[1]张美玲,张复宏,徐宣国.制度支持对苹果种植户有机肥施用行为的影响分析[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(04):1106-1114.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.04.030]
 ZHANG Mei-ling,ZHANG Fu-hong,XU Xuan-guo.Effects of institutional support on organic fertilizer application behavior of apple growers[J].,2022,38(04):1106-1114.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.04.030]
点击复制

制度支持对苹果种植户有机肥施用行为的影响分析()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
38
期数:
2022年04期
页码:
1106-1114
栏目:
农业经济·农业信息
出版日期:
2022-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of institutional support on organic fertilizer application behavior of apple growers
作者:
张美玲张复宏徐宣国
(山东农业大学经济管理学院,山东泰安271018)
Author(s):
ZHANG Mei-lingZHANG Fu-hongXU Xuan-guo
(College of Economics and Management, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China)
关键词:
制度支持农户分化有机肥Mlogit模型
Keywords:
institutional supportfarmer differentiationorganic fertilizerMlogit model
分类号:
F323.3
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.04.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
施用有机肥作为典型的绿色农业技术可以减少农业面源污染、提高农户收入。依据551户苹果种植户施用有机肥的调研数据,通过聚类分析将种植户分为传统型、发展型和农场型,并以传统型种植户为参照组,利用Mlogit模型实证分析制度支持对不同类型种植户有机肥施用行为的影响,并探究了3种制度支持方式对不同类型种植户所具有的平均边际效应和调节作用。结果表明,在农户分化视角下,相对于传统型种植户而言,农机补贴对发展型种植户有机肥施用行为具有显著的正向影响且具有调节效应;农机补贴、组织检测、技术培训对农场型种植户均有显著的正向影响且具有调节效应。不同的制度支持方式对不同类型的种植户有机肥施用行为的影响具有明显的差异性,唯有结合不同类型种植户的特点,实施有针对性的制度支持策略才能广泛促进农户对有机肥的施用行为。
Abstract:
Applying organic fertilizer as a typical green agricultural technology can reduce agricultural non-point source pollution and increase the income of farmers. Based on the survey data of 551 apple growers, the growers were divided into traditional, developmental and farm types by cluster analysis. Taking traditional growers as the reference group, the Mlogit model was used to empirically analyze the effects of institutional support on the organic fertilizer application behavior of differentiated growers. The average marginal effect and moderating effect of three institutional methods on different types of growers were also explored. The results showed that from the perspective of farmer differentiation, compared with traditional growers, agricultural machinery subsidy had a significant positive effect on organic fertilizer application behavior of developmental growers and had a moderating effect. Agricultural machinery subsidies, organization testing and technical training had significant positive and moderating effects on the farm-based households. There are obvious differences in the influence of different institutional support methods on organic fertilizer application behavior of different types of growers. Only combining the characteristics of different types of growers, the implementation of targeted institutional support strategies can widely promote the organic fertilizer application behavior of farmers.

参考文献/References:

[1]王桂霞,杨义风. 农户有机肥替代化肥技术采纳行为决定: 市场驱动还是政府激励?——基于农户分化视角[J]. 农村经济, 2021(4): 102-110.
[2]张新建,宁晓光,郑桂亮,等. 有机肥替代化肥对土壤肥力及番茄产量和品质的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2020, 36(14): 59-63.
[3]XU F, LIU Y L, DU W C, et al. Response of soil bacterial communities, antibiotic residuals, and crop yields to organic fertilizer substitution in North China under wheat-maize rotation[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 785: 1-9.
[4]MAO H, ZHOU L, YING R Y, et al.Time preferences and green agricultural technology adoption: field evidence from rice farmers in China[J]. Land Use Policy,2021, 109: 1-14.
[5]张秀志,郭甜丽,焦学艺,等. 商品有机肥配施对果园土壤肥力和“蜜脆”苹果果实品质的影响[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(1): 65-74.
[6]孙若梅. 绿色农业生产: 化肥减量与有机肥替代进展评价[J].重庆社会科学, 2019(6): 33-43.
[7]LU H, HU L X, ZHENG W W, et al. Impact of household land endowment and environmental cognition on the willingness to implement straw incorporation in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020, 262: 1-9.
[8]高晶晶,彭超,史清华. 中国化肥高用量与小农户的施肥行为研究——基于1995~2016年全国农村固定观察点数据的发现[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(10): 120-132.
[9]JU X T, GU B J, WU Y Y, et al. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016, 41: 26-32.
[10]BRUNELLE T, DUMAS P, SOUTY F, et al. Evaluating the impact of rising fertilizer prices on crop yields[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2015, 46 (5): 653-666.
[11]CHONG H, WHITE R E, PRYBUTOK V. Relationship among organizational support, JIT implementation, and performance[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2001, 101(6): 273-281.
[12]桑贤策,罗小锋,黄炎忠,等. 政策激励、生态认知与农户有机肥施用行为——基于有调节的中介效应模型[J].中国生态农业学报,2021,29(7): 1274-1284.
[13]曾杨梅,张俊飚,何可. 不同代际传递方式对稻农有机肥施用意愿的影响[J].中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27(4): 644-653.
[14]恰亚诺夫. 农民经济组织[M].萧正洪,译.北京: 中央编译出版社, 1996: 43-56.
[15]张琛,彭超,孔祥智. 农户分化的演化逻辑、历史演变与未来展望[J].改革, 2019(2): 5-16.
[16]黄晓慧,陆迁,王礼力. 资本禀赋、生态认知与农户水土保持技术采用行为研究——基于生态补偿政策的调节效应[J].农业技术经济, 2020(1): 33-44.
[17]黎春梅,何格. SLA框架下生计资本影响山区农户分化的机理与实证研究——以广西山区农户为例[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(11): 144-156.
[18]孙鹏飞,郑军,赵凯,等. 基于农户分化视角的农户对宅基地退出政策评价研究——以安徽金寨县农户为例[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(3): 73-80.
[19]刘莎,刘明. 家庭借贷、经营规模与农户土地经营意愿——基于小农户、中农户和大农户分化视角[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2021, 30(8): 1969-1981.
[20]杨钰蓉,何玉成,闫桂权. 不同激励方式对农户绿色生产行为的影响——以生物农药施用为例[J].世界农业, 2021(4): 53-64.
[21]EISENBERGER R H R, HUNTINGTON R, HUTCHISON S, et al. Perceived organizational support[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986, 71 (3): 500-507.
[22]BIKKINA N T R, BHAMORIYA V. Farmer producer organizations as farmer collectives: acase study from India[J]. Development Policy Review, 2018, 36 (6): 669-687.
[23]COTEUR I, WUSTENBERGHS H, DEBRUYNE L, et al. How do current sustainability assessment tools support farmers’strategic decision making?[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020,114: 1-13.
[24]杨柳,朱玉春,任洋. 社会信任、组织支持对农户参与小农水管护绩效的影响[J].资源科学, 2018, 40(6): 1230-1245.
[25]杜为研,唐杉,汪洪. 蔬菜种植户对有机肥替代化肥技术支付意愿及其影响因素的研究[J].中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(12): 32-39.
[26]杨义武,林万龙. 农机具购置补贴、农机社会化服务与农民增收[J].农业技术经济, 2021(9): 16-35.
[27]NARROD C, ROY D, OKELLO J, et al. Public-private partnerships and collective action in high value fruit and vegetable supply chains[J]. Food Policy, 2009, 34 (1): 8-15.
[28]聂江美,杨璇. 农户农地转出规模及其影响因素差异——基于纯农、兼业和非农三类农户的比较[J].湖南农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 19(6): 30-36.
[29]马志雄,丁士军. 基于农户理论的农户类型划分方法及其应用[J].中国农村经济, 2013(4): 28-38.
[30]陈卓,吴伟光. 浙江省集体林区农户生计策略选择及其影响因素研究[J].林业经济评论, 2014, 4(1): 121-128.
[31]牛荣,闫啸,罗剑朝. 基于不同农户分化类型的农地经营权抵押贷款需求研究——来自陕西高陵的实证分析[J]. 北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2021, 19(1): 90-100,124.
[32]JANSEN H G P, PENDER J, DAMON A, et al. Policies for sustainable development in the hillside areas of Honduras: a quantitative livelihoods approach [J]. Agricultural Economics, 2006, 34(2): 141-153
[33]汪存友,余嘉元. SPSS两阶聚类法如何自动确定聚类数[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2010,27(2): 202-203.
[34]HUA X B, YAN J Z, ZHANG Y L. Evaluating the role of livelihood assets in suitable livelihood strategies: protocol for anti-poverty policy in the Eastern Tibetan Plateau, China[J]. Ecological Indicators,2017, 78: 62-74.
[35]WANG P, YAN J Z, HUA X B, et al. Determinants of livelihood choice and implications for targeted poverty reduction policies: A case study in the YNL river region, Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Indicators,2019, 101: 1055-1063.
[36]CHOW G C. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions[J].Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society,1960, 28(3): 591-605.
[37]WANG Q Y, LI Z W, FENG X L. Does the happiness of contemporary women in china depend on their husbands′ achievements?[J]. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 2019, 40(1):710-728.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-04-20基金项目:山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2018MG013);国家自然科学基金项目(72073084)作者简介:张美玲(1999-),女,山东济南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业经济管理。(E-mail)1252761711@qq.com通讯作者:张复宏,(E-mail)sdzhangfuhong@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-06