[1]王亚梁,朱德峰,陈惠哲,等.水稻叶龄变化对短日长的响应[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(02):265-270.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.002]
　WANG Ya-liang,ZHU De-feng,CHEN Hui-zhe,et al.Response of leaf age in rice to short day length[J].,2020,(02):265-270.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.002]
点击复制

水稻叶龄变化对短日长的响应()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
265-270
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2020-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Response of leaf age in rice to short day length
作者:
王亚梁; 朱德峰; 陈惠哲; 向镜; 张义凯; 徐一成; 张玉屏
（中国水稻研究所/水稻生物学国家重点实验室， 浙江杭州310006）
Author(s):
WANG Ya-liang; ZHU De-feng; CHEN Hui-zhe; XIANG Jing; ZHANG Yi-kai; XU Yi-cheng; ZHANG Yu-ping
(China National Rice Research Institute/State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Hangzhou 310006, China)
关键词:
水稻; 短日长; 叶龄; 品种差异
Keywords:
rice; short day length; leaf age; cultivar difference
分类号:
S511.01
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.02.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
光周期是影响水稻叶片数的重要环境因子。本研究利用盆栽试验研究了10 h短日长处理对水稻品种叶片数的影响。结果表明，对生产中主茎总叶片数14～17叶的水稻品种来说，除3叶期外，短日长处理不同程度减少水稻主茎总叶片数，7～9叶龄期对短日长最敏感，7叶期和9叶期短日长处理使水稻主茎总叶片数显著减少。7叶期短日处理，水稻主茎总叶片数减少幅度表现为：高短日长敏感型品种＞中短日长敏感型品种＞低短日长敏感型品种。短日长处理对所有品种穗分化期叶龄余数影响不大。在不同品种类型中，籼粳杂交稻对短日长响应最为敏感，短日长处理下籼粳杂交稻主茎叶片数下降幅度大于粳稻和籼稻。在同一亚种内不同品种对短日长响应的敏感性也存在差异。
Abstract:
Day length is an important environmental factor affecting the number of rice leaves. In this study, the effects of 10 hours short day treatment on the number of rice leaves were studied by pot experiment. The results showed that, except for the 3-leaf stage, the final main-stem leaf number of rice with14-17 leaves was reduced under short day length treatment. Moreover, the final main-stem leaf number was significantly decreased under the shortday length treatment at 7-leaf stage abd 9-leaf stage. The reduction of final main-stem leaf number after short day length treatment at the 7-leaf stage of rice presented the tendency as follows: high short-day sensitive cultivars > medium short-day sensitive cultivars > low short-day sensitive cultivars. The short-day length did not influence the leaf age remainder at panicle initiation stage of every rice cultivar. For different subspecies, indica-japonica hybrid rice was most sensitive to short day length treatment. In addition, the reduction of final main-stem leaf number of indica-japonica hybrid rice was higher than that of japonica rice and indica rice under short day length treatment. In conclusion, the sensitivity of different varieties in the same subspecies to short day length is different.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈峰，赵庆雷，尹秀波，等. 山东省直播稻的发展现状及对策[J]. 山东农业科学，2018,50(5):156-159.
[2]陈波,周年兵,郭保卫,等. 南方稻区“籼改粳”研究进展[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 38(1) :67-72.
[3]龚金龙,邢志鹏,胡雅杰,等. “籼改粳”的相对优势及生产发展对策[J]. 中国稻米, 2013, 19(5): 1-6.
[4]凌启鸿,苏祖芳,张洪程,等.水稻品种不同生育类型的叶龄模式[J]. 中国农业科学, 1983, 16(1): 9-18.
[5]松岛省三. 稻作的理论与技术[M]. 庞城，译. 北京:农业出版社，1966: 121-133.
[6]BROOKING I R, JAMIESON P D, PORTER J R. The influence of daylength on final leaf number in spring wheat[J]. Field Crops Research, 1995, 41: 155-165.
[7]RIGGI E, SCORDIA D, CUZZOLA C F, et al. Leaf appearance rate and final main stem leaf number as affected by temperature and photoperiod in cereals grown in Mediterranean environment[J]. Italian Journal of Agronomy, 2017, 12(3):183-191.
[8]LEE C, LEE B, SHIN J, et al. Heading date and final leaf number as affected by sowing date and prediction of heading date based on leaf appearance model in rice[J]. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 2001, 46: 195-201.
[9]冯阳春,魏广彬,李刚华,等. 水稻主茎出叶动态模拟研究[J]. 中国农业科学，2009，42(4), 1172-1180.
[10]叶宏宝,孟亚利,汤亮,等.水稻叶龄与叶面积指数动态的模拟研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(6): 625-630.
[11]朱德峰,章秀福,许立,等. 水稻主茎叶片出生与温度关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 1998, 17(5): 71-73.
[12]唐锡华,倪彭寿,童本仙,等. 在控制条件下对不同稻种日长和温度反应发育特性的研究[J]. 植物生理学报, 1978 (4): 153-168.
[13]YIN X Y, KROPFF M J, YNALVEZ M A. Photoperiodically sensitive and insensitive phases of pre-flowering development in rice[J]. Crop Science, 1997, 37(1): 182-190.
[14]YABUTA S, HSKOYAMA S, INAFUKU S, et al. The photoperiodic sensitivity estimation at three growth phases of rice fractionated by turning point of leaf emergence and panicle initiation[J]. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 2015, 84(1): 64-68.
[15]孟亚利,曹卫星,周治国,等. 基于生长过程的水稻阶段发育与物候期模拟模型[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11): 1362-1367.
[16]NOGUCHI Y, NAKAJIMA T, YAMAGUCHI T. Studies on the control of flower bud formation by temperature and daylength in rice plants: IX. Aging effect in relation to photoperiodic induction[J]. Japanese Journal of Breeding, 1971, 21(2): 81-86.
[17]HAUN J R. Visual quantification of wheat development[J]. Agronomy Journal, 1973, 65: 116-119.
[18]YIN X Y, KROPFF M J. Use of the Beta function to quantify effects of photoperiod on flowering and leaf number in rice[J]. Agricultural & Forest Meteorology, 1996, 81: 217-228.
[19]唐锡华,李文安. 水稻光照发育阶段的研究Ⅱ.几种内外条件对水稻光照阶段发育的影响[J]. 作物学报, 1964, 3(3): 283-296.
[20]RITCHIE J T. Systems approaches for agricultural development[M]. Netherlands: Springer Nature,1993:77-93.
[21]韩天富,王金陵. 大豆开花后光周期反应的研究[J].植物学报, 1995,37(11): 863-869.
[22]ERMINI M L, MARIANI S, SCARANO S, et al. Rice crop duration and leaf appearance rate in a variable thermal environment. II. Comparison of genotypes[J]. Field Crops Research, 1998, 58: 129-140.
[23]ITOH J I, HASEGAWA A, KITANO H, et al. A recessive heterochronic mutation, plastochronl, shortens the plastochron and elongates the vegetative phase in rice[J]. The Plant Cell,1998, 10: 1511-1521.
[24]SALAM M A, MACKILL D J. Effects of a photoperiod sensitivity gene on morphological characters in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 1993，33:261-268.
[25]钟代彬,罗利军,梅捍卫,等. 水稻主茎总叶片数及其相关性状的QTL分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(1): 7-12.
[26]魏祥进,徐俊锋,江玲,等. 我国水稻主栽品种抽穗期多样性的遗传分析[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1):10-22.
[27]CHO L H, YOON J, PASRIGA R, et al. Homodimerization of Ehd1 is required to induce flowering in rice[J]. Plant Physiology, 2016,170: 2159-2171.
[28]KOMIYA R, IKEGAMI A, TAMAKI S, et al. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice[J]. Development, 2008, 135: 767-774.
[29]李开斌,张天春,阮文忠,等.超级粳稻楚粳27号的选育及应用[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(5): 71-72.

相似文献/References:

[1]王士磊,丁正权,黄海祥.水稻隐性早熟突变体ref早熟性的遗传分析和基因定位[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):721.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.001]
　WANG Shi-lei,DING Zheng-quan,HUANG Hai-xiang.Inheritance and gene mapping of recessive earliness in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J].,2016,(02):721.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.001]
[2]王在满,郑乐,张明华,等.不同播种方式对直播水稻倒伏指数和根系生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.002]
　WANG Zai-man,ZHENG Le,ZHANG Ming-hua,et al.Effects of seeding manners on lodging index and root growth of directseeded rice[J].,2016,(02):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.002]
[3]易能,薛延丰,石志琦,等.微囊藻毒素对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的胁迫作用[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):729.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.003]
　YI Neng,XUE Yan-feng,SHI Zhi-qi,et al.Inhibitory effect of microcystins on seed germination and seedling growth of rice[J].,2016,(02):729.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.003]
[4]刘凯,王爱民,严国红,等.一个水稻显性矮秆突变体的遗传特性与降株高能力[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):968.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.002]
　LIU Kai,WANG Ai-min,YAN Guo-hong,et al.Genetic analysis and plant height reduction of a dominant dwarf mutant of rice[J].,2016,(02):968.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.002]
[5]王红,杨镇,裴文琪,等.功能性微生物制剂对镉胁迫下水稻生长及生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):974.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.003]
　WANG Hong,YANG Zhen,PEI Wen-qi,et al.Growth and physiological characteristics of cadmium-stressed rice influenced by functional microorganism agent[J].,2016,(02):974.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.003]
[6]孙玲,单捷,毛良君,等.基于遥感和Moran's I指数的水稻面积变化空间自相关性研究[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.017]
　SUN Ling,SHAN Jie,MAO Liang-jun,et al.Spatial autocorrelation of changes in paddy rice area based on remote sensing and Moran’s I index[J].,2016,(02):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.017]
[7]张晓忆,李卫国,景元书,等.多种光谱指标构建决策树的水稻种植面积提取[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.018]
　ZHANG Xiao-yi,LI Wei-guo,JING Yuan-shu,et al.Extraction of paddy rice area by constructing the decision tree with multiple spectral indices[J].,2016,(02):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.018]
[8]裔传灯,李玮,王德荣,等.水稻GW5基因的1212-bp Indel变异对粒形的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1201.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.001]
　YI Chuan-deng,LI Wei,WANG De-rong,et al.Effect of 1212-bp Indel variation of gene GW5 on rice grain shape[J].,2016,(02):1201.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.001]
[9]刘红江,陈虞雯,张岳芳,等.不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
　LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Yu-wen,ZHANG Yue-fang,et al.Effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice[J].,2016,(02):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
[10]郭保卫,许轲,魏海燕,等.钵苗机插水稻茎秆的抗倒伏能力[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1280.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.014]
　GUO Bao-wei,XU Ke,WEI Hai-yan,et al.Culm lodging resistance characteristics of bowl seedling mechanical-transplanting rice[J].,2016,(02):1280.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2019-07-05基金项目：国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0300409)；现代农业产业技术体系建设专项(CARS-01-07B)作者简介：王亚梁（1992-）, 男, 浙江义乌人, 博士, 助理研究员, 研究方向为水稻抗逆栽培与机械化。通讯作者：张玉屏, （Tel） 15397092027;（E-mail） cnrrizyp@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-18