[1]曹荣荣,刘旭,徐英杰,等.滨海盐碱地棉花铃期冠层空间分布对光合生产的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(04):821-827.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.003]
 CAO Rong-rong,LIU Xu,XU Ying-jie,et al.Effects of canopy space distribution on photosynthetic production of cotton during boll period in coastal saline-alkali area in China[J].,2020,(04):821-827.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.003]
点击复制

滨海盐碱地棉花铃期冠层空间分布对光合生产的影响()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年04期
页码:
821-827
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2020-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of canopy space distribution on photosynthetic production of cotton during boll period in coastal saline-alkali area in China
作者:
曹荣荣12刘旭1徐英杰2张谦1梁青龙1王燕1冯国艺1祁虹1
(1.河北省农林科学院棉花研究所,农业部黄淮海半干旱区棉花生物学与遗传育种重点实验室,河北石家庄050051;2.河北省遵化市农业农村局,河北唐山064200)
Author(s):
CAO Rong-rong12LIU Xu1XU Ying-jie2ZHANG Qian1LIANG Qing-long1WANG Yan1FENG Guo-yi1QI Hong1
(1.Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Cotton in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture, Cotton Research Institute, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050051, China;2.Bureau of Agriculture and Country in Zunhua of Hebei Province, Tangshan 064200, China)
关键词:
棉花滨海盐碱地产量冠层光合生产
Keywords:
cottoncoastal saline-alkali areayieldcanopyphotosynthetic production
分类号:
S562.01
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为分析滨海盐碱地不同盐碱程度棉田棉花铃期冠层结构空间分布特点及其对棉花光合生产和产量的影响,2015-2016年在河北省国营海兴农场重度盐碱棉田(5.0~10.0 g/kg)、中度盐碱棉田(3.0~5.0 g/kg)和轻度盐碱棉田(3.0 g/kg以下)开展试验,以冀棉228为材料在铃期测定冠层结构、光合特性以及物质积累的空间分布情况,并进行产量及其构成因子测定。结果表明,在3类盐碱程度棉田中,冠层结构指标及光合生产指标重度棉田除中上层冠层开度最大外,其他指标均最小。中度盐碱棉田较轻度盐碱棉田除叶倾角和冠层开度上中层较小、下层较大外,其他指标均为上层较大,中下层较小。各层源器官光合物质积累明显高于库器官。轻度盐碱棉田棉花光合物质积累量最大。叶面积、光分布和源库比的上、中、下冠层比例重度棉田分别为1.7∶1.5∶1.0、3.6∶3.6∶1.0和3.2∶2.8∶1.7,中度盐碱棉田棉花分别为3.2∶2.2∶1.0、5.3∶5.3∶1.0和5.3∶2.7∶1.6,轻度盐碱棉田棉花分别为1.6∶1.4∶1.0、2.2∶2.2∶1.0和2.3∶2.1∶2.0;群体光合速率上、中、下冠层比例重度盐碱棉田棉花和中度盐碱棉田棉花为2.5∶2.5∶1.0,轻度盐碱棉田棉花为2.2∶2.2∶1.0;光合物质积累量上、中、下冠层比例重度盐碱棉田棉花和轻度盐碱棉田棉花为1.3∶1.3∶1.0,中度盐碱棉田棉花为1.6∶1.6∶1.0。2年平均皮棉产量轻度、中度、重度盐碱棉田分别超过1 200 kg/hm2、900 kg/hm2和600 kg/hm2。因此,滨海盐碱地种植棉花应根据不同盐碱程度调整栽培措施,重度盐碱棉田应当加强抑盐等相关农艺措施,中度盐碱棉田应加强棉花生育前期的水肥调控,轻度盐碱棉田可开展优质高效生产措施。
Abstract:
To analyze the effects of the spatial distribution of canopy structure on photosynthetic production during boll period and cotton yield in cotton field with different saline-alkali degrees in coastal saline-alkali area, the experiment was conducted in state-run Haixing in Hebei province farm during 2015-2016. Cotton cultivar Jimian 228 was planted in heavy saline-alkali field (5.0-10.0 g/kg), moderate saline-alkali field (3.0-5.0 g/kg) and mild saline-alkali field(below 3.0 g/kg). The spatial distribution of canopy structure, photosynthetic characteristics and canopy photosynthetic and matter accumulation were measured in this experiment. The yield and its component factors of cotton were also measured. The results showed that the canopy structure index and photosynthetic production index of cotton in heavy saline-alkali field were the smallest except for the canopy openness in upper and middle canopy. In the mild and moderate saline-alkali fields the leaf angle and canopy openness were smaller in upper and middle layers and larger in the lower layer. The accumulation of photosynthetic matter IN source organs was significantly higher than that in sink organs at all layers. The accumulation of photosynthetic matter was the largest in mild saline-alkali cotton field. The ratios of leaf area, light distribution and source/sink in the upper, middle and lower canopy were 1.7∶1.5∶1.0, 3.6∶3.6∶1.0 and 3.2∶2.8∶1.7 in heavy saline-alkali cotton field, 3.2∶2.2∶1.0, 5.3∶5.3∶1.0 and 5.3∶2.7∶1.6 in the moderate saline-alkali cotton field, and 1.6∶1.4∶1.0, 2.2∶2.2∶1.0 and 2.3∶2.1∶2.0 in the mild saline-alkali cotton field. The ratio of photosynthetic rate in the upper, middle and lower canopy was 2.5∶2.5∶1.0 in the heavy and moderate saline-alkali cotton fields, and 2.2∶2.2∶1.0 in the mild saline-alkali cotton field. The ratio of photosynthetic matter accumulation in the upper, middle and lower canopy was 1.3∶1.3∶1.0 in the heavy and mild saline-alkali cotton fields, and 1.6∶1.6∶1.0 in the moderate saline-alkali cotton field. In 2015 and 2016, the average lint yield in mild, moderate and heavy saline-alkali cotton fields exceeded 1 200 kg/hm2, 900 kg/hm2 and 600 kg/hm2, respectively. In conclusion, the cultivation measures should be adjusted according to different saline-alkali levels in the coastal saline-alkali area. The salt suppression and other related agronomic measures should be strengthened in heavy saline-alkali cotton field, the water and fertilizer regulation should be strengthened in moderate saline-alkali cotton field at early growth stage of cotton, and high quality and efficient production measures should be carried out in mild saline-alkali cotton field.

参考文献/References:

[1]杨劲松. 中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 837-845.
[2]董合忠. 盐碱地棉花栽培学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[3]郭军,任国玉,李明财. 近47年环渤海地区不同级别降水事件变化[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(12): 2271-2280.
[4]RENGASAAMY P. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2010, 37(7): 613-620.
[5]WANG J C, YAO L R, LI B C, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of cultured suspension cells of the halophyte Halogeton glomeratus by iTRAQ provides insights into response mechanisms to salt stress[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7(30): 1-12.
[6]喻树迅. 我国棉花生产现状与发展趋势[J]. 中国工程科学, 2013, 15(4): 9-13.
[7]KAO W Y, TASI T T, TASI H C. Response of three glyeine species to salt stress[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2006, 56: 120-125.
[8]杨淑萍,危常州,梁永超. 盐胁迫对不同基因型海岛棉光合作用及荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43: 1585-1593.
[9]冯国艺,张谦,王树林,等. 秸秆还田对滨海盐碱地棉苗光合特性及生长的影响[J], 棉花学报, 2015, 27(3): 248-253.
[10]DONG H Z, LI W J, ENEJI A E, et al. Nitrogen rate and plant density effects on yield and late-season leaf senescence of cotton raised on a saline field[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012, 126(1): 137-144.
[11]FENG G Y, GAN X X, YAO Y D, et al. Comparisons of photosynthetic characteristics in relation to lint yield among F1 hybrids, their F2 descendants and parental lines of cotton[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2014, 13(9): 1909-1920.
[12]YAO H S, ZHANG Y L, YI X P, et al. Cotton responds to different plant population densities by adjusting specific leaf area to optimize canopy photosynthetic use efficiency of light and nitrogen[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 188: 10-16.
[13]陈源,王永慧,肖健,等. 高品质陆地棉棉铃发育特点[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(8): 1371-1376.
[14]READ J J, REDDY K R, JENKINS J N. Yield and fiber quality of upland cotton as influenced by nitrogen and potassium nutrition[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2006, 24(3): 282-290.
[15]冯国艺,罗宏海,姚炎帝,等. 新疆超高产棉花叶、铃空间分布及与群体光合生产的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(13): 2607-2617.
[16]MATTERA J, ROMERO L A, CUATRN A L, et al. Yield components,light interception and radiation use efficiency of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) in response to row spacing[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2013, 45: 87-95.
[17]FENG G Y, LUO H H, ZHANG Y L, et al. Relationship between plant canopy characteristics and photosynthetic productivity in diverse cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. The Crop Joural, 2016, 4(6): 499-508.
[18]RENGASAAMY P. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils[J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2010, 37(7): 613-620.
[19]WANG J C, YAO L R, LI B C, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of cultured suspension cells of the halophyte Halogeton glomeratus by iTRAQ provides insights into response mechanisms to salt stress[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7(30): 1-12.
[20]冯国艺,张谦,祁虹,等. 滨海盐碱地水盐时空变化特征及对棉花光合生产的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(4): 1012-1022.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵亮,狄佳春,陈旭升.棉花基因组数据库中CPS&KS 基因的查找与分析[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.004 ]
 ZHAO Liang,DI Jia-chun,CEHN Xu-sheng.Analysis of ent-copalyl diphosphate aynthase and ent-kaurene synthase (CPS&KS) gene family in cotton genome databases[J].,2016,(04):27.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.004 ]
[2]赵君,刘剑光,吴巧娟,等.棉花种质种仁含油量测定及其遗传多样性分析[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(05):975.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.006]
 ZHAO Jun,LIU Jian-guang,WU Qiao-juan,et al.Kernel oil content and genetic diversity of upland cotton germplasm[J].,2015,(04):975.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.05.006]
[3]杨长琴,刘瑞显,张国伟,等.花铃期干旱对棉纤维素累积及纤维比强度的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(06):1218.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.005]
 YANG Chang-qin,LIU Rui-xian,ZHANG Guo-wei,et al.Cellulose accumulation and fiber strength affected by drought during flowering and bolling stage in cotton[J].,2015,(04):1218.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.06.005]
[4]杨长琴,刘瑞显,张国伟,等.花铃期渍水对棉铃对位叶光合速率、物质累积及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(04):732.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.004]
 YANG Chang-qin,LIU Rui-xian,ZHANG Guo-wei,et al.Photosynthesis of subtending leaves of bolls, dry matter accumulation and cotton yield in response to waterlogging during flowering and boll-forming stage[J].,2015,(04):732.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.04.004]
[5]刘雅辉,王秀萍,鲁雪林,等.棉花耐盐相关序列扩增多态性(SRAP)分子标记筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(03):484.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.03.003]
 LIU Ya-hui,WANG Xiu-ping,LU Xue-lin,et al.Selection of sequence-related amplified polymorphism molecular marker associated with salt tolerance of cotton[J].,2015,(04):484.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.03.003]
[6]王为,叶泗洪,潘宗瑾,等.棉花分子标记冗余性检测与评价的方法[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(02):247.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.004]
 WANG Wei,YE Si-hong,PAN Zong-jin,et al.An approach to detecting and evaluating molecular marker redundancy in cotton[J].,2015,(04):247.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.004]
[7]郭琪,徐珍珍,黄芳,等.棉花HKT基因家族的全基因组分析[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(05):975.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.003]
 GUO Qi,XU Zhen-zhen,HUANG Fang,et al.Genome-wide analysis of high-affinity potassium transporter gene family in cotton[J].,2017,(04):975.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.003]
[8]黄芳,徐珍珍,孟珊,等.盐胁迫下棉花LTR-反转座子的转录激活及在耐盐相关基因发掘中的应用[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(06):1220.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.004]
 HUANG Fang,XU Zhen-zhen,MENG Shan,et al.The identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTR-RTs) with transcription activity under salt stress and its application in screening the candidate genes related to salt-tolerant in cotton[J].,2017,(04):1220.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.004]
[9]徐剑文,孔杰,赵君,等.盐胁迫下棉花萌发、成苗和产量相关性状的QTL定位[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(05):972.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.002]
 XU Jian-wen,KONG-Jie,ZHAO Jun,et al.Identification of QTLs conferring the traits related to germination, seedling survival and production of cotton under salt stress[J].,2018,(04):972.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.002]
[10]韦陈华,邓国强,颜超,等.高密度重化控技术对小麦后直播棉花成铃时空分布的调控[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(05):1022.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.008]
 WEI Chen-hua,DENG Guo-qiang,YAN Chao,et al.Impact of high planting density with heavy chemical regulation technique on boll spatio-temporal distribution of cotton under direct seeding modes after wheat harvested[J].,2018,(04):1022.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.05.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2020-04-27基金项目:河北省自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(C2015301051); 河北省农林科学院现代农业科技创新工程项目(2019-2-7-1)作者简介:曹荣荣(1982-),女,河北遵化人,学士,农艺师,主要从事作物抗逆高产生理研究。(E-mail)zaipei@sohu.com。刘旭为共同第一作者。通讯作者:冯国艺,(E-mail) fgy_2010@sina.com。祁虹为共同通讯作者。
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-08