[1]师杨杰,靳红梅,管益东,等.生物腐殖酸对番茄产量、品质和土壤养分含量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(08):1739-1746.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.08.014]
　SHI Yang-jie,JIN Hong-mei,GUAN Yi-dong,et al.Effects of biological humic acid on tomato yield, quality and soil nutrient content[J].,2023,(08):1739-1746.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.08.014]
点击复制

生物腐殖酸对番茄产量、品质和土壤养分含量的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年08期
页码:
1739-1746
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2023-12-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of biological humic acid on tomato yield, quality and soil nutrient content
作者:
师杨杰1; 2; 靳红梅2; 3; 管益东1; 盛良全4; 朱燕云2; 3; 朱宁2; 3
(1.南京信息工程大学环境科学与工程学院,江苏南京210044；2.江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,江苏南京210014；3.江苏省有机固体废弃物资源化协同创新中心,江苏南京210095；4.阜阳师范大学,安徽阜阳236037)
Author(s):
SHI Yang-jie1; 2; JIN Hong-mei2; 3; GUAN Yi-dong1; SHENG Liang-quan4; ZHU Yan-yun2; 3; ZHU Ning2; 3
(1.School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;2.Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;3.Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Organic Solid Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing 210095, China；4.Fuyang Normal University, Fuyang 236037, China)
关键词:
番茄; 生物腐殖酸; 施用水平; 产量; 品质
Keywords:
tomato; biological humic acid; application level; yield; quality
分类号:
S641.2
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.08.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探明生物腐殖酸对番茄植株生长性状、果实产量和品质及土壤养分含量的影响,本研究以金陵露比番茄品种为试验材料,设置3个处理:对照、每株根施生物腐殖酸37.5 mg、每株根施生物腐殖酸150.0 mg。结果表明,根施生物腐殖酸可以显著促进番茄植株生长,明显改善果实品质,当生物腐殖酸施用水平为每株150.0 mg时,番茄部分生长性状指标、产量和品质指标(番茄红素含量除外)最佳。与对照相比,生物腐殖酸施用量为每株150.0 mg时,番茄植株的株高、茎粗、SPAD值显著提高,果实单株产量、单位面积产量明显提升,果实维生素C含量、可溶性糖含量、可溶性蛋白含量显著增加。生物腐殖酸施用对总氮、速效磷、有效钾、有机质等土壤养分含量无显著影响。综合考虑各项指标,每株根施生物腐殖酸150.0 mg对番茄植株生长和果实发育促进效果最显著。
Abstract:
To explore the effects of biological humic acid (BHA) on tomato plant growth characteristics, fruit yield and quality, and nutrient content of soil, this study used Jinling Ruby tomato as the experimental material, and set up three treatments: control, root application of BHA at 37.5 mg per plant, root application of BHA at 150.0 mg per plant. The results showed that root application of BHA could significantly promote tomato plant growth and improve fruit quality. When the application level of BHA was 150.0 mg per plant, the indices of some growth traits, yield and quality indices (except lycopene content) of tomato were the best. Compared with the control, the plant height, stem diameter and SPAD value at 150.0 mg per plant application level were significantly improved, the fruit weight per plant and the yield per square meter were significantly improved, and the contents of vitamin C, soluble sugar and soluble protein in fruits were significantly increased. The application of BHA had no significant effect on the content of soil nutrients such as total nitrogen, available phosphorus, available potassium and organic matter. Taking all indicators into account, root application of 150.0 mg BHA per plant had the most significant effect on promoting the growth of tomato plant and fruit development.

参考文献/References:

[1]王归鹏,王文元,袁泽南,等. 全有机营养栽培对樱桃番茄养分吸收、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2022(10):128-137.
[2]李红斌,陈建,章斌. 有机微生物复合肥对连作樱桃番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 园艺与种苗,2022,42(10):23-24.
[3]MIRIAM D, STEINGSS C B, CHERUBINO L, et al. Effects of a plant-derived biostimulant application on quality and functional traits of greenhouse cherry tomato cultivars[J]. Food Research International,2022,157:11218.
[4]GAO F C, LI H J, MU X G, et al. Effects of organic fertilizer application on tomato yield and quality: a meta-analysis[J]. Applied Sciences,2023,13(4):2184.
[5]JUDITH S, PETER B, KARSTEN K, et al. Molecular features of humic acids and fulvic acids from contrasting environments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(3):1330-1339.
[6]MILNE C J, KINNIBURGH D G, VAN R W H, et al. Generic NICA-Donnan model parameters for metal-ion binding by humic substances[J]. Environmental Science &Amp; Technology,2003,37(5):958-971.
[7]孙向春,冯涛,殷晓燕,等. 腐植酸对土壤理化性质及洋葱产量的影响[J]. 蔬菜,2022(2):27-31.
[8]宋挚,郭新送,范仲卿,等. 腐植酸等碳替代有机肥对葡萄产量、品质及土壤养分的影响[J]. 华北农学报,2022,37(3):158-167.
[9]JIANYUAN J, SHUIQIN Z, LIANG Y, et al. Combining humic acid with phosphate fertilizer affects humic acid structure and its stimulating efficacy on the growth and nutrient uptake of maize seedlings[J]. Scientific Reports,2020,10(1):17502.
[10]周丽平,袁亮,赵秉强,等. 不同分子量风化煤腐殖酸对玉米植株主要代谢物的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2019,25(1):142-148.
[11]邓爱妮,罗金辉,苏初连,等. 碱性含腐植酸营养液对樱桃番茄产质量影响及其改土效果[J]. 南方农业学报,2021,52(5):1282-1290.
[12]GERKE J. Concepts and misconceptions of humic substances as the stable part of soil organic matter: a review[J]. Agronomy,2018,8(5):76.
[13]曾维爱,曾敏,周航,等. 腐植酸和硫酸铁配施改良偏碱烟田土壤的研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2013,27(3):170-173.
[14]上海市环境监测中心. 水质总氮的测定碱性过硫酸钾消解紫外分光光度法:HJ 636-2012[S]. 北京:环境保护部,2012:1-14.
[15]北京市环保监测中心,上海市环境监测中心. 水质 总磷的测定 钼酸铵分光光度法:GB/T 11893-1989[S]. 北京:国家技术监督局,1989:1-8.
[16]国际标准化组织. 水质钠和钾的测定第1部分原子吸收光谱法测定钠:ISO 9964-1-1993[S]. 日内瓦:国际标准化组织,1993:1-4.
[17]北京国家化肥质量监督检验中心. 水溶肥料游离氨基酸含量的测定:NY/T 1975-2010[S]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2010:1-7.
[18]张述伟,宗营杰,方春燕,等. 蒽酮比色法快速测定大麦叶片中可溶性糖含量的优化[J]. 食品研究与开发,2020,41(7):196-200.
[19]北京国家化肥质量监督检验中心,济南农业部肥料质量监督检验测试中心. 水溶肥料 钙、镁、硫、氯含量的测定:NY/T 1117-2010[S]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2010:1-14.
[20]高继国,郭春绒. 普通生物化学教程实验指导[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社,2009.
[21]高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
[22]上海市质量监督检验技术研究院. 番茄制品中番茄红素、叶黄素、胡萝卜素含量的测定 超高效液相色谱法:GB/T 41133-2022[S]. 北京:国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会,2022:1-12.
[23]鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
[24]周朱梦. 尾菜水热处理条件优化及其液相产物中腐殖酸特性研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2021.
[25]刘秋梅,陈兴,孟晓慧,等. 新型木霉氨基酸有机肥研制及其对番茄的促生效果[J]. 应用生态学报,2017,28(10):3314-3322.
[26]YANY X, ZHANG Y J, GAO J L, et al. Intracellular and extracellular sources, transformation process and resource recovery value of proteins extracted from wastewater treatment sludge via alkaline thermal hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis[J]. The Science of the Total Environment,2022,852:158512.
[27] SUTIVISEDSAK N, LEATHERS T D, NUNNALLY M S, et al. Production of the bioactive polysaccharide Schizophyllan from renewable cellulosic materials[J]. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society,2012,244:7727.
[28]孔令冉,董雯昕,杨天一,等. 腐植酸在改良和培肥土壤中的作用[J]. 腐植酸,2019(1):7-12.
[29]刘艳,唐亚福,杨越超,等. 大颗粒活化腐植酸肥对苹果土壤团聚体和有机碳的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(4):1021-1026.
[30]侯献飞,苗昊翠,李强,等. 腐植酸水溶肥对花生生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学,2022,59(7):1598-1605.
[31]陈倩,李秉毓,张鑫,等. 腐植酸分次施用明显提高富士苹果产量、品质和氮素利用率[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(4):757-764.
[32]高原,郭晓青,李福德,等. 基施黄腐酸肥料情况下减施化肥提高设施辣椒产量和品质[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(3):594-602.
[33]王云赫,范仲卿,郭新送,等. 腐植酸对不同筋度小麦品种生长特性、产量和品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2022,42(10):1240-1246.
[34] CALVO P, NELSON L, KLOEPPER J W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants[J]. Plant and Soil,2014,383(1/2):3-41.
[35]DE H D, MARTA F, VICTORIA F, et al. Discriminating the short-term action of root and foliar application of humic acids on plant growth: emerging role of jasmonic acid[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2020,11:493.
[36]侯晓娜. 黄腐酸和聚天冬氨酸对蔬菜氮素吸收及肥料氮转化的影响[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2013.
[37]张玲. 黄腐酸和甜菜碱对苹果抗旱生理及果实产量品质的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2016.
[38]丁守鹏,张国新,姚玉涛,等. 腐植酸肥料对滨海盐碱地土壤性状及番茄生长和品质的影响[J]. 河北农业科学,2021,25(6):65-70.
[39]周 丽,高进华,解学仕,等. 含腐植酸土壤调理剂对酸性土壤改良苹果产量及品质的影响[J]. 腐植酸,2022(4):47-51.
[40]WANG J W, ZHANG J, LI J, et al. Exogenous application of 5-aminolevulinic acid promotes coloration and improves the quality of tomato fruit by regulating carotenoid metabolism[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2021,12:683868.
[41]金宁,肖雪梅,郁继华,等. 不同品种番茄果实矿质元素含量评价[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2020,55(4):76-84.
[42]COLPAS-CASTILLO F, DUNOYER A T, CAMARGO J M. Agricultural soils strengthening employing humic acids and its effect on plant growth chilli pepper and eggplant[J]. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture,2018,30(11):941-945.
[43]YANAN L. Research progress of humic acid fertilizer on the soil[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series,2020,1549(2):022004.
[44]黄占斌,郝文静,冯泽珅,等. 腐植酸在土壤改良和污染修复中的应用现状及研究展望[J]. 水土保持通报,2022,42(2):354-361.
[45]李夏雯,卢树昌. 调理剂对旱直播稻土壤物理性状、氮素吸收与迁移的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(22):216-222.
[46]范琼,冯剑,邹冬梅,等. 碱性液体肥对树仔菜-土壤重金属生物有效性及积累迁移的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2022,53(12):3336-3345.
[47]雷菲,王莉,刘海林,等. 腐殖酸缓释氮肥对糯玉米产量、氮肥利用率及土壤细菌多样性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(17):271-275.
[48]卜晓莉,姬慧娟,马青林,等. 生物炭-泥炭复合基质对马缨杜鹃生长和生理的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报,2021,30(5):58-68.
[49]王彩虹,郝水源. 长期施用腐殖酸复合微生物肥对小麦生长及产量的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(7):100-105.
[50] 孙海燕,孙义卓,周娈,等. 化肥减量配施腐植酸生物肥对土壤生物学性质和玉米干物质量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(3):677-684.
[51]HU Y W, LI Q K, SONG C J, et al. Effect of humic acid combined with fertilized on the improvement of saline-alkali land and cotton growth[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research,2021(2):1279-1294.
[52]郝翔翔,邹文秀,韩晓增. 长期不同利用方式对黑土剖面中有机质化学组成的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2022,59(5):1228-1237
[53] LI Y, FANG F, WEI J L, et al. Humic acid fertilizer improved soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut: a three-year experiment[J]. Scientific Reports,2019,9(1):12094.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵丽萍,李永灿,赵统敏,等.灰霉菌毒素诱导番茄抗性突变体及相关防御酶活性[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(03):631.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.03.023]
　ZHAO Li-ping,LI Yong-can,ZHAO Tong-min,et al.Resistant mutant induced by toxin of Botrytis cinerea in tomato and the activities of related defensive enzymes[J].,2016,(08):631.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.03.023]
[2]李亚茹,王银磊,赵丽萍,等.番茄ty-5和 Mi-1基因多重 PCR 体系的建立[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):869.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.024]
　LI Ya-ru,WANG Yin-lei,ZHAO Li-ping,et al.Identification of ty-5 gene and Mi-1 gene by multiplex PCR in tomato[J].,2016,(08):869.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.024]
[3]吕敏,苏建坤,白和盛,等.桃蚜取食和机械损伤对番茄和辣椒 PAL、LOX 和 PPO 活性的诱导作用[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1273.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.013]
　Lv?Min,SU Jian-kun,BAI He-sheng,et al.The activities of PAL, LOX and PPO in tomato and pepper plants induced by aphid herbivory and mechanical damage[J].,2016,(08):1273.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.013]
[4]姜静,王银磊,赵丽萍,等.番茄qRT-PCR内参基因的筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(02):389.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.024]
　JIANG Jing,WANG Yin-lei,ZHAO Li-ping,et al.Selection of tomato reference genes for qRT-PCR[J].,2017,(08):389.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.024]
[5]罗伟君,唐琳,周佳丽,等.纳米锌肥对番茄果实锌含量与品质的强化[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.028 ]
　LUO Wei-jun,TANG Lin,ZHOU Jia-li,et al.Improvement of zinc concentration and quality of tomato fruit by nano zinc fertilizer[J].,2016,(08):184.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.028 ]
[6]乔俊卿,陈志谊,梁雪杰,等.枯草芽孢杆菌Bs916在番茄根部的定殖[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(06):1278.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.013]
　QIAO Jun-qing,CHEN Zhi-yi,LIANG Xue-jie,et al.Colonization of Bacillus subtilis Bs916 on tomato root[J].,2015,(08):1278.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.013]
[7]翟亚明,魏丽萍,杨倩.不同调控方式对设施盐渍化土壤特性和番茄产量及品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(04):871.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.025]
　ZHAI Ya-ming,WEI Li-ping,YANG Qian.Effects of regulatory measures on characters of greenhouse saline soil and tomato yield and quality[J].,2015,(08):871.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.025]
[8]杨玛丽,赵统敏,余文贵,等.转基因 RNAi 技术在番茄研究中的应用[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(01):217.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.034]
　YANG Ma-li,ZHAO Tong-min,YU Wen-gui,et al.Progress in RNA interference technique applied in tomato[J].,2015,(08):217.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.034]
[9]唐玉新,曲萍,陆岱鹏,等.适合机械化移栽的番茄穴盘育苗基质配方筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(06):1342.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.021]
　TANG Yu-xin,QU Ping,LU Dai-peng,et al.Screening of tomato plug seedling substrates proportion suitable for mechanized transplanting[J].,2017,(08):1342.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.021]
[10]姜静,王银磊,李亚茹,等.江苏省及其他地区番茄黄化曲叶病毒的分子鉴定及序列分析[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(01):238.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.035]
　JIANG Jing,WANG Yin-lei,LI Ya-ru,et al.Molecular identification and sequence analysis of tomato yellow leaf curl virus in Jiangsu province and its peripheral area[J].,2018,(08):238.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.01.035]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-12-21基金项目:江苏省重点研发计划社会发展项目(BE2022788)；江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(20)1011]作者简介:师杨杰(1998-),女,河南开封人,硕士研究生,研究方向为有机废弃物高效转化与利用。(E-mail)20201248130@nuist.edu.cn通讯作者:朱宁,(E-mail)ning.zhu@jaas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-01-15