[1]徐臣善,徐爱红,萧蓓蕾,等.授粉品种对红富士苹果果实糖积累及其代谢相关酶活性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(01):121-128.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.016]
　XU Chen-shan,XU Ai-hong,XIAO Bei-lei,et al.Effects of pollination varieties on sugar accumulation and metabolism related enzyme activities in red Fuji apple fruit[J].,2021,(01):121-128.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.016]
点击复制

授粉品种对红富士苹果果实糖积累及其代谢相关酶活性的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年01期
页码:
121-128
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2021-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of pollination varieties on sugar accumulation and metabolism related enzyme activities in red Fuji apple fruit
作者:
徐臣善1; 徐爱红1; 萧蓓蕾1; 赵海洲2; 潘恩敬1; 王明友1
（1.德州学院，山东德州253023；2.德州市林业事业发展中心，山东德州253023）
Author(s):
XU Chen-shan1; XU Ai-hong1; XIAO Bei-lei1; ZHAO Hai-zhou2; PAN En-jing1; WANG Ming-you1
(1.Dezhou University, Dezhou 253023, China;2.Dezhou Forestry Development Center, Dezhou 253023, China)
关键词:
苹果; 授粉品种; 糖积累; 糖代谢; 酶活性
Keywords:
apple; pollination variety; sugar accumulation; sugar metabolism; enzymatic activity
分类号:
S661.1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.016
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以长富2号红富士苹果（Malus pumila Mill. cv. Red Fuji, Nagafu NO.2）为母本，红星、荷红、美红3个授粉品种为父本，进行人工授粉，研究授粉品种对红富士苹果果实糖积累及代谢关键酶活性的影响。结果表明：果实生长发育过程中，果实总糖、蔗糖、葡萄糖、果糖含量均呈上升的趋势，果糖占总糖的比例最高；3个授粉处理的果实蔗糖、葡萄糖和果糖含量在花后14～42 d均无显著差异，总糖含量在花后14 d无显著差异；花后70～182 d，授粉品种为美红的果实蔗糖含量显著低于授粉品种为红星的果实（P<0.05），葡萄糖和果糖含量则显著高于授粉品种为红星的果实（P<0.05），总糖含量在花后42～182 d显著高于授粉品种为红星的果实（P<0.05）。授粉品种为美红的果实蔗糖磷酸合酶（SPS）活性在花后154～182 d显著低于授粉品种为红星的果实（P<0.05），其他时间各授粉处理间无显著差异；授粉品种为美红的果实山梨醇脱氢酶（SDH）活性在花后70～182 d显著高于授粉品种为红星的果实（P<0.05），蔗糖合酶合成方向（SS-s）活性在花后70～182 d则显著低于授粉品种为红星的果实（P<0.05），酸性转化酶（AI）活性在整个发育期（花后14～182 d）显著高于授粉品种为红星的果实（P<0.05）；各授粉处理果实中性转化酶活性（NI）在整个发育期均无显著差异。果实发育过程中，所有各授粉处理果实糖的积累均与SDH、SPS、SS-s活性呈正相关，与NI活性呈负相关，与AI活性呈显著（P<0.05）或极显著负相关（P<0.01）。果实发育过程中，授粉品种没有影响红富士苹果果实糖积累及代谢酶活性的变化趋势，但影响糖含量及代谢酶活性，酶活性的改变可能导致了果实糖积累的差异。
Abstract:
The effects of pollination varieties on sugar accumulation in Red Fuji apple fruits and activities of key enzymes in metabolism were studied by using Red Fuji apple Nagafu NO.2 as the female parent and three pollination varieties (Starking, Hehong and Meihong) as the male parent to conduct artificial pollination. The results showed that the contents of total sugar, sucrose, glucose and fructose in fruits all presented rising trends during the process of growth and development, and fructose content accounted for the highest proportion of total sugar. There were no significant differences in sucrose, glucose and fructose content in fruits by three pollination treatments 14-42 days after bloom, and there was no significant difference in total sugar content 14 days after bloom. The sucrose content in fruits pollinated with Meihong was significantly lower than fruits pollinated with Starking (P<0.05), but glucose and fructose contents in fruits were both significantly higher than fruits pollinated with Starking (P<0.05), 70-182 days after bloom. The total sugar content in fruits pollinated with Meihong was significantly higher than fruits pollinated with Starking 42-182 days after bloom (P<0.05). The activity of sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) in fruits pollinated with Meihong was significantly lower than fruits pollinated with Starking 154-182 days after bloom (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between pollination treatments in other periods. The activity of sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH) in fruits pollinated with Meihong was significantly higher than fruits pollinated with Starking (P<0.05), but the activity of synthesis of sucrose synthase (SS-s) was significantly lower than fruits pollinated with Starking (P<0.05), 70-182 days after bloom. The activity of acid invertase (AI) in fruits pollinated with Meihong was significantly higher than fruits pollinated with Starking (P<0.05) during the whole development period (14-182 days after bloom). There was no significant difference in activity of neutral invertase (NI) in fruits treated with different varieties during the whole developmental period. During the development process of fruits, the sugar accumulations showed positive correlations with SDH, SPS and SS-s activities in fruits pollinated with each variety, but showed negative correlation with NI activity and significant (P<0.05) or highly significant (P<0.01) negative correlations with AI activity. During the development process of fruits, pollination variety showed no variation trend on influencing sugar accumulation and related enzyme activities in sugar metabolism in fruits of Red Fuji apple. However, the pollination varieties affected sugars contents and metabolic enzyme activities in sugar metabolism of fruits and the changes of enzyme activities probably resulted in the differences in sugar accumulation of fruits.

参考文献/References:

[1]李天忠,浅田武典,韩振海,等. 苹果部分品种的授粉结实性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2004, 31(6): 794-796.
[2]李保国,顾玉红,郭素平,等. 2001苹果果实若干性状的花粉直感规律研究[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2004, 27(6): 34-37.
[3]石海强,黄保中,秦立者,等. 授粉品种对红富士苹果坐果率及果实品质的影响[J]．河北农业科学, 2006, 10(3): 33-35.
[4]徐臣善. 授粉处理对红富士苹果果实品质影响的综合评价[J]. 广西植物, 2013, 33(5): 685-690.
[5]王延秀,陈佰鸿,王淑华,等. 对‘长富2号’苹果授粉后11个海棠品种花粉直感效应的综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2014, 23(4): 83-89.
[6]王海波,王传增,程来亮,等. 花粉直感效应对富士苹果套袋果实糖酸组分和味感品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(4): 42-45.
[7]王永章,张大鹏. 乙烯对成熟期新红星苹果果实碳水化合物代谢的调控[J]. 园艺学报, 2000, 27(6): 391-395.
[8]李培环,董晓颖,王永章,等. ‘新红星’苹果果实蔗糖合酶的活性及亚细胞定位[J]. 园艺学报, 2002, 29(4): 375-377.
[9]BERUTER J, STUDER-FEUSI M E, RUEDI P. Sorbitol and sucrose partitioning in the growing apple fruit [J]. Plant Physiology, 1997, 151: 269-276.
[10]HUBBARD N L, PHARR D M, HUBER S C. Sucrose phosphate synthase and other sucrose metabolizing enzymes in fruit of various species [J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1991, 82: 191-196.
[11]李洁,姚宝花,宋宇琴,等. 枣不同品种和果实不同部位糖积累及相关酶活性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(12): 31-40.
[12]郭雪飞,周晓凤,冯一峰,等. 两种糖积累型枣品种果实糖积累生理代谢机制研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(6): 837-846.
[13]PARK S W, SONG K J, KIM M Y, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of four cDNAs encoding the isoforms of NAD-dependent sorbitol dehydrogenase from the Fuji apple [J]. Plant Science, 2002, 162: 513-519.
[14]NOSARSZEWSKI M, CLEMENTS A M, DOWNIE A B, et al. Sorbitol dehydrogenase expression and activity during apple fruit set and early development [J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2004, 121: 391-398.
[15]KOCH K. Sucrose metabolism: Regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development [J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2004, 7: 235-246.
[16]徐臣善. 授粉品种对苹果果实生长及内源激素含量的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 2013, 49(3): 277-284.
[17]WARREN C R, ADAMS M A. Capillary electrophoresis for the determination of major amino acid and sugars in foliage application to the nutrition of sclerophyllous species [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2000, 51: 1147-1157.
[18]高俊凤. 植物生理实验技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001: 46.
[19]宋烨,刘金豹,王孝娣,等. 苹果加工品种的糖积累与蔗糖代谢相关酶活性[J]. 果树学报, 2006, 23(1): 1-4.
[20]RUFLY T W, HUBER S C. Changes in starch formation and activities of sucrose phosphate synthase and cytoplasmic fructose-1, 6-biosphatase in response to source-sink alteration [J]. Plant Physiology, 1983, 72: 474-478.
[21]ISLAM M S, MATSUI T, YOSID Y. Carbohydrate content and the activity of sucrose synthase, sucrose phosphate synthase and acid invertase in different tomato cultivars during fruit development [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 1996, 65: 125-136.
[22]MIRON D, SCHAFFER A A. Sucrose phosphate synthase, sucrose synthase, and invertase activities in developing fruit of Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and the sucrose accumulation Lycopersicon hirsutum Hub and Bonpl [J]. Plant Physiology, 1991, 95: 623-627.
[23]龚荣高,张光伦. 柑橘果实糖代谢的研究进展[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2003, 21(4): 343-346.
[24]梁 俊,郭 燕,刘玉莲,等. 不同品种苹果果实中糖酸组成与含量分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然版), 2010, 39(10): 163-170.
[25]王延秀,陈佰鸿,王淑华,等. 对‘长富2号’苹果授粉后11个海棠品种花粉直感效应的综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2014, 23(4): 83-89.
[26]WANG H B, WANG C Z, CHENG L L, et al. Effect of metaxenia on volatile compounds in bagged apple fruit of Fuji [J]. Agricultural Science&Technology, 2017, 18(4): 583-587.
[27]温志静,郭延平,张雯,等. 叶喷不同水平氮肥对苹果果实淀粉和糖及代谢相关酶活性的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2018, 27(6): 839-845.
[28]WIND J, SMEEKENS S, HANSON J. Sucrose：Metabolite and signaling molecule [J]. Phytochemistry, 2010, 71: 1610-1614.
[29]ZHOU R, CHENG L, DANDEKAR A M. Down-regulation of sorbitol dehydrogenase and up-regulation of sucrose synthase in shoot tips of the transgenic apple trees with decreased sorbitol synthesis [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2006, 57: 3647-3657.
[30]王永章,张大鹏. ‘红富士’苹果果实蔗糖代谢与酸性转化酶和蔗糖合酶关系的研究[J].园艺学报, 2001, 28(3): 259-261.
[31]张勇,付春霞,刘飞,等. 叶面施锌对苹果果实中糖代谢相关酶活性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(8): 1429-1436.

相似文献/References:

[1]张丽颖,冯新新,高晶晶,等.根际浇灌ALA 溶液对苹果叶片生理特性与果实品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(01):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.025]
　ZHANG Li-ying,FENG Xin-xin,GAO Jing-jing,et al.Effects of rhizosphere-applied 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) solutions on leaf physiological characteristics and fruit quality of apples[J].,2015,(01):158.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.025]
[2]牛鹏飞,申远,李帅,等.苹果中福美胂残留的RP-HPLC检测[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(03):706.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.033]
　NIU Peng-fei,SHEN Yuan,LI Shuai,et al.Determination of residual asomate in apple by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC)[J].,2018,(01):706.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.033]
[3]车金庆,王帆,王艺洁,等.基于视觉注意机制的黄绿色苹果图像分割[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1347.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.021]
　CHE Jin-qing,WANG Fan,WANG Yi-jie,et al.A segmentation method of yellow and green apple images based on visual attention mechanism[J].,2018,(01):1347.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.021]
[4]车金庆,王帆,吕继东,等.重叠苹果果实的分离识别方法[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(02):469.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.02.030]
　CHE Jin-qing,WANG Fan,LYU Ji-dong,et al.Separation and recognition method for overlapped apple fruits[J].,2019,(01):469.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.02.030]
[5]张永超,赵录怀,王昊,等.基于环境气体信息的BP神经网络苹果贮藏品质预测[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(01):194.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.027]
　ZHANG Yong-chao,ZHAO Lu-huai,WANG Hao,et al.Prediction of apple storage quality using BP neural network based on environmental gas information[J].,2020,(01):194.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.027]
[6]张俊娜,王冲,张东,等.小农户管理行为对苹果园郁闭度的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(01):163.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.021]
　ZHANG Jun-na,WANG Chong,ZHANG Dong,et al.Effect of smallholder farmers’ management behavior on the canopy density of apple orchard[J].,2021,(01):163.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.021]
[7]王新亮,彭玲,王健,等.苹果Dof转录因子生物信息学及其表达分析[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(02):480.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.02.026]
　WANG Xin-liang,PENG Ling,WANG Jian,et al.Bioinformatics and expression analysis of the Dof transcription factors in apple[J].,2021,(01):480.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.02.026]
[8]陈光明,孔浩然,章永年,等.苹果机器人采摘存在的关键问题及对策[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(06):1709.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.06.030]
　CHEN Guang-ming,KONG Hao-ran,ZHANG Yong-nian,et al.Key problems and countermeasures of apple machine picking[J].,2022,38(01):1709.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.06.030]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2020-05-16基金项目：山东省自然科学基金项目（ZR2014CL025）；国家星火计划项目（2015GA740088）作者简介：徐臣善（1983-），男，山东日照人，博士，讲师，主要从事果树栽培生理、生态研究。（E-mail）michael_10@163.com通讯作者：王明友，（E-mail）nwmy_sddz@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-03-15