[1]林湘岷,沈宗专,李荣,等.基于Web of Science的抑病型土壤文献计量分析[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(03):821-829.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.03.030]
　LIN Xiang-min,SHEN Zong-zhuan,LI Rong,et al.Bibliometric study of the papers in the field of disease-suppressive soil based on the Web of Science database[J].,2022,38(03):821-829.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.03.030]
点击复制

基于Web of Science的抑病型土壤文献计量分析()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
38
期数:
2022年03期
页码:
821-829
栏目:
农业经济·农业信息
出版日期:
2022-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Bibliometric study of the papers in the field of disease-suppressive soil based on the Web of Science database
作者:
林湘岷; 沈宗专; 李荣; 欧燕楠; 陶成圆; 沈其荣
（南京农业大学资源与环境科学学院，江苏南京210095）
Author(s):
LIN Xiang-min; SHEN Zong-zhuan; LI Rong; OU Yan-nan; TAO Cheng-yuan; SHEN Qi-rong
(College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)
关键词:
抑病型土壤; 生物防治; 知识图谱分析; 可视化分析; 引文图谱分析
Keywords:
disease-suppressive soil; biological control; knowledge map analysis; visual analysis; citation map analysis
分类号:
S154.3
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.03.030
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
抑病型土壤是植物-土壤-微生物三者相互作用最终形成的可抑制作物土传病害发生的一种特殊状态的土壤，是分离、筛选可防治作物土传病害发生的高效生物防治菌株以及揭示土壤微生物抑制土传病害发生作用机理的最佳研究材料。因此，有关抑病型土壤的研究经久不衰。本研究利用知识图谱分析、引文图谱分析及可视化分析等软件对Web of Science核心合集数据库中抑病型土壤相关研究领域的论文发表数量、期刊、所属学科、作者、作者所在国家和机构、主要研究内容、发展方向等进行文献计量分析。结果表明，近年来，抑病型土壤的相关研究越来越受关注，土壤学科在此领域的发文数量仅次于植物学科。中国、美国、荷兰、德国在抑病型土壤研究方面发表论文数量较多，并且国家之间合作密切。美国农业部农业研究局、瓦格宁根大学、法国科学研究中心、南京农业大学、中国科学院等是论文发表数量较多的研究机构。在抑病型土壤领域研究论文的发表期刊中，《Phytopathology》是本地引用次数最多的，《Soil Biology and Biochemistry》是5年（2016-2020年）影响因子最高的。抑病型土壤领域发表论文较多的学者有Weller D M、沈其荣和Thomashow L S等。生物防治仍是抑病型土壤研究领域一个重要方向。抑病型土壤领域的未来研究趋势可能将集中于根际微生物组的特征解析、调控技术、机制等方面。综上所述，抑病型土壤领域过去的研究多聚焦于解析土壤微生物群落组成特征，分离、筛选关键抑病微生物，以及阐明关键抑病微生物的生防作用机制。根-土-微生物之间的互作机制、多营养级微食物网相互作用关系与调控策略、抑病型土壤功能维持等可能是抑病型土壤领域未来的研究焦点。
Abstract:
Disease-suppressive soil is a kind of soil that formed through the interactions among plant-soil-microorganisms. It is an excellent research material to isolate and screen the high-efficiency biocontrol strains involved in controlling of crop soil-borne diseases and decipher the mechanisms of soil microbes in inhibiting soil-borne diseases. Therefore, lots of studies related to disease-suppressive soils have been conducted by experts at home and abroad. The bibliometric research was studied to analyze the number of papers, the main published journals, distributions in disciplines, scholars, countries and institutions, scientific hotspots and trends in the field of disease-suppressive soil based on the knowledge map analysis, citation map analysis and visual analysis using the core collection database of the Web of Science in present study. The results showed that the importance of researches on disease-suppressive soils had been increased in recent years. And the number of publications in this field of soil science ranked second only after plant science. The United States, China, the Netherlands, Germany were the top countries that published many articles in the field of disease-suppressive soils. At the same time, the cooperations among these countries were also very close. Further the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA ARS), Wageningen University, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Nanjing Agricultural University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and other institutions were the top organizations which published plenty of papers at domestic and foreign. Phytopathology was the top journal that published most papers in the field of disease-suppressive soil based on local citation frequency. Moreover, Soil Biology and Biochemistry was the main journal with the highest impact factor in the terms of past five years in the field of disease-suppressive soil. Weller D M, Shen Q, and Thomashow L S were the most productive scholars in this field. Biological control was one of the research hotspot in the field of disease-suppressive soil. The future research trends of disease-suppressive soils may focus on the characterization of rhizosphere microbiota, regulation techniques and mechanisms. In conclusion, the most of researches in the field of disease-suppressive soils focus on deciphering the characteristics of soil microbial community composition, isolating and screening key disease-suppressing microorganisms, and elucidating the biological control mechanism of key disease-suppressing microorganisms. The interaction mechanisms among root, soil and microbes, the multi-nutrient micro-food web interactions and regulation strategies, and maintenance of disease-suppressive soil functions may be the forefront of future researches in the field of disease-suppressive soils.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨珍,戴传超,王兴祥,等. 作物土传真菌病害发生的根际微生物机制研究进展[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):12-22.
[2]DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M, GUERRA C A, CANO-DAZ C, et al. The proportion of soil-borne pathogens increases with warming at the global scale[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2020, 10: 550–554.
[3]严康,汪海珍,楼骏,等.基于Web of Science对土传病害研究现状和趋势的计量分析[J].土壤学报,2020,57(3):680-690.
[4]BUTLER D. Fungus threatens top banana[J]. Nature, 2013, 504(7479): 195-196.
[5]BAKER K, COOK R J. Biological control of plant pathogens[M]. San Francisco: W H Freeman, 1974: 433.
[6]COOK R J，BAKER K F. The nature and practice of biological control of plant pathogens[M].St Paul, MN: American Phytopathology Society,1983: 539.
[7]SCHLATTER D, KINKEL L, THOMASHOW L, et al. Disease suppressive soils: new insights from the soil microbiome[J]. Phytopathology, 2017,107(11):1284-1297.
[8]韦中,沈宗专,杨天杰,等. 从抑病土壤到根际免疫：概念提出与发展思考[J].土壤学报,2021, 58(4): 814-824.
[9]陈香,李卫民,刘勤. 基于文献计量的近30年国内外土壤微生物研究分析[J].土壤学报,2020,57(6):1458-1470.
[10]CHEN C M. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2006, 57(3): 359-377.
[11]ECK N J V, WALTMAN L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping[J]. Scientometrics, 2010, 84: 523-538.
[12]张超,文涛,张媛,等. 基于文献计量分析的镰刀菌枯萎病研究进展解析[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1280-1291.
[13]邢素芝,李孝良,肖新,等. 基于CiteSpace可视化分析有机肥料研究进展[J].土壤,2020,52(4):659-667.
[14]刘杏梅,赵健,徐建明. 污染农田土壤的重金属钝化技术研究——基于Web of Science数据库的计量分析[J].土壤学报,2021,58(2):445-455.
[15]GARFIELD E. From the science of science to scientometrics visualizing the history of science with HistCite software[J]. Journal of Informetrics, 2009, 3(3):173-179.
[16]CARRIN V J, PEREZ-JARAMILLO J, CORDOVEZ V, et al. Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome[J]. Science, 2019, 366(6465): 606-612.
[17]张俊伶,张江周,申建波,等. 土壤健康与农业绿色发展：机遇与对策[J].土壤学报,2020,57(4):783-796.
[18]张桃林. 守护耕地土壤健康支撑农业高质量发展[J].土壤,2021,53(1):1-4.
[19]SHIOMI Y，NISHIYAMA M，ONIZUKAE T，et al. Comparison of bacterial community structures in the rhizoplane of tomato plants grown in soils suppressive and conducive towards bacterial wilt[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999,65(9): 3996-4001.
[20]POSTMA J， SCHEPER R W A， SCHILDER M T. Effect ofsuccessive cauliflower plantings and Rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 inoculations on disease suppressiveness of asuppressive and a conducive soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2010,42(5): 804-812.
[21]OLATINWO R，YIN B，BECKER J O，et al. Suppression of the plant-parasitic nematode Heterodera schachtii by the fungus Dactylella oviparasitica[J]. Phytopathology, 2016,96:111-114.
[22]褚海燕,马玉颖,杨腾,等. “十四五”土壤生物学分支学科发展战略[J].土壤学报,2020,57(5):1105-1116.
[23]申建波,白洋,韦中,等. 根际生命共同体：协调资源、环境和粮食安全的学术思路与交叉创新[J].土壤学报,2021,58(4):805-813.
[24]LEE S M, KONG H G, SONG G C, et al. Disruption of firmicutes and actinobacteria abundance in tomato rhizosphere causes the incidence of bacterial wilt disease[J]. The ISME Journal, 2021, 15(1): 330-347.
[25]MENDES R, KRUIJT M, BRUIJN I D, et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria[J]. Science, 2011, 332(6033): 1097-1100.

相似文献/References:

[1]张志春,张怡,沈迎春,等.杀虫真菌爪哇棒束孢对非洲菊烟粉虱作用特点和控害效果[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(06):1398.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.06.007]
　ZHANG Zhi-chun,ZHANG Yi,SHEN Ying-chun,et al.Characteristics and control effects of insecticidal fungus Isaria javanica against Bemisia tabaci of Gerbera jamesonii[J].,2020,(03):1398.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.06.007]
[2]路兆军,于晓丽,苗杰,等.假单胞菌PL-21的鉴定及其拮抗2种苹果病原菌的作用[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(03):808.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.03.033]
　LU Zhao-jun,YU Xiao-li,MIAO Jie,et al.Identification of Pseudomonas sp. PL-21 and its antagonistic effect on two apple pathogens[J].,2021,(03):808.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.03.033]
[3]纠敏,李晶晶,李伟山,等.大豆疫霉病病菌生防放线菌的筛选、鉴定及生防效果[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(05):1137.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.007]
　JIU Min,LI Jing-jing,LI Wei-shan,et al.Screening, identification and biocontrol effect of actinomycetes against Phytophthora sojae[J].,2021,(03):1137.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.007]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-10-19基金项目：中国科学院战略性先导科技专项项目（XDA28070302）；国家自然科学基金项目（31972509、42090065）；江苏省政策引导类计划（国际科技合作/港澳台科技合作）项目（BZ2020026）；中央本级重大增减支项目（2060302）；江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(19)2026]作者简介：林湘岷（1998-），男，湖南株洲人，硕士研究生，主要从事土壤微生物与生物肥料研究。(E-mail) 2020803200@stu.njau.edu.cn通讯作者：沈宗专，（E-mail）shenzongz@njau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-07-07