[1]魏燕萍,韩俊英,尤刚,等.基于AHP和模糊综合评价的兰州市休闲农业发展评价与分析[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(01):227-233.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.032]
　WEI Yan-ping,HAN Jun-ying,YOU Gang,et al.Evaluation and analysis of Lanzhou leisure agriculture development based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation[J].,2020,(01):227-233.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.032]
点击复制

基于AHP和模糊综合评价的兰州市休闲农业发展评价与分析()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
227-233
栏目:
农业经济·农业信息
出版日期:
2020-02-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Evaluation and analysis of Lanzhou leisure agriculture development based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
作者:
魏燕萍1; 2; 韩俊英1; 尤刚3; 薛正旭1
（1.甘肃农业大学信息科学技术学院，甘肃兰州730070；2.政协兰州市委员会，甘肃兰州730030；3.中电万维信息技术有限责任公司，甘肃兰州730000）
Author(s):
WEI Yan-ping1; 2; HAN Jun-ying1; YOU Gang3; XUE Zheng-xu1
（1.College of Information Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;2.Lanzhou Municipal Committee of the CPPCC, Lanzhou 730030, China;3.Zhongdian Wanwei Information Technology Co., Ltd., Lanzhou 730000, China）
关键词:
休闲农业; 层次分析法; 模糊综合评价
Keywords:
leisure agriculture; analytic hierarchy process; fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
分类号:
F327
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.032
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过实地调研和组织专家交流、访谈会议等方式，在专家的反馈意见和调研数据分析的基础上，采用层次分析法（AHP）构建了由4个准则层和22个评价因素层构成的兰州市休闲农业发展评价指标体系。通过标度（1～9）将所有指标进行两两相比，按重要程度建立判别矩阵，通过求解矩阵最大特征根（λmax）及对应的特征向量（ω）计算权重。经一致性检验，满足一致性要求，得到逐层总排序权重。鉴于休闲农业的可持续发展受诸多因素影响，且部分指标存在一定的模糊性，采用模糊评价方法将调研评价指标的得分与权重综合评价的结果相结合，对其进行定量研究分析和综合评价。评价结果表明：兰州市休闲农业现状发展评价体系得分为72.98，处于中等发展水平并呈现增长趋势和发展上升潜力，评价结果较为全面、客观，并在一定程度上能代表兰州市休闲农业阶段性发展水平。
Abstract:
Through field research and organizing expert exchange and interview meetings, on the basis of experts′ feedback and survey data analysis, the evaluation index system of Lanzhou leisure agriculture development was constructed by using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which consisted of four criteria levels and 22 indicators levels. All indicators were compared by scale (one to nine). The discriminant matrix was established according to the importance degree, and the weight results were calculated by solving the maximum eigenvalue (λmax) of the matrix and the corresponding eigenvector (ω). By consistency test, the consistency requirements were satisfied and the total ranking weight results were obtained. In view of the fact that the sustainable development of leisure agriculture was affected by many factors, and some of the indicators had certain fuzziness, a fuzzy evaluation method was used to combine the score of the research evaluation indicators with the result of the weight comprehensive evaluation, and carry out quantitative analysis and comprehensive evaluation. The evaluation results showed that the evaluation system of leisure agriculture development in Lanzhou had a score of 72.98. The development of leisure agriculture in Lanzhou was in the middle level and showed a growing trend and potential. The evaluation results are comprehensive and objective, and can represent the stage development level of leisure agriculture in Lanzhou to a certain extent.

参考文献/References:

[1]胡绿俊. 农业生态旅游资源分类及其开发经营评价体系研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2013.
[2]张胜利. 中国休闲农业发展现状与对策研究[D]. 长沙:湖南农业大学,2014.
[3]李丰玉,董子铭. 基于层次分析法(AHP)的休闲农业产业集群竞争力评价指标体系[J].江苏农业科学,2014,42(12):484-486.
[4]王颖,王和平,张丽娟. 休闲农业评价指标体系研究综述[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(1):216-221.
[5]刘水良,吴吉林,田金霞. 基于AHP法的休闲型旅游地评价——以湘鄂渝黔边区为例[J].资源开发与市场,2010,26(10):937-939.
[6]袁红. 基于层次分析和模糊评判的湖北省休闲农业区域发展潜力分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(9):309-314.
[7]陈丽媛. 基于AHP层次分析法的休闲农业评价体系构建[D].昆明:云南农业大学,2015.
[8]王瑞红,杨立社. 西安市长安区休闲农业发展对策研究[J].陕西农业科学，2014,60(1):109-111.
[9]任阳阳. 兰州市休闲农业发展问题研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016.
[10]刘继志. 基于AHP层次分析法的天津市美丽乡村评价指标研究[J].南方农业,2018,12(17):100-102.
[11]潘方勇. 成都市现代农业评价指标体系研究[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2008,27(4):76-79.
[12]文化,姜翠红,王爱玲，等. 北京都市型现代农业评价指标体系与调控对策[J].农业现代化研究,2008，29(2):155-158.
[13]陈志峰,郑百龙,许标文,等. 休闲农业模糊综合评价指标体系构建与实证分析[J].福建农业学报, 2012,27(1):99-103.

相似文献/References:

[1]张颖,陈奕捷,肖勇,等.基于数据包络分析法的北京市休闲农业园区评价[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1421.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.035]
　ZHANG Ying,CHEN Yi-jie,XIAO Yong,et al.Efficiency evaluation of beijing leisure agriculture park based on DEA (data envelopment analysis) method[J].,2016,(01):1421.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.035]
[2]蒋国龙,朱玉清,李保全.乡村旅游发展的演化机理与案例研究[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(03):709.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.03.033]
　JIANG Guo-long,ZHU Yu-qing,LI Bao-quan.Evolution of rural tourism development and a case analysis[J].,2017,(01):709.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.03.033]
[3]魏兰君,周建涛,颜志梅,等.果树在休闲农业中的功能[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(03):657.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.026]
　WEI Lan-jun,ZHOU Jian-tao,YAN Zhi-mei,et al.Function of fruit trees in leisure agriculture[J].,2018,(01):657.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.026]
[4]孙鲁云,王力.基于层次分析法-熵权法的中国棉花质量综合评价与分析[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(03):642.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.03.009]
　SUN Lu-yun,WANG Li.Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of Chinese cotton quality based on analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method[J].,2022,38(01):642.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.03.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2019-07-02基金项目：甘肃农业大学学科建设专项基金项目（GAU-XKJS-2018-255）；国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目（201810733001）；甘肃农业大学青年导师基金项目（GAU-QDFC-2019-04）作者简介：魏燕萍（1981-），女，甘肃皋兰人，硕士，助理工程师，主要研究方向为农业信息化、政务信息化。(E-mail)10781308@qq.com通讯作者：韩俊英，(E-mail)hanjy@gsau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-13