[1]武国峰,黄红英,孙恩惠,等.不同墙体材料日光温室的保温性能[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(02):441-448.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.034]
 WU Guo-feng,HUANG Hong-ying,SUN En-hui,et al.Thermal insulation performances of straw bale wall and soil wall in greenhouse[J].,2015,(02):441-448.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.034]
点击复制

不同墙体材料日光温室的保温性能()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年02期
页码:
441-448
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2015-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Thermal insulation performances of straw bale wall and soil wall in greenhouse
作者:
武国峰1黄红英1孙恩惠1徐跃定1陈福恒2常志州1
(1.江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,江苏省农业废弃物资源化工程技术研究中心,江苏南京210014;2.宿迁市宿城区嘉南蔬菜专业合作社,江苏宿迁223800)
Author(s):
WU Guo-feng1HUANG Hong-ying1SUN En-hui1XU Yue-ding1CHEN Fu-heng2CHANG Zhi-zhou1〖JP〗
(1.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Science/Jiangsu Agricultural Waste Treatment and Recycle Engineering Research Center, Nanjing 210014,China;2.Jianan Vegetables Professional Cooperatives of Sucheng District, Suqian 223800, China)
关键词:
日光温室秸秆块墙体土墙体温度分布保温性能
Keywords:
Solar greenhousestraw-bale wallsoil walltemperature distributionheat conservation
分类号:
S625.1
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.034
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为明确秸秆块墙体日光温室和土墙体日光温室的保温性能,本文以秸秆块墙体日光温室和土墙体日光温室为研究对象,分析了两种墙体结构温室中墙体温度、土壤温度、室内空气温度分布以及晴天和阴天时空气温度变化。结果显示,厚度0.6 m的秸秆块墙体日光温室与平均墙厚4.0 m土墙体日光温室相比,晴天时温室内空气温度和土壤温度差异不显著,清晨和阴天时秸秆块墙体温室内空气温度略低;秸秆块墙体内侧变温层厚度为15 cm,土墙体内侧变温层厚度为45 cm;秸秆块墙体日光温室中40 cm以内土壤层温度 [(15.4±1.0) ℃]与土墙体日光温室 [(16.1±2.0) ℃]无显著差异(P>0.05);夜间秸秆块墙体日光温室空气温度低于土墙体日光温室空气温度(P<0.05),白天两者差异不显著(P>0.05);试验期间,两种墙体结构日光温室中空气温度最低为8.2 ℃,能满足常规蔬菜反季节栽培对设施保温性能的要求。
Abstract:
Two kinds of solar greenhouses, one with straw-bale wall and another with soil wall, were studies to compare the thermal insulation of both greenhouses. The greenhouse with 0.6-m-thick straw-bale wall had close air and soil temperatures to those in the greenhose with a 4.0-m-thick soil wall in sunny days, while the air temperature in straw-bale wall greenhouse was a little lower than that in soil wall greenhouse in cloudy days. The metalimnion inside north wall was only 15 cm for straw-bale wall, while it was 45 cm for soil wall. The soil temperatures 40 cm below ground were (15.4±1.0) ℃ for straw-bale wall and (16.1±2.0) ℃ for soil wall greenhouse; the difference was not significant (P>0.05). The average air temperature in the two greenhouse also had no significant difference at day time, but was a slightly lower than that in soil wall greenhouse at night(P<0.05). The lowest air temperature in the experiment was 8.2 ℃ for the two kinds of greenhouse, which can satisfy the growth of anti-season vegetables.

参考文献/References:


[1]李天来.论我国日光温室生产发展的制约因素与战略性调整[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(Z1):75-78.
[2]张武锁,李连旺,温祥珍,等.墙体填充材料对日光温室保温性的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报,2007,28(3):1-4.
[3]管勇,陈超,李琢,等. 相变蓄热墙体对日光温室热环境的改善[J]. 农业工程学报,2012,28(10):194-201.
[4]梁浩,方慧,杨其长,等. 日光温室后墙蓄放热帘增温效果的性能测试[J]. 农业工程学报,2013,29(12):187-193.
[5]王顺生,马承伟,柴力龙,等. 日光温室内置式太阳能集热调温装置试验研究[J]. 农机化研究, 2007(2):130-133.
[6]白义奎,迟道才,王铁良,等. 日光温室燃池:地中热交换系统加热效果的初步研究[J]. 农业工程学报,2006,22(10):178-181.
[7]戴巧利,左然,李平,等. 主动式太阳能集热/土壤蓄热塑料大棚增温系统及效果[J]. 农业工程学报,2009,25(7):164-168.
[8]傅志前. 不同密度的麦秸砖墙导热系数试验研究[J].建筑材料学报,2012,15(2):289-292.
[9]JOLANTA V, ALBINAS G, SIGITAS V, et al. Evaluation of structure influence on thermal conductivity of thermal insulating materials from renewable resources [J]. Materials Science, 2011,17(2):208-212.
[10]KATHARINE W, PETE W, CHRISTOPHER G, et al. Development and testing of a prototype straw bale house [J]. Construction Materials, 2012,165(6):377-384.
[11]佟国红,白义奎,赵荣飞,等. 日光温室复合墙与土墙热性能对比分析[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2011,42(6):718-722.
[12]王谦,陈景玲,孙治强,等. 冬季日光温室北墙内表面热流分析[J].中国农业气象, 2010,31(2):225-229.
[13]管勇,陈超,凌浩恕,等.日光温室三重结构相变蓄热墙体传质特性分析[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(21):166-173.
[14]贾红,徐为根,彭明艳,等. 日光温室土壤温度变化特征和预报模型研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2011, 39(11): 6471- 6482.
[15]白义奎,刘文合,柴宇,等. 防寒沟对日光温室横向地温的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2004,35(5-6):595-597.
[16]毛丽萍,李亚灵,赵军良,等. 昼夜温差对番茄幼苗光合特性和物质积累的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2012, 27 (1): 128-133.

相似文献/References:

[1]顾大路,王伟中,孙爱侠,等.不同轮作模式对日光温室黄瓜生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):874.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.025]
 GU Da-lu,WANG Wei-zhong,SUN Ai-xia,et al.Cucumber growth in solar greenhouse affected by rotation modes[J].,2016,(02):874.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.025]
[2]张洋,郁继华,唐中祺,等.不同时段株间补光对日光温室番茄产量及品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(02):430.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.025]
 ZHANG Yang,YU Ji-hua,TANG Zhong-qi,et al.Effects of inter-lighting supplementation at different times on tomato yield and quality in solar greenhouse[J].,2020,(02):430.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.025]
[3]刘晓奇,肖雪梅,王俊文,等.水分亏缺对日光温室基质栽培番茄果实营养和风味品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(02):443.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.02.022]
 LIU Xiao-qi,XIAO Xue-mei,WANG Jun-wen,et al.Effects of water deficit on nutrition and flavor qualities of tomato fruits cultivated by substrate in solar greenhouse[J].,2021,(02):443.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.02.022]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2014-07-08 基金项目:江苏省农业自主创新基金项目[CX(12)1002-3];江苏省农业三新工程项目[SXGC(2013)378] 作者简介:武国峰(1983-),男,河北衡水人,博士,助理研究员,主要从事农业废弃物资源化利用研究。(E-mail)wu_guofeng@sina.cn 通讯作者:常志州,(E-mail)czhizhou@hotmail.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-04-30