类归属研究[J]. 土壤,2011,43(4):623-629.
[2]韩上,武际,李敏,等. 深耕结合秸秆还田提高作物产量并改善耕层薄化土壤理化性质[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(2):276-284.
[3]白伟,孙占祥,张立祯,等. 耕层土壤虚实结构优化春玉米根系形态提高水分利用效率[J]. 农业工程学报,2019,35(21):88-97.
[4]翟振,李玉义,张莉,等. 短期深旋松对黄淮海沙姜黑土耕层结构及小麦生长的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2017,28(4):1211-1218.
[5]赵凌天,咸云宇,刘光明,等. 不同机械化耕播模式对冬小麦幼苗质量和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2021,37(17):31-38.
[6]陈欢,曹承富,孔令聪,等. 长期施肥下淮北砂姜黑土区小麦产量稳定性研究[J]. 中国农业科学,2014,47(13):2580-2590.
[7]Qiao S C, Harrison S P, Prentice I C, et al. Optimality-based modelling of wheat sowing dates globally[J]. Agricultural Systems,2023,206:103608.
[8]谢迎新,靳海洋,孟庆阳,等. 深耕改善砂姜黑土理化性状提高小麦产量[J]. 农业工程学报,2015,31(10):167-173.
[9]李福建,徐东忆,吴鹏,等. 耕播方式对稻茬小麦籽粒产量、养分吸收和利用的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2021,41(3):338-347.
[10]陈检锋,陈华,付利波,等. 免耕覆盖下不同氮磷钾配比对旱地小麦产量效益和养分利用的影响[J]. 农学学报,2020,10(2):50-55.
[11]刘水苗,关小康,刘长硕,等. 适宜耕作模式提高黄淮海平原冬小麦产量并改善土壤水肥状况[J]. 农业工程学报,2023,39(18):82-91.
[12]Abrisqueta I, Abrisqueta J M, Tapia L M, et al. Basal crop coefficients for early-season peach trees[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2013,121:158-163.
[13]Ali M H, Hoque M R, Hassan A A, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation on yield,water productivity,and economic returns of wheat[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2007,92:151-161.
[14]Thorup K K, Cortasa M S, Loges R. Winter wheat roots grow twice as deep as spring wheat roots, is this important for N uptake and N leaching losses?[J]. Plant Soil,2009,322:101-114.
[15]王玥凯,郭自春,张中彬,等. 不同耕作方式对砂姜黑土物理性质和玉米生长的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2019,56(6):1370-1380.
[16]李成玉,程思贤,马海彬,等. 豫南砂姜黑土水浇地不同产田土壤理化性状及其与作物产量的相关性[J]. 河南农业科学,2023,52(4):74-81.
[17]Liu G X, Han J G. Seeding establishment of wild and cultivated Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. under different seeding depths[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2008,72:279-284.
[18]樊明,沈强云,魏亦勤,等. 不同播种方式和播深对宁夏引黄灌区滴灌春小麦生长及产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学,2025,53(1):48-54.
[19]何进,李洪文,陈海涛,等. 保护性耕作技术与机具研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报,2018,49(4):1-19.
[20]豆利岭,刘庆峰,王宁,等. 不同土壤和播种深度下稻秸淋洗对小麦出苗及生长发育的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2019,47(23):106-110.
[21]Azam G, Wickramarachchi K, Scanlan C, et al. Deep and continuous root development in ameliorated soil improves water and nutrient uptakes and wheat yield in water-limited conditions[J]. Plant and Soil,2025,512:1405-1420.
[22]邵立威,张喜英,陈素英,等. 花后脱叶对冬小麦产量形成和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2009,25(1):21-26.

相似文献/References:

[1]伍 宏,朱昌华,夏 凯,等.叶面喷施激动素对小麦品种济麦22品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(02):299.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.02.010]
　WU Hong,ZHU Chang-hua,XIA Kai,et al.Effect of foliar application of kinetin on quality of Triticum aestivum L. Jimai 22[J].,2016,(07):299.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.02.010]
[2]蒋正宁,别同德,赵仁惠,等.受条锈菌诱导的小麦丝氨酸苏氨酸激酶基因TaS/TK的克隆与表达[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):980.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.004]
　JIANG Zheng-ning,BIE Tong-de,ZHAO Ren-hui,et al.Cloning and expression analysis of a Serine/Threonine protein kinase gene TaS/TK in wheat in response to stripe rust fungal infection[J].,2016,(07):980.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.004]
[3]丁彬彬,张旭,吴磊,等.小麦3B 短臂染色体抗赤霉病主效 QTL 区域候选基因的表达[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(01):6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.002 ]
　DING Bin-bin,ZHANG Xu,WU Lei,et al.Expression of candidate genes on the region of a major QTL for the resistance to Fusarium head blight on the short arm of chromosome 3B in wheat[J].,2017,(07):6.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.002 ]
[4]周淼平,姚金保,张鹏,等.小麦幼苗纹枯病抗性评价新方法[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(01):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.010 ]
　ZHOU Miao-ping,YAO Jin-bao,ZHANG Peng,et al.New method for the resistance evaluation of wheat sharp eyespot in seedling[J].,2017,(07):61.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.01.010 ]
[5]吴磊,姜朋,张瑜,等.苏麦3号小麦穗部病毒诱导的基因沉默（VIGS）体系的建立及验证[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(02):248.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.002]
　WU Lei,JIANG Peng,ZHANG Yu,et al.Construction and validation of virus-induced gene silencing(VIGS) system in spike of wheat variety Sumai 3[J].,2017,(07):248.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.002]
[6]邵继锋,陈荣府,董晓英,等.利用分根技术研究小麦铝磷交互作用[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.012 ]
　SHAO Ji-feng,CHEN Rong-fu,DONG Xiao-ying,et al.Aluminum-phosphorus interaction in wheat grown in a split-root device[J].,2016,(07):78.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.012 ]
[7]叶景秀.小麦籽粒蛋白质双向电泳体系的优化[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(05):957.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.002]
　YE Jing-xiu.Optimization of two-dimensional electrophresis system for grain protein in spring wheat[J].,2015,(07):957.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.002]
[8]郑舒文,徐其隆,邹华文.脱落酸对涝渍胁迫下小麦产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(05):967.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.004]
　ZHENG Shu-wen,XU Qi-long,ZOU Hua-wen.Yield of waterlogged wheat in response to ABA application[J].,2015,(07):967.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.004]
[9]张玉萍,马占鸿.不同施氮量下小麦遥感估产模型构建[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(06):1325.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.020]
　ZHANG Yu-ping,MA Zhan-hong.Yield estimation model of wheat based on remote sensing data under different nitrogen supply conditions[J].,2015,(07):1325.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.020]
[10]张卓亚,王晓琳,许晓明,等.腐植酸对小麦扬花期水分利用效率及灌浆进程的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(04):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.003]
　ZHANG Zhuo-ya,WANG Xiao-ling,XU Xiao-ming,et al.Effect of humic acid on water use efficiency and grouting process of wheat at flowering[J].,2015,(07):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2025-10-10基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目(32301447);国家重点研究计划项目(2023YFD1900204);安徽省农业科学院青年英才计划项目(QNYC-202217);作物抗逆与高效生产全国重点实验室开放课题基金项目(SKLCSRHPKF2025002);安徽省涡阳县国家现代农业产业园创建科技提升项目;安徽小麦良种联合攻关科研项目作者简介：尚云秋(1994-),男,山东枣庄人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事小麦生理生态与高产优质高效栽培研究。(E-mail)shangyunqiu1234@163.com通讯作者：杜世州,(E-mail)dsz315@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-08-21