[1]陈雅琦,莫正海,娄文睿,等.煤污病胁迫下3个薄壳山核桃品种的光合特性[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(04):968-973.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.04.020]
　CHEN Ya-qi,MO Zheng-hai,LOU Wen-rui,et al.Effects of sooty mold on photosynthetic characteristics of three pecan cultivars[J].,2021,(04):968-973.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.04.020]
点击复制

煤污病胁迫下3个薄壳山核桃品种的光合特性()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年04期
页码:
968-973
栏目:
园艺
出版日期:
2021-08-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of sooty mold on photosynthetic characteristics of three pecan cultivars
作者:
陈雅琦1; 2; 3; 莫正海1; 2; 3; 娄文睿1; 2; 3; 翟敏1; 2; 3; 郭忠仁1; 2; 3; 宣继萍1; 2; 3
（1.江苏省中国科学院植物研究所，江苏南京210014；2.江苏省植物资源研究与利用重点实验室，江苏南京210014；3.江苏省农业种质资源保护与利用平台，江苏南京210014）
Author(s):
CHEN Ya-qi1; 2; 3; MO Zheng-hai1; 2; 3; LOU Wen-rui1; 2; 3; ZHAI Min1; 2; 3; GUO Zhong-ren1; 2; 3; XUAN Ji-ping1; 2; 3
(1.Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;2.Jiangsu Key Laboratory for the Research and Utilization of Plant Resources, Nanjing 210014, China;3.The Jiangsu Provincial Platform for Conservation and Utilization of Agricultural Germplasm, Nanjing 210014, China)
关键词:
薄壳山核桃; 煤污病; 光响应曲线; 叶绿素荧光参数
Keywords:
pecan; sooty mold; light response curve; chlorophyll fluorescence parameters
分类号:
S436.64
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.04.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究煤污病对薄壳山核桃光合特性的影响，以Stuart、Wichita、Pawnee 3种受煤污病危害程度不同的品种为对象，测定染病叶片及健康叶片的光合参数、光响应曲线以及叶绿素荧光参数。结果表明：煤污病可显著影响薄壳山核桃叶片的光合气体交换，3个品种染病叶片光合气体交换参数[净光合速率（Pn）、蒸腾速率（Tr）、胞间CO2浓度（Ci）及气孔导度（Gs）]较健康叶片均出现显著下降（P<0.05），其程度从大到小依次为Stuart >Wichita > Pawnee。就Pn而言，Stuart染病叶片下降61.07%，Wichita 染病叶片下降51.26%，Pawnee染病叶片下降40.62%。光响应曲线显示，3个品种染病叶片的最大净光合速率（Pnmax）均显著低于健康叶片，暗呼吸速率（Rd）与健康叶片无显著差异，表观量子效率（AQY）均显著低于健康叶片，光补偿点（LCP）均显著高于健康叶片。3个品种染病叶片的叶绿素荧光参数（Fv/Fm、ΦPSⅡ、ETR、qP）相比于健康叶片，整体而言均出现了下降，但未达到显著水平。说明煤污病可造成薄壳山核桃叶片光合速率下降，净光合速率下降程度为40.62%～61.07%。染病叶片利用弱光的能力下降，合成的光合产物减少，而实际光合效率并未显著降低，光合机构仍较为稳定。
Abstract:
To explore the effects of sooty mold on photosynthetic characteristics of pecan, photosynthetic parameters, light response curves and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of infected and healthy leaves of Stuart, Wichita and Pawnee were measured. The results showed that sooty mold could significantly affect the photosynthetic gas exchange of pecan leaves, and the gas exchange parameters [net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance(Gs)] of infected leaves of three cultivars were significantly decreased compared with those of healthy leaves (P<0.05), with the order of Stuart > Wichita > Pawnee. The Pn of infected leaves of Stuart, Wichita, Pawnee decreased by 61.07%, 51.26% and 40.62%, respectively. The results of light response curves showed that maximum net photosynthetic rate （Pnmax） of infected leaves was significantly lower than that of healthy leaves, dark respiration rate (Rd) of infected leave had no significant difference with that of healthy leaves, apparent quantum efficiency (AQY) of infected leaves was significantly lower than that of healthy leaves, and light compensation point (LCP) of infected leaves was significantly higher than that of healthy leaves. Compared with those of healthy leaves, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fv/Fm, ΦPSⅡ, ETR, qP) of infected leaves of the three cultivars decreased, but the difference was not significant. In conclusion, sooty mold can reduce the photosynthetic rate of pecan leaves, and the Pn decreases by 40.62%-61.07%. The ability of weak light utilization and the photosynthetic production of infected leaves are decreased. The actual photosynthetic efficiency of infected leaves is not significantly reduced, and the photosynthetic mechanism is still relatively stable.

参考文献/References:

[1]常君，姚小华，杨水平，等. 水分胁迫对美国山核桃苗木生长的影响[J]. 林业科学研究，2009，22(1):134-138.
[2]贾晓东，王婵，莫正海，等. 美国山核桃与浙江山核桃果实品质的比较研究[J]. 天津农业科学，2013，19(3):28-31.
[3]刘壮壮，骆敏，彭方仁，等. 不同品种薄壳山核桃光合及快速叶绿素荧光诱导动力学特性[J]. 东北林业大学学报，2017，45(4):36-42.
[4]CHOMNUNTI P，HONGSANAN S，BEGOA A H，et al. The sooty moulds[J]. Fungal Diversity，2014，66(1):1-36.
[5]孙福金，陈永新. 油桃煤污病发生规律及防治[J]. 北方果树，2012(1):49.
[6]LEMOS-FILHO J P，PAIVA  A S. The effects of sooty mold on photosynthesis and mesophyll structure of mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King. Meliaceae)[J]. Bragantia，2006，65(1):11-17.
[7]SANTOS S A P，SANTOS C，SILVA S，et al. The effect of sooty mold on fluorescence and gas exchange properties of olive tree[J]. Turkish Journal of Biology，2013，37(5):620-628.
[8]BERRY J A，DOWNTON W J S． Environmental regulation of photosynthesis[M]．Berlin：Springer，1982：263-343．
[9]PRADO C H，MORAES J A P V D. Photosynthetic capacity and specific leaf mass in twenty woody species of cerrado vegetation under field conditions[J]. Photosynthetica, 1997, 33(1): 103-112.
[10]BEER S，BJRK M，BEARDALL J. Basic concepts and key parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence[M]// GAO K，HUTCHINS D A，BEARDALL J. Research methods of environmental physiology in aquatic sciences. Singapore:Springer,2020:221-229.
[11]谭晓红，彭祚登，贾忠奎，等. 不同刺槐品种光合光响应曲线的温度效应研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报，2010，32(2):64-68.
[12]许晨璐，孙晓梅，张守攻. 日本落叶松与长白落叶松及其杂种光合特性比较[J]. 北京林业大学学报，2012，34(4):62-66.
[13]刘思祝. 不同光照条件下红鳞蒲桃幼苗生长特性研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学，2012.
[14]白文玉，铁烈华，冯茂松，等. 不同种源桤木嫁接幼苗光合和叶绿素荧光特征[J]. 四川农业大学学报，2020，38(6):670-676.
[15]孙龙，彭祚登，王冲，等. 干旱胁迫对两种沙地灌木能源树种光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报：自然科学版，2014，38(2):99-104.
[16]FARQUHAR G D，SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology，1982，33:317-345.
[17]许大全. 光合作用气孔限制分析中的一些问题[J].植物生理学通讯,1997(4):241-244.
[18]潘俊倩，谷小红，郭宝林. 2种淫羊藿的光合日变化比较[J]. 农学学报，2017，7(4):51-57.
[19]汤文华，窦全琴，潘平平，等. 不同薄壳山核桃品种光合特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版，2020，44(3):81-88.
[20]何海洋，彭方仁，张瑞，等. 不同品种美国山核桃嫁接苗光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报：自然科学版，2015，39(4):19-25.
[21]张守仁. 叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论[J]. 植物学通报，1999，16(4):444-448.
[22]王可玢，许春辉，赵福洪，等. 水分胁迫对小麦旗叶某些体内叶绿素a荧光参数的影响[J]. 生物物理学报，1997，13(2):273-278.
[23]徐德聪，吕芳德，潘晓杰. 叶绿素荧光分析技术在果树研究中的应用[J]. 经济林研究，2003，21(3):88-91.
[24]郎剑锋，杜开书，赵荣艳，等. 烟煤病研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学，2010，38(7):3525-3527,3541.

相似文献/References:

[1]朱海军,生静雅,张普娟,等.贮藏温度对薄壳山核桃抗氧化功能及品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2015,(02):449.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.035]
　ZHU Hai-jun,SHENG Jing-ya,ZHANG Pu-juan,et al.Antioxidation and quality of pecan stored at different temperatures[J].,2015,(04):449.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2015.02.035]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2021-01-28基金项目：江苏省林业局林业科技创新项目[LYKJ(2020)04]作者简介：陈雅琦（1994-），女，江苏南京人，硕士研究生，主要从事薄壳山核桃种质资源利用研究。（E-mail）yqchen94@163.com通讯作者：宣继萍，（E-mail）xuanjiping@cnbg.net
更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-06