[1]张甜,应诗家,蓝赐华,等.夏季发酵床结合网床养殖模式对舍内环境质量和肉番鸭生长性能的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):860-868.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.023]
　ZHANG Tian,YING Shi-jia,LAN Ci-hua,et al.Effects of slatted floor-biobedding system on duck house air quality and growth performances of Muscovy duck in summer[J].,2016,(04):860-868.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.023]
点击复制

夏季发酵床结合网床养殖模式对舍内环境质量和肉番鸭生长性能的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年04期
页码:
860-868
栏目:
畜牧兽医·水产养殖
出版日期:
2016-10-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of slatted floor-biobedding system on duck house air quality and growth performances of Muscovy duck in summer
作者:
张甜1; 2; 应诗家1; 蓝赐华3; 肖文权3; 赵伟1; 吴云良1; 林勇1; 施振旦1
1. 江苏省农业科学院畜牧研究所动物品种改良和繁育重点实验室，江苏 南京 210014；2. 华南农业大学动物科技学院，广东 广州 510642；3. 莆田广东温氏家禽有限公司，福建 莆田 351254
Author(s):
ZHANG Tian1; 2; YING Shi-jia1; LAN Ci-hua3; XIAO Wen-quan3; ZHAO Wei1; WU Yun-liang1; LIN Yong1; SHI Zhen-dan1
1. Institute of Animal Science, Laboratory of Animal Improvement and Reproduction, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China; 2. Department of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; 3. Guangdong Wenshi Poultry Limited Company, Putian 351254, China
关键词:
肉番鸭; 舍内环境; 发酵床网养; 发酵床平养; 网床架养
Keywords:
Muscovy duck;  duck house environment;  bio-bedding under slatted floor;  conventional bio-bedding;  slatted floor
分类号:
S834.4+5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.023
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了探究夏季发酵床结合网床养鸭模式对舍内环境质量和肉鸭生产性能的影响，为发酵床养殖模式在南方地区推广提供理论依据，比较分析了发酵床平养、网床架养和发酵床结合网床架养3种养殖模式对鸭舍内温度、湿度、粉尘、有害气体、微生物以及番鸭生产性能的影响。结果显示，在整个试验期间，大部分日龄发酵床结合网床架养的舍内NH3、CO2、PM10、总菌、大肠杆菌、沙门氏菌+志贺氏菌浓度低于网床架养或发酵床平养（P<0.05）。舍内温度、湿度、内毒素和PM2.5浓度在大部分日龄3种养殖模式间差异不显著（P>0.05）结合网床架养。发酵床结合网床架养模式的公番鸭、上市体质量、上市率均高于发酵床平养（P<0.05），料质量比低于网床架养和发酵床平养（P<0.05），发酵床结合网床架养母番鸭上市体质量、日增质量均高于发酵床平养（P＜0.05），料质量比低于网床架养和发酵床平养（P＜0.05）。可见，南方夏季高温高湿季节发酵床结合网床养鸭模式比单纯的发酵床养殖或网床架养模式能更好地改善舍内空气环境质量以及提高番鸭健康和生产性能。
Abstract:
To investigate the influence of novel bio-bedding under slatted floor (BBSF) system on duck house air quality and Muscovy duck production performances in summer the novel BBSF system in Southern China, air quality parameters and duck growth performances were measured and compared in BBSF system, conventional bio-bedding (CBB), and slatted floor (SF) system. During the experimental period, the concentrations of duck house NH3, CO2, PM10, total bacteria, Escherichia coli, Salmonella+Shigella in BBSF system were lower than those in SFP<0.5) or CBB system (P<0.05). Temperature and relative humidity, and the concentrations of LPS and PM2.5 were close in the three types of duck houses (P>0.05). The PM2.5 concentrations at 31 and 51 days after birth (P<0.5), temperature at 20∶00, and LPS concentration at 71 d after birth were lower in BBSF system (P<0.05). Duck daily gain, market weight and market qualifying rate in BBSF system were higher than those in CBB (P<0.05) or SF system (P<0.05). However, the ratio of feed to gain in BBSF were lower (P<0.05). The results indicate that, compared with either CBB or SF system, the BBSF system outperformed in improving duck house air environment, duck health condition and growth performances in summer.

参考文献/References:

[1]MENG J, SHI F H, MENG Q X, et al. Effects of bedding material composition in deep litter systems on bedding characteristics and growth performance of limousin calves[J]. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 2015, 28(1): 143-150.
[2]FOLORUNSO O R, KAYODE S, ONIBON V O. Poultry farm hygiene: microbiological quality assessment of drinking water used in layer chickens managed under the battery cage and deep litter systems at three poultry farms in southwestern Nigeria[J]. Pak J Biol Sci, 2014, 17(1): 74-79.
[3]简保权, 朱舒平, 邓昌彦, 等. 猪粪堆肥过程中NH3和H2S的释放及除臭微生物的筛选研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(S2): 183-186.
[4]冯幼, 张祥斌, 陈学灵, 等. 夏季发酵床饲养模式对断奶仔猪生长性能、血清生化指标及猪舍环境的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(22): 4706-4713.
[5]PHILIPPE F X, CANART B, LAITAT M, et al. Effects of available surface on gaseous emissions from group-housed gestating sows kept on deep litter[J]. Animal, 2010, 4(10): 1716-1724.
[6]HOY S, MULLER K, WILLIG R. Investigations on the concentration and emission of ammonia and nitrous oxide in various deep litter keeping systems for fattening pigs and in slatted floor keeping[J]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 1997, 110(3): 9-95.
[7]宦海琳, 冯国兴, 李健, 等. 发酵床猪舍内气载需氧菌的分布状况[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(6): 1411-1414.
[8]郑雪芳, 刘波, 蓝江林, 等. 微生物发酵床对猪舍大肠杆菌病原生物防治作用的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(22): 4728-4739.
[9]刘宇锋，罗佳，严少华，等． 发酵床垫料特性与资源化利用研究进展[J]． 江苏农业学报，2015，31(3):70-707．
[10] KATAKAM K K, THAMSBORG S M, KYVSGAARD N C, et al. Development and survival of Ascaris suum eggs in deep litter of pigs[J]. Parasitology, 2014，14（12）: 1-11.
[11] GROENESTEIN C M, VANFAASSEN H G. Volatilization of ammonia, nitrous oxide and nitric oxide in deep-litter systems for fattening pigs[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 1996, 65(4): 269-274.
[12] HOY S. Correlation between concentration of ammonia in the air of pigsties and the activity of fattening pigs in deep litter[J]. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr, 1995, 102(8): 323-326.
[13] 秦枫，潘孝青，顾洪如，等． 发酵床不同垫料对猪生长、组织器官及血液相关指标的影响[J]． 江苏农业学报，2014，30 (1): 13-134．
[14] NORGAARD-NIELSEN G. Bone strength of laying hens kept in an alternative system, compared with hens in cages and on deep-litter[J]. Br Poult Sci, 1990, 31(1): 81-89.
[15] OKE O E, LADOKUN A O, ONAGBESAN O M. Reproductive performance of layer chickens reared on deep litter system with or without access to grass or legume pasture[J]. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl), 2016，100（2）：229-235.
[16] SOGUNLE O M, OLANIYI O A, EGBEYALE L T, et al. Free range and deep litter poultry production systems: effect on performance, carcass yield and meat composition of cockerel chickens[J]. Trop Anim Health Prod, 2013, 45(1): 281-288.
[17] 郭玉光，郑贤，陈倍技，等．发酵床饲养方式对肥育猪生产性能的影响[J]．江苏农业科学，2014，42（4）:148-151．
[18] 陈岩锋, 梁阿政, 孙世坤, 等. 半番鸭网床平养与地面平养对比试验[J]. 福建农业学报, 2013, 28(10): 947-952.
[19] 赵伟，林勇，施振旦，等．不同养殖模式对高邮鸭肉品质性状的影响[J]．江苏农业科学，2014，43(12)：232-234.
[20] 朱洪, 常志州, 叶小梅, 等. 基于畜禽废弃物管理的发酵床技术研究:Ⅲ高湿热季节养殖效果评价[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008(01): 354-358.
[21] 林勇, 章小婷, 计徐, 等. 肉鸭发酵床抗生素、重金属累积及细菌耐药性的演变特性[J]. 微生物学报, 2015, 54(4): 457-466.
[22] 李超, 郝海玉, 孙玲玉, 等. 猪舍环境气载微生物监测[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2014(10): 1684-1692.
[23] 周忠凯, 秦竹, 余刚, 等. 发酵床育肥猪舍内湿热环境与通风状况研究[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013，29(3): 592-598.
[24] XIN H, GATES R S, GREEN A R, et al. Environmental impacts and sustainability of egg production systems[J]. Poult Sci, 2011, 90(1): 263-277.
[25] SHEPHERD T A, ZHAO Y, LI H, et al. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems-Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions[J]. Poult Sci, 2015, 94(3): 534-543.
[26] ZHOU C, HU J, ZHANG B, et al. Gaseous emissions, growth performance and pork quality of pigs housed in deep-litter system compared to concrete-floor system[J]. Anim Sci J, 2015, 86(4): 422-427.
[27] 郭海宁, 李建辉, 马晗, 等. 不同养猪模式的温室气体排放研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014，33(12): 2457-2462.
[28] WEI A, MENG Z. Evaluation of micronucleus induction of sand dust storm fine particles (PM2.5) in human blood lymphocytes[J]. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol, 2006, 22(3): 292-297.
[29] GENG H, MENG Z, ZHANG Q. In vitro responses of rat alveolar macrophages to particle suspensions and water-soluble components of dust storm PM2.5[J]. Toxicol In Vitro, 2006, 20(5): 575-584.
[30] 刘晓莉, 杨东升, 孟紫强. 大气细颗粒物对大鼠脑组织的氧化损伤效应[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2005(8): 99-991.
[31] 黄雪莲, 金昱, 郭新彪, 等. 沙尘暴PM2.5、PM10对大鼠肺泡巨噬细胞吞噬功能的影响[J]. 卫生研究, 2004(2): 154-157.
[32] 余旭平, 何世成, 吴海波, 等. 猪场空气细菌数量与猪高热综合征的相关性研究[J]. 浙江大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2005, 31(1): 102-108.
[33] DOUWES J, THORNE P, PEARCE N, et al. Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects[J]. Ann Occup Hyg, 2003, 47(3): 187-200.
[34] 饶桂波，孟菲，王力波,等. 猪伪狂犬病毒变异株与大肠杆菌、志贺氏菌 混合感染的病原鉴定及分析[Ｊ]. 南方农业学报， 2015，46（6）：1111-1116.
[35] 谭业平，陆昌华，胡肄农，等． 规模猪场猪繁殖与呼吸综合征(PＲＲS) 风险评估系统的构建[J]． 江苏农业学报，2014，30 (3):602-606．
[36] 钟召兵, 柴同杰, 段会勇, 等. 鸡舍环境金黄色葡萄球菌气溶胶产生及其传播的REP-PCR鉴定[J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2008, 39(10): 1395-1401.
[37] FIEGEL J, CLARKE R, EDWARDS D A. Airborne infectious disease and the suppression of pulmonary bioaerosols[J]. Drug Discov Today, 2006, 11(1-2): 51-57.
[38] KODAMA A M, MCGEE R I. Airborne microbial contaminants in indoor environments. Naturally ventilated and air-conditioned homes[J]. Arch Environ Health, 1986, 41(5): 306-311.
[39] DONALDSON A I, GLOSTER J, HARVEY L D, et al. Use of prediction models to forecast and analyse airborne spread during the foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Brittany, Jersey and the Isle of Wight in 1981[J]. Vet Rec, 1982, 110(3): 53-57.
[40] 张红双, 秦梅, 柴同杰, 等. 不同养殖环境对商品肉鸡免疫功能的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2011, 30(1): 34-38.
[41] ROSS M A, CURTIS L, SCHEFF P A, et al. Association of asthma symptoms and severity with indoor bioaerosols[J]. Allergy, 2000, 55(8): 705-711.
[42] SMID T, HEEDERIK D, HOUBA R, et al. Dust- and endotoxin-related acute lung function changes and work-related symptoms in workers in the animal feed industry[J]. Am J Ind Med, 1994, 25(6): 877-888.
[43] URBAIN B, PROUVOST J F, BEERENS D, et al. Chronic exposure of pigs to airborne dust and endotoxins in an environmental chamber: technical note[J]. Vet Res, 1996, 27(6): 569-578.
[44] MADELIN T M, WATHES C M. Air hygiene in a broiler house: comparison of deep litter with raised netting floors[J]. Br Poult Sci, 1989, 30(1): 23-37.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2015-09-09基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(13)3071]；国家现代农业产业体系专项基金项目（CARS-43-16） 作者简介：张甜（1984-），女，新疆呼图壁人，硕士，主要从事家禽环境控制研究。（E-mail）zht19890815@foxmail.com通讯作者：施振旦，（E-mail）zdshi@jaas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-01