[1]卢洪美,王晨宇,巩梦梦,等.微生物菌肥配施生物质炭对土壤肥力及黑麦草生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(12):2266-2272.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.12.009]
　LU Hongmei,WANG Chenyu,GONG Mengmeng,et al.Effects of microbial fertilizer combined with biochar on soil fertility and ryegrass growth[J].,2024,(12):2266-2272.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.12.009]
点击复制

微生物菌肥配施生物质炭对土壤肥力及黑麦草生长的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年12期
页码:
2266-2272
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2024-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of microbial fertilizer combined with biochar on soil fertility and ryegrass growth
作者:
卢洪美; 王晨宇; 巩梦梦; 谷勋刚
(安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,安徽合肥230036)
Author(s):
LU Hongmei; WANG Chenyu; GONG Mengmeng; GU Xungang
(College of Resources and Environment, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)
关键词:
黑麦草; 微生物菌肥; 生物质炭; 土壤肥力; 产量
Keywords:
ryegrass; microbial fertilizer; biochar; soil fertility; yield
分类号:
S543+.606.2
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.12.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究微生物菌肥配施生物质炭对土壤肥力与黑麦草生长的增效机制,本研究以邦德3为供试材料,采用盆栽方式,设置不施肥对照(CK)、有机物料(T1)、生物质炭(T2)、未灭菌微生物菌肥(T3)、灭菌微生物菌肥(T4)、生物质炭与菌剂配施(T5)、生物质炭与微生物菌肥配施(T6)等处理,分析不同处理对土壤有机质含量、有效磷含量、速效钾含量及过氧化氢酶活性、脲酶活性、蔗糖酶活性、碱性磷酸酶活性、黑麦草叶片养分含量和产量的影响。结果表明：随着黑麦草的生长,不同施肥处理的土壤有机质含量、有效磷含量、速效钾含量总体呈先增加后减少的趋势；在不同生长时期,微生物菌肥配施生物质炭处理(T6)的土壤有机质含量、有效磷含量、速效钾含量整体上均显著高于其他处理。黑麦草收获时,T6、T5和T3处理的土壤过氧化氢酶、脲酶、蔗糖酶和碱性磷酸酶的活性均显著高于CK,其中,T6处理增加最为显著,土壤过氧化氢酶、脲酶、蔗糖酶和碱性磷酸酶的活性分别比CK提高230.91%、73.03%、24.00%和238.28%。T1～T6处理的黑麦草产量和叶片全氮、全磷、全钾含量均显著高于CK,其中,T6处理增加最为显著,产量（鲜重）和叶片全氮、全磷、全钾含量分别比CK增加104.37%、81.70%、271.43%和153.48%。因此,微生物菌肥配施生物质炭可有效提高黑麦草产量和土壤速效养分含量,增加土壤肥力和促进黑麦草生长。本研究结果可为黑麦草的优质种植和微生物菌肥的高效利用提供依据。
Abstract:
In order to explore the synergistic mechanism of microbial fertilizer combined with biochar on soil fertility and ryegrass growth, this study used Bangde 3 as the test material, and used pot methods to set up no fertilization control (CK) and treatments such as organic material (T1), biochar (T2), unsterilized microbial fertilizer (T3), sterilized microbial fertilizer (T4), biochar and microbial agent application (T5), biochar and microbial fertilizer application (T6). The effects of different treatments on soil organic matter content, available phosphorus content, available potassium content, and activities of catalase, urease, sucrase, alkaline phosphatase, as well as ryegrass leaf nutrient content and yield were analyzed. The results showed that with the growth of ryegrass, the soil organic matter content, available phosphorus content and available potassium content of different fertilization treatments increased first and then decreased. At different growth stages, the soil organic matter content, available phosphorus content and available potassium content of microbial fertilizer combined with biochar treatment (T6) were significantly higher than those of other treatments on the whole. When ryegrass was harvested, the activities of soil catalase, urease, sucrase and alkaline phosphatase in T6, T5 and T3 treatments were significantly higher than those in CK. Among them, T6 treatment increased the most significantly, and the activities of soil catalase, urease, sucrase and alkaline phosphatase were 230.91%, 73.03%, 24.00% and 238.28% higher than CK, respectively. The yield of ryegrass and the contents of total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium in leaves of T1-T6 treatments were significantly higher than those of CK. Among them, the increase of T6 treatment was the most significant, and the yield (fresh weight) and the contents of total nitrogen, total phosphorus and total potassium in leaves increased by 104.37%, 81.70%, 271.43% and 153.48%, respectively, compared with CK. Therefore, microbial fertilizer combined with biochar can effectively increase ryegrass yield and soil available nutrient content, increase soil fertility and promote ryegrass growth. This study provides a basis for the high-quality planting of ryegrass and the efficient utilization of microbial fertilizer.

参考文献/References:

[1]ABRAHA A B, TRUTER W F, ANNANDALE J G, et al. Forage yield and quality response of annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) to different water and nitrogen levels[J]. Afr J Range Forage Sci,2015,32:125-131.
[2]LERMI G A, ERKOVAN I H, KO A. Determination of combined effects of organic and mineral fertilizer on forage yield and quality of annual ryegrass[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(12):2935.
[3]WANG Q, SHAN C, ZHANG P, et al. The combination of nanotechnology and potassium: applications in agriculture[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International,2024,31(2):1890-1906.
[4]ANJALI T, SHARMA R P, SANKHYAN N K, et al. Maize grain quality as influenced by 46 years’ continuous application of fertilizers, farmyard manure (fym),and lime in an alfisol of north-western Himalayas[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2021,52(2):149-160.
[5]WYNGAARD N, CABRERA M L, JAROSCH K A, et al. Phosphorus in the coarse soil fraction is related to soil organic phosphorus mineralization measured by isotopic dilution[J]. Soil Biol Biochem,2016,96:107-118.
[6]ZHU J, LI M, WHELAN M. Phosphorus activators contribute to legacy phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: a review[J]. Sci Total Environ,2018,612:522-537.
[7]CHOUDHARY M, GARG K, REDDY B M, et al. Unlocking growth potential:synergistic potassium fertilization for enhanced yield,nutrient uptake,and energy fractions in Chinese cabbage[J]. Heliyon,2024,10(7):e28765.
[8]张登晓,高雅,介红彬,等. 生物质炭对农田磷有效性的影响研究进展[J]. 河南农业大学学报,2021,55(2):199-205.
[9]张磊,张维乐,鲁剑巍,等. 秸秆还田条件下不同供钾能力土壤水稻、油菜、小麦钾肥减量研究[J]. 中国农业科学,2017,50(19):3745-3756.
[10]郭艳兰,牟德生,张勤德,等. 化肥减量配施不同用量微生物菌肥对黑比诺葡萄生长、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2023,39(9):1938-1944.
[11]汪钱龙,张德智,王菊芬,等. 不同植物促生细菌对玉米生长的影响及其生长素分泌能力研究[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学版),2015,30(4):494-498.
[12]刘云峰,杨宁,温丹,等. 微生物菌肥在园艺作物上的应用研究[J]. 安徽农业科学,2022,50(7):11-15.
[13]苏正川,熊仁科,罗小艳. 解淀粉芽孢杆菌的作用及其产品开发[J]. 农药科学与管理,2019,40(6):21-30.
[14]胡肖盼,刘文硕. 不同浓度胶质芽孢杆菌对草莓生长发育的影响[J]. 现代农业科技，2023(11):42-44.
[15]张爱民,李乃康,赵钢勇,等. 土壤中解磷、解钾微生物研究进展[J]. 河北大学学报(自然科学版),2015,35(4):442-448.
[16]ETESAMI H, EMAMI S, ALIKHANI H A. Potassium solubilizing bacteria (KSB): mechanisms, promotion of plant growth, and future prospects: a review[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2017,17(4):897-911.
[17]曹秋艳,李海渤,冯慧敏,等. 施用微生物菌肥对无花果鲜食品质和贮藏特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2023,39(3):807-813.
[18]何永梅,孔志强,陈胜文,等. 生物菌肥及其在蔬菜生产上的应用[J]. 科学种养,2019(9):33-35.
[19]IBARRA-GALEANA J A, CASTRO-MARTNEZ C, FIERRO-CORONADO R A, et al. Characterization of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria exhibiting the potential for growth promotion and phosphorus nutrition improvement in maize (Zea mays L.) in calcareous soils of Sinaloa, Mexico[J]. Annals of Microbiology,2017,67(12):801-811.
[20]AYANA R B. Bacillus velezensis AR1 mediated plant nourishing through solubilization of hardly soluble phosphorus nutrient sources[J]. Cogent Food & Agriculture,2023,9(2):366.
[21]潘纪源,董庆龙,温海彬,等. 巨大芽孢杆菌菌剂对苹果产量、品质及土壤微生物的影响[J]. 园艺学报,2023,50(11):2453-2465.
[22]宋嘉欣,石文昕,刘世辉,等. 微生物菌肥对茄子生长发育及土壤环境的影响[J]. 天津农学院学报,2023,30(5):16-22.
[23]阎世江,田如霞,张京社,等. 生物菌肥对茄子生长及品质的影响[J]. 蔬菜,2019(12):41-46.
[24]张艺灿,刘凤之,王海波. 根际溶磷微生物促生机制研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2020(2):1-9.
[25]REN H, GUO H, SHAFIQUL ISLAM M, et al. Improvement effect of biochar on soil microbial community structure and metabolites of decline disease bayberry[J]. Front Microbiol,2023,14:1154886.
[26]ABDELRAOUF R, ABDOU S, MAHMOUD ABBAS M, et al. Influence of n-fertigation stress and agro-organic wastes (biochar) to improve yield and water productivity of sweet pepper under sandy soils conditions[J]. Plant Arch,2020,20:3208-3217.
[27]陈贵云,王惠芳,王铎,等. 烟秆生物质炭基肥施用对烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2024,40(1):12-19.
[28]董万鹏,吴楠,龙婷,等. 微生物菌肥对玫瑰防病促生作用及土壤微环境的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2023(8):121-127.
[29]决超. 微生物菌肥与土壤改良基质对连作马铃薯土壤性质及微生物群落的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(1):218-224.
[30]TAGGART COSETTE B, MUIR JAMES P, BRADY JEFF A, et al. Impacts of biochar on Trifolium incarnatum and Lolium multiflorum:soil nutrient retention and loss in sandy loam amended with dairy manure[J]. Agronomy,2022,13(1):26.
[31]朱长伟,孟威威,石柯,等. 不同轮耕模式下小麦各生育时期土壤养分及酶活性变化特征[J]. 中国农业科学,2022,55(21):4237-4251.
[32]KENTA I, FUJIO N, SADOU S, et al. Understanding yield-limiting factors for sorghum in semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa: beyond soil nutrient deficiency[J]. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2024,70(2):114-122.
[33]ANKIT G, KUMAR V S, SINGH R C, et al. Quantifying the fertility status and relationship between soil properties under major tea estates of north-western Himalaya[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2024,55(3):287-301.
[34]OLLIO I, MIGUEL S V, GMEZ S D, et al. Effect of biofertilizers on broccoli yield and soil quality indicators[J]. Horticulturae,2023,10(1):42.
[35]KAUR G, VATS K A, SINGH R, et al. Effect of vermicompost, biofertilizers and in organic fertilizers on nutrient uptake and physico-chemical properties of soil: a case study of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)[J]. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change,2023,13(10):4519-4525.
[36]YIN J, SONG Z, GUO X S, et al. Adjusting the fertilizer application structure for nutrient saving and yield increase in potato[J]. International Journal of Plant Production,2023,17(2):379-387.
[37]TANG Z, HE N, ZHANG L, et al. Straw and biochar application alters the structure of rhizosphere microbial communities in direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) paddies[J]. Agronomy,2024,14(2):316.
[38]DABHI V R, SURVE H V, BAMBHANEEYA M S, et al. Response of seed size and bio-fertilizer on yield, quality, nutrient content and uptake of groundnut crop under rainfed condition[J]. International Journal of Plant Soil Science,2022,34(24):69-75.
[39]ZAITUN Z, SUFARDI S, SUWARNO S, et al. Contribution biochar residue to the role of compost and urea in improving crop yields, soil chemistry properties, and the diversity of soil surface insects in the maize (Zea mays L.) crop land[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2023,1266(1):12077. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/1266/1/01.

相似文献/References:

[1]沈伟,岑湘涛,吴晓倩,等.入侵植物白花鬼针草与2种牧草混播时的竞争效应[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(03):795.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.03.035]
　SHEN Wei,CEN Xiang-tao,WU Xiao-qian,et al.Competition effect of invasive plant Bidens pilosa var. radiata and two forages under different mixed sowing patterns[J].,2020,(12):795.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.03.035]
[2]王琳,管永祥,陈震,等.不同种类绿肥养分积累比较及其对水稻产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(05):1139.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.010]
　WANG Lin,GUAN Yong-xiang,CHEN Zhen,et al.Comparison of nutrient accumulation of different green manures and the effects on rice yield[J].,2020,(12):1139.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.010]
[3]曹秋艳,李海渤,冯慧敏,等.施用微生物菌肥对无花果鲜食品质和贮藏特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(03):807.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.022]
　CAO Qiu-yan,LI Hai-bo,FENG Hui-min,et al.Effect of applying microbial fertilizer on fresh-eating quality and storage characteristics of figs[J].,2023,(12):807.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.03.022]
[4]郭艳兰,牟德生,张勤德,等.化肥减量配施不同用量微生物菌肥对黑比诺葡萄生长、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(09):1938.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.09.016]
　GUO Yan-lan,MU De-sheng,ZHANG Qin-de,et al.Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction combined with microbial fertilizer on growth, quality and soil fertility of Pinot Noir grape[J].,2023,(12):1938.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.09.016]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2024-03-01基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目(31770729)；安徽虫虫生物科技有限公司项目(KJ2021092)作者简介：卢洪美(1998-),女,贵州遵义人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为植物营养与土壤化学。(E-mail)3513731803 @qq.com通讯作者：谷勋刚,(E-mail) xggu89@ahau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-01-23