[1]薛利红,段婧婧,杨林章.太湖流域农田灌排系统生态化改造技术及相关标准[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(01):81-86.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.01.009]
　XUE Li-hong,DUAN Jing-jing,YANG Lin-zhang.Ecological transformation technology and related standards of farmland irrigation and drainage system in Taihu Lake Basin[J].,2022,38(01):81-86.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.01.009]
点击复制

太湖流域农田灌排系统生态化改造技术及相关标准()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
38
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
81-86
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2022-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Ecological transformation technology and related standards of farmland irrigation and drainage system in Taihu Lake Basin
作者:
薛利红; 段婧婧; 杨林章
（江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所/农业农村部长江下游平原农业环境重点实验室，江苏南京210014）
Author(s):
XUE Li-hong; DUAN Jing-jing; YANG Lin-zhang
(Key Lab of Agro-environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014， China)
关键词:
太湖流域; 面源污染; 高标准农田建设; 灌排系统生态化改造
Keywords:
Taihu Lake Basin; non-point pollution; high-standard farmland construction; ecological transformation of farmland irrigation and drainage system
分类号:
S277
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.01.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
农田面源污染已成为中国农业绿色发展以及水环境质量改善的主要限制因子，如何保障国家粮食安全的同时有效减少农田面源污染是“十四五”的关注重点。本研究结合中国高标准农田建设的最新需求，指出了农田灌排系统生态化改造是高标准农田建设与面源污染防控的有机结合点，重点阐述了农田灌排系统生态化改造的建设目标、基本原则、适用技术和相关标准，并提出了当前农田灌排系统生态化改造的主要研究方向，以期为太湖流域生态农田建设提供相关参考，促进农业面源污染防控与高标准农田的融合，助推中国耕地数量、质量、生态“三位一体”保护。
Abstract:
Farmland non-point source pollution in China has become the main limiting factor for the green development of agriculture and the improvement of water environment quality. How to ensure national food security and effectively reduce farmland non-point source pollution is the focus of the 14th five-year plan. Based on the latest requirements of high-standard farmland construction in China, this paper pointed out that the ecological transformation of farmland irrigation and drainage system was the organic combination of high standard farmland construction and non-point source pollution prevention and control. Construction objectives, basic principles, applicable technologies and relevant standards of farmland irrigation and drainage system ecological transformation were discussed emphatically, and the main research direction in the future was put forward. It is expected to provide relevant reference for the construction of ecological farmland in Taihu Lake Basin, promote the integration of agricultural non-point source pollution prevention and control and high-standard farmland, and boost the trinity protection of quantity, quality and ecology of arable land in China.

参考文献/References:

[1]中华人民共和国生态环境部,国家统计局,中华人民共和国农业农村部.第二次全国污染源普查公报[R/OL].（2020-06-09）
[2021-12-23].https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202006/t20200610_783547.html.
[2]王海,席运官,陈瑞冰,等．太湖地区肥料、农药过量施用调查研究[J].农业环境与发展，2009（3）：10-15.
[3]XUE L H, YU Y L, YANG L Z. Maintaining yields and reducing nitrogen loss in rice-wheat rotation system in Taihu Lake region with proper fertilizer management[J]. Environmental Research Letter, 2014, 9: 115010.
[4]杨勇. 关于推进生态型高标准农田建设的思考[J].中国农业综合开发，2020(12):31-33.
[5]罗明,宇振荣,应凌霄. 从生态系统健康视角看土地综合整治[J].中国土地，2020(2):4-8.
[6]沈佳莹,刘辉,温小乐,等. 高标准农田生态系统服务价值评估——以福建省永泰县同安镇片区为例[J].亚热带资源与环境学报,2019,14(4):86-92.
[7]杨林章,施卫明,薛利红,等. 农村面源污染治理的"4R"理论与工程实践——总体思路与"4R"治理技术[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2013,32(1):1-8.
[8]施卫明,薛利红,王建国,等. 农村面源污染治理的"4R"理论与工程实践——生态拦截技术[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2013,32(9):1697-1704.
[9]杨林章,周小平,王建国,等. 用于农田非点源污染控制的生态拦截型沟渠系统及其效果[J]. 生态学杂志,2005,24(11): 1371-1374
[10]何元庆, 魏建兵, 胡远安,等. 珠三角典型稻田生态沟渠型人工湿地的非点源污染削减功能[J]．生态学杂志,2012,31(2):394-398.
[11]王晓玲, 李建生, 李松敏, 等. 生态塘对稻田降雨径流中氮磷的拦截效应研究[J]. 水利学报, 2017, 48(3): 291-298.
[12]XUE L H, HOU P F, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Application of systematic strategy for agricultural non-point source pollution control in Yangtze River basin, China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020, 304：107148.
[13]李华斌,梁海兵,李健,等. 农业面源污染全过程防治策略初探[J].中国农村水利水电，2014(1):81-85.
[14]王岩,王建国,李伟,等. 生态沟渠对农田排水中氮磷的去除机理初探[J].生态与农村环境学报，2010, 26（6）：586-590.
[15]常志州,黄红英,靳红梅,等. 农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践——氮磷养分循环利用技术[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(10): 1901-1907
[16]YUAN Z W, PANG Y J, GAO J Q, et al. Improving quantification of rainfall runoff pollutant loads with consideration of path curb and field ridge[J]. Resources, Environment and Sustainability, 2021(6): 100042.
[17]周根娣,梁新强,田光明,等. 田埂宽度对水田无机氮磷侧渗流失的影响[J].上海农业学报, 2006, 22(2): 68-70.
[18]祝惠,阎百兴. 三江平原水田氮的侧渗输出研究[J]. 环境科学, 2011, 32(1): 108-112.
[19]刘福兴,宋祥甫,邹国燕,等. 一种用于农田排水口的污染物促沉净化装置：CN203878034U [P]. 2014-10-15.
[20]CHEN L, LIU F, WANG Y, et al. Nitrogen removal in an ecological ditch receiving agricultural drainage in subtropical central China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2015, 82: 487-492.
[21]LI X N, ZHANG W W, ZHAO C Q, et al. Nitrogen interception and fate in vegetated ditches using the isotope tracer method: a simulation study in northern China[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 228: 105893.
[22]WANG J L, CHEN G F, FU Z S, et al. Application performance and nutrient stoichiometric variation of ecological ditch systems in treating non-point source pollutants from paddy fields[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2020, 299: 106989.
[23]KUMWIMBA M N, ZHU B, MUYEMBE D K. Assessing the influence of different plant species in drainage ditches on mitigation of non-point source pollutants (N, P, and sediments) in the Purple Sichuan Basin[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment，2017, 189(6): 267-271.
[24]WANG X L, LI J S, LI S M. A study on removing nitrogen from paddy field rainfall runoff by an ecological ditch-zeolite barrier system[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24: 27090-27103.
[25]刘福兴,陈桂发,付子轼,等. 不同构造生态沟渠的农田面源污染物处理能力及实际应用效果[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(6):787-794.
[26]刘福兴,王俊力,付子轼. 不同规格生态沟渠对排水污染物处理能力的研究[J].土壤学报,2019,56(3): 561-570.
[27]王迪,李红芳,刘锋,等. 亚热带农区生态沟渠对农业径流中氮素迁移拦截效应研究[J]. 环境科学, 2016,37(5):1717-1723.
[28]张树楠,肖润林,余红兵,等. 水生植物刈割对生态沟渠中氮、磷拦截的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2012,20(8):1066-1071.
[29]张小龙,王晓昌,刘言正,等. 多级生态塘植物修复技术用于富营养化水体修复[J]. 中国给水排水, 2015,31(4):95-98.
[30]严燕，孙子杰，李震宇，等.农村生态保护中的肥料减施问题与落实——以太湖流域磷肥减施工作为例［J］．江苏农业科学，2021,49(13):207-211.
[31]刘红江,郑建初,孙国峰,等. 麦季农田流失养分植物拦截技术体系研究[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(4):611-617.
[32]朱金格,张晓姣,刘鑫,等. 生态沟-湿地系统对农田排水氮磷的去除效应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019,38(2):405-411.
[33]刘方平,向爱农,才硕,等. 南方稻田灌排系统生态整治效应分析[J].灌溉排水学报, 2019,38(4):116-121.
[34]MIN J, LU K P, ZHAO X, et al. Nitrogen removal from the surface runoff of a field scale greenhouse vegetable production system[J]. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(24): 3136-3147.
[35]肖强,张维理,王秋兵,等. 太湖流域麦田土壤氮素流失过程的模拟研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):731-736.
[36]张继宗,雷秋良,左强,等. 模拟降雨条件下太湖地区稻田氮素径流流失特征[J].湖北农业科学,2009,48(11):2688-2692.
[37]严磊,邓旭哲,薛利红,等. 不同雨强和植被盖度对稻田径流及氮素流失的影响[J].农业环境科学学报，2021,40（12）:1-12.
[38]陈育超,李阳,于海明,等. 太湖地区何家浜流域初期雨水对水稻田污染物的冲刷效应[J].环境工程学报,2016,10(2):573-580.
[39]吴政文,张秋玲,李文会,等. 基于生态视角下高标准农田建设的实践研究——以苏州市通安镇生态农田建设为例[J].湖北农业科学,2020,59(S1):476-479，483.

相似文献/References:

[1]李妍,席运官,张纪兵,等.太湖流域水稻生产的氮、磷投入阈值[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(05):1017.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.012]
　LI Yan,XI Yun-guan,ZHANG Ji-bing,et al.The thresholds of nitrogen and phosphorus inputs for rice production in Lake Taihu area[J].,2015,(01):1017.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.012]
[2]陈新宇,杨智,杨梖,等.吸咐磷后的镧改性秸秆替代化学磷肥施用对土壤磷形态的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(06):1020.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.06.008]
　CHEN Xinyu,YANG Zhi,YANG Bei,et al.Effects of replacing chemical phosphate fertilizer with lanthanum modified straw after phosphorus adsorption on soil phosphorus forms[J].,2024,(01):1020.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.06.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-12-23基金项目：国家重点研发计划项目（2021YFD1700803）;江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(19）1007]作者简介：薛利红（1977-），女，河南修武人，博士，研究员，主要从事农田养分管理与农业面源污染控制方面的研究。(E-mail)njxuelihong@gmail.com通讯作者：杨林章，(E-mail)lzyang@issas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-03-04