[1]李斗,王宇航,杨江山,等.外源亚精胺对酿酒葡萄叶片氮代谢、内源激素动态变化及果实品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(08):1533-1541.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.08.017]
　LI Dou,WANG Yuhang,YANG Jiangshan,et al.Effects of exogenous spermidine on nitrogen metabolism, dynamic changes of endogenous hormones in leaves and fruit quality of wine grape[J].,2024,(08):1533-1541.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.08.017]
点击复制

外源亚精胺对酿酒葡萄叶片氮代谢、内源激素动态变化及果实品质的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年08期
页码:
1533-1541
栏目:
加工贮藏·质量安全
出版日期:
2024-08-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of exogenous spermidine on nitrogen metabolism, dynamic changes of endogenous hormones in leaves and fruit quality of wine grape
作者:
李斗1; 王宇航1; 杨江山1; 金鑫1; 王春恒1; 戴子博1; 陈亚娟1; 邵璋1; 冯丽丹2
(1.甘肃农业大学园艺学院,甘肃兰州730070；2.甘肃省葡萄酒产业技术研发中心,甘肃兰州730070)
Author(s):
LI Dou1; WANG Yuhang1; YANG Jiangshan1; JIN Xin1; WANG Chunheng1; DAI Zibo1; CHEN Yajuan1; SHAO Zhang1; FENG Lidan2
(1.College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China；2.Research and Development Center of Wine Industry in Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China)
关键词:
雷司令葡萄; 亚精胺; 氮代谢; 内源激素; 果实品质
Keywords:
Riesling grape; spermidine; nitrogen metabolism; endogenous hormone; fruit quality
分类号:
S663.1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.08.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究亚精胺(Spd)对酿酒葡萄叶片氮代谢、内源激素和果实品质的影响,筛选适于葡萄生产的Spd处理方法。本研究以10年生雷司令葡萄为试验材料,于开花期、坐果期、膨大期、转色期叶面喷施不同浓度[0.3 mmol/L(T1)、0.6 mmol/L(T2)、0.9 mmol/L(T3)、1.2 mmol/L(T4)]的亚精胺溶液,以喷施清水为对照(CK),测定不同时期叶片氮代谢、内源激素含量和果实品质相关指标,利用主成分分析法对果实品质进行综合评价。研究结果表明,适宜浓度的外源Spd处理能增强葡萄叶片氮代谢能力,提高叶片激动素(KT)、生长素(IAA)、赤霉素(GA3)含量,降低脱落酸(ABA)含量,并提升果实品质；T3处理在转色期显著提高了叶片硝态氮(NO-3-N)和铵态氮(NH+4-N)含量,较CK分别提高37.84%和21.52%；T3处理叶片KT、IAA、GA3含量在开花期、转色期及成熟期显著高于CK；T3处理与CK相比显著提高了果实可溶性固形物、可溶性糖、维生素C、葡萄糖、蔗糖、草酸、酒石酸、柠檬酸、苹果酸和富马酸含量。综上所述,适宜浓度的Spd处理可以增强雷司令葡萄叶片氮代谢能力,提高叶片KT、IAA、GA3含量,降低ABA含量,提升果实品质,根据主成分分析结果,使用0.9 mmol/L Spd处理效果最佳。
Abstract:
To investigate the effects of spermidine (Spd) on nitrogen metabolism, endogenous hormones of wine grape leaves and fruit quality, and screen out the suitable Spd treatment method for wine grape production, 10-year-old Riesling grapes were used as experimental materials in this study. Spd solutions of 0.3 mmol/L (T1), 0.6 mmol/L (T2), 0.9 mmol/L (T3) and 1.2 mmol/L (T4) were sprayed on the leaves at flowering stage, fruit setting stage, expansion stage and veraison stage, and water was sprayed as control (CK). The nitrogen metabolism and the contents of endogenous hormones in leaves at different stages and the related indexes of fruit quality were measured, and the fruit quality was comprehensively evaluated by principal component analysis. The results showed that the appropriate concentration of exogenous Spd treatment could enhance the nitrogen metabolism capacity of grape leaves, increase the contents of kinetin (KT), auxin (IAA) and gibberellin (GA3) in leaves, reduce the content of abscisic acid (ABA), and improve fruit quality. Specifically, T3 treatment significantly increased the contents of nitrate nitrogen (NO-3-N) and ammonium nitrogen (NH+4-N) in leaves during the color-changing stage, which were 37.84% and 21.52% higher than those of CK, respectively. The contents of KT, IAA, and GA3 in leaves in T3 treatment were significantly higher than those in CK during flowering, color-changing and ripening stages. Compared with CK, T3 treatment significantly increased the contents of soluble solids, soluble sugars, vitamin C, glucose, sucrose, oxalic acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, malic acid, and fumaric acid in fruits. In conclusion, the appropriate concentration of Spd treatment could enhance the nitrogen metabolism capacity of Riesling grape leaves, increase the contents of KT, IAA and GA3 in leaves, reduce ABA content, and improve fruit quality. According to the results of principal component analysis, the treatment of 0.9 mmol/L Spd had the best effect.

参考文献/References:

[1]LAURA R, ALESSIO A, GVANTSA S, et al. Microclimate of grape bunch and sunburn of white grape berries:effect on wine quality[J]. Foods,2023,12(3):621.
[2]GIZELLA J, BARNA  S, SZABINA S, et al. Delay in the ripening of wine grapes:effects of specific phytotechnical methods on harvest parameters[J]. Agronomy,2023,13(8):1963.
[3]刘浩然,汪俏梅. 脱落酸对番茄部分果实性状和营养品质的影响[J]. 核农学报,2020,34(12):2858-2864.

[4]郭淑萍,杨顺林,杨玉皎,等. GA3和CPPU对无核翠宝葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报,2022,39(10):1834-1844.
[5]孙嘉茂,崔全石,王语晴,等. 苹果采前喷施EBR与MeJA对采后品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报,2022,49(10):2236-2248.
[6]程大伟,何莎莎,谷世超,等. GA3和TDZ对‘红艳无核’葡萄果实品质的影响[J］. 果树学报,2021,38(2):212-221.
[7]曹雄军,谢太理,张瑛,等. 植物生长调节剂对巨玫瑰葡萄夏果品质的影响［J］. 南方农业学报,2013,44(12):2049-2052.
[8]向丽霞,胡立盼,孟森,等. 叶面喷施亚精胺对高温胁迫下番茄叶绿素合成代谢的影响［J］. 西北植物学报,2020,40(5):846-851.
[9]MEHER, SHIVAKRISHNA P, ASHOK REDDY K. Effect of PEG-6000 imposed drought stress on RNA content,relative water content (RWC),and chlorophyll content in peanut leaves and roots［J］. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences,2018,25(2):285-289.
[10]林必博,王锋,周济铭. 亚精胺提高植物抗旱性作用机理的研究进展[J]. 贵州农业科学,2020,48(9):6-10.
[11]ASHRAF M, HARRIS P J C. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants[J]. Plant Science,2004, 166(1):3-16.
[12]余琦隆,韩莹琰,郝敬虹,等. 外源亚精胺对高温胁迫下生菜氮代谢的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2022,55(7):1399-1410.
[13]SHAN X, ZHOU H, SANG T,et al. Effects of exogenous spermidine on carbon and nitrogen metabolism in tomato seedlings under high temperature[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,2016,141(4):381-388.
[14]DONG L, LI L J, MENG Y, et al. Exogenous spermidine optimizes nitrogen metabolism and improves maize yield under drought stress conditions[J]. Agriculture,2022,12(8):1270.
[15]李秀,巩彪,徐坤. 外源亚精胺对高温胁迫下生姜叶片内源激素及叶绿体超微结构的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2015,48(1):120-129.
[16]CHI Z H,WANG Y Q,DENG Q X,et al. Endogenous phytohormones and the expression of flowering genes synergistically induce flowering in loquat[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2020,19(9):2247-2256.
[17]朱新卫,张辉,车凤斌,等. 亚精胺处理对小白杏货架期品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报,2013,36(3):241-244.
[18]苏杨映兰. 多胺与植物生长调节剂对梨果实和花芽发育的影响[D]. 扬州:扬州大学,2015.
[19]汪开拓,雷长毅,韦盼盼,等. 亚精胺处理对桃果实贮藏品质及内源乙烯和多胺代谢的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2020,46(10):92-99,117.
[20]黎冰. 氮素形态对赤霞珠葡萄氮代谢和蔗糖代谢调控机制的研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.
[21]梁剑光,朱玲,徐正军. 靛酚蓝-分光光度法测定发酵液中氨态氮含量研究[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2006(9):134-137.
[22]李慧,丛郁,常有宏,等. 豆梨NADH型硝酸还原酶基因克隆、表达及酶活性分析[J]. 果树学报,2014,31(5):760-768.
[23]马宗桓,陈佰鸿,毛娟,等. 施氮时期对酿酒葡萄叶片氮代谢酶及相关基因表达的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2018,38(2):298-306.
[24]赵鹏,何建国,熊淑萍,等. 氮素形态对专用小麦旗叶酶活性及籽粒蛋白质和产量的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报,2010,15(3):29-34.
[25]王小纯,熊淑萍,马新明,等. 不同形态氮素对专用型小麦花后氮代谢关键酶活性及籽粒蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 生态学报,2005(4):802-807.
[26]马宗桓,毛娟,魏居灿,等. 施氮时期对葡萄叶片光合生理及内源激素水平的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(5):86-93.
[27]王玉倩,张娜,黄建全,等. 生长调节剂对‘天工墨玉’葡萄果实品质的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒,2021(4):58-62.
[28]耿娜娜,李学英,顾丁,等. Folin-Denis分光光度法测定五倍子中单宁酸的含量[J]. 安徽农业科学,2013,41(29):11848-11850,11915.
[29]王洪丽,张彧,韩洋,等. Folin-Ciocalteu比色法测定未成熟黄瓜中的总酚含量[J]. 食品工业,2015,36(9):262-266.
[30]刘晓涵,陈永刚,林励,等. 蒽酮硫酸法与苯酚硫酸法测定枸杞子中多糖含量的比较[J]. 食品科技,2009,34(9):270-272.
[31]贺雅娟,马宗桓,韦霞霞,等. 黄土高原旱塬区不同品种苹果果实糖及有机酸含量比较分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2021,42(10):248-254.
[32]李彦彪,马维峰,贾进,等. 河西走廊不同产地‘赤霞珠’酿酒葡萄果实品质评价[J]. 西北植物学报,2021,41(5):817-827.
[33]张一龙,李雯,喻启坤,等. 狗牙根叶与根氮代谢对不同干旱胁迫的响应机制[J]. 草业学报,2023,32(7):175-187.
[34]GU J F, LI Z K, MAO Y Q,et al. Roles of nitrogen and cytokinin signals in root and shoot communications in maximizing of plant productivity and their agronomic applications[J]. Plant Science,2018,274:320-331.
[35]ZHANG Y, HU X H, SHI Y,et al. Beneficial role of exogenous spermidine on nitrogen metabolism in tomato seedlings exposed to saline-alkaline stress[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,2013,138(1):38-49.
[36]熊淑萍,吴克远,王小纯,等. 不同氮效率小麦品种苗期根系氮代谢及其吸收能力差异分析[J]. 麦类作物学报,2016,36(3):325-331.
[37]李丽杰. 外源亚精胺(Spd)对玉米干旱胁迫的缓解效应及调控机理[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2019.
[38]王新磊,吕新芳. 氮代谢参与植物逆境抵抗的作用机理研究进展[J]. 广西植物,2020,40(4):583-591.
[39]白志刚,张均华,黄洁,等. 氮肥运筹对水稻氮代谢及稻田土壤氮素迁移转化的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2018,37(11):3440-3448.

[40]樊丁宇,赵婧彤,阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提,等. 喷施赤霉素对骏枣叶片发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报,2021,30(8):1199-1209.

[41]LI J J, LIU B Y, LI X Y, et al. Exogenous abscisic acid mediates berry quality improvement by altered endogenous plant hormones level in ‘Ruiduhongyu’ grapevine[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2021,12:739964.

[42]朱燕,魏佳,许自龙,等. 促生长植物激素对桑树叶片衰老过程生理生化指标的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报,2023,35(6):1278-1285.

[43]王海波,王帅,王孝娣,等. 6-BA及氨基酸硒对葡萄叶片衰老的影响[J]. 果树学报,2017,34(11):1426-1434.

[44]杜兴良. 外源亚精胺对烤烟成熟期上部叶衰老特性及品质的影响[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学,2021.

[45]李淑红,王磊,史文婷,等. 不同营养液浓度对‘巨峰’葡萄生长发育和果实品质的影响[J]. 西北农业学报,2018,27(3):394-401.

[46]周江,张辉,吴斌,等. 亚精胺处理对无核白葡萄贮藏品质的影响[J]. 保鲜与加工,2015,15(4):17-20.

[47]朱新卫. 精胺、亚精胺对杏果采后品质及生理效应的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2014.

[48]撒晓梅,李明. 不同施肥处理对酿酒葡萄浆果品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2023(6):26-33.

[49]魏烈权,卢世雄,马宗桓,等. 基于主成分分析法的嘉峪关10种酿酒葡萄品种品质评价[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2020,55(3):90-96.
[50]AMAN U M, ZORA S. Improved fruit retention, yield and fruit quality in mango with exogenous application of polyamines[J]. Scientia Horticulturae,2006,110(2):167-174.
[51]王舒,董庆苓,胡潇,等. 樱桃品种对樱桃酒品质及生物胺含量的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2017，43(8):81-85.
[52]曹炜玉,路文鹏,舒楠,等. 葡萄酒风味物质及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 中国酿造,2022,41(5):1-7.
[53]张扬,彭晶晶,李坤一,等. 发酵前添加有机酸对西拉红葡萄酒颜色和感官质量的影响[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2023,49(7):90-98.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐港明,符杏,丰华,等.多胺对大豆下胚轴不定根中二胺氧化酶基因表达和酶活性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1237.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.007]
　XU Gang-ming,FU Xing,FENG Hua,et al.Changes of diamine oxidase gene expression and enzyme activity during regeneration of soybean hypocotyl adventitious roots promoted by exogenous polyamines[J].,2016,(08):1237.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.007]
[2]金鑫,王宇航,李斗,等.外源亚精胺对雷司令葡萄果实香气成分的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(08):1747.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.08.015]
　JIN Xin,WANG Yu-hang,LI Dou,et al.Effects of exogenous spermidine on aroma components of Riesling grape berries[J].,2023,(08):1747.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.08.015]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-11-08基金项目:甘肃省科技计划项目(21CX6NA080);甘肃省科技重大专项(18ZD2NA006-4)作者简介:李斗(1997-),男,甘肃永昌人,硕士,主要从事果树栽培技术与生理研究。(E-mail)1976348148@qq.com通讯作者:杨江山,(E-mail)yangjs@gsau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-18