[1]陈琛,于小凤,赵步洪,等.水稻大库容遗传群体源库性状、物质生产与分配的基本特征[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(05):1009-1014.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.05.001]
　CHEN Chen,YU Xiao-feng,ZHAO Bu-hong,et al.Fundamental features of source-sink properties, biomass production and distribution in rice genetic populations with high sink capacity type[J].,2019,(05):1009-1014.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.05.001]
点击复制

水稻大库容遗传群体源库性状、物质生产与分配的基本特征()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年05期
页码:
1009-1014
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2019-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Fundamental features of source-sink properties, biomass production and distribution in rice genetic populations with high sink capacity type
作者:
陈琛1; 2; 于小凤1; 3; 赵步洪4; 高英博1; 舒小伟1; 徐杰皎1; 唐东南1; 黄建晔1; 王余龙1; 姚友礼1; 董桂春1
(1.扬州大学江苏省作物遗传生理国家重点实验室培育点/农业部长江中下游作物生理生态与栽培重点开放实验室/粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心, 江苏扬州225009;2.江苏丘陵地区镇江农业科学研究所, 江苏镇江212400;3.江苏省连云港市海州区农林水利局, 江苏 连云港 222000;4.江苏里下河地区农业科学研究所, 江苏扬州225007)
Author(s):
CHEN Chen1; 2; YU Xiao-feng1; 3; ZHAO Bu-hong4; GAO Ying-bo1; SHU Xiao-wei1; XU Jie-jiao1; TANG Dong-nan1; HUANG Jian-ye1; WANG Yu-long1; YAO You-li1; DONG Gui-chun1
(1.Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology of Jiangsu Province/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Cultivation in Middle and Low Reaches of Yangtze River of Ministry of Agriculture/Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;2.Zhenjiang Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the Ning-zhen Hilly District, Zhenjiang 212400, China;3.Agriculture, Forestry and Water Conservancy Bureau, Lianyungang 222000, China;4.Institute of Agricultural Science of the Lixiahe District in Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225007, China)
关键词:
库容量类型; 产量; 源库; 物质生产; 物质分配
Keywords:
sink capacity type;  yield;  source-sink;  matter production;  matter distribution
分类号:
S511
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.05.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在大田条件下，以染色体单片段代换系水稻群体114个株系为供试材料，采用聚类分析的方法依据供试群体库容量大小将其分为6种类型。结果表明：1)供试群体库容量变幅为676.80～1 326.43 g/m2，666.7 m2产量变幅为311.74～763.35 kg，供试材料间差异较大，同时随着库容量的增大，产量呈明显增加趋势；2)大库容量水稻抽穗期LAI、成熟期LAI均显著大于其他类型，结实期叶面积下降比例较其他类型小；3)大库容量水稻库容量大，库容量形成速率大，粒叶比大，结实期净同化率高；4)大库容量水稻主要生育时期(抽穗期、结实期、成熟期等)群体干物质积累量均具有较大的优势，结实期的优势更明显，其单茎干质量及单穗干质量亦具有相似的特征；5)大库容量水稻抽穗期茎鞘叶干质量比例大，穗干质量中等，成熟期这2个性状均为中等水平，经济系数中等偏上。大库容量水稻源足、库大，产量优势明显，但经济系数中等表明其库容量有进一步充实的潜力。
Abstract:
A total of 114 chromosome single segment substitution lines (CSSSLs) were analyzed in two consecutive years under field condition, and subcategorized into six types, according to their sink size by minimum square sum within groups (MinSSw) method. The results showed that there were significant differences among the CSSSL in their sink capacity and yield level, with the sink capacity range of 676.80-1 326.43 g/m2 and 666.7 m2 yield range of 311.74-763.35 kg. With the increase of sink capacity, the yield improved. The LAI at heading and maturity stage in the high sink capacity type were higher than those in any other types. And the LAI at grain-filling stage was going down a bit. The sink capacity and sink capacity formation rate, with a higher value in larger sink capacity type. The grain leaf ratio and net assimilation rate at grain-filling stage were also larger in high sink capacity type lines than those in other types. The dry matter production per unit area in high sink capacity type lines was higher than that in other types, especially in grain-filling stage. Similar trends were observed in the dry matter production per stem and dry weight per panicle. At heading stage, the stem-leaf dry weight ratio in the high sink capacity type was the largest, but the panicle ratio was at an intermediate level. However, at maturity stage, the stem-leaf and panicle ratios were at an intermediate level, as well as the harvest index. The source and sink in higher sink capacity type lines possess superior features than those in other types, and therefore a higher grain yield level. However, the intermediate level of harvest index suggests that the sink capacity can still be further enlarged.

参考文献/References:

[1]崔菁菁, 徐克章, 石晶皎, 等. 不同水稻品种库源的特征变化[J]. 植物学报, 2015, 50(6):699-705.
[2]朱庆森, 张祖建, 杨建昌, 等. 亚种间杂交稻产量源库特征[J]. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(3): 52-59.
[3]曹显祖, 朱庆森. 水稻品种的库源特征及其类型划分的研究[J]. 作物学报, 1987, 13(4):265-272.
[4]凌启鸿, 杨建昌. 水稻群体“粒叶比”与高产栽培途径的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 1986, 20(3):1-8.
[5]董桂春, 于小凤, 董燕萍, 等. 不同库容量类型常规籼稻品种氮素吸收与分配的差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(10):3432-3441.
[6]于小凤, 王熠, 袁秋梅, 等. 氮素高效吸收型粳稻品种源库指标的基本特点[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2012,33(1):54-60.
[7]凌启鸿, 张洪程, 蔡建中, 等. 水稻高产群体质量及其优化控制探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 1993, 26(6):1-11.
[8]屠乃美, 官春云. 水稻幼穗分化期间减源对源库关系的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报, 1999, 56(6):430-436.
[9]黄育明. 我国水稻品种改良过程源库特征的变化[J]. 福建农业大学学报, 1998, 27(3):271-278.
[10]王丰, 张国平, 白朴. 水稻源库关系评价体系研究进展与展望[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(6): 556-560.
[11]薛艳凤, 陆江锋, 吕川根, 等. 两系亚种间杂交稻两优培九籽粒灌浆动态研究[J]. 江苏农业研究, 2001, 22(2):13-19.
[12]梁建生, 曹显祖, 张海燕, 等. 水稻籽粒灌浆期间茎鞘贮存物质含量变化及其影响因素研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 1994, 8(3):151-156.
[13]袁继超, 丁志勇, 俄胜哲, 等. 源库关系对水稻籽粒灌浆特性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2005, 18(1):15-19.
[14]徐富贤, 郑家奎, 朱永川, 等. 川东南高温伏旱区杂交中稻品种库源结构对稻米整精米率与垩白粒率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(5): 432-437.
[15]熊洁, 耿春苗, 丁艳锋, 等.不同库容类型杂交早籼稻品种源库结构对垩白的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2011, 44(19):3970-3980.
[16]陈琛, 羊彬, 朱正康, 等. 影响水稻遗传群体株系氮素高效吸收的主要根系性状[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(4): 390-398.
[17]陈琛, 王熠, 羊彬, 等. 株高对遗传群体水稻株系氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(22): 4450-4459.
[18]陈琛, 张家星, 李万元, 等. 氮高效水稻主要源库性状的基本特点及其调控[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(2):185-194.
[19]ZHOU Y, DONG G C, TAO Y J, et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with toot taits using sequencing-based genotyping chromosome segment substitution lines derived from 9311 and Nipponbare in rice(Oryza sativa L.)[J]. PLoS ONE, 2016, 11(3): e0151796.
[20]顾世梁, 莫惠栋. 动态聚类的一种新方法——最小组内平方和法[J]. 江苏农学院学报, 1989, 10(4):1-8.
[21]盛大海, 刘元英, 李广宇. 水稻源库关系研究进展与应用[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2009, 40(5):117-122.
[22]张亚芳, 陈宗祥, 娄丽娟, 等. 几个水稻品种源库关系分析[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2011, 32(1):6-9，13.
[23]董桂春, 居静, 李进前, 等. 不同穗型常规籼稻品种源库性状的差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(12):4187-4196.
[24]冯跃华, 潘剑, 何腾兵, 等. 不同施氮水平对超级稻源库特性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(15):252-256.
[25]庄文锋, 杨文月, 王全芳, 等. 种植密度和施N时期对不同穗型水稻源库关系的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2013, 43(2):5-13.
[26]李健陵, 张晓艳, 杜尧东, 等. 高温对抽穗开花期至灌浆结实期水稻源库特性的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2013, 34(1):23-29.
[27]TADAHIKO M. Plant nutrition for sustainable food production and environment[M]. Netherlands: Springer Science& Business Media, 1997.
[28]VENKATESWARLU B, VISPERAS R M. Source-sink relationships in cropplants: a review[R]. Manila:The International Rice Research Institute, 1987:125.
[29]袁小乐, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 等. 超级早、晚稻品种的源库协调性[J]. 作物学报, 2009, 35(9):1744-1748.
[30]凌启鸿. 作物群体质量[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2000:42-120.
[31]潘俊峰, 崔克辉, 向镜, 等. 不同库容量类型基因型水稻茎鞘非结构性碳水化合物积累转运特征[J].华中农业大学学报, 2015, 34(1):9-15.
[32]董桂春, 李进前, 于小凤, 等. 不同库容量常规籼稻品种物质生产与分配的基本特征[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(6):639-644.
[33]HUANG M, XIA B, ZOU Y, et al. Improvement in super hybrid rice: a comparative study between super hybrid and inbred varieties[J]. Research on Crops, 2012, 13: 1-10.
[34]PENG S B, KHUSH G S, VIRK P, et al. Progress in ideotype breeding to increase rice yield potential[J]. Field Crops Research, 2008, 108(1):32-38.
[35]杨建昌, 王朋, 刘立军, 等. 中籼水稻品种产量与株型演进特征研究[J].作物学报, 2006, 32(7):949-955.
[36]马文波, 马均, 明东风, 等. 不同穗重型水稻品种剑叶光合特性的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2003,29(2):236-240.
[37]陈温福, 徐正进, 张龙步, 等. 北方粳型稻超高产育种理论与实践[J]. 中国农业科学, 2007,40(5):869-874.
[38]程式华, 曹立勇, 陈深广, 等. 后期功能型超级杂交稻的概念及生物学意义[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2005,38(3):280-284.
[39]李红宇, 刘梦红, 李晓蕾, 等. 东北地区水稻源库特征的演进研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2013(3):103-107.

相似文献/References:

[1]顾大路,王伟中,孙爱侠,等.不同轮作模式对日光温室黄瓜生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):874.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.025]
　GU Da-lu,WANG Wei-zhong,SUN Ai-xia,et al.Cucumber growth in solar greenhouse affected by rotation modes[J].,2016,(05):874.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.025]
[2]孙艳军,史珑燕,徐刚,等.锌肥施用量对大蒜产量、品质及矿质元素含量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):891.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.028]
　SUN Yan-jun,SHI Long-yan,XU Gang,et al.Yield, quality and mineral element content of garlic in response to zinc fertilization[J].,2016,(05):891.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.028]
[3]罗汉东,王华,付艳秋,等.油茶果实性状、养分含量和产油量对磷水平的响应[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):898.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.029]
　LUO Han-dong,WANG Hua,FU Yan-qiu,et al.Fruit traits, nutrient content and oil content of Camellia oleifera in response to phosphorus levels[J].,2016,(05):898.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.029]
[4]王振楠,杨美玲,刘鸯,等.丛枝菌根真菌对红花生长及根际土壤微环境的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):904.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.030]
　WANG Zhen-nan,YANG Mei-ling,LIU Yang,et al.Effects of arbuscular mycorrhization on the growth of safflower and the microenvironment of rhizosphere soil[J].,2016,(05):904.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.030]
[5]王志春.棉花秸秆培养料对金针菇产量和品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):917.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.032]
　Xinyang Agricultural Experimental Station,Yancheng 09,China.Influence of cotton stalk on the needle mushroom yield and quality[J].,2016,(05):917.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.032]
[6]岳海旺,陈淑萍,彭海成,等.玉米籽粒灌浆特性品种间比较[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1043.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.014]
　YUE Hai-wang,CHEN Shu-ping,PENG Hai-cheng,et al.Grain filling characteristics in maize materials[J].,2016,(05):1043.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.014]
[7]谭芳,经艳,王伦旺,等.不同施肥量和种植密度对桂糖32号甘蔗蔗糖分和产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1055.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.016]
　TAN Fang,JING Yan,WANG Lun-wang,et al.Yield and sucrose content of sugar cane Guitang32 influenced by fertilizer application rates and planting densities[J].,2016,(05):1055.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.016]
[8]张国芹,牟建梅,何玲莉,等.氮硅配施对不结球白菜养分吸收及产量和品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1128.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.028]
　ZHANG Guo-qin,MOU Jian-mei,HE Ling-li,et al.Effects of nitrogen-silicon applications on nutrient absorption, yield and quality of Brassica chinensis[J].,2016,(05):1128.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.028]
[9]刘红江,陈虞雯,张岳芳,等.不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
　LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Yu-wen,ZHANG Yue-fang,et al.Effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice[J].,2016,(05):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
[10]杨长琴,张国伟,刘瑞显.种植密度与缩节胺(DPC)对麦后直播机采棉产量和品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1288.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.015]
　YANG Chang-qin,ZHANG Guo-wei,LIU Rui-xian.Effects of planting density and dimethyl piperidinium chloride (DPC) on yields and fiber qualities of machine picked cotton after barley harvesting[J].,2016,(05):1288.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2019-01-18 基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目(31571608)；江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20151311)；江苏省高校自然科学研究重大项目(15KJA210003)；江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(16)1001、CX(18)1002]；上海农场项目(20141209000082)；江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目；扬州市现代农业项目(YZ2017045) 作者简介：陈琛(1990-)，男，汉族，江苏丹阳人，博士，助理研究员，主要从事作物栽培生理、生态研究。(E-mail)852235436@qq.com 通讯作者：董桂春，(E-mail)gcdong@yzu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-11