[1]苏丽洁,刘振华,胡月明,等.广州市近20年耕地资源时空分布特征及其演变规律[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(04):978-988.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.007]
　SU Li-jie,LIU Zhen-hua,HU Yue-ming,et al.Spatio-temporal distribution characteristics and evolution law of cultivated land resources in Guangzhou in recent 20 years[J].,2023,(04):978-988.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.007]
点击复制

广州市近20年耕地资源时空分布特征及其演变规律()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年04期
页码:
978-988
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2023-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatio-temporal distribution characteristics and evolution law of cultivated land resources in Guangzhou in recent 20 years
作者:
苏丽洁1; 刘振华1; 胡月明2; 3; 邹润彦1; 3; 彭一平1; 周悟1
（1.华南农业大学资源环境学院，广东广州510642；2.海南大学热带作物学院，海南海口570100；3.广州市华南自然资源科学技术研究院，广东广州510642）
Author(s):
SU Li-jie1; LIU Zhen-hua1; HU Yue-ming2; 3; ZOU Run-yan1; 3; PENG Yi-ping1; ZHOU Wu1
(1.College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;2.College of Tropical Crops, Hainan University, Haikou 570100, China;3.South China Institute of Natural Resources Science and Technology, Guangzhou 510642, China)
关键词:
广州市; 耕地资源; 时空分布特征; 演变规律
Keywords:
Guangzhou; cultivated land resources; spatio-temporal distribution characteristics; evolution law
分类号:
F301.24
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.04.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
广州市是中国快速城市化的典型地区，研究广州市耕地资源时空分布特征及其与快速城市化发展的内在联系，可为缓解快速城市化地区的人地矛盾提供参考，进而为政府部门制定耕地资源保护与利用政策提供支撑。本研究采用耕地年均变化率、耕地相对变化率和区域耕地质量等别等指标对广州市2005-2018年耕地资源数量和质量的时空分布特征进行分析，并利用ARCGIS软件对广州市各区的耕地质量聚集特征及耕地质心时空演变规律进行探讨。结果表明：（1）广州市耕地面积从2005年的91 880.08 hm2下降到2018年82 440.10 hm2，各区耕地年变化率差异大，耕地相对变化率空间分布呈现由市中心向外逐渐减缓的格局；（2）广州市耕地质量等别范围为1～6等，其中1～4等优等耕地占97%。2005至2018年，平均耕地质量等别提升了0.12个等级，耕地质量呈稳中有升的趋势；（3）耕地质量空间格局呈现质量好的耕地在广州西南部越来越聚集以及增城中部越来越分散，质量差的耕地在东北部越来越分散，其他小范围分布地区越来越聚集的规律；（4）广州市耕地质心整体往东北方向移动，各区的耕地质心有不同的移动模式，且与各区的城市空间发展战略相吻合。快速城市化过程对广州市耕地资源时空分布特征造成显著影响，亦对区域的经济、城市可持续发展和生态环境稳定产生了新的挑战，因此，严格落实耕地进出平衡，有效防止耕地“非粮化”；加快高标准农田建设，提升耕地质量；坚持土地节约集约利用，优化耕地空间格局，以促进城市经济、文化、生态健康可持续发展。
Abstract:
Guangzhou is a typical area of rapid urbanization in China. Studying the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of cultivated land resources in Guangzhou and its internal relationship with rapid urbanization development can provide reference for alleviating the contradiction between people and land in rapid urbanization areas, and then provide support for government departments to formulate policies for the protection and utilization of cultivated land resources. In this study, the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of the quantity and quality of cultivated land resources in Guangzhou from 2005 to 2018 were analyzed by using the average annual change rate of cultivated land, the relative change rate of cultivated land and the average value of regional cultivated land quality. The spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of cultivated land quality aggregation and cultivated land centroid in each district of Guangzhou were discussed by using ARCGIS software. The results showed that the area of cultivated land in Guangzhou decreased from 91 880.08 hm2 in 2005 to 82 440.10 hm2 in 2018. The annual change rate of cultivated land in each district was quite different, and the spatial distribution of the relative change rate of cultivated land gradually slowed down from the city center to the outside. The quality of cultivated land in Guangzhou ranged from grade 1 to grade 6, of which grade 1-4 accounted for more than 97%. From 2005 to 2018, the average cultivated land quality grade increased by 0.12 grades, and the quality of cultivated land showed a steady upward trend. The spatial pattern of cultivated land quality showed that the cultivated land with good quality was more and more concentrated in the southwest of Guangzhou and dispersed in middle of Zengcheng. The cultivated land with poor quality was more and more dispersed in the northeast, while more and more concentrated in other small-scale distribution areas. The centroid of cultivated land in Guangzhou moved to the northeast as a whole. The centroid of cultivated land in each district had different moving modes, which was consistent with the urban spatial development strategy of each district. The rapid urbanization process had a significant impact on the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of cultivated land resources in Guangzhou, and brought new challenges to the regional economy, urban sustainable development and ecological environment stability. Therefore, it is necessary to strictly implement the balance of cultivated land usage and reclamation, and effectively prevent the non-grain production of cultivated land, accelerate the construction of high-standard farmland and improve the quality of cultivated land. We also should adhere to the economical and intensive use of land, optimize the spatial pattern of cultivated land, for promoting the sustainable development of urban economy, culture and ecology.

参考文献/References:

[1]胡月明,杨颢,邹润彦,等. 耕地资源系统认知的演进与展望[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(6): 937-945，932.
[2]WU Y, SHAN L, GUO Z, et al. Cultivated land protection policies in China facing 2030: Dynamic balance system versus basic farmland zoning[J]. Habitat International, 2017, 69: 126-138.
[3]GONG J, JIANG C, CHEN W, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics in the cultivated and built-up land of Guangzhou: Insights from zoning[J]. Habitat International, 2018, 82: 104-112.
[4]TAN M, LI X, LU C. Urban land expansion and arable land loss of the major cities in China in the 1990s[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2005, 48(9): 1492-1500.
[5]JIANG L, DENG X, SETO K C. Multi-level modeling of urban expansion and cultivated land conversion for urban hotspot counties in China[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012, 108(2/3/4): 131-139.
[6]JIANG L, ZHANG Y. Modeling urban expansion and agricultural land conversion in Henan province, China: An integration of land use and socioeconomic data[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(9): 920.
[7]BREN D’AMOUR C, REITSMA F, BAIOCCHI G, et al. Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2017, 114(34): 8939-8944.
[8]WU W B, YU Q Y, PETER V H, et al. How could agricultural land systems contribute to raise food production under global change?[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(7): 1432-1442.
[9]EVANS R, TAYLOR J. Some methods of directly assessing water erosion of cultivated land - a comparison of measurements made on plots and in fields[J]. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 1995, 19(1): 115-129.
[10]TAMBARA E, MURWIRA A, KATIVU S. From natural woodlands to cultivated land: diversity of fruit-feeding butterflies and beetles in the mid-Zambezi valley, northern Zimbabwe[J]. African Journal of Ecology, 2013, 51(2): 263-269.
[11]牛善栋,方斌. 中国耕地保护制度70年：历史嬗变、现实探源及 路径优化[J]. 中国土地科学, 2019, 33(10): 1-12.
[12]LIANG C, PENG H J, WEI C, et al. Farmland protection policies and rapid urbanization in China: A case study for Changzhou City[J]. Land Use Policy, 2015, 48: 552-566.
[13]SONG W, PIJANOWSKI B C, TAYYEBI A. Urban expansion and its consumption of high-quality farmland in Beijing, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 54: 60-70.
[14]BUYANOVSKY G A, WAGNER G H. Carbon cycling in cultivated land and its global significance[J]. Global Change Biology, 1998, 4(2): 131-141.
[15]GODFRAY H C J, BEDDINGTON J R, CRUTE I R, et al. Food Security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people[J]. Science, 2010, 327(5967): 812-818.
[16]GASPARRI N I, GRAU H R, SACCHI L V. Determinants of the spatial distribution of cultivated land in the North Argentine Dry Chaco in a multi-decadal study[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2015, 123: 31-39.
[17]肖丽群,邓群钊,林永钦,等. 新型城镇化背景下耕地保护与建设用地集约利用协同发展研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(9): 62-71.
[18]程维明,高晓雨,马廷,等. 基于地貌分区的1990-2015年中国耕地时空特征变化分析[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(9): 1613-1629.
[19]黄海潮,雷鸣,孔祥斌,等. 中国耕地空间格局变化及其生态系统服务价值响应[J]. 水土保持研究, 2022, 29(1): 339-348.
[20]关兴良,方创琳,鲁莎莎. 中国耕地变化的空间格局与重心曲线动态分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2010, 25(12): 1997-2006.
[21]SONG W, LIU M L. Farmland conversion decreases regional and national land quality in China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 28(2): 459-471.
[22]孔祥斌,张青璞. 中国西部区耕地等别空间分布特征[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(22): 1-7.
[23]欧阳玲,王宗明,贾明明,等. 基于遥感的吉林省中西部耕地数量和质量空间格局变化分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(13): 234-242.
[24]SHI W, TAO F, LIU J. Changes in quantity and quality of cropland and the implications for grain production in the Huang-Huai-Hai plain of China[J]. Food Security, 2013, 5(1): 69-82.
[25]卫新东,王筛妮,员学锋,等. 陕西省耕地质量时空变化特征及其分异规律[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(3): 240-248.
[26]韩宗伟,卢德彬,杨建,等. 贵州省耕地质量时空格局及变化趋势分析[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24(6): 154-159，166.
[27]许彩彩,吕春娟,陈卓,等. 省域视角下耕地自然质量空间格局与影响因素[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(3): 253-264.
[28]李丹,周嘉,战大庆. 黑龙江省耕地时空变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(7): 1266-1275.
[29]段继雯. 基于GIS的耕地等别更新评价[D]. 青岛：山东科技大学, 2020.
[30]张文静. 近20年蒙古国耕地时空变化及驱动力分析[D]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古师范大学, 2019.
[31]刘春艳,朱康文,刘吉平. 三峡库区重庆段土地覆盖和生物多样性功能演化及预测[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(19): 258-267.
[32]罗光杰,王世杰,李阳兵,等. 岩溶地区坡耕地时空动态变化及其生态服务功能评估[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(11): 233-243.
[33]唐常春,陈烈,魏成. 大都市边缘区域耕地数量变化的时空特征及动力机制——以广州市花都区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2006(5): 43-49.
[34]宋林韩. 陕西省耕地质量时空变化及影响因素研究[D]. 西安：长安大学, 2021.
[35]姜艳,杨淳棉,聂艳,等. 湖北省县域耕地多功能时空演变及耦合协调分析[J]. 山地学报, 2021, 39(6): 891-900.
[36]韩博,金晓斌,项晓敏,等. 基于“要素-景观-系统”框架的江苏省长江沿线生态修复格局分析与对策[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 141-161.
[37]程钰,刘婷婷,赵云璐,等. 京津冀及周边地区“2+26”城市空气质量时空演变与经济社会驱动机理[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(10): 183-192.
[38]朱新健. 建好高标准农田 赋能乡村振兴——“藏粮于地、藏粮于技”战略实践篇[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(13):2.
[39]薛利红,段婧婧,杨林章. 太湖流域农田灌排系统生态化改造技术及相关标准[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(1):81-86.
[40]汤玲迪,袁寿其,刘俊萍,等. 中国喷灌机现状与发展思考[J].排灌机械工程学报,2022,40(10):1072-1080.
[41]王蓓. 基于土地整治的耕地质量等别提升研究[D]. 天津：天津工业大学, 2017.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-09-20 基金项目：国家自然科学基金联合基金项目（U1901601）；国家重点研发计划项目（2020YFD1100204）；2019年省级乡村振兴战略专项——农业科技创新及推广项目（2019KJ132）；广东省基础与应用基础研究基金项目（2021A1515011643）作者简介：苏丽洁（1996-），女，广东茂名人，硕士研究生，主要从事土地资源利用与评价研究。（E-mail）sulijie0521@163.com 通讯作者：邹润彦，（E-mail）yansunnyon@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-12