[1]訾金爽,李四方,汪芳芳,等.安徽麦区软质小麦主要品质性状的基因型-环境互作分析[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(07):1161-1169.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.07.002]
　ZI Jinshuang,LI Sifang,WANG Fangfang,et al.Genotype-environment interaction analysis of the main quality traits of soft wheat in wheat area of Anhui province[J].,2024,(07):1161-1169.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.07.002]
点击复制

安徽麦区软质小麦主要品质性状的基因型-环境互作分析()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年07期
页码:
1161-1169
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2024-07-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Genotype-environment interaction analysis of the main quality traits of soft wheat in wheat area of Anhui province
作者:
訾金爽1; 李四方1; 汪芳芳1; 郑文寅1; 2
(1.安徽农业大学农学院/农业农村部黄淮南部小麦生物学与遗传育种重点实验室，安徽合肥230036；2.扬州大学/江苏省粮食作物现代产业技术协同创新中心，江苏扬州225009)
Author(s):
ZI Jinshuang1; LI Sifang1; WANG Fangfang1; ZHENG Wenyin1; 2
(1.College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Wheat Biology and Genetic Breeding in Southern Huanghuai, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hefei 230036, China;2.Yangzhou University/Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Industrial Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou 225009, China)
关键词:
软质小麦; AMMI模型; 主要品质性状; 基因型-环境互作分析; 稳定性
Keywords:
soft wheat; AMMI model; main quality traits; genotype-environment interaction analysis; stability
分类号:
S512.1
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.07.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了深入研究安徽麦区软质小麦主要品质性状的基因型效应与不同种植区域环境效应的互作关系及稳定性，本研究利用AMMI双标图对种植于7个生态试点的12个软质小麦品种的蛋白质含量、湿面筋含量、面团稳定时间及吸水率4个品质指标进行综合评价。AMMI双标图分析结果表明，濉溪和新马桥生态试点能够较好地分辨品种湿面筋含量，区分品种面团稳定时间的最佳地点是太和生态试点，阜阳生态试点能够很好地区分不同品种的吸水率，能较好地区分蛋白质含量的生态试点是新马桥。吸水率和面团稳定时间表现好的品种是瑞华麦516、天益科麦5号；湿面筋含量中较稳定的品种是华成863和瑞华麦516；天益科麦5号是蛋白质含量平均值较高且较稳定的品种。相对而言，天益科麦5号具有广适、稳定且品质性状优良的基因型。
Abstract:
To deeply study the interactive relationship between genotypic effects of the main quality traits and the environmental effects of different planting regions and the relationship stability of soft wheat in wheat-growing areas of Anhui province, AMMI biplot was used to comprehensively evaluate four quality indicators such as protein content, wet gluten content, dough stabilization time and water absorption rate, of 12 soft wheat varieties planted in seven ecological pilot sites in this study. The analysis results of the AMMI biplot indicated that, ecological test sites of Suixi and Xinmaqiao could distinguish the wet gluten content of different varieties well. The best location for distinguishing dough stability time of varieties was Taihe ecological test site. Fuyang cological pilot site could distinguish the water absorption rate of different varieties well, and the appropriate ecological site for distinguishing protein content was Xinmaqiao. The varieties that performed well in water absorption rate and dough stabilization time were Ruihuamai 516 and Tianyikemai 5. The most stable varieties in terms of wet gluten content were Huacheng 863 and Ruihuamai 516. Tianyikemai 5 had a relatively high and stable average protein content. In comparison, Tianyikemai 5 has a widely adapted, stable and high-quality genotype.

参考文献/References:

[1]郑文寅,胡泽林,程颖,等. 安徽麦区软质小麦籽粒品质和终端制品品质评价[J]. 麦类作物学报,2023,43(2):182-189.
[2]董一帆,任毅,程宇坤,等. 冬小麦籽粒主要品质性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2023,56(11):2047-2063.
[3]曹颖妮,赵光华,辛玉杰,等. 低筋小麦配粉及其对加工品质的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2022,42(2):178-187.
[4]吴海彬,孙辉,洪宇,等. 2022年我国小麦品质分析[J]. 粮油食品科技,2024,32(2):92-99.
[5]李保云,梁容奇,张义荣,等. 小麦面食品加工理论与实践[M]. 北京:中国农业大学出版社,2023:60-62.
[6]SOUZA E J, MARTIM J M, GUTTIERI M J, et al. Influence of genotype,environment,and nitrogen management on spring wheat quality[J]. Crop Science,2005,45:425-432.
[7]BRESEGHELLO F, PATRICK L F, GAINES C, et al. Geneticloci related to kernel quality differences between a soft and a hard wheat cultivar[J]. Crop Science,2005,45:1685-1695.
[8]JOHN D, BERZONSKY W A. Evaluation of spring wheat quality traits and genotypes for production of cantonese asian noodles[J]. Crop Science,2003,43:1313-1319.
[9]刘茜茜. 四川不同小麦品种的生物活性物质及抗氧化特性的基因型及其环境互作效应分析[D]. 雅安：四川农业大学，2016.
[10]姚金保,张鹏,余桂红,等. 江苏省小麦品种(系)籽粒产量基因型与环境互作分析[J]. 麦类作物学报,2021,41(2):191-202.
[11]李朝苏,吴晓丽,汤永禄,等. 四川近十年来小麦主栽品种的品质状况[J]. 作物学报,2016,42(6):803-812.
[12]乔玉强,马传喜,司红起,等. 基因型和环境及其互作效应对小麦品质的影响及品质稳定性分析[J]. 激光生物学报,2008,17(6):768-774.
[13]孙宪印,米勇,王超,等. 基因型和环境及其互作效应对旱肥地小麦产量性状的影响[J]. 分子植物育种,2021,19(17):5899-5908.
[14]臧贺藏,曹廷杰,张杰,等. 不同生态条件下小麦新品种产量的基因型与环境互作分析[J]. 华北农学报,2021,36(6):88-95.
[15]黄松,张天海,黄岩,等. 不同小麦品种蛋白质含量与面团稳定时间的相关回归分析[J]. 分子植物育种,2023,21(21):7135-7141.
[16]温建,孙成金,汪松玉,等. 中国小麦主产区重要品质性状演变分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(19):75-80.
[17]董一帆,任毅,程宇坤,等. 冬小麦籽粒主要品质性状的全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国农业科学,2023,56(11):2047-2063.
[18]黄晓荣,甘斌杰,夏孝群,等. 安徽省春性小麦区系主要品质性状分析[J]. 麦类作物学报,2023,43(5):582-590.
[19]张平平,姚金保,王化敦,等. 江苏省优质软麦品种品质特性与饼干加工品质的关系[J]. 作物学报,2020,46(4):23-34.
[20]EDWARD J S, MARY J. Basis for soft wheat for end-use quality[J]. Crop Science,2012,52:21.
[21]常成,马传喜. 品种和种植环境对软质小麦品质性状的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报,2003，30(3):265-268.
[22]ANNICCHIARICO P. Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis of genotype-location interaction in variety trials repeated over years[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics,1997,94(8):1072-1077.
[23]崔顺利,何美敬,侯名语,等. 利用GGE双标图分析花生品质性状的基因型——环境互作[J]. 中国油料作物学报,2021,43(4):617-626.
[24]Cereals & Grains Association. AACC approved methods of analysis,11th ed. Method 38-12.02[S/OL].
[2023-12-01]. https://www.cerealsgrains.org/resources/Methods/Pages/38Gluten.aspx.
[25]中华人民共和国农业部. 小麦实验制粉第1部分：设备、样品制备和润麦：NY/T 1094.1-2006 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.
[26]李伟琦,支小刚,赵建华,等. 基于AMMI模型和GGE双标图的玉米区域实验分析[J]. 寒旱农业科学,2023,2(7):607-610.
[27]王淑君,王阔,刘金荣,等. AMMI 模型分析夏谷品种适应性[J]. 中国种业,2014(10):48-50.
[28]刘卫星,贺群玲,张枫叶,等. 大粒花生品种区域试验的AMMI模型分析[J]. 作物杂志,2020(2):60-64.
[29]TADEUSZ A, ZOFIA B, ZYGMUNT K. Effect of genotype, environment and their interaction on quality parameters of wheat breeding lines of diverse grain Hardness[J]. Plant Production Science,2012,15(3):192-203.
[30]MA M M, LI Y C. Current situation and key parameters for improving wheat quality in china[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science,2021,12:1-13.
[31]JING Q, JIANG D, DAI T B. Effects of genotype and environment on wheat grain quality and protein components[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2003,14(10):1649-1653.
[32]辛培尧. 基因型、环境及其互作对河西走廊春小麦品质性状及产量影响的研究[D]. 兰州：甘肃农业大学,2002.
[33]胡承霖. 安徽麦作学[M]. 合肥:安徽科学技术出版社,2009:215-224.

相似文献/References:

[1]戴习彬,王远,周志林,等.菜用甘薯产量稳定性及试验点鉴别力综合分析[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(01):22.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.01.003]
　DAI Xi-bin,WANG Yuan,ZHOU Zhi-lin,et al.Comprehensive analysis of yield stability and testing sites discrimination of leaf-vegetable sweetpotato varieties[J].,2023,(07):22.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.01.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2023-12-12基金项目：安徽省科技重大专项(202204c06020061)；安徽省农业农村厅小麦良种联合攻关项目(2021-2025)；安徽省小麦现代产业技术体系项目(2021-2025)作者简介：訾金爽(1999-)，男，安徽宿州人，硕士研究生，研究方向为作物遗传育种。(E-mail)zjs17681016813@163.com通讯作者：郑文寅，(E-mail)zhengwenyin_75@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-09-14