[1]徐筋燕,何晓兰,邵明灿,等.不同连作年限栝楼根际土壤微生物群落多样性分析[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(05):1140-1150.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.006]
 XU Jin-yan,HE Xiao-lan,SHAO Ming-can,et al.Analysis of microbial community diversity in rhizosphere soil of continuous cropping Trichosanthes kirilowii[J].,2023,(05):1140-1150.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.006]
点击复制

不同连作年限栝楼根际土壤微生物群落多样性分析()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年05期
页码:
1140-1150
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2023-08-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis of microbial community diversity in rhizosphere soil of continuous cropping Trichosanthes kirilowii
作者:
徐筋燕1何晓兰1邵明灿1万云龙2刁亚梅3杨中海4郭书巧1
(1.江苏省农业科学院经济作物研究所,江苏南京210014;2.江苏省农业科学院蔬菜研究所,江苏南京210014;3.江苏农林职业技术学院农学园艺学院,江苏句容212400;4.涟水雨果农业发展有限公司,江苏淮安223411)
Author(s):
XU Jin-yan1HE Xiao-lan1SHAO Ming-can1WAN Yun-long2DIAO Ya-mei3YANG Zhong-hai4GUO Shu-qiao1
(1.Institute of Industrial Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;2.Institute of Vegetable Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;3.School of Agronomy and Horticulture, Jiangsu Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry, Jurong 212400, China;4.Lianshui Yuguo Agricultural Development Co., Ltd., Huai’an 223411, China)
关键词:
栝楼连作根际土壤微生物群落土壤理化性质高通量测序
Keywords:
Trichosanthes kirilowiicontinuous croppingrhizosphere soilmicrobial communityphysicochemical properties of the soilhigh-throughput sequencing
分类号:
S567.23+9
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.05.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为明确连作对栝楼根际土壤微生物群落的影响和栝楼连作障碍产生的原因,以连作2年和连作4年的栝楼根际土壤为研究对象,进行土壤理化性质测定以及土壤细菌16S和真菌ITS高通量测序。土壤理化性质测定结果表明,与连作2年的栝楼根际土壤样本相比,连作4年的栝楼根际土壤样本中有机碳含量下降;与对照土壤样本和连作2年的栝楼根际土壤样本相比,连作4年的栝楼根际土壤样本阳离子交换量(CEC)下降,说明土壤保肥能力已下降。细菌群落α多样性分析结果显示,栝楼连作对细菌群落的影响相对较小。细菌群落结构分析结果表明,与对照土壤样本相比,栝楼连作根际土壤中一些具有重要功能的细菌门相对丰度下降。与对照土壤样本相比,连作2年和连作4年的栝楼根际土壤样本中真菌群落群落结构和组成发生明显变化,一些有害真菌属如Stagonosporopsis、Rhizoctonia和Colletotrichum的相对丰度大幅增加。典型相关分析结果表明,硝态氮含量、全磷含量和速效磷含量是栝楼根际土壤微生物群落多样性的主要影响因素;pH值、阳离子交换量是CK土壤微生物群落多样性的主要影响因素。
Abstract:
To clarify the effects of continuous cropping on the rhizosphere soil microbial community of Trichosanthes kirilowii and the causes of continuous cropping obstacles, rhizosphere soil samples of Trichosanthes kirilowii after continuous cropping for two and four years were used for analyzing in this study. The physicochemical properties of the soil samples were determined, and the bacterial 16S library and fungal ITS library were constructed and sequenced by high-throughput sequencing technology. The results of physicochemical properties showed that compared with the rhizosphere soil samples of Trichosanthes kirilowii after continuous cropping for two years, the organic carbon content in the rhizosphere soil samples of Trichosanthes kirilowii after continuous cropping for four years decreased. Compared with the control soil samples and the rhizosphere soil samples of Trichosanthes kirilowii after continuous cropping for two years, the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of soil samples began to decrease after four years of continuous cropping, indicating that the soil fertility retention capacity began to decrease. The results of α-diversity of bacterial communities showed that the continuous cropping of Trichosanthes kirilowii had a relatively small effect on bacterial community. However, the relative abundance of some functional bacteria in the rhizosphere soil samples of continuous cropping Trichosanthes kirilowii decreased campared with that in the control soil samples. Compared with the control soil samples, the structure and composition of fungal communities in the rhizosphere soil samples of Trichosanthes kirilowii after continuous cropping for two years and four years changed significantly, and the relative abundance of some harmful fungi such as Stagonosporopsis, Rhizoctonia and Colletotrichum increased significantly. The results of canonical correlation analysis showed that nitrate nitrogen content, total phosphorus content and available phosphorus content were the main influencing factors of microbial community diversity in rhizosphere soil of Trichosanthes kirilowii, and pH and CEC were the main influencing factors of soil microbial community diversity in CK.

参考文献/References:

[1]宋宁,王新苗,樊俐慧,等. 天花粉的临床应用及其用量探究[J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2020, 36(3): 433-435.
[2]王静,蒋杰,李新朋,等. 天花粉治疗糖尿病物质基础及作用机制研究进展[J]. 药学研究, 2021,40(10):684-686,697.
[3]司红梅,于旭东,商建伟,等. 基于网络药理学探讨威灵仙-天花粉药对抗癌的作用机制[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2021, 27(5): 182-190.
[4]刘岱琳,曲戈霞,王乃利,等. 瓜蒌的抗血小板聚集活性成分研究[J]. 中草药, 2004,35(12): 1334-1336.
[5]郭琳,苗明三. 瓜蒌化学、药理及临床应用探讨[J]. 中医学报, 2014,29(6): 865-868.
[6]闫爱国,刘建勋,李欣志,等. 瓜蒌薤白半夏汤合血府逐瘀汤组方对小型猪痰瘀互结证冠心病模型心肌细胞凋亡及相关蛋白表达的影响[J]. 中国中药杂志,2015,40(11): 2174-2179.
[7]何湛湛,杨桢,亓玉婕,等. 枳实薤白桂枝汤现代药理作用研究进展[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2023,29(6):254-259.
[8]何玲玲,赵玲. 瓜蒌薤白半夏汤防治新型冠状病毒肺炎潜在应用的研究进展[J]. 现代药物与临床, 2020,35(5): 1024-1027.
[9]董陈颍,杨鸿. 基于网络药理学探讨宣白承气汤对新冠肺炎的抗炎作用机制[J]. 海南医学院学报, 2020,26(19): 1446-1454.
[10]孟小勤,鲁奇亮,刘姗,等. 田和炳宣透汤用于新冠肺炎瘥后防复验案4则[J]. 四川中医, 2021, 39(3):16-19.
[11]阮维斌,王敬国,张福锁. 连作障碍因素对大豆养分吸收和固氮作用的影响[J]. 生态学报,2003,23(1):22-29.
[12]杨凡,王建宏,蔡毓新,等. 设施黄瓜连作障碍灾变机制及酵素菌应用研究进展[J]. 中国瓜菜,2022,35(7): 6-12.
[13]王梓,李勇,丁万隆. 人参化感自毒作用与连作障碍机制研究进展[J]. 中国现代中药, 2017, 19(7): 1040-1044.
[14]李丽,蒋景龙. 西洋参化感自毒作用与连作障碍研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(13):4436-4443.
[15]LIU Z X, LIU J J, YUA Z H, et al. Long-term continuous cropping of soybean is comparable to crop rotation in mediating microbial abundance, diversity and community composition [J]. Soil & Tillage Research, 2020, 197: 104503.
[16]CHEN S, QI G F, LUO T, et al. Continuous-cropping tobacco caused variance of chemical properties and structure of bacterial network in soils [J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2018, 29:4106-4120.
[17]MENDES R, GARBEVA P, RAAIJMAKERS J M. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms [J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2013, 37(5):634-663.
[18]RICHARD J, MANUELA P, ANTONELLA S, et al. The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition-current knowledge and future directions[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1617.
[19]LI X G, DING C F, ZHANG T L, et al. Fungal pathogen accumulation at the expense of plant-beneficial fungi as a consequence of consecutive peanut monoculturing [J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2014, 72: 11-18.
[20]XIONG W, LI Z G, LIU H J, et al. The effect of long-term continuous cropping of black pepper on soil bacterial communities as determined by 454 pyrosequencing [J]. PLoS One, 2015,10(8): e0136946.
[21]PATERSON E. Importance of rhizodeposition in the coupling of plant and microbial productivity [J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2003, 54: 741-750.
[22]WANG Y Z, XU X M, LIU T M, et al. Analysis of bacterial and fungal communities in continuous-cropping ramie (Boehmeria nivea L. Gaud) fields in different areas in China [J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 3264.
[23]涂勇,杨文钰,刘卫国,等. 大豆与烤烟不同套作年限对根际土壤微生物数量的影响[J]. 作物学报,2015,41(5):733-742.
[24]CUI J, LI Y, WANG C, et al. Characteristics of the rhizosphere bacterial community across different cultivation years in saline-alkaline paddy soils of Songnen Plain of China [J]. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2018, 64: 925-936.
[25]赖家豪,熊桂红,刘 冰,等. 放线菌活性物质的挖掘与分离技术研究进展[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(13):82-89.
[26]银江林,李蜜,易湘茜,等. 广西涠洲岛3种海参共附生细菌多样性及其延缓衰老活性分析[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(10):2904-2912.
[27]纠敏,李晶晶,李伟山,等. 大豆疫霉病病菌生防放线菌的筛选、鉴定及生防效果[J].江苏农业学报,2021,37(5):1137-1142.
[28]范江龙,李欣蕊,席雪冬. 小麦赤霉病生物防治研究进展[J].生物加工过程,2021,19(4):420-431.
[29]程欢,张东华,张俊忠,等. 苹果砧木T337不同组织内生菌群落及其功能预测[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(14):144-154.
[30]李朝生,田丹丹,覃柳燕,等. 香蕉套种黑皮冬瓜对香蕉枯萎病的防控效果及土壤微生物群落的影响[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(5):1238-1245.
[31]彭玉娇,崔学宇,邵元元,等. 不同树龄沙田柚果园土壤肥力、叶片养分和土壤细菌群落的特征[J].江苏农业学报,2021,37(2):348-354.
[32]MAHAPATRA S, RAO E S, SANDEEPKUMAR G M, et al. Stagonosporopsis cucurbitacearum the causal agent of gummy stem blight of watermelon in India [J]. Australasian Plant Disease Notes, 2020, 15. DOI:10.1007/s13314-020-0376-z.
[33]VAGHEFI N, PETHYBRIDGE S J, FORD R, et al. Stagonosporopsis spp. associated with ray blight disease of Asteraceae [J]. Australasian Plant Pathology, 2012, 41(6): 675-686.
[34]GONZALEZ M, PUJOL M, METRAUX J P, et al. Tobacco leaf spot and root rot caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kühn [J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2011, 12(3): 209-216.
[35]DEAN R, VAN KAN J A L, PRETORIUS Z A, et al. The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology [J]. Molecular Plant Pathology, 2012, 13 (4): 414-430.
[36]CARLUCCI A, RAIMONDO M L, SANTOS J, et al. Plectosphaerella species associated with root and collar rots of horticultural crops in southern Italy [J]. Persoonia, 2012, 28: 34-48.
[37]HILL V R, KAHLER A M, JOTHIKUMAR N, et al. Multistate evaluation of an ultrafiltration-based procedure for simultaneous recovery of enteric microbes in 100-liter tap water sample [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2007, 73: 4218-4225.
[38]YU H, SI P, SHAO W, et al. Response of enzyme activities and microbial communities to soil amendment with sugar alcohols [J]. Microbiologyopen, 2016, 5: 604-615.
[39]KRAGELUND C, LEVANTESI C, BORGER A. Identity abundance and ecophysiology of filamentous Chloroflexi species present in activated sludge treatment plants [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2007, 59: 671-682.
[40]DYTCZAK M A, LONDRY K L, OLESZKIEWICZ J A. Nitrifying genera in activated sludge may influence nitrification rates [J]. Water Environment Research, 2008, 80(5): 388-396.
[41]熊艺,郑璐,沈仁芳,等. 缺氮胁迫对小麦根际土壤微生物群落结构特征的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2022, 59 (1):218-230.
[42]LI Y L, TREMBLAY J, BAINARD L D, et al. Long-term effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on soil microbial community structure and function under continuous wheat production [J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2020, 22(3):1066-1088.
[43]KAVAMURA V N, HAYAT R, CLARK I M, et al. Inorganic nitrogen application affects both taxonomical and predicted functional structure of wheat rhizosphere bacterial communities [J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 1074.
[44]WHEELER K A, HURDMAN B F, PITT J I. Influence of pH on the growth of some toxigenic 470 species of Aspergillus, Penicillium and Fusarium [J]. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 1991, 12(2/3): 141-149.
[45]MARSCHNER P, JENTSCHKE G, GODBOLD D L. Cation exchange capacity and lead sorption in ectomycorrhizal fungi [J]. Plant and Soil, 1998, 205: 93-98.

相似文献/References:

[1]李春宏,殷剑美,王立,等.连作对芋头根际土壤理化性状和微生物特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(04):825.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.011]
 LI Chun hong,YIN Jian mei,WANG Li,et al.Effects of continuous cropping on soil physicochemical and microbial properties of taro[J].,2019,(05):825.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.011]
[2]王廷峰,赵密珍,关玲,等.玉米套作及秸秆还田对草莓连作土壤养分及微生物区系的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(06):1421.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.06.022]
 WANG Ting-feng,ZHAO Mi-zhen,GUAN-Ling,et al.Effects of intercropping with corn and straw returning on nutrients and microflora in strawberry continuous cropping soil[J].,2019,(05):1421.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.06.022]
[3]高晶霞,吴雪梅,牛勇琴,等.辣根素水乳剂对连作辣椒生长及土壤酶活性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(01):116.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.015]
 GAO Jing-xia,WU Xue-mei,NIU Yong-qin,et al.Effect of athomin water emulsion on growth and soil enzyme activities of continuous cropping pepper[J].,2021,(05):116.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.015]
[4]何雅祺,王鑫鑫,张弛,等.间作、套种模式在中药材栽培中的效应研究进展[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(04):1077.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.04.034]
 HE Ya-qi,WANG Xin-xin,ZHANG Chi,et al.Research progress on the effects of intercropping and interplanting modes in the Cultivation of chinese medicinal materials[J].,2021,(05):1077.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.04.034]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-09-19 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年项目(31901559);江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(21)3167];江苏省苏北科技专项(SZ-HA2021034)作者简介:徐筋燕(1985-),女,江苏昆山人,助理研究员,主要从事栝楼遗传育种研究。(Tel)025-84390290;(E-mail)xujinyan0610@126.com 通讯作者:郭书巧,(E-mail)sg2015@jaas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-09-13