[1]赵颖,周枫,罗佳琳,等.稻秸还田下不同施肥管理措施对土壤养分、冬小麦产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(05):1167-1174.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.011]
　ZHAO Ying,ZHOU Feng,LUO Jia-lin,et al.Effects of different fertilization management measures on soil nutrient, winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency under rice straw returning[J].,2021,(05):1167-1174.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.011]
点击复制

稻秸还田下不同施肥管理措施对土壤养分、冬小麦产量和氮肥利用率的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年05期
页码:
1167-1174
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2021-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different fertilization management measures on soil nutrient, winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency under rice straw returning
作者:
赵颖1; 周枫1; 罗佳琳1; 2; 赵亚慧1; 王宁1; 于建光1; 2; 3; 薛利红1; 3; 杨林章1; 3
（1.江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所，江苏南京210014；2.南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院，江苏南京210095；3.农业农村部长江下游平原农业环境重点实验室，江苏南京210014）
Author(s):
ZHAO Ying1; ZHOU Feng1; LUO Jia-lin1; 2; ZHAO Ya-hui1; WANG Ning1; YU Jian-guang1; 2; 3; XUE Li-hong1; 3; YANG Lin-zhang1; 3
(1.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;2.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;3.Key Laboratory for Agricultural Environment at the Lower Reach of the Yangtze River Plain, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China)
关键词:
稻秸还田; 有机肥替代; 减量施肥; 作物产量; 氮肥利用率
Keywords:
rice straw returning; organic fertilizer substitution; reduced fertilization; crop yield; nitrogen use efficiency
分类号:
S154.4
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了解江苏金坛地区稻秸还田条件下如何合理使用肥料，通过设置田间定位试验，研究稻秸还田条件下不施肥（S）、常规施肥（FS）、有机肥氮替代75%化肥氮（MS）和化肥减量20%（RS）4种处理对冬小麦产量、氮素利用的影响。结果表明，FS、MS、RS处理相对于S处理均可显著提高冬小麦产量，其中3种施肥处理的理论产量分别增加了192%、232%、260%，实际产量则分别增加了321%、278%、333%；RS处理的氮肥表观利用率、农学利用率和偏生产力相比于FS处理分别提高了14个百分点、4.59 kg/kg和5.80 kg/kg，而MS处理的氮肥表观利用率与FS处理相当，但氮肥农学利用率、偏生产力均下降了2.06 kg/kg；在1个作物生长季，稻秸还田配施肥料后的作物产量与肥料类型和施肥量无关。综合分析可知，该地区可考虑化肥减量配施或初期进行低量有机肥替代化肥，以保证作物产量并降低不合理施肥导致的潜在环境风险。
Abstract:
In order to investigate how to apply fertilizer reasonably under the condition of rice straw returning to the field in Jintan, a field experiment was conducted to study the effects of different fertilization management measures under rice straw returning on winter wheat yield and nitrogen use efficiency. Four different treatments were designed under rice straw returning: no fertilization(S), application of chemical fertilizer(FS), substitution of organic fertilizer nitrogen for 75% of chemical fertilizer nitrogen(MS) and reduction of chemical fertilizer by 20%(RS). The results showed that FS, MS and RS treatments could significantly increase the yield of winter wheat compared with S treatment. The theoretical yield improved by 192%, 232% and 260%, respectively, while the actual yield improved by 321%, 278% and 333%, respectively. Compared with FS, the apparent nitrogen use efficiency, nitrogen agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity of RS treatment increased by 14 percentage points, 4.59 kg/kg and 5.80 kg/kg, respectively. The apparent nitrogen use efficiency in MS was equivalent to that in FS, but the nitrogen agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity in MS decreased by 2.06 kg/kg. In one growing season, the wheat yield after rice straw returning combined with fertilization was unrelated to the types and rates of fertilizer. Overall, the reduction of chemical fertilizer or substitution of chemical fertilizer with low amount of organic fertilizer in the early stage can be considered in this region to ensure crop yield and reduce environmental risks.

参考文献/References:

[1]PUTTASO A, VITYAKON P, SAENJAN P, et al．Relationship between residue quality, decomposition patterns, and soil organic matter accumulation in a tropical sandy soil after 13 years[J]．Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2011, 89(2): 159-174．
[2]BLANCO-CANQUI H. Crop residue removal for bioenergy reduces soil carbon pools: how can we offset carbon losses?[J]．BioEnergy Research, 2013(6): 358-371．
[3]ZHAO S C, QIU S J, XU X P, et al．Change in straw decomposition rate and soil microbial community composition after straw addition in different long-term fertilization soils[J]．Applied Soil Ecology, 2019, 138: 123-133．
[4]REN J Q, YU P X, XU X H． Straw utilization in China-status and recommendations [J]．Sustainability, 2019, 11(6): 1-17．
[5]MARY B, RECOUS S, DARWIS D, et al．Interactions between decomposition of plant residues and nitrogen cycling in soil[J]．Plant and Soil, 1996, 181: 71-82．
[6]ZHAO Y, ZHANG J B, MLLER C, et al． Temporal variations of crop residue effects on soil N transformation depend on soil properties as well as residue qualities[J]．Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2018, 54(2): 659-669．
[7]ZHANG L Y, WANG J, PANG H C, et al． Effects of pelletized straw on soil nutrient properties in relation to crop yield[J]．Soil Use and Management, 2018, 34(4): 479-489．
[8]张刚，王德建，俞元春，等．秸秆全量还田与氮肥用量对水稻产量、氮肥利用率及氮素损失的影响[J]．植物营养与肥料学报，2016，22（4）：877-885．
[9]房静静，丁维婷，武雪萍，等．长期秸秆配施化肥对土壤养分及小麦产量、品质的影响[J]．中国土壤与肥料，2020(5)：141-146．
[10]TIAN Y H, YIN B, YANG L Z, et al． Nitrogen runoff and leaching losses during rice-wheat rotations in Taihu Lake region, China[J]．Pedosphere, 2007, 17(4):445-456．
[11]POSTMA-BLAAUW M B, DE GEODE R G M, BLOEM J, et al．Soil biota community structure and abundance under agricultural intensification and extensification[J]．Ecology, 2010, 91(2): 460-473．
[12]陆强，王继琛，李静，等． 秸秆还田与有机无机肥配施在稻麦轮作体系下对籽粒产量及氮素利用的影响[J]．南京农业大学学报，2014，37（6）：66-74．
[13]VANCE E D, BROOKES P C, JENKINSON D S． An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C[J]．Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19(6): 703-707．
[14]鲁如坤． 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]．北京：中国农业科技出版社, 2000．
[15]串丽敏，何萍，赵同科，等． 中国小麦季氮素养分循环与平衡特征[J]．应用生态学报，2015，26（1）：76-86．
[16]张磊，邵宇航，谷世禄，等． 减量施氮下基肥后移对南方冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J]．应用生态学报，2016，27（12）：3953-3960．
[17]凌宁，荀卫兵，沈其荣． 根际沉积碳与秸秆碳共存下作物与微生物氮素竞争机制及其调控[J]．南京农业大学学报，2018，41（4）：589-597．
[18]赵鹏，陈阜． 秸秆还田配施化学氮肥对冬小麦氮效率和产量的影响[J]．作物学报，2008，34（6）：1014-1018．
[19]张姗，石祖梁，杨四军，等． 施氮和秸秆还田对晚播小麦养分平衡和产量的影响[J]．应用生态学报，2015，26（9）：2714-2720．
[20]吴立鹏，张士荣，娄金华，等． 秸秆还田与优化施氮对稻田土壤碳氮含量及产量的影响[J]．华北农学报，2019，34（4）：158-166．
[21]毛伟,曾洪玉,李文西,等. 不同土壤肥力下有机氮部分替代化学氮对小麦产量构成及土壤养分的影响[J].江苏农业学报, 2020,36(5):1189-1196.
[22]王雯清，黄丽娜，程世敏，等. 有机氮替代部分无机氮下减氮对宝岛蕉苗期生长及肥料氮素去向的影响[J].南方农业学报，2020，51（8）:1917-1924.
[23]SHAH S A, SHAH S M, MOHAMMAD W, et al． N uptake and yield of wheat as influenced by integrated use of organic and mineral nitrogen[J]．International Journal of Plant Production, 2009, 3(3): 45-56．
[24]SHAH A, SHAFI M, BAKHT J, et al． Effect of integrated use of nitrogen on yield and N uptake of maize crop[J]．Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2010, 42(5): 3633-3638．
[25]侯红乾，冀建华，刘秀梅，等． 不同比例有机肥替代化肥对水稻产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]．土壤，2020，52（4）：758-765．
[26]孟超然，白如霄，候建伟，等． 有机肥替代部分化肥对干旱区滴灌玉米养分吸收及产量影响[J]．土壤，2020，52（4）：750-757．
[27]张亚丽，吕家珑，金继运，等． 施肥和秸秆还田对土壤肥力质量及春小麦品质的影响[J]．植物营养与肥料学报，2012，18（2）：307-314．
[28]王贺正，张钧，吴金芝，等． 不同氮素水平对小麦旗叶生理特征和产量的影响[J]．草业学报，2013，22（4）：69-75．
[29]樊高琼，吴中伟，郑亭，等． 氮肥运筹对四川丘陵旱地带状种植小麦碳素同化、转运和产量的影响[J]．水土保持学报，2012，26（3）：238-243．
[30]张媛媛，李建林，王春宏，等． 氮素和生物腐解剂调控下稻草还田对水稻氮素积累及产量的影响[J]．土壤通报，2012，43（2）：435-438．
[31]徐国伟，吴长付，刘辉，等． 麦秸还田及氮肥管理技术对水稻产量的影响[J]．作物学报，2007，33（2）：284-291．
[32]易琼，张秀芝，何萍，等． 氮肥减施对稻-麦轮作体系作物氮素吸收、利用和土壤氮素平衡的影响[J]．植物营养与肥料学报，2010，16（5）：1069-1077．
[33]刘学军，巨晓棠，张福锁． 减量施氮对冬小麦-夏玉米种植体系中氮利用与平衡的影响[J]．应用生态学报，2004，15（3）：458-462．
[34]强久次仁． 不同比例有机无机肥配施对冬小麦产量及氮效率的影响[D]．杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2016．

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-02-05基金项目：公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201503136）；江苏省博士后科研资助计划项目（2019K167）作者简介：赵颖（1988-），女，江苏南京人，博士，助理研究员，主要从事土壤氮素循环及其生态环境效应研究。（E-mail）kathy-137@163.com通讯作者：于建光，（E-mail）yujg@jaas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-11-09