[1]Ê¢ÐÀ,ÐìÓî»Ô,Ö£ÎÄå¹,µÈ.ËĸöÅ£×åÎïÖÖȾɫÌåˮƽ»ùÒò×éÍêÈ«ÐÍ΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼ÌØÕ÷·ÖÎö[J].½­ËÕũҵѧ±¨,2026,42(01):110-119.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.01.012]
¡¡SHENG Xin,XU Yuhui,ZHENG Wenqian,et al.Microsatellite distribution characteristics in chromosome-level genomes of four bovini species[J].,2026,42(01):110-119.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.01.012]
µã»÷¸´ÖÆ

ËĸöÅ£×åÎïÖÖȾɫÌåˮƽ»ùÒò×éÍêÈ«ÐÍ΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼ÌØÕ÷·ÖÎö()

½­ËÕũҵѧ±¨[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

¾í:
42
ÆÚÊý:
2026Äê01ÆÚ
Ò³Âë:
110-119
À¸Ä¿:
ÐóÄÁÊÞÒ½¡¤Ë®²úÑøÖ³
³ö°æÈÕÆÚ:
2026-01-31

ÎÄÕÂÐÅÏ¢/Info

Title:
Microsatellite distribution characteristics in chromosome-level genomes of four bovini species
×÷Õß:
Ê¢ÐÀ123ÐìÓî»Ô123Ö£ÎÄå¹123³ÂÉú÷123ÀîÈðÕÜ123Íõ¹óÔª4ÂíÖ¾½Ü123
(1.Çຣ´óѧÐóÄÁÊÞÒ½¿ÆÑ§Ôº,ÇຣÎ÷Äþ810016£»2.ũҵũ´å²¿Çà²Ø¸ßÔ­ÐóÇÝÒÅ´«ÓýÖÖÖØµãʵÑéÊÒ,ÇຣÎ÷Äþ810016£»3.Çຣʡ¸ßÔ­¼ÒÐóÒÅ´«×ÊÔ´±£»¤Óë´´ÐÂÀûÓÃÖØµãʵÑéÊÒ,ÇຣÎ÷Äþ810016£»4.Ìì¾þÏØÐóÄÁÊÞÒ½Õ¾,Çຣº£Î÷817200)
Author(s):
SHENG Xin123XU Yuhui123ZHENG Wenqian123CHEN Shengmei123LI Ruizhe123WANG Guiyuan4MA Zhijie123
(1.Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary, Qinghai University, Xining 810016, China£»2.Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Genetics and Breeding on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Xining 810016, China£»3.Plateau Livestock Genetic Resources Protection and Innovative Utilization Key Laboratory of Qinghai Province, Xining 810016, China£»4.Tianjun Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station, Haixi 817200, China)
¹Ø¼ü´Ê:
Å£×å»ùÒò×éÍêÈ«ÐÍ΢ÎÀÐÇ(P-SSR)·á¶È·Ö²¼¹æÂÉ
Keywords:
bovinigenomeperfect microsatellites (P-SSRs)abundancedistribution pattern
·ÖÀàºÅ:
S823
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2026.01.012
ÎÄÏ×±êÖ¾Âë:
A
ÕªÒª:
Å£×åÎïÖÖ×÷ΪũҵÉú²úÓëÉú̬ϵͳÖеĹؼüÀàȺ,ÆäÒÅ´«×ÊÔ´µÄ±£»¤Óë¿É³ÖÐøÀûÓöÔÐóÄÁÒµ·¢Õ¹¼°Î¬³ÖÉúÎï¶àÑùÐÔ¾ßÓÐÖØÒªÒâÒ塣Ȼ¶ø,µ±Ç°Õë¶ÔÅ£×åÎïÖÖ»ùÒò×éÖÐÍêÈ«ÐÍ΢ÎÀÐÇ(Perfect microsatellites, P-SSR)µÄϵͳ±È½ÏÑо¿Ïà¶ÔØÑ·¦¡£±¾Ñо¿»ùÓÚȾɫÌåˮƽµÄ¸ßÖÊÁ¿»ùÒò×éÐòÁÐ,²ÉÓÃKrait v1.4.0Èí¼þ¶ÔÆÕͨţ¡¢êóÅ£(º¬¼ÒêóÅ£ºÍÒ°êóÅ£)¡¢ÁöÅ£¡¢Ë®Å£»ùÒò×éÖеÄP-SSR½øÐÐϵͳ¼ì²âÓë×ۺϷÖÎö¡£·Ö±ð´ÓÆÕͨţ¡¢¼ÒêóÅ£¡¢Ò°êóÅ£¡¢ÁöÅ£¼°Ë®Å£È«»ùÒò×éÖмø¶¨³ö817 477¸ö¡¢775 897¸ö¡¢740 044¸ö¡¢739 975¸ö¡¢777 401¸öP-SSR£»ÆäÖÐ,ÆÕͨţ»ùÒò×éÖÐP-SSRÏà¶ÔƵÂÊ×î¸ß,Æä´ÎÊÇˮţ¡¢Ò°êóÅ£ºÍÁöÅ£,¼ÒêóÅ£»ùÒò×éÖÐP-SSRÏà¶ÔƵÂÊ×îµÍ¡£ÔÚˮţ»ùÒò×éÖÐ,P-SSRÐòÁÐ×ܳ¤¶ÈËùÕ¼±ÈÀý×î¸ß,ÆÕͨţ¡¢¼ÒêóÅ£¼°Ò°êóÅ£´ÎÖ®,ÁöÅ£×îµÍ¡£ÔÚ4¸öÅ£×åÎïÖֵĻùÒò×éÖÐ,µ¥ºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´ÀàÐÍP-SSRµÄ³öÏÖÆµÂÊ×î¸ß,Æä´ÎΪ¶þºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´¡¢ÈýºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´¡¢ÎåºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´¡¢ËĺËÜÕËáÖØ¸´¡¢ÁùºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´¡£4¸öÅ£×åÎïÖֵĵ¥ºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´ÖÁÎåºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´ÀàÐ͵ÄP-SSRÓÅÊÆÖØ¸´»ùÐòÏàͬ,·Ö±ðΪA¡¢AC¡¢AGC¡¢AAATºÍAACTG¡£ÔÚ¸÷Å£×åÎïÖÖÖÐ,ÏàÍ¬ÖØ¸´ÀàÐ͵ÄP-SSRÖØ¸´»ùÐòÊýÁ¿·Ö²¼Çø¼ä¸ß¶ÈÒ»Ö¡£µ¥ºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´ÖÁÁùºËÜÕËáÖØ¸´ÀàÐ͵ÄÖØ¸´»ùÐòÊýÁ¿·Ö²¼·¶Î§·Ö±ðÊÇ12¡«28´Î¡¢7¡«24´Î¡¢5¡«13´Î¡¢4¡«8´Î¡¢4¡«7´ÎºÍ4¡«10´Î¡£Ïà¹ØÐÔ·ÖÎö½á¹û±íÃ÷,4¸öÅ£×åÎïÖÖ»ùÒò×éÖи÷ÌõȾɫÌ峤¶ÈÓëÆäËùº¬P-SSRÊýÁ¿³Ê¼«ÏÔÖøÕýÏà¹Ø£¨P<0.001£©,¶ø¸÷ÌõȾɫÌåP-SSRÏà¶ÔƵÂʺÍÏà¶ÔÃܶȾùÓëÆäȾɫÌåG+Cº¬Á¿³ÊÏÔÖø»ò¼«ÏÔÖø¸ºÏà¹Ø£¨P<0.05¡¢P<0.01¡¢P<0.001£©¡£³¤¶È´óÓÚ100 bpºÍ1 000 bpµÄP-SSRÊýÁ¿ÔÚ¼ÒêóÅ£»ùÒò×éÖÐ×î¶à¡£×ÛÉÏ,±¾Ñо¿½á¹ûϵͳ½ÒʾÁ˸÷Å£×åÎïÖÖ»ùÒò×éÖÐP-SSRµÄ·á¶ÈÓë·Ö²¼¹æÂÉ,ΪÉîÈë̽¾¿Å£×åÎïÖÖ»ùÒò×éÖÐÖØ¸´ÐòÁеÄ×é³É²îÒì¡¢½ø»¯»úÖÆ¼°ÆäÉúÎïѧ¹¦ÄÜÌṩÁËÖØÒªÒÀ¾Ý¡£
Abstract:
Bovini species play a crucial role in agricultural production and ecosystem functioning, and the conservation and sustainable utilization of these genetic resources are of great significance for the development of animal husbandry and the maintenance of biodiversity. However, systematic comparative studies on perfect mi-crosatellites (P-SSRs) in the genomes of bovini species are still scarce. To address this gap, this study conducted systematic detection and comprehensive analysis of P-SSRs in cattle (Bos taurus), yak (Bos grunniens and Bos mutus), zebu (Bos indicus), and buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) using Krait v1.4.0 software based on high-quality chromosome-level genome sequences. The results showed that a total of 817 477, 775 897, 740 044, 739 975, and 777 401 P-SSRs were identified in the genomic sequences of cattle, domestic yak, wild yak, zebu and buffalo, respectively. Among them, the P-SSRs showed the highest relative frequency in cattle, followed by buffalo, wild yak, and zebu, with the lowest in domestic yak. Moreover, the proportion of the total length of P-SSRs was the highest in buffalo, followed by cattle, domestic yak, and wild yak, with zebu showing the lowest proportion. In the genomic sequences of the four bovini species, the relative frequency of mononucleotide repeats of SSRs was the highest, followed by dinucleotide, trinucleotide, pentanucleotide, tetranucleotide, and hexanucleotide repeats. In all four bovini species, the dominant repeat motifs of P-SSRs in mononucleotide, dinucleotide, trinucleotide, tetranucleotide, and pentanucleotide repeats were identical, specifically A, AC, AGC, AAAT, and AACTG. Among different bovini species, the distribution ranges of repeat motif counts for each corresponding P-SSR type were highly conserved. The distribution ranges for the number of repeat motifs were 12-28 times for mononucleotide, 7-24 times for dinucleotide, 5-13 times for trinucleotide, 4-8 times for tetranucleotide, 4-7 times for pentanucleotide, and 4-10 times for hexanucleotide repeats. Correlation analysis revealed that across the four bovini species, chromosome length showed a highly significant positive correlation with the number of P-SSRs (P<0.001). In contrast, both the relative frequency and relative density of P-SSRs on each chromosome were significantly or highly significantly negatively correlated with G+C content (P<0.05, P<0.01, P<0.001). The number of P-SSRs longer than 100 bp and 1 000 bp was greatest in the domestic yak genome. In conclusion, the findings of this study systematically reveal the abundance and distribution patterns of P-SSRs in bovini genomes, providing a valuable foundation for further exploration of the compositional divergence, evolutionary mechanisms, and biological functions of repetitive sequences in these species.

²Î¿¼ÎÄÏ×/References:

[1]SHARMA P C, GROVER A, KAHL G. Mining microsatellites in eukaryotic genomes[J]. Trends in Biotechnology,2007,25(11):490-498.
[2]TAUTZ D, RENZ M. Simple sequences are ubiquitous repetitive components of eukaryotic genomes[J]. Nucleic Acids Research,1984,12(10):4127-4138.
[3]CHEN M, ZENG G M, TAN Z Y, et al. Compound microsatellites in complete Escherichia coli genomes[J]. FEBS Letters,2011,585(7):1072-1076.
[4]WEBER J L. Informativeness of human (dC-dA) n ¡¤ (dG-dT) n polymorphisms[J]. Genomics,1990,7(4):524-530.
[5]SELKOE K A, TOONEN R J. Microsatellites for ecologists:a practical guide to using and evaluating microsatellite markers[J]. Ecology Letters,2006,9(5):615-629.
[6]KANNUR B H, FAIROZE M N, GIRISH P S, et al. Breed traceability of buffalo meat using microsatellite genotyping technique[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2017,54(2):558-563.
[7]ZHOU C, LI F J, WEN Q C, et al. Characterization of microsatellites in the endangered snow leopard based on the chromosome-level genome[J]. Mammal Research,2021,66(2):385-398.
[8]CHEN Y, GUO C, ZHOU S L, et al. The mating system of Himalayan marmots as inferred by microsatellite markers[J]. Current Zoology,2023,69(6):654-657.
[9]BOGA KURU B, KRMZBAYRAK T, ¦ZZ ÿðþ ‰C ENSOY Y. Zavot cattle genetic characterization using microsatellites[J]. Tropical Animal Health and Production,2022,54(6):363.
[10]WALL D A, DAVIS S K, READ B M. Phylogenetic relationships in the subfamily bovinae (Mammalia:Artiodactyla) based on ribosomal DNA[J]. Journal of Mammalogy,1992,73(2):262-275.
[11]HASSANIN A, AN J, ROPIQUET A, et al. Combining multiple autosomal introns for studying shallow phylogeny and taxonomy of Laurasiatherian mammals:application to the tribe Bovini (Cetartiodactyla,Bovidae)[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution,2013,66(3):766-775.
[12]¶¡×ÓÐñ,ÐìµtÑ©,·ëÍ®,µÈ. ˮţÃÚÈéÆÚÓë¸ÉÈéÆÚ²îÒìѪÇåÉú»¯Ö¸±ê¼°´úлÎïÑо¿[J]. »ùÒò×éѧÓëÓ¦ÓÃÉúÎïѧ,2024,43(6):1054-1065.
[13]Ö£±üÎä,ÖÇÓî,ÀîÑå¾ü,µÈ. Ò»Àý´óÁÖÁ糦¶¾ÑªÖ¢µÄÕï¶Ï[J]. Ò°Éú¶¯Îïѧ±¨,2022,43(3):788-792.
[14]WANG X D, PEI J, GUO S K, et al. Characterization of N(6)-methyladenosine in domesticated yak testes before and after sexual maturity[J]. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology,2021,9:755670.
[15]ÍõÔÂÔÂ,Áõѩѩ,¶­À¤ÕÜ,µÈ. 7ÖÖ¼ÒÑø¶¯ÎïÈ«»ùÒò×é΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼µÄ²îÒìÑо¿[J]. ÖйúÐóÄÁÊÞÒ½,2015,42(9):2418-2426.
[16]ÐìÓî»Ô,ÂíÖ¾½Ü,¹ùÎÀÐË,µÈ. êóţȫ»ùÒò×éµ¥´¿ÐÍ΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼ÌØÕ÷·ÖÎö[J]. Öйúũҵ´óѧѧ±¨,2024,29(3):134-142.
[17]ÍôÅô·É. ¼ÒÅ£»ùÒò×é¶Ì´®ÁªÖظ´±äÒìÑо¿[D]. ÑîÁè:Î÷±±Å©ÁֿƼ¼´óѧ,2024.
[18]MA Z J. Abundance and characterization of perfect microsatellites on the cattle Y chromosome[J]. Animal Biotechnology,2017,28(3):157-162.
[19]ÑÕ·¼éª,ÂíÖ¾½Ü,ÐìÓî»Ô,µÈ. êóÅ£YȾɫÌå»ùÒò×éµ¥´¿ÐÍ΢ÎÀÐÇ·á¶È·ÖÎö[J]. ÖйúÐóÄÁÔÓÖ¾,2023,59(6):172-178.
[20]ÐìÓî»Ô,Ðì¶«»Ô,²ÜƼ,µÈ. 5¸öÅ£ÖÖXȾɫÌåµ¥´¿ÐÍ΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼¹æÂɼ°Æä²îÒìÑо¿[J]. ÖйúÐóÄÁÔÓÖ¾,2024,60(4):176-183.
[21]QI W H, JIANG X M, DU L M, et al. Genome-wide survey and analysis of microsatellite sequences in bovid species[J]. PLoS One,2015,10(7):133667.
[22]ÆÝÎÄ»ª,½¯Ñ©Ã·,¸ÊÀöƼ,µÈ. Å£¿Æ¶¯Îï»ùÒò×éGCº¬Á¿Óë΢ÎÀÐǺ¬Á¿µÄÏà¹ØÐÔ·ÖÎö[J]. »ùÒò×éѧÓëÓ¦ÓÃÉúÎïѧ,2015,34(11):2381-2386.
[23]QI W H, JIANG X M, YAN C C, et al. Distribution patterns and variation analysis of simple sequence repeats in different genomic regions of bovid genomes[J]. Scientific Reports,2018,8:14407.
[24]ÆÝÎÄ»ª,½¯Ñ©Ã·,Ф¹úÉú,µÈ. Å£ºÍÃàÑòÈ«»ùÒò×é΢ÎÀÐÇÐòÁеÄËÑË÷¼°ÆäÉúÎïÐÅϢѧ·ÖÎö[J]. ÐóÄÁÊÞҽѧ±¨,2013,44(11):1724-1733.
[25]ÆÝÎÄ»ª,½¯Ñ©Ã·,¶ÅÁªÃ÷,µÈ. êóÅ£ºÍˮţȫ»ùÒò×é΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼¹æÂɼ°Æä±È½Ï·ÖÎö[J]. »ùÒò×éѧÓëÓ¦ÓÃÉúÎïѧ,2015,34(7):1406-1412.
[26]ROSEN B D, BICKHART D M, SCHNABEL R D, et al. De novo assembly of the cattle reference genome with single-molecule sequencing[J]. GigaScience,2020,9(3):21.
[27]PORRELLI S, GERBAULT-SEUREAU M, ROZZI R, et al. Draft genome of the lowland anoa (Bubalus depressicornis) and comparison with buffalo genome assemblies (Bovidae,Bubalina)[J]. G3,2022,12(11):234.
[28]NAJI M M, UTSUNOMIYA Y T, S¦ZLKNER J, et al. Investigation of ancestral alleles in the Bovinae subfamily[J]. BMC Genomics,2021,22(1):108.
[29]ZHANG S Z, LIU W Y, LIU X F, et al. Structural variants selected during yak domestication inferred from long-read whole-genome sequencing[J]. Molecular Biology and Evolution,2021,38(9):3676-3680.
[30]GAO X, WANG S, WANG Y F, et al. Long read genome assemblies complemented by single cell RNA-sequencing reveal genetic and cellular mechanisms underlying the adaptive evolution of yak[J]. Nature Communications,2022,13:4887.
[31]MANEE M M, ALGARNI A T, ALHARBI S N, et al. Genome-wide characterization and analysis of microsatellite sequences in camelid species[J]. Mammal Research,2020,65(2):359-373.
[32]ÆÝÎÄ»ª,Ñϳ¬³¬,Ф¹úÉú,µÈ. ɽÑòºÍ²ØÁçÑòÈ«»ùÒò×é΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼¹æÂɼ°ÆäÉúÎïÐÅϢѧ·ÖÎö[J]. ËÄ´¨´óѧѧ±¨(×ÔÈ»¿ÆÑ§°æ),2016,53(4):937-944.
[33]ÆÝÎÄ»ª,½¯Ñ©Ã·,Ф¹úÉú,µÈ. ÖíÈ«»ùÒò×éÖÐ΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼¹æÂÉ[J]. ÐóÄÁÓëÊÞÒ½,2014,46(8):9-13.
[34]Í¿·ÉÔÆ,ÁõÏþ»ª,¶ÅÁªÃ÷,µÈ. ´óÊóÈ«»ùÒò×é΢ÎÀÐÇ·Ö²¼ÌØÕ÷Ñо¿[J]. ½­Î÷ũҵ´óѧѧ±¨,2015,37(4):708-711.
[35]ÑîÐûÒ¶,¸ßÃ÷Ñô,ºúÐÀåû,µÈ. BVDV-2d¶¾ÖêµÄ·ÖÀë¼ø¶¨¼°Í¬ÒåÃÜÂë×ÓʹÓÃģʽ·ÖÎö[J]. ½­ËÕũҵѧ±¨,2024,40(11):2111-2121.
[36]ÖܵÏ,ÕÔÖÒº£,Íõ¸®,µÈ. »ùÓÚת¼×é²âÐòµÄ¹ØÁëÅ£¼¡ÈâÉú³¤·¢Óý¹Ø¼ü»ùÒòɸѡÓë¼ø¶¨[J]. ÄÏ·½Å©ÒµÑ§±¨,2024,55(3):611-622.
[37]HUANG J, LI W J, JIAN Z Y, et al. Genome-wide distribution and organization of microsatellites in six species of birds[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,2016,67:95-102.
[38]LIU S X, HOU W, SUN T L, et al. Genome-wide mining and comparative analysis of microsatellites in three macaque species[J]. Molecular Genetics and Genomics,2017,292(3):537-550.
[39]SRIVASTAVA S, AVVARU A K, SOWPATI D T, et al. Patterns of microsatellite distribution across eukaryotic genomes[J]. BMC Genomics,2019,20(1):153.
[40]BROCKSCHMIDT F F, N¦ZTHEN M M, HILLMER A M. The two most common alleles of the coding GGN repeat in the androgen receptor gene cause differences in protein function[J]. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology,2007,39(1):1-8.
[41]FONDON J W 3RD, GARNER H R. Molecular origins of rapid and continuous morphological evolution[J]. PNAS,2004,101(52):18058-18063.
[42]HANCOCK J M. Simple sequences and the expanding genome[J]. BioEssays,1996,18(5):421-425.
[43]ADELSON D L, RAISON J M, EDGAR R C. Characterization and distribution of retrotransposons and simple sequence repeats in the bovine genome[J]. PNAS,2009,106(31):12855-12860.

ÏàËÆÎÄÏ×/References:

[1]¹ùÏòÃÈ,ÕÅÑÇÆ½,¸¶Åô³Ì,µÈ.ÔæÊ÷»ùÒò×éÖÐת×ùÔª¼þ·ÖÎö[J].½­ËÕũҵѧ±¨,2017,(02):412.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.027]
¡¡GUO Xiang-meng,ZHANG Ya-ping,FU Peng-cheng,et al.Analysis of transposable elements in jujube genome[J].,2017,(01):412.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.02.027]
[2]Íõº£²¨,´ú¶¬ÇÙ,¹ù¿¡ÔÆ.Сͩ×Ó14-3-3»ùÒò¼Ò×åµÄ¼ø¶¨¼°µÍÎÂвÆÈÓ¦´ð[J].½­ËÕũҵѧ±¨,2017,(05):1007.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.008]
¡¡WANG Hai-bo,DAI Dong-qin,GUO Jun-yun.Genome-wide identification and chilling stress response of 14-3-3 gene family in Jatropha curcas[J].,2017,(01):1007.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.05.008]
[3]ʱµ¤âù,·¶±¦³¬,³£Ð¼û,µÈ.ÐÂÐ͹Ú×´²¡¶¾(SARS-CoV-2)Óë³£¼û¼ÒÑø¶¯Îï¹Ú×´²¡¶¾µÄͬԴÐÔ·ÖÎö[J].½­ËÕũҵѧ±¨,2020,(01):251.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.035]
¡¡SHI Dan-yi,FAN Bao-chao,CHANG Xin-jian,et al.Genetic analysis on the homology between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2) and common domestic animal coronaviruses[J].,2020,(01):251.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.01.035]
[4]ÖìÑÞ,º«³¤Ö¾.ÆÕͨºËÌÒÓëÉîÎÆºËÌÒÖÐÒ¶ÂÌÌå»ùÒò×éÃÜÂë×ÓʹÓÃÌØÕ÷¶Ô±È[J].½­ËÕũҵѧ±¨,2024,(08):1507.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.08.015]
¡¡ZHU Yan,HAN Changzhi.Comparison of codon usage characteristics of chloroplast genomes in Juglans regia and Juglans sigillata[J].,2024,(01):1507.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.08.015]
[5]ÁÖÂüÂü,ÁõÇÙ,º«¹â½Ü,µÈ.ÊÈÏß³æÖ²¡¸Ë¾úYZ011¶ÔÁÛ³áÄ¿À¥³æÉ±³æ»îÐÔ¼°±È½Ï»ùÒò×éѧ·ÖÎö[J].½­ËÕũҵѧ±¨,2025,(02):258.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.02.006]
¡¡LIN Manman,LIU Qin,HAN Guangjie,et al.Insecticidal activity and comparative genomics analysis of Xenorhabdus nematophila YZ011 against lepidopteran insects[J].,2025,(01):258.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.02.006]

±¸×¢/Memo

±¸×¢/Memo:
ÊÕ¸åÈÕÆÚ£º2025-08-18»ù½ðÏîÄ¿£ºÇຣʡ¡°À¥ÂØÓ¢²Å¡¤¸ß¶Ë´´Ð´´ÒµÈ˲𱼯»®ÏîÄ¿(Áì¾üÈ˲Å);µÚÈý´ÎÈ«¹úÐóÇÝÒÅ´«×ÊÔ´ÆÕ²éÏîÄ¿×÷Õß¼ò½é£ºÊ¢ÐÀ(2000-),Å®,¹ã¶«ÉÇÍ·ÈË,˶ʿÑо¿Éú,Ö÷Òª´Óʶ¯ÎïÒÅ´«×ÊÔ´Ñо¿¡£(E-mail)2603043164@qq.comͨѶ×÷ÕߣºÂíÖ¾½Ü,(E-mail)zhijiema@126.com
¸üÐÂÈÕÆÚ/Last Update: 2026-02-09