[1]苏西娅,任俊鹏,毛妮妮.树形对桃树生长、产量及果实品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2026,42(01):180-185.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.01.019]
　SU Xiya,REN Junpeng,MAO Nini.Influence of different tree shapes on growth,yield and fruit quality of peach trees[J].,2026,42(01):180-185.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.01.019]
点击复制

树形对桃树生长、产量及果实品质的影响()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
42
期数:
2026年01期
页码:
180-185
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2026-01-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influence of different tree shapes on growth,yield and fruit quality of peach trees
作者:
苏西娅; 任俊鹏; 毛妮妮
(江苏丘陵地区镇江农业科学研究所,江苏句容212400)
Author(s):
SU Xiya; REN Junpeng; MAO Nini
(Zhenjiang Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Jiangsu Hilly Region, Jurong 212400, China)
关键词:
桃树; 树形; 生长指标; 产量; 品质
Keywords:
peach; tree shape; growth indices; yield; quality
分类号:
S662.1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.01.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究树形对江苏丘陵地区桃树生长和桃果实产量和品质的影响,筛选适合当地的优质高产树形,本研究以桃树品种白凤为试验材料,比较“Y”形、倒“个”形和开心形3种桃树树形对叶片生长指标和光合色素含量、果实品质和产量的影响。结果表明:3种树形对桃树单叶干重、鲜重、厚度、叶面积、果实色泽、糖含量、糖酸比没有显著影响。开心形桃树冠径最大,“Y”形桃树次之,倒“个”形桃树最小。倒“个”形桃树营养枝数量显著高于开心形桃树和“Y”形桃树。倒“个”形桃树果实可溶性固形物含量显著高于“Y”形桃树,奎尼酸含量显著高于开心形桃树。开心形桃树果实的果形指数和柠檬酸含量均显著高于“Y”形桃树和倒“个”形桃树。“Y”形桃树叶片类胡萝卜素含量显著高于倒“个”形桃树和开心形桃树,3种树形桃树叶片叶绿素a含量、叶绿素b含量及总叶绿素含量无显著差异。倒“个”形桃树的单株果实数量比“Y”形桃树增加61.92%,而3种树形桃树的产量无显著差异。综上所述,倒“个”形树形能减少桃树冠径、提高桃果实品质,是江苏丘陵地区适宜的桃树树形。
Abstract:
In order to explore the effects of tree shape on the growth of peach trees and the yield and quality of peach fruits in hilly areas of Jiangsu province, and to screen the high-quality and high-yield tree shapes in this area, this study used the peach variety Baifeng as the experimental material to compare the effects of three tree shapes of “Y”-shaped, inverted “ge” (Chinese character)-shaped and open-center-shaped peach trees on leaf growth indices and photosynthetic pigment content, fruit quality and yield. The results showed that the three tree shapes had no significant effect on the dry weight, fresh weight, thickness and area of peach leaves, and color, sugar content and sugar-acid ratio of peach fruits. The crown diameter of the open-center-shaped peach tree was the largest, followed by the “Y”-shaped peach tree, and the inverted “ge” (Chinese character)-shaped peach tree was the smallest. The number of vegetative branches of inverted “ge” (Chinese character)-shaped peach trees was significantly higher than those of open-center-shaped peach trees and “Y”-shaped peach trees. The fruit soluble solids content of the inverted “ge” (Chinese character)-shaped peach tree was significantly higher than that of the “Y”-shaped peach tree, and the quinic acid content was significantly higher than that of the open-center-shaped peach tree. The fruit shape index and citric acid content of open-center-shaped peach trees were significantly higher than those of “Y”-shaped peach trees and inverted “ge” (Chinese character)-shaped peach trees. The carotenoids content in the leaves of “Y”-shaped peach trees was significantly higher than that of inverted “ge” (Chinese character)-shaped peach trees and open-center-shaped peach trees. There was no significant difference in chlorophyll a content, chlorophyll b content or total chlorophyll content among the three tree-shaped peach trees. The number of fruits per plant of the inverted “ge” (Chinese character)-shaped peach tree was 61.92% higher than that of the “Y”-shaped peach tree, while there was no significant difference in the yield of the three tree-shaped peach trees. In summary, the inverted “ge” (Chinese character)-shaped tree shape can reduce the crown diameter of peach trees and improve the quality of peach fruits and is a suitable peach tree shape in hilly areas of Jiangsu province.

参考文献/References:

[1]姜武,沈志军,姜卫兵，等. 不同季节水蜜桃品种光合生理指标的比较[J]. 江苏农业学报,2008,24(3):321-330.
[2]ZHAO M X, SUN W T, LI H X, et al. The effects of the tree structure of zaosu pear on the transport and distribution of photosynthetic assimilates and fruit quality under desert-area conditions[J]. Agronomy,2022,12(10):2440.
[3]安佰义,谷娜,刘晓嘉,等. 不同树形对李树冠层结构和光合特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2019(3):29-35.
[4]MARTINS T S, MAGALHES FILHO J R, CRUZ L P, et al. Light interception and conversion efficiencies and biomass partitioning in sugarcane varieties with varying canopy architecture under subtropical conditions[J]. Field Crops Research,2025,322:109724.
[5]王宝珠,李洁,何银涛,等. 3种树形对苹果幼树内源激素及成花的影响[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,43(3):60-67.
[6]刘珊珊. 不同树形对梨冠层结构、光合特性及果实品质的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2023.
[7]姜晓艳,李俊才,王家珍,等. 不同树形对早金酥梨光合特性、树体生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(3):163-166.
[8]陈泉,徐嵩琳,杨梅,等. 不同树形对‘血橙8号’生长和结果的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种
[2025-04-03]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20230509.1702.014.html.
[9]张国薇,周桂虹,黄大荣,等. 不同树形青脆李光合特效及果实品质研究[J]. 中国南方果树,2023,52(1):140-142.
[10]乔白雪. 树形对甜樱桃光合特性以及果实品质的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2023.
[11]张茵桔,刘小利,李沁. 不同树形对软儿梨光合特性、果实品质的影响[J]. 南方农业,2024,18(1):129-133.
[12]刘丽,李秋利,高登涛,等. 树形对桃树生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 果树学报,2022,39(1):36-46.
[13]杨勇,陈成,阎永齐,等. 不同树形对桃冠层叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(17):158-165.
[14]张红欢,杨兴旺,冀晓昊,等. 树形对促早栽培桃冠层结构、光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报,2024,41(3):470-480.
[15]牛茹萱,赵秀梅,王晨冰,等. 桃不同树形的冠层特征及对果实产量、品质的影响[J]. 果树学报,2019,36(12):1667-1674.
[16]沈志军,马瑞娟,俞明亮,等. 桃果实发育过程中主要糖及有机酸含量的变化分析[J]. 华北农学报,2007,22(6):130-134.
[17]夏宁. 桃树枝条修剪后分枝特性的定量化模拟与可视化研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2004.
[18]肖龙. 丰产桃园树冠结构与冠层参数的研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学,2012.
[19]KIM C K, EOM S H. Light controls in the regulation of carotenoid biosynthesis in leafy vegetables:a review[J]. Horticulturae,2025,11(2):152.
[20]郭天发. 桃果皮颜色关键基因PpMYB10.1的自然等位变异发掘及功能分析[D]. 阿拉尔:塔里木大学,2021.
[21]肖龙,陈海江,邸葆,等. 两种桃树树形冠层参数变化及对产量和品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2012(17):20-23.
[22]郑先波,李明,谭彬,等. 不同生长型桃的叶脉结构与树体结构的差异与关系[J]. 华北农学报,2017,32(4):195-200.
[23]GULLO G, MOTISI A, ZAPPIA R, et al. Rootstock and fruit canopy position affect peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch](cv. Rich May) plant productivity and fruit sensorial and nutritional quality[J]. Food Chemistry,2014,153:234-242.
[24]刘珊珊,令狐田,赵志霞,等. 不同树形对砀山酥梨冠层结构、光合特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 果树资源学报,2022,3(5):41-49.
[25]牛良,王志强,刘淑娥,等. 不同生长型桃树叶片形态解剖结构及其与营养生长的关系[J]. 江苏农业学报,2008,24(4):480-484.
[26]GONALVES B, CORREIA C M, SILVA A P, et al. Leaf structure and function of sweet cherry tree (Prunus avium L.) cultivars with open and dense canopies[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2008,116(4):381-387.
[27]李桂祥,聂佩显,高晓兰,等. 桃树不同树形树体结构及叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光参数比较[J]. 北方园艺,2023(14):30-35.
[28]张抗萍,李荣飞,刘松月,等. 不同树形龙安柚冠层特性[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(24):8456-8466.
[29]卢明艳,宋锋惠,史彦江,等. 树形对骏枣叶片生理状态及产量和品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报,2022,35(12):2794-2800.
[30]TAN L P, CHEN Z F, YANG Y T, et al. Study on the fruit quality of different canopy and tree shapes of Huangguogan Citrus[J]. E3S Web of Conferences,2020,206:02019.
[31]史昕冉. 4个桃品种在安阳地区表现及不同树形桃果实品质比较[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学,2023.
[32]赵俊杰. 三种树形对桃生理特性及果实品质的影响[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学,2017.
[33]王安柱,张芳芳,韩明玉,等. 主干形桃树对光截获能力和果实产量品质的影响[J]. 果树学报,2009,26(1):86-89.
[34]周贤豹,潘海发,朱军,等. 一种桃高光效宜机操作新树形——倒“个”形[J]. 甘肃农业科技,2022,53(6):93-96.

相似文献/References:

[1]邢东兴,王明军,陈玲侠,等.桃树遥感辨识的最佳时相与方法[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(04):919.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.024]
　XING Dong xing,WANG Ming jun,CHEN Ling xia,et al.Optimal phase and method for remote sensing identification of peach trees[J].,2019,(01):919.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.024]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2025-04-15基金项目：镇江市农业科学院科技发展与青年人才基金项目(QNJJ2021004)；2024年度镇江市“1+1+N”新型农业推广项目[ZJNJ(2024)03]作者简介：苏西娅(1995-),女,山西长治人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事果树栽培生理及果树景观化研究。(E-mail)suxiyathea@126.com通讯作者：毛妮妮,(E-mail)maonini1982@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-02-09