[1]张新星,陈召亚,宋烨龙,等.儿茶素对土壤反硝化过程及N2O排放的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2026,42(03):574-581.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.03.015]
　ZHANG Xinxing,CHEN Zhaoya,SONG Yelong,et al.Effects of catechin on soil denitrification process and N2O emission[J].,2026,42(03):574-581.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.03.015]
点击复制

儿茶素对土壤反硝化过程及N2O排放的影响()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
42
期数:
2026年03期
页码:
574-581
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2026-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of catechin on soil denitrification process and N2O emission
作者:
张新星1; 2; 陈召亚1; 2; 宋烨龙1; 廖文华2; 高志岭2
(1.河北省土传病害绿色防控技术创新中心,河北保定071000；2.河北农业大学，资源与环境科学学院,河北保定071000)
Author(s):
ZHANG Xinxing1; 2; CHEN Zhaoya1; 2; SONG Yelong1; LIAO Wenhua2; GAO Zhiling2
(1.Hebei Technology Innovation Center for Green Management of Soi-borne Diseases, Baoding 071000, China；2.College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China)
关键词:
儿茶素; 反硝化抑制剂; 反硝化过程; N2O排放
Keywords:
catechin; denitrification inhibitor; denitrification process; N2O emission
分类号:
Q946.84+1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.03.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本研究设置不施用氮肥且不施用儿茶素（对照，CK1)、施用0.17 g/kg氮肥但不施用儿茶素（对照，CK2)、 施用0.17 g/kg氮肥和0.075 g/kg儿茶素(T1)、施用0.17 g/kg氮肥和0.150 g/kg儿茶素(T2)模拟田间氮肥施用量,探究儿茶素对N2O排放量、氮形态转化、土壤微生物群落及反硝化功能基因的影响。另设置不添加儿茶素（对照，CK3)、儿茶素添加量0.075 g/kg(T3)、儿茶素添加量0.150 g/kg(T4)、儿茶素添加量0.300 g/kg(T5)探究儿茶素对土壤反硝化潜势和呼吸速率的影响。研究结果表明,培养1 d后和4 d后,各处理N2O排放通量均表现为CK2＞T1处理＞T2处理。CK2土壤N2O累积排放量显著高于T1处理和T2处理(P＜0.05),CK1土壤N2O累积排放量显著低于T1处理和T2处理(P＜0.05)。儿茶素对土壤铵态氮(NH+4-N)含量无显著影响,培养1～3 d,T2 处理硝态氮(NO-3-N)含量增幅大于 CK2,亚硝态氮(NO-2-N)含量降幅大于CK2,表明儿茶素可抑制NO-3-N还原并促进NO-2-N转化。随着儿茶素添加量增加,土壤反硝化潜势显著降低(P＜0.05)。培养15 d后,T2 处理亚硝酸还原酶编码基因nirK、nirS拷贝数显著低于 CK2,氧化亚氮还原酶编码基因nosZ拷贝数显著高于CK2,且(nirK拷贝数+nirS拷贝数)/nosZ拷贝数显著降低(P＜0.05),表明儿茶素可通过抑制N2O生成、促进N2O还原双路径调控反硝化过程。T4处理土壤本底呼吸速率显著低于CK3 和 T3 处理(P＜0.05),T3处理、T4处理基质诱导呼吸速率均显著低于CK3,且T4处理基质诱导呼吸速率显著低于T3 处理(P＜0.05),表明儿茶素可抑制土壤微生物代谢活性,进而削弱反硝化过程。本研究为农业生态系统 N2O 减排及土壤氮素高效管理提供理论依据。
Abstract:
In this study, four treatments were set up to simulate field nitrogen application rates: no nitrogen fertili-zer and no catechin (control, CK1), 0.17 g/kg nitrogen fertilizer without catechin (control, CK2), 0.17 g/kg nitrogen fertilizer combined with 0.075 g/kg catechin (T1), and 0.17 g/kg nitrogen fertilizer combined with 0.150 g/kg catechin (T2). The effects of catechin on N2O emission flux, nitrogen form transformation, soil microbial community and denitrification functional genes were investigated. In addition, another four treatments were designed to explore the effects of catechin on soil denitrification potential and respiration rate: no catechin (control, CK3), 0.075 g/kg catechin addition (T3), 0.150 g/kg catechin addition (T4), and 0.300 g/kg catechin addition (T5). The results showed that after 1 d and 4 d of incubation, the N2O emission flux in all treatments followed the order of CK2＞T1＞T2. The cumulative N2O emission from soil in CK2 was significantly higher than that in T1 and T2 treatments (P＜0.05), while the cumulative N2O emission in CK1 was significantly lower than that in T1 and T2 treatments (P＜0.05). Catechin had no significant effect on soil ammonium nitrogen (NH+4-N) content. During 1-3 d of incubation, the increase range of nitrate nitrogen (NO-3-N) content in T2 treatment was higher than that in CK2, and the decrease range of nitrite nitrogen (NO-2-N) content was higher than that in CK2, indicating that catechin could inhibit NO-3-N reduction and promote NO-2-N transformation. With the increase of catechin addition amount, the soil denitrification potential decreased significantly (P＜0.05). After 15 d of incubation, the copy numbers of nitrite reductase encoding genes nirK and nirS in T2 treatment were significantly lower than those in CK2, while the copy number of nitrous oxide reductase encoding gene nosZ was significantly higher than that in CK2, and the ratio of the sum of nirK and nirS copy numbers to nosZ copy number decreased significantly (P＜0.05). These results indicated that catechin could regulate the denitrification process through dual pathways of inhibiting N2O production and promoting N2O reduction. The soil basal respiration rate in T4 treatment was significantly lower than that in CK3 and T3 treatments (P＜0.05). The substrate-induced respiration rates in T3 and T4 treatments were significantly lower than that in CK3, and the substrate-induced respiration rate in T4 treatment was significantly lower than that in T3 treatment (P＜0.05), suggesting that catechin could inhibit the metabolic activity of soil microorganisms, thereby weakening the denitrification process. This study provides a theoretical basis for N2O emission reduction and efficient soil nitrogen management in agricultural ecosystems.

参考文献/References:

[1]CHRISTENSEN S, ROUSK K. Global N2O emissions from our planet:which fluxes are affected by man, and can we reduce these?[J]. iScience,2024,27:109042.
[2]SONG L, PAN J X, WANG J S, et al. Nitrifcation derived N2O emission increases but denitrifcation derived N2O emission decreases with N enrichment in both topsoil and subsoil[J]. Catena,2023,222:106890.
[3]刘小林,林丽,刘佳妮,等. 光照和施氮量对水稻根、叶际N2O排放的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2019,34(5):116-125.
[4]吕金东,张丽媛,虞娜,等. 水氮耦合对设施土壤N2O和NO排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2021,40(6):1366-1376.
[5]TIAN H, PAN N, THOMPSON R, et al. Global nitrous oxide budget 1980-2020[M]. Gttingen:Copernicus Publications,2023.
[6]SYAKILA A,KROEZE C. The global nitrous oxide budget revisited[J]. Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management,2011,1:17-26.
[7]INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE. Climate change 2007-mitigation of climate change:working group Ⅲ contribution to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007.
[8]张鹏,吴佩聪,单颖,等. 秸秆还田对热带土壤-水稻种植系统N2O排放的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2021,36(增刊1):260-266.
[9]RIBEIRO P, SINGH A, SAGERVANSHI A, et al. High soil moisture rather than drying-rewetting cycles reduces the effectiveness of nitrification inhibitors in mitigating N2O emissions[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2024,60:627-638.
[10]WANG Q, HU H W, SHEN J P, et al. Effects of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) on N2O emissions and the abundance of nitrifiers and denitrifiers in two contrasting agricultural soils[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments,2017,17:1635-1643.
[11]ZHANG J Q, LIU Y H, DONG J Y. Responses of alpine soil nitrification and denitrification rates to nitrogen addition gradient—the role of functional genes[J]. Agriculture,2023,13(2):245.
[12]LEVY-BOOTH D J, PRESCOTT C E, GRAYSTON S J. Microbial functional genes involved in nitrogen fixation,nitrification and denitrification in forest ecosystems[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2014,75:11-25.
[13]GUO C Q, WANG H M, ZOU D B, et al. A novel amended nitrification inhibitor confers an enhanced suppression role in the nitrification of ammonium in soil[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments,2022,22:831-843 .
[14]YIN M Y, GAO X P, KUANG W N, et al. Meta-analysis of the effect of nitrification inhibitors on the abundance and community structure of N2O-related functional genes in agricultural soils[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2023,865:161215.
[15]MAHMOOD T, ALI R, YAQUB M. Transformations of surface-applied urea in an alkaline calcareous soil as affected by urease inhibitor N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide at different temperatures[J]. Soil and Environment,2023,42(2):216-222.
[16]GUPTA S, YILDIRIM S, ANDRIKOPOULOS B, et al. Deciphering the interactions in the root-soil nexus caused by urease and nitrification inhibitors:a review[J]. Agronomy,2023,13(6):1603.
[17]陶甄,李中阳,李松旌,等. 硝化抑制剂、脲酶抑制剂与生物炭复配对土壤温室气体排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2022,41(6):1368-1379.
[18]ZHANG X N, LU Y F, YANG T, et al. Factors influencing the release of the biological nitrification inhibitor 1,9-decanediol from rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots[J]. Plant and Soil,2019,436(1/2):253-265.
[19]DI T, AFZAL M R, YOSHIHASHI T, et al. Further insights into underlying mechanisms for the release of biological nitrification inhibitors from sorghum roots[J]. Plant and Soil,2018,423(1/2):99-110.
[20]陆玉芳,施卫明. 生物硝化抑制剂的研究进展及其农业应用前景[J]. 土壤学报,2021,58(3):545-557.
[21]SUN L, LU Y F, YU F W, et al. Biological nitrification inhibition by rice root exudates and its relationship with nitrogen-use efficiency[J]. New Phytologist,2016,212(3):646-656.
[22]CANTAREL A A M, AYMERIC S, GERVAIX J, et al. Biological inhibition of denitrification (BDI):an early plant strategy for Fallopia × bohemica seedling development[J]. Annals of Botany,2024, 133(4):533-546.
[23]GALLAND W, PIOLA F, BURLET A, et al. Biological denitrification inhibition (BDI) in the field:a strategy to improve plant nutrition and growth[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2019,136:107513.
[24]BARDON C, POLY F, HAICHAR F E Z, et al. Biological denitrification inhibition (BDI) with procyanidins induces modification of root traits,growth and N status in Fallopia × bohemica[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2017,107:41-49.
[25]路雪纯,辛嘉英,夏春谷,等. 植物来源酚类化合物的研究进展[J]. 食品工业,2021,42(7):274-279.
[26]INGOLD M, WACHENDORF C, BUERKERT A. Net-mineralization of organic matter and greenhouse gas emissions from Quebracho tannin-enriched manure applied to acidic and alkaline soils[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,2021,184(5):530-542.
[27]赵蕊,毛涛,秦嘉海. 有机物料组合肥还田对耕地质量及甜菜品质和效益的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2022,40(2):189-196.
[28]马宗海,闫治斌,王学,等. 葡萄酒渣复混肥对制种玉米田改土培肥效应研究[J]. 中国种业,2015(10):54-57.
[29]CHEN C C, QIU H, MA H L, et al. Response of the subtropical forest soil N transformations to tannin acid-organic nitrogen complexes[J]. SN Applied Sciences,2020,2(7):1209.
[30]HE W X, LI T L, TIAN X H, et al. Effect of phenol allelochemicals on soil enzyme activity[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica,2015,24(6):147-154.
[31]ADAMCZYK B, KITUNEN V, SMOLANDER A. Response of soil C and N transformations to condensed tannins and different organic N-condensed tannin complexes[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2013,64:163-170.
[32]景悦杨,王珊珊,张新星,等. 添加单宁酸和原花青素对油菜氮素利用率和氧化亚氮排放的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2024,47(1):49-57.
[33]HATTENSCHWILER S, VITOUSEK P M. The role of polyphenols in terrestrial ecosystem nutrient cycling[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2000,15(6):238-243.
[34]MCGIVERN B B, TFAILY M M, BORTON M A, et al. Decrypting bacterial polyphenol metabolism in an anoxic wetland soil[J]. Nature Communications,2021,12(1):2466.
[35]张新星,陈召亚,廖文华,等. 儿茶素对反硝化细菌反硝化过程及N2O排放的影响[J]. 环境污染与防治,2025,47(7):36-41.
[36]TANG S, MA Q X, LUO J P, et al. The inhibition effect of tea polyphenols on soil nitrifification is greater than denitrifification in tea garden soil[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2021,778:146328.
[37]THORPE A S, CALLAWAY R M. Biogeographic differences in the effects of Centaurea stoebe on the soil nitrogen cycle:novel weapons and soil microbes[J]. Biological Invasions,2010,13(6):1435-1445.
[38]袁雨婷,高志岭,贾树云,等. 施用沼液对苹果园土壤N2O和NH3排放的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2019,42(5):57-64.
[39]袁雨婷. 沼液施用方式和土壤含水量对土壤NH3、N2O和CH4排放的影响[D]. 保定:河北农业大学,2019.
[40]米晓君,李睿琦,王丹,等. 开放式和密闭式土柱培养系统的差异性—以NH3和N2O排放为例[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2020,43(6):108-115.

相似文献/References:

[1]邰玉玲,杨林,王欢欢,等.茶特征成分合成相关新转录因子鉴定[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(06):1534.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.023]
　TAI Yu-ling,YANG Lin,WANG Huan-huan,et al.Identification of new transcription factors related to the synthesis of characteristic components in tea[J].,2021,(03):1534.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.023]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2025-04-07基金项目:河北省自然科学基金项目(D2024104004)；保定学院科研培育基金项目(2025Z03)作者简介:张新星(1990-),女,河北邢台人,博士,讲师,从事农业环境保护研究。(E-mail)zhangxinxing1231@163.com通讯作者:高志岭,(E-mail)zhilinggao@hotmail.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-04-17