[1]王子夕,王琳,吕晓阳,等.基于生命周期评价方法的传统水稻和有机水稻种植系统碳足迹分析——以江苏省宜兴地区为例[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(11):2200-2208.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.013]
　WANG Zixi,WANG Lin,LYU Xiaoyang,et al.Carbon footprint analysis of traditional rice and organic rice planting systems based on life cycle assessment method: a case study in Yixing area in Jiangsu province[J].,2025,(11):2200-2208.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.013]
点击复制

基于生命周期评价方法的传统水稻和有机水稻种植系统碳足迹分析——以江苏省宜兴地区为例()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2025年11期
页码:
2200-2208
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2025-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Carbon footprint analysis of traditional rice and organic rice planting systems based on life cycle assessment method: a case study in Yixing area in Jiangsu province
作者:
王子夕1; 2; 王琳1; 3; 吕晓阳1; 3; 杜晓睿1; 邬彩霞1; 李新娥1; 刘大林1
(1.扬州大学动物科学与技术学院,江苏扬州225009;2.中国国检测试控股集团股份有限公司,北京100024;3.扬州大学农业科技发展研究院/教育部农业与农产品安全国际合作联合实验室,江苏扬州225009)
Author(s):
WANG Zixi1; 2; WANG Lin1; 3; LYU Xiaoyang1; 3; DU Xiaorui1; WU Caixia1; LI Xin’e1; LIU Dalin1
(1.College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China;2.China Testing & Certification International Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100024, China;3.Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology Development， Yangzhou University/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety, Ministry of Education, Yangzhou 225009, China)
关键词:
水稻; 生命周期评价; 温室气体排放; 碳足迹
Keywords:
rice; life cycle assessment; greenhouse gas emission; carbon footprint
分类号:
S511
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
水稻是最重要的粮食作物,亦是温室气体的主要排放作物之一。本研究以中国江苏省宜兴地区的传统水稻和有机水稻种植为研究对象,以1 kg稻谷产量和1 hm2水稻面积为功能单位,采用生命周期评价法核算了农资投入、整地、插秧、大田生产和收割等过程温室气体排放潜势。结果表明,江苏省宜兴地区传统水稻种植过程中温室气体排放量高于有机水稻种植过程;不同功能单位下,传统水稻和有机水稻种植中温室气体排放贡献最大的均为CH4,功能单位为1 kg水稻时,田间CH4排放占比分别为9182%和9186%。此外,情景模拟结果表明,相对于秸秆100%还田,秸秆完全离田情况下,传统水稻CH4和N2O排放潜势减少;有机水稻种植系统的温室气体排放潜势随着牛粪施入比例增加而减少。本研究结果可为江苏地区水稻种植和秸秆利用过程碳核算提供一定的参考依据。
Abstract:
Rice is the most important food crop, and is also one of the major sources for greenhouse gas emission. This study focused on the traditional and organic rice cultivation in Yixing of Jiangsu province of China as the research object. The functional units were 1 kg rice yield and 1 hm2 rice area, and the life cycle assessment method was used to calculate the greenhouse gas emission potential of agricultural inputs, land preparation, transplanting, field production, and harvesting processes. The results showed that the greenhouse gas emission during traditional rice cultivation in Yixing of Jiangsu province was higher than that during organic rice cultivation. Under different functional units, CH4 contributed the most to greenhouse gas emission in both traditional and organic rice systems. When the functional unit was 1 kg of rice, the proportions of CH4 emissions from the field were 91.82% and 91.86%, respectively. In addition, scenario simulation results indicated that compared to returning 100% of straw to the field, the potential for CH4 and N2O emissions decreased during traditional rice cultivation. The greenhouse gas emission potential of organic rice system decreased as the proportion of cow manure application increased. The results in this study may provide a certain reference basis for carbon accounting in the process of rice planting and rice straw utilization in Jiangsu province.

参考文献/References:

[1]ESMIZADE S, LANDI A, GILANI A, et al. Evaluating the amount of carbonic greenhouse gasses (GHGes) emission from rice paddies[C]//GILKES R, PRAKONGKEP N. 19th world congress of soil science 2010. Brisbane:Australian Society of Soil Science Incorporated,2011:68-70.
[2]BEACH R H, DEANGELO B J, ROSE S, et al. Mitigation potential and costs for global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Agricultural Economics,2008,38(2):109-115.
[3]IPCC. Climate change 2014:synthesis report[R]. Geneva,Switzerland:IPCC Press,2014.
[4]WANG X, CHANG X Y, MA L B, et al. Global and regional trends in greenhouse gas emissions from rice production,trade,and consumption[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2023,101:107141.
[5]CRIPPA M, SOLAZZO E, GUIZZARDI D, et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions[J]. Nature Food,2021,2(3):198-209.
[6]MAZZETTO A M, FALCONER S, LEDGARD S. Carbon footprint of New Zealand beef and sheep meat exported to different markets[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2023,98:106946.
[7]FAO. FAOSTAT online database[EB/OL].
[2024-12-01]. http://faostat.fao.org/data.
[8]DEVKOTA K P, BEEBOUT S E J, SUDHIR-YADAV, et al. Setting sustainability targets for irrigated rice production and application of the Sustainable Rice Platform performance indicators[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2022,92:106697.
[9]LINQUIST B, VAN GROENIGEN K J, ADVIENTO-BORBE M A, et al. An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops[J]. Global Change Biology,2012,18(1):194-209.
[10]李强,杨文慧,邹晨昕,等. 滨海滩涂垦区主要大田作物生产碳足迹研究:以江苏省盐城市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(7):188-198.
[11]王兴,赵鑫,王钰乔,等. 中国水稻生产的碳足迹分析[J]. 资源科学,2017,39(4):713-722.
[12]何巧玲,杨刚,邹兰,等. 油菜秸秆不同还田方式下水稻碳足迹分析[J]. 西南农业学报,2022,35(7):1673-1679.
[13]YODKHUM S, GHEEWALA S H, SAMPATTAGUL S. Life cycle GHG evaluation of organic rice production in northern Thailand[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2017,196:217-223.
[14]谭博特. 江苏省水稻生产生命周期评价及环境效应研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2020.
[15]BRODT S, KENDALL A, MOHAMMADI Y, et al. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in California rice production[J]. Field Crops Research,2014,169:89-98.
[16]GOMIERO T, PAOLETTI M G, PIMENTEL D. Energy and environmental issues in organic and conventional agriculture[J]. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences,2008,27(4):239-254.
[17]HE X Q, QIAO Y H, LIANG L, et al. Environmental life cycle assessment of long-term organic rice production in subtropical China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018,176:880-888.
[18]MEIER M S, STOESSEL F, JUNGBLUTH N, et al. Environmental impacts of organic and conventional agricultural products-Are the differences captured by life cycle assessment?[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2015,149:193-208.
[19]BHATIA A, SASMAL S, JAIN N, et al. Mitigating nitrous oxide emission from soil under conventional and no-tillage in wheat using nitrification inhibitors[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2010,136(3/4):247-253.
[20]DAS S, ADHYA T K. Effect of combine application of organic manure and inorganic fertilizer on methane and nitrous oxide emi-ssions from a tropical flooded soil planted to rice[J]. Geoderma,2014,213:185-192.
[21]WANG M X, XIA X F, ZHANG Q J, et al. Life cycle assessment of a rice production system in Taihu region,China[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology,2010,17(2):157-161.
[22]XU X M, LAN Y. Spatial and temporal patterns of carbon footprints of grain crops in China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,146:218-227.
[23]KOGA N, TAJIMA R. Assessing energy efficiencies and greenhouse gas emissions under bioethanol-oriented paddy rice production in northern Japan[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2011,92(3):967-973.
[24]卢青,杨剑,潘诗琴,等. 莫能菌素在鸡粪中的降解规律及其对鸡粪堆肥微生物群落的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2024,55(9):2783-2797.
[25]赵华轩,李尚民,蒲俊华,等. 鸡粪筒仓式反应器堆肥产品质量评估和经济效益分析[J]. 江苏农业学报,2023,39(5):1159-1168.
[26]许俊香,邹国元,孙钦平,等. 畜禽粪便Cu、Zn含量特征研究[J]. 江苏农业科学,2024,52(11):254-259.
[27]王瑞飞,孔盈利,魏艺璇,等. 菌剂对鸡粪-生物炭堆肥理化性质和微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2023,39(4):966-977.
[28]LAL R. World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel[J]. Environment International,2005,31(4):575-584.
[29]BI Y Y, GAO C Y, WANG Y J, et al. Estimation of straw resources in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2009,25(12):211-217.
[30]TURMEL M S, SPERATTI A, BAUDRON F, et al. Crop residue management and soil health:a systems analysis[J]. Agricultural Systems,2015,134:6-16.
[31]HUANG R, TIAN D, LIU J, et al. Responses of soil carbon pool and soil aggregates associated organic carbon to straw and straw-derived biochar addition in a dryland cropping mesocosm system[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2018,265:576-586.

相似文献/References:

[1]王士磊,丁正权,黄海祥.水稻隐性早熟突变体ref早熟性的遗传分析和基因定位[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):721.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.001]
　WANG Shi-lei,DING Zheng-quan,HUANG Hai-xiang.Inheritance and gene mapping of recessive earliness in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J].,2016,(11):721.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.001]
[2]王在满,郑乐,张明华,等.不同播种方式对直播水稻倒伏指数和根系生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.002]
　WANG Zai-man,ZHENG Le,ZHANG Ming-hua,et al.Effects of seeding manners on lodging index and root growth of directseeded rice[J].,2016,(11):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.002]
[3]易能,薛延丰,石志琦,等.微囊藻毒素对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的胁迫作用[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):729.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.003]
　YI Neng,XUE Yan-feng,SHI Zhi-qi,et al.Inhibitory effect of microcystins on seed germination and seedling growth of rice[J].,2016,(11):729.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.003]
[4]刘凯,王爱民,严国红,等.一个水稻显性矮秆突变体的遗传特性与降株高能力[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):968.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.002]
　LIU Kai,WANG Ai-min,YAN Guo-hong,et al.Genetic analysis and plant height reduction of a dominant dwarf mutant of rice[J].,2016,(11):968.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.002]
[5]王红,杨镇,裴文琪,等.功能性微生物制剂对镉胁迫下水稻生长及生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):974.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.003]
　WANG Hong,YANG Zhen,PEI Wen-qi,et al.Growth and physiological characteristics of cadmium-stressed rice influenced by functional microorganism agent[J].,2016,(11):974.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.003]
[6]孙玲,单捷,毛良君,等.基于遥感和Moran's I指数的水稻面积变化空间自相关性研究[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.017]
　SUN Ling,SHAN Jie,MAO Liang-jun,et al.Spatial autocorrelation of changes in paddy rice area based on remote sensing and Moran’s I index[J].,2016,(11):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.017]
[7]张晓忆,李卫国,景元书,等.多种光谱指标构建决策树的水稻种植面积提取[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.018]
　ZHANG Xiao-yi,LI Wei-guo,JING Yuan-shu,et al.Extraction of paddy rice area by constructing the decision tree with multiple spectral indices[J].,2016,(11):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.018]
[8]裔传灯,李玮,王德荣,等.水稻GW5基因的1212-bp Indel变异对粒形的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1201.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.001]
　YI Chuan-deng,LI Wei,WANG De-rong,et al.Effect of 1212-bp Indel variation of gene GW5 on rice grain shape[J].,2016,(11):1201.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.001]
[9]刘红江,陈虞雯,张岳芳,等.不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
　LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Yu-wen,ZHANG Yue-fang,et al.Effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice[J].,2016,(11):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
[10]郭保卫,许轲,魏海燕,等.钵苗机插水稻茎秆的抗倒伏能力[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1280.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.014]
　GUO Bao-wei,XU Ke,WEI Hai-yan,et al.Culm lodging resistance characteristics of bowl seedling mechanical-transplanting rice[J].,2016,(11):1280.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2024-12-13基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(23)1036]作者简介：王子夕(2000-),女,江苏徐州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为草畜一体化系统的碳足迹核算。(Tel)17851973620;(E-mail)zixiwww@126.com通讯作者：王琳,(E-mail)lynn1215@yzu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-12-18