[1]文廷刚,王伟中,杨文飞,等.水稻穗分化期外源植物生长调节剂处理对颖花分化与退化的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(03):514-522.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.03.003]
 WEN Ting-gang,WANG Wei- zhong,YANG Wen-fei,et al.Effects of exogenous plant growth regulator treatments on rice spikelet differentiation and degeneration during panicle initiation stage[J].,2019,(03):514-522.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.03.003]
点击复制

水稻穗分化期外源植物生长调节剂处理对颖花分化与退化的影响()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
514-522
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2019-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of exogenous plant growth regulator treatments on rice spikelet differentiation and degeneration during panicle initiation stage
作者:
文廷刚12王伟中1杨文飞1顾大路1钱新民2施洪泉1孙爱侠1吴传万12
(1. 江苏徐淮地区淮阴农业科学研究所,江苏 淮安 223001;2.江苏省植物生长调节剂工程技术研究中心,江苏 淮安 223001)
Author(s):
WEN Ting-gang12WANG Wei-zhong1YANG Wen-fei1GU Da-lu1QIAN Xin-min2SHI Hong-quan1SUN Ai-xia1WU Chuan-wan12
(1.Huaiyin Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the Xuhuai District of Jiangsu Province, Huai’an 223001, China;2.Jiangsu Engineering and Technology Research Center for Plant Growth Regulators, Huai’an 223001, China)
关键词:
水稻植物生长调节剂穗分化期颖花分化与退化结实率
Keywords:
riceplant growth regulatorpanicle differentiation stagespikelet differentiation and degenerationseed setting rate
分类号:
S511
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.03.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以南粳9108为材料,在水稻生长的第一苞分化期(Ⅰ期)、枝梗及颖花分化期(Ⅱ期)、颖花分化雌雄蕊形成期(Ⅲ期)、雌雄蕊形成减数分裂期(Ⅳ期)喷施乙烯利(Eth, 10×10-3 mol/L)和多效唑(PP333,300 mg/L),以清水为对照(CK),研究不同时期外源调节剂处理对稻穗一次枝梗颖花和二次枝梗颖花的分化、退化以及穗部性状和产量构成的影响。结果表明,乙烯利在幼穗分化各时期处理均显著增加了水稻总颖花分化数和退化数,但每穗颖花数均表现为降低,尤以Ⅳ期每穗颖花数降低最多,其中主要降低了二次枝梗颖花数。多效唑在幼穗分化前期(Ⅰ和Ⅱ期)处理总颖花分化数、总颖花退化数和每穗颖花数均表现为增加;而在后期(Ⅲ和Ⅳ期)处理则相反。相关性分析结果显示,水稻结实率和实粒数与二次枝梗颖花数关系更紧密,而总颖花数和千粒质量与一次枝梗颖花数关系更紧密。方差分析结果显示,不同时期处理和调节剂处理以及不同时期处理与调节剂处理的交互作用对水稻穗部性状的影响均达到显著水平。因此,乙烯利处理通过减少一次枝梗颖花数和二次枝梗颖花数,从而降低了每穗颖花数和实粒数,空秕粒数增加,导致了结实率、千粒质量和产量的下降。多效唑前期(Ⅰ和Ⅱ期)处理通过提升一次枝梗颖花数和二次枝梗颖花数,促进了每穗颖花数的增加,从而提高了实粒数、结实率和千粒质量,最终提高了产量;但在后期(Ⅲ和Ⅳ期)处理则相反。
Abstract:
Nanjing 9108 was adopted as the rice material to investigate the effects of different plant growth regulator treactments on spikelet differentiation and degeneration for primary and second branch, as well as panicle traits and yield components in rice, which was treated at four different growth periods as follows: bud differentiation (Ⅰ), branch and floret differentiation stage (Ⅱ), spikelet differentiation to pistilstamen formation stage (Ⅲ), pistilstamen formation to pollen meiosis stage (Ⅳ) when ethephon (Eth,10×10-3 mol/L), paclobutrazol (PP333, 300 mg/L) and water (CK) were applied. The results showed that Eth significantly increased the total spikelet differentiation and degeneration in all stages during panicle initiation, and significantly reduced the number of spikelet per panicle, particularly at stages Ⅳ, which decreased the spikelet mainly in secondary branches. PP333 increased the total differentiation and degradation spikelet number as well as the spikelet per panicle when applied at the early stage (ⅠandⅡ). On the contrary, the results were the opposite when PP333 applied at the late stage (Ⅲ and Ⅳ). The correlation analysis results showed that the seed setting rate and grain number of rice were more closely related to the number of spikelet in secondary branches, while the total spikelet number and 1000grain weight were more closely related to the number of spikelet in primary branches. The variance analysis results showed that the effects of different period treatments and regulator treatments as well as their interaction on the panicle traits of rice reached significant levels. Therefore, Eth decreased the spikelet per panicle and grain number by reducing the number of primary and secondary branches, and increased the number of sterile grains, resulting in a decrease in seed setting rate, 1000grain weight and yield. PP333 promoted the increase of spikelet per panicle by increasing the number of primary and secondary branches at the early stage (ⅠandⅡ), thereby increasing the grain number, seed setting rate and 1000grain weight, and ultimately increasing the yield; but when PP333 was applied at the late stage (Ⅲ and Ⅳ), the opposite results were obtained.

参考文献/References:

[1]王惠芝. 氮素穗肥调控水稻颖花数形成的生理机制研究[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2007.
[2]凌启鸿,蔡建中,苏祖芳. 叶龄余数在稻穗分化进程鉴定中的应用价值[J]. 中国农业科学,1980,13(4):1-11.
[3]王亚梁,张玉屏,曾研华,等. 水稻穗分化期高温对颖花分化及退化的影响[J]. 中国农业气象,2015,36(6): 724-731.
[4]曾研华,张玉屏,向镜,等. 籼型常规早稻穗分化期低温对颖花形成和籽粒充实的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2015,26(7): 2007-2014.
[5]李刚华,王惠芝,王绍华,等. 穗肥对水稻穗分化期碳氮代谢及颖花数的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2010,33(1): 1-5.
[6]杨洪建,王余龙,黄建晔,等. 开放式空气CO2浓度增高对水稻颖花分化和退化的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2002,13(10): 1215-1218.
[7]阿加拉铁,薛大伟,李仕贵,等. 植物激素与水稻产量的关系[J]. 中国稻米,2006,13(5): 1-3.
[8]董庆坤,刘慧丽. 植物激素调控籽粒大小的研究进展[J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2015,47(6): 72-78.
[9]黄静静,王绍华,李刚华,等. 6苄基腺嘌呤对水稻颖花分化影响机制的研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2009, 32(3): 8-13.
[10]顾大路,王伟中,王红军,等. 乙烯利在水稻中后期应用的效果研究[J]. 江苏农业科学,2003,31(5):26-28.
[11]宫彦龙,徐海,夏原野,等. 幼穗分化期喷施表油菜素内酯(epiBR)对水稻穗部性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志,2016,32(2): 133-138.
[12]宫彦龙,雷月,夏原野,等. 幼穗分化期喷施细胞分裂素(CTK)对水稻穗部性状及株型性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017,33(5): 112-118.
[13]闫志强,徐海,宫彦龙,等. 籼粳稻的花时对乙烯利调控的响应及其敏感性差异[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报,2015,46(6):641-647.
[14]李宗霆,周燮. 植物激素及其免疫检测技术[M]. 南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1993:101-102.
[15]闫凯莉,韩云,谭廷钢,等. 15%多效唑可湿性粉剂对水稻生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 热带农业科学,2016,36(2): 73-76.
[16]孙克新. 多效唑调节杂交稻制种花期的效应及其解除[J]. 杂交水稻,2001,16(1): 17-18.
[17]赫明涛,王军,孙扣忠,等. 水稻制种花期相遇的调节技术[J]. 江苏农业科学,1999,27(4): 11-12.
[18]姚友礼,王余龙,蔡建中,等. 水稻大穗形成机理的研究——穗肥施用时期对每穗颖花分化、退化和现存数的影响[J]. 江苏农学院学报,1997,18(4): 29-35.
[19]姜辉,姜树坤,陈丽丽,等. 水稻顶端颖花退化的形态与发育学研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2016,39(1):7-11.
[20]赵长华,丁艳峰. 水稻穗粒数形成的生理生化研究进展[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2001,21(1):5-8.
[21]郑福余. 水稻二次枝梗颖花的灌浆程度对产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,1997,20(4):16-18.

相似文献/References:

[1]王士磊,丁正权,黄海祥.水稻隐性早熟突变体ref早熟性的遗传分析和基因定位[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):721.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.001]
 WANG Shi-lei,DING Zheng-quan,HUANG Hai-xiang.Inheritance and gene mapping of recessive earliness in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J].,2016,(03):721.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.001]
[2]王在满,郑乐,张明华,等.不同播种方式对直播水稻倒伏指数和根系生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.002]
 WANG Zai-man,ZHENG Le,ZHANG Ming-hua,et al.Effects of seeding manners on lodging index and root growth of directseeded rice[J].,2016,(03):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.002]
[3]易能,薛延丰,石志琦,等.微囊藻毒素对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的胁迫作用[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):729.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.003]
 YI Neng,XUE Yan-feng,SHI Zhi-qi,et al.Inhibitory effect of microcystins on seed germination and seedling growth of rice[J].,2016,(03):729.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.003]
[4]刘凯,王爱民,严国红,等.一个水稻显性矮秆突变体的遗传特性与降株高能力[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):968.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.002]
 LIU Kai,WANG Ai-min,YAN Guo-hong,et al.Genetic analysis and plant height reduction of a dominant dwarf mutant of rice[J].,2016,(03):968.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.002]
[5]王红,杨镇,裴文琪,等.功能性微生物制剂对镉胁迫下水稻生长及生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):974.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.003]
 WANG Hong,YANG Zhen,PEI Wen-qi,et al.Growth and physiological characteristics of cadmium-stressed rice influenced by functional microorganism agent[J].,2016,(03):974.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.003]
[6]孙玲,单捷,毛良君,等.基于遥感和Moran's I指数的水稻面积变化空间自相关性研究[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.017]
 SUN Ling,SHAN Jie,MAO Liang-jun,et al.Spatial autocorrelation of changes in paddy rice area based on remote sensing and Moran’s I index[J].,2016,(03):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.017]
[7]张晓忆,李卫国,景元书,等.多种光谱指标构建决策树的水稻种植面积提取[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.018]
 ZHANG Xiao-yi,LI Wei-guo,JING Yuan-shu,et al.Extraction of paddy rice area by constructing the decision tree with multiple spectral indices[J].,2016,(03):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.018]
[8]裔传灯,李玮,王德荣,等.水稻GW5基因的1212-bp Indel变异对粒形的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1201.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.001]
 YI Chuan-deng,LI Wei,WANG De-rong,et al.Effect of 1212-bp Indel variation of gene GW5 on rice grain shape[J].,2016,(03):1201.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.001]
[9]刘红江,陈虞雯,张岳芳,等.不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
 LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Yu-wen,ZHANG Yue-fang,et al.Effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice[J].,2016,(03):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
[10]郭保卫,许轲,魏海燕,等.钵苗机插水稻茎秆的抗倒伏能力[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1280.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.014]
 GUO Bao-wei,XU Ke,WEI Hai-yan,et al.Culm lodging resistance characteristics of bowl seedling mechanical-transplanting rice[J].,2016,(03):1280.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.014]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-12-12 基金项目:淮安市农业科学院院长科研基金项目(HNY201706和HNY201707);江苏省“六大人才高峰”高层次人才项目(NY-161) 作者简介:文廷刚(1983-),男,重庆人,硕士,副研究员,主要从事作物栽培与调控。(E-mail)wentinggang@126.com 通讯作者:杨文飞,(Tel)13952383328@139.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-06-30