[1]张丽欣,孟盼盼,吕清豪,等.药菊苗期抗旱性综合评价及抗旱鉴定指标筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(10):1942-1951.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.10.019]
　ZHANG Lixin,MENG Panpan,LYU Qinghao,et al.Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance and screening of drought resistance identification indicators in Chrysanthemum morifolium seedling stage[J].,2024,(10):1942-1951.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.10.019]
点击复制

药菊苗期抗旱性综合评价及抗旱鉴定指标筛选()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年10期
页码:
1942-1951
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2024-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance and screening of drought resistance identification indicators in Chrysanthemum morifolium seedling stage
作者:
张丽欣1; 孟盼盼1; 吕清豪1; 李珅2; 祁瑞林2; 张红瑞1
(1.河南农业大学农学院,河南郑州450046；2.河南省经济作物推广总站,河南郑州450002)
Author(s):
ZHANG Lixin1; MENG Panpan1; LYU Qinghao1; LI Shen2; QI Ruilin2; ZHANG Hongrui1
(1.College of Agronomy, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450046, China;2.Cash Crop Promotion Station of Henan Province, Zhengzhou 450002, China)
关键词:
药菊; 苗期; 干旱胁迫; 抗旱性综合评价
Keywords:
Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.;  seedling stage;  drought stress;  comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance
分类号:
S682.1+1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.10.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究干旱胁迫对不同栽培类型药菊苗期生长的影响,并筛选耐旱性较强的药菊栽培类型和适宜的抗旱性鉴定指标,为抗旱药菊种质选择奠定基础,本研究以5个栽培类型药菊为材料,测定其在干旱胁迫下苗期的生长指标和生理生化指标,并使用相关性分析、主成分分析、隶属函数分析相结合的方法对其进行抗旱性综合评价。结果表明,干旱胁迫下药菊苗期植株变矮；随着干旱胁迫加重,其地下部干重、根冠比、总根投影面积等指标呈降低趋势,脯氨酸、可溶性糖和可溶性蛋白质含量呈增长趋势。抗旱性综合评价结果表明,怀菊抗旱性综合评价值最大(0.854),皇菊抗旱性综合评价值最小(0.093),5个栽培类型药菊抗旱性为怀菊>滁菊>亳菊>杭菊>皇菊；叶片相对含水量、叶片干重、地下部干重、根冠比、叶绿素相对含量（SPAD值）和过氧化物酶活性等可作为药菊苗期的抗旱性鉴定指标。
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to study the effects of drought stress on the seedling growth of different cultivation types of Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat., and to screen the cultivation types with strong drought tolerance and suitable drought-resistant identification indexes, so as to lay a foundation for the selection of drought-resistant C. morifolium germplasm. In this study, five cultivated types of C. morifolium were used as materials, and their seedling growth and physiological and biochemical indexes were measured under drought stress, and their drought resistance was comprehensively evaluated using a combination of correlation analysis, principal component analysis and membership function analysis. The results showed that under drought stress, the seedlings of C. morifolium became shorter. With the aggravation of drought stress, the underground dry weight, root-shoot ratio and total root projected area showed a decreasing trend, but the proline content, soluble sugar content and soluble protein content showed an increasing trend. The results of comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance indicated that the comprehensive evaluation value of drought resistance of Huaiju was the largest (0.854), and the comprehensive evaluation value of drought resistance of Huangju was the smallest (0.093). The drought resistance of five cultivated types of C. morifolium followed the order of Huaiju > Chuju > Boju > Hangju > Huangju. The relative water content, leaf dry weight, underground dry weight, root-shoot ratio, relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value) and peroxidase activity can be used as drought resistance identification indexes of C. morifolium at seedling stage.

参考文献/References:

[1]国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典[M]. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:323-324.
[2]SANCHEZ A C, SUBUDHI P K, ROSENOW D L, et al. Mapping QTLs associated with droughtresistance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench)[J]. Plant Molecular Biology,2002,48:713-726．
[3]孙晓琛,原静静,栗锦鹏,等. 干旱胁迫下药用植物响应机制研究进展[J]. 甘肃中医药大学学报,2021,38(5):77-83.
[4]孙淑英,陈贵林. 不同种源黄芪种子萌发期抗旱性鉴定[J]. 分子植物育种,2017,15(10):4248-4255.
[5]汪灿,周棱波,张国兵,等. 薏苡种质资源苗期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学,2017,50(15):2872-2887.
[6]李纪潮,张金渝,杨天梅,等. 滇重楼种质资源抗旱综合评价及生理机制研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2020,22(10):49-59.
[7]王沛琦,胡尊红,杨谨,等. 药用型红花苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国现代中药,2021,23(4):660-665.
[8]陈郡雯,吴卫,郑有良,等. 聚乙二醇(PEG-6000)模拟干旱条件下白芷苗期抗旱性研究[J]. 中国中药杂志,2010,35(2):149-153.
[9]王旭. 药菊扦插生根影响因子及技术研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学,2012.
[10]张红瑞,周艳,黄勇,等. 采收时间对6个栽培类型药菊产量品质的影响[J]. 山东农业科学,2016,48(7):82-85.
[11]屠万倩,刘晓苗,张留记,等. HPLC法同时测定不同产地不同品种菊花中8种成分的含量[J]. 中药材,2018,41(1):147-150.
[12]王锴乐,纪宝玉,裴莉昕,等. 怀菊快繁体系及组培苗分级标准的建立[J]. 北方园艺,2021(24):122-128.
[13]HU C Q, CHEN K, SHI Q, et al. Anti-AIDS agents,10-acacetin-7-β-D-galactopyrano side,an anti-HIV principle from Chrysanthemum morifolium and a structure-activity correlation with some related flavonoids[J]. Natural Products,1994,57(I):42-51.
[14]汪灿,周棱波,张国兵,等. 酒用糯高粱资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学,2017,50(8):1388-1402.
[15]张冬野. 外源水杨酸和氯化钙对番茄抗旱性及差异基因表达的影响[D]. 哈尔滨：东北农业大学,2016.
[16]田小霞,许明爽,郑明利,等. 黄花草木樨苗期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(10):120-127.
[17]徐银萍,潘永东,刘强德,等. 大麦种质资源成株期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 作物学报,2020,46(3):448-461.
[18]欧巧明,叶春雷,李进京,等. 胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性综合评价及其指标筛选[J]. 干旱区研究,2017,34(5):1083-1092.
[19]张红瑞,张丽欣,王飞,等. 丹参花果期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 山西农业科学,2023,51(5):502-508.
[20]张红瑞,张丽欣,李梦荷,等. 丹参萌发期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2023,41(1):19-26.
[21]李海明,刘绍东,张思平,等. 陆地棉种质资源花铃期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2019,20(3):583-597.
[22]王焱,沙柏平,李明雨，等. 苜蓿种质资源萌发期抗旱指标筛选及抗旱性综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2019,20(3):598-609,623.
[23]郭鹏辉,高丹丹,田晓静,等. 干旱胁迫对紫苏种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国油料作物学报,2015,37(5):683-687.
[24]刘晓丹,关丽云,高阳,等. 芝麻生长对水分胁迫的响应及抗旱性鉴定[J]. 江苏农业科学,2022,50(14):85-91.
[25]任磊,赵夏陆,许靖,等. 4种茶菊对干旱胁迫的形态和生理响应[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(15):5131-5139.
[26]吴曼,金苇,李影,等. 干旱胁迫下红、绿茎马齿苋幼苗的生理生化特性比较[J]. 湖北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,42(1):38-45.
[27]方明月,汪溢磐,赵奕,等. 低温干旱复合胁迫对8个紫花苜蓿品种形态和生理特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(11):2967-2974.
[28]李王胜,王雪倩,尹希龙,等. 甜菜苗期抗旱性鉴定及指标筛选[J]. 中国农学通报,2022,38(21):17-23.
[29]王庆惠,韩伟,侯银莹,等. 不同耐盐品种棉花根系主要指标对盐分胁迫的响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(3):865-873.
[30]董馥慧,裴红宾,张永清,等. 干旱胁迫与复水对苦荞生长及叶片内源激素含量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2019,21(12):41-48.
[31]宋殿秀,崔良基,王德兴,等. 17份食用向日葵杂交种苗期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2021,39(3):18-22.
[32]孙晓梵,张一龙,李培英,等. 不同施氮量对干旱下狗牙根抗氧化酶活性及渗透调节物质含量的影响[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(6):69-78.
[33]杨云富,郭巧生,张守栋,等. 水分胁迫对药用白菊花抗干旱生理及药材内在品质的影响[J]. 中国中药杂志,2009,34(4):486-487.
[34]TOSCANO S, ROMANO D, TRIBULATO A, et al. Effects of drought stress on seed germination of ornamental sunflowers [J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum,2017,39:184.
[35]翟新秘,秦利军,项阳,等. 隶属函数分析法对25份贵州玉米种质抗旱性评价研究[J]. 种子,2018,37(9):51-55.
[36]罗俊杰,欧巧明,叶春雷,等. 重要胡麻栽培品种的抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选[J]. 作物学报,2014,40(7):1259-1273.
[37]RAVELOMBOLA W, QIN J, WENG Y, et al. Evaluation of cowpea for drought tolerance at seedling stage[J]. Euphytica,2020,216(8)：1-19.
[38]LIU C Y, YANG Z Y, HU Y G. Drought resistance of wheat alien chromosome addition lines evaluated by membership function value based on multiple traits and drought resistance index of grain yield[J]. Field Crop Research,2015,179:103-112.
[39]张常青,洪波,李建科,等. 地被菊花幼苗耐旱性评价方法研究[J]. 中国农业科学,2005，38(4):789-796.
[40]翟丽丽,房伟民,陈发棣,等. 国庆小菊观赏性和耐旱、涝性的综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2012,45(4):734-742.
[41]汪本勤,李丕睿,陈发棣. 6个切花菊品种的耐盐性评价[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2013,34(1):84-88.
[42]汤肖玮,苏江硕,管志勇,等. 茶用菊苗期抗旱性和耐涝性的综合评价[J]. 园艺学报,2021,48(12):2443-2457.
[43]田治国,王飞,张文娥,等. 多元统计分析方法在万寿菊品种抗旱性评价中的应用[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(12):3315-3320.
[44]胡同华. 亳菊抗旱转基因体系建立及抗旱性评价[D]. 合肥：安徽大学,2016.
[45]孙静. 切花菊抗旱性评价及抗旱机理研究[D]. 南京：南京农业大学,2012.
[46]栾东涛,王婧,张冬梅,等. 四种盆栽小菊抗旱性研究[J]. 北方园艺,2020(20):54-61.
[47]姜自红,卢漫. 5种菊属植物的抗旱性比较[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版),2018,15(18):11-14,4-5.

相似文献/References:

[1]郭文琦,张培通,李春宏,等.大蒜苗期农艺性状与青蒜产量的关系[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1319.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.017]
　GUO Wen-qi,ZHANG Pei-tong,LI Chun-hong,et al.The relationship between main agronomic traits and yield of garlic sprout during garlic seedling stage[J].,2018,(10):1319.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.017]
[2]李浩龙,周蓉,蒋芳玲,等.醋栗番茄LA2093渐渗系群体苗期耐盐性评价[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(06):1620.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.06.021]
　LI Hao-long,ZHOU Rong,JJANG Fang-ling,et al.Evaluation of salt tolerance of introgression line population of Solanum pimpinellifolium LA2093 at seedling stage[J].,2022,38(10):1620.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.06.021]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2023-10-27基金项目：河南省财政科技兴林项目(YLK202305)；河南省中药材产业科技特派员服务团项目(2024)；国家自然科学基金项目(31701370)；河南省教育厅高等学校重点科研项目(19A210005、23A210002)作者简介：张丽欣(1998-),女,河南宜阳人,硕士,主要从事药用植物资源与栽培研究。(E-mail)1561079373@qq.com通讯作者：张红瑞,(E-mail)zhanghongrui2003@126.com；李珅,(E-mail)15003835012@163.com；祁瑞林,(E-mail)15538360258@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-11-21