[1]马思宇,刘瑞香,郭占斌,等.藜麦光合特性及非结构性碳水化合物含量与产量的关系[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(06):1378-1385.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.003]
　MA Si-yu,LIU Rui-xiang,GUO Zhan-bin,et al.Photosynthetic characteristics and the relationship between non-structural carbohydrates content and yield of quinoa[J].,2021,(06):1378-1385.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.003]
点击复制

藜麦光合特性及非结构性碳水化合物含量与产量的关系()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
1378-1385
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2021-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Photosynthetic characteristics and the relationship between non-structural carbohydrates content and yield of quinoa
作者:
马思宇1; 刘瑞香1; 郭占斌2; 杨瑞萍1
（1.内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院，内蒙古呼和浩特010011；2.内蒙古益稷生物科技有限公司，内蒙古呼和浩特010011 ）
Author(s):
MA Si-yu1; LIU Rui-xiang1; GUO Zhan-bin2; YANG Rui-ping1
(1.College of Desert Control Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010011, China;2.Inner Mongolia Yiji Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010011, China)
关键词:
藜麦; 光合特性; 非结构性碳水化合物; 产量; 相关性
Keywords:
quinoa; photosynthetic characteristics; non-structural carbohydrate; yield; relevance
分类号:
S519
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以陇藜4号、Z4、青藜、蒙4、蒙5等5个品种（系）藜麦为试验材料，研究藜麦的光合性能、非结构性碳水化合物含量及其与产量的关系。分别在分枝期、现穗期、开花期、灌浆期、成熟期测定中上部叶片的净光合速率（Pn）、气孔导度（Gs）、胞间CO2浓度（Ci）、蒸腾速率（Tr）、叶片水分利用效率（WUE）、叶绿素含量以及非结构性碳水化合物含量，成熟后测定产量。结果表明，5个品种（系）藜麦的产量存在显著差异，陇藜4号的产量最高。藜麦叶片的Pn、Gs、Tr、WUE随生育进程推进均呈先上升后下降的趋势，Ci与叶绿素含量在整个生育期呈下降趋势。非结构性碳水化合物含量在整个生育期的变化趋势不同。藜麦分枝期Pn与产量呈显著正相关，灌浆期Pn与产量呈极显著正相关；Gs在现穗期与产量呈极显著正相关，开花期Gs与产量呈显著正相关；Ci、Tr、WUE与产量的相关性不显著。灌浆期可溶性糖含量与产量呈显著正相关；蔗糖含量、果糖含量、葡萄糖含量与产量的相关性不显著；可溶性淀粉含量与产量在成熟期呈极显著正相关。藜麦产量高低受多因素综合作用，藜麦生育中后期的Pn、Gs是高产、高光效品种鉴定评价的重要指标，应侧重培育在灌浆期与成熟期可溶性糖含量高与可溶性淀粉含量高的品种。
Abstract:
The photosynthetic performance, non-structural carbohydrate content and its relationship with yield of quinoa were studied by using five varieties (lines) of quinoa (Longli No.4, Z4, Qingli, Meng4 and Meng5) as experimental materials. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), transpiration rate (Tr), water use efficiency (WUE), chlorophyll content and non structural carbohydrate content of middle and upper leaves were measured at branching stage, panicle stage, flowering stage, grain filling stage and milky stage respectively, and the yield was determined after maturity. The results showed that there were significant differences in the yield of quinoa among five varieties (lines), Longli No.4 had the highest yield. The Pn, Gs, Tr and WUE of quinoa increased first and then decreased with the growth process, while the contents of Ci and chlorophyll decreased during the whole growth period. The variation trend of non-structural carbohydrates content was different during the whole growth period. There was a significant positive correlation between Pn and yield at branching stage and extremely significant positive correlation between Pn and yield at filling stage. Gs was significantly positively correlated with yield at heading stage, and there was a significant positive correlation between G2 and yield at flowering stage. There was no significant correlation between Ci, Tr, WUE and yield. There was a significant positive correlation between soluble sugar content and yield at the filling stage. There was no significant correlation between sucrose content, fructose content, glucose content and yield. There was a significant positive correlation between soluble starch content and yield at maturity stage. The yield of quinoa is affected by multiple factors. The Pn and Gs in the middle and late growth period of quinoa are important indices for the identification and evaluation of high-yield and high-light-efficiency varieties, and the cultivars with high soluble sugar content and high soluble starch content in the grain-filling stage and mature stage should be cultivated.

参考文献/References:

[1]ZURITA-SILVA A， FUENTES，ZAMORA P，et al.Breeding quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): potential and perspectives[J]. Molecular Breeding，2014，34(1):13-30.
[2]肖正春，张广伦.藜麦及其资源开发利用[J].中国野生植物资源，2014，33(2):62-66.
[3]RUBN V，BLANCA H L.Nutritional and biological value of quinoa(Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)[J]. Current Opinion in Food Science，2017(14):1-6.
[4]PEREIRA E，ENCINA-Z C，BARROS L，et al.Chemical and nutritional characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd (Quinoa) grains: a good alternative to nutritious food.[J].Food Chemistry，2019(280):110-114.
[5]任贵兴，杨修仕，么杨.中国藜麦产业现状[J].作物杂志，2015(5):1-5.
[6]史海萍.试析藜麦行业研究现状及其商业化种植前景[J].南方农业，2017，11(27):71，73.
[7]刘锁荣，范文虎. 促进山西藜麦种植规模化及产业链形成的建议[J].山西农业科学，2011，39(7):767-769.
[8]王鑫.藜麦在山西不同生态区域的适应性研究[D].晋中：山西农业大学，2018.
[9]姚庆，西尔娜依，崔宏亮.新疆伊犁河谷藜麦适应性研究初报[J].山西农业科学，2018，46(4):576-579.
[10]李娜娜，丁汉凤，郝俊杰，等.藜麦在中国的适应性种植及发展展望[J].中国农学通报，2017，33(10):31-36.
[11]任永峰，王志敏，赵沛义，等.内蒙古阴山北麓区藜麦生态适应性研究[J].作物杂志，2016(2):79-82.
[12]刘洋，闫殿海，毛玉金，等.藜麦在青海的引种及适应性鉴定方法探讨[J].青海农林科技，2016(2):61-63.
[13]王志恒，黄思麒，李成虎，等.13种藜麦萌发期抗逆性综合评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)，2021，49(1):25-36.
[14]王志恒，徐中伟，周吴艳，等.藜麦种子萌发阶段响应干旱和盐胁迫变化的综合评价[J].中国生态农业学报，2020，28(7):1033-1042.
[15]吕亚慈，郭晓丽，时丽冉，等.不同藜麦品种萌发期抗旱性研究[J].种子，2018，37(6):86-89.
[16]石振兴. 国内外藜麦品质分析及其减肥活性研究[D].北京：中国农业科学院，2016.
[17]胡一波，杨修仕，陆平，等.中国北部藜麦品质性状的多样性和相关性分析[J].作物学报，2017，43(3):464-470.
[18]王晨静，赵习武，陆国权，等.藜麦特性及开发利用研究进展[J].浙江农林大学学报，2014，31(2):296-301.
[19]王倩朝，孔治有，刘俊娜，等.藜麦籽粒主要营养及抗氧化成分遗传特性分析与评价[J].云南农业大学学报(自然科学版)，2020，35(6):931-937.
[20]陈志婧，廖成松.7个不同品种藜麦营养成分比较分析[J].食品工业科技，2020，41(23):266-271.
[21]李翔，蒋方国，凌云坤，等.响应面法优化藜麦核桃酸奶发酵工艺研究[J].食品研究与开发，2020，41(23):131-136.
[22]魏小雁，成宇峰.响应面法优化藜麦面条加工工艺[J].粮食与油脂，2020，33(12):53-58.
[23]杨贵恒，聂聪，姚青海，等.藜麦啤酒的酿造方法及香气化合物[J].食品工业，2020，41(11):51-54.
[24]凌启鸿.作物群体质量[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社，2000.
[25]FISCHER R A，REES D，SAYRE K D，et al. Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate，and cooler canopies[J]. Crop Science，1998，38：1467-1475.
[26]王雅梅. 玉米-大豆不同宽幅间作对大豆光合特性和水分利用效率的影响[D].北京：中国农业科学院，2020.
[27]ZHANG M ，SU W，FU Y， et al. Super-resolution enhancement of Sentinel-2 image for retrieving LAI and chlorophyll content of summer corn[J]. European Journal of Agronomy，2019，111:378-396.
[28]焦念元，宁堂原，赵春，等.玉米花生间作复合体系光合特性的研究[J].作物学报，2006，32(6):917-923.
[29]李培广，周海燕，陈翠云，等.阿拉善荒漠优势植物可溶性糖的季节变化[J].生态学杂志，2012，31(12):3018-3023.
[30]李天来，焦晓赤，齐明芳，等.不同耐冷番茄叶片光合速率及可溶性糖的变化特性研究[J].华北农学报，2011，26(4):97-103.
[31]王文杰，贺海升，关宇，等.丙酮和二甲基亚砜法测定植物叶绿素和类胡萝卜素的方法学比较[J].植物研究，2009，29(2):224-229.
[32]吴强盛. 植物生理学实验指导[M].北京：中国农业出版社,2018.
[33]BENDEVIS M，SUN Y，SHABALA S，et al.Differentiation of photoperiod-induced ABA and soluble sugar responses of two quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation，2014，33(3):562-570.
[34]李照君，田汝美，蒲艳艳，等.大豆光合指标日变化规律及其与产量关系研究[J].大豆科学，2020，39(4):577-586.
[35]马淑蓉，高小丽，李云，等.不同产量水平小豆叶片的光合特性[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)，2013，41(4):79-85.
[36]冯国郡，章建新，李宏琪，等.甜高粱光合生理特性及其与产量的关系[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)，2013，41(4):93-100.
[37]华劲松，赵应林，王华强，等. 不同收获时间对藜麦籽粒产量及物理特性的影响［J］.江苏农业科学，2020,48(21):119-122.
[38]王艳青,卢文洁,李春花,等. 10个藜麦新品系主要农艺性状分析与综合评价[J].南方农业学报,2019,50(3):540-545.
[39]韩俊梅. 杂交大豆光合生理生化机制的研究[D].太原：山西大学，2013.
[40]申加祥，宁堂原，李增嘉，等.不同熟期玉米套作夏玉米可溶性糖含量与产量形成[J].玉米科学，2004，12(2):65-68.
[41]王晓慧，徐克章，李大勇，等.大豆品种遗传改良过程中叶片可溶性糖含量和比叶重的变化[J].大豆科学，2007，26(6):879-884.
[42]侯俊峰，黄鑫，侯阁阁，等.非结构性碳水化合物积累与小麦植株抗旱性及产量的关系[J].西北农业学报，2017，26(11):1590-1597.
[43]POURTAU N， MARS M，PURDY S，et al. Interactions of abscisic acid and sugar signalling in the regulation of leaf senescence[J]. Planta，2004，219(5):765-772.
[44]MAI L，HOCH G，KRNER C. Source/sink removal affects mobile carbohydrates in Pinus cembra at the Swiss treeline[J]. Trees，2002，16(4/5):331-337.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘红江,陈虞雯,张岳芳,等.不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
　LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Yu-wen,ZHANG Yue-fang,et al.Effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice[J].,2016,(06):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
[2]张辉,朱绿丹,安霞,等.水分和钾肥耦合对甘薯光合特性和水分利用效率的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1294.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.016]
　ZHANG Hui,ZHU Lü-dan,AN Xia,et al.Effects of water coupled with K on the photosynthetic characteristics of sweet potato and its water use efficiency[J].,2016,(06):1294.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.016]
[3]李翊华,张芬琴,陈修斌,等.温室水肥耦合对甜椒生长和果期叶片光合特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(02):415.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.030]
　LI Yi-hua,ZHANG Fen-qin,CHEN Xiu-bin,et al.Growth and photosynthetic characteristics at fruiting period of greenhouse pepper in response to water and fertilizer coupling[J].,2015,(06):415.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.030]
[4]曲继松,张丽娟,冯海萍,等.根域限制对柠条基质黄瓜幼苗生长及气体交换参数的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(01):130.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.020]
　QU Ji-song,ZHANG Li-juan,FENG Hai-ping,et al.Effect of root-zone volume on the growth and gas exchange parameters of cucumber seedlings in caragana substrates[J].,2015,(06):130.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.01.020]
[5]李琪,王清,王连喜,等.花后遮光渍水对南京冬小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(03):555.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.03.011]
　LI Qi,WANG Qing,WANG Lian-xi,et al.Photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat in response to post-anthesis shading and waterlogging in Nanjing[J].,2017,(06):555.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.03.011]
[6]刘忆文,董彦娜,白靖怡,等.加拿大美女樱的耐荫性[J].江苏农业学报,2017,(06):1438.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.035]
　LIU Yi-wen,DONG Yan-na,BAI Jing-yi,et al.Study on the shade tolerance of Verbenr hybrida[J].,2017,(06):1438.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2017.06.035]
[7]冯渊圆,胡海波,祝文斌,等.苏北沿海林农复合经营系统环境特征及农作物光合特性[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(01):96.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.01.014]
　FENG Yuan-yuan,HU Hai-bo,ZHU Wen-bin,et al.Study on environmental characteristics and photosynthesis characteristics of crops for agroforestry management systems in northern Jiangsu province[J].,2019,(06):96.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.01.014]
[8]朱绍丹,陈丽,焦健,等.土壤干旱及生草间作对油橄榄光合特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(02):282.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.02.006]
　ZHU Shao-dan,CHEN Li,JIAO Jian,et al.Effects of soil drought and grass intercropping on photosynthetic characteristics of olive[J].,2019,(06):282.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.02.006]
[9]孙彦坤,陈睿,李静,等.不同降雨年型下反枝苋和大豆光合特征的比较[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(03):554.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.03.008]
　SUN Yan-kun,CHEN Rui,LI Jing,et al.Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics between Amaranthus retroexus and Glycine max under different annual rainfall pattern[J].,2019,(06):554.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.03.008]
[10]束晓春,李乃伟,汤兴利,等.NaCl处理对不同珊瑚菜种源光合生理和药用有效成分的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(04):790.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.006]
　SHU Xiao chun,LI Nai wei,TANG Xing li,et al.Effects of NaCl stress on photosynthetic physiology and active component of different Glehnia littoralis provenance[J].,2019,(06):790.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.04.006]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-03-15基金项目：内蒙古关键技术攻关项目（2019GG355）；内蒙古自然科学基金项目（2020MS03091）；呼和浩特市应用技术研究与开发项目（2019-农-20）作者简介：马思宇（1994-），女，山东济南人，硕士研究生，研究方向为植物资源保护与利用。（E-mail）sm370103@163.com通讯作者：刘瑞香，（E-mail）liuruix@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-01-07