[1]张玉池,刘琪,相世刚,等.稻田杂草对草甘膦和草铵膦的敏感性差异[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1260-1266.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.009]
　ZHANG Yu-chi,LIU Qi,XIANG Shi-gang,et al.Sensitivity difference of weeds in rice field to glyphosate and glufosinate[J].,2018,(06):1260-1266.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.009]
点击复制

稻田杂草对草甘膦和草铵膦的敏感性差异()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
1260-1266
栏目:
植物保护
出版日期:
2018-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Sensitivity difference of weeds in rice field to glyphosate and glufosinate
作者:
张玉池; 刘琪; 相世刚; 强胜; 宋小玲
（南京农业大学生命科学学院杂草研究室，江苏南京210095）
Author(s):
ZHANG Yu-chi; LIU Qi; XIANG Shi-gang; QIANG Sheng; SONG Xiao-ling
(Weed Research Laboratory, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)
关键词:
稻田杂草; 草甘膦; 草铵膦; 敏感性
Keywords:
weeds in rice field; glyphosate; glufosinate; sensitivity
分类号:
S511.053
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.009
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
选择水稻田10种单子叶杂草和4种双子叶杂草为研究对象，通过室内试验明确供试杂草对灭生性除草剂草甘膦和草铵膦的敏感性差异，为将来抗草甘膦和抗草铵膦转基因水稻商业化生产中杂草防除提供依据。结果显示不同杂草对2种灭生性除草剂的敏感性存在差异，41%草甘膦异丙胺盐水剂和18%草铵膦可溶液在最高剂量下对供试杂草达到药害5级所需时间分别为 5～13 d和 4～9 d，杂草对草甘膦的反应速度比对草铵膦的慢，杂草对41%草甘膦异丙胺盐水剂和18%草铵膦可溶液的ED90分别为 5.12～605 kg/hm2和 2.49～287 kg/hm2。对41%草甘膦异丙胺盐水剂较不敏感的杂草有稗草（二氯喹啉酸抗性和敏感性生物型）（Echinochloa crusgalli L.）、杂草稻（泰州、益阳、茂名生物型）（Oryza sativa f. spontanea）、 异型莎草（Cyperus difformis L.）、碎米莎草（C. iria L.）和丁香蓼（Ludwigia prostrate Roxb.）；对18%草铵膦可溶液较不敏感的杂草有稗草（二氯喹啉酸抗性和敏感性生物型）、硬稃稗（二氯喹啉酸抗性生物型）（E. glabrescens Munro ex Hook f.）、光头稗（E. colonum L.）、长芒稗（E. caudata Roshev.）、异型莎草、碎米莎草、耳叶水苋（Ammannia arenaria H. B. K.）和多花水苋（A. multiflora Roxb.）。因此在抗草甘膦和草铵膦水稻商业化生产中需要密切关注对草甘膦和草铵膦较不敏感杂草的种群动态，并探索相应的杂草防除策略。
Abstract:
In order to detect the sensitivity difference of weeds in rice field to non-selective herbicides，glyphosate and glufosinate, and provide basis for future weeds control in glyphosate-resistant and glufosinate-resistant transgenic rice commercial production, bioassay was conducted on ten monocotyledons weeds and four dicotyledons weeds. The results showed that days which were required for weeds reaching injury level five after applying 41% glyphosate isopropylammonium AS and 18% glufosinate-ammonium SL were 5-13 days and 4-9 days, respectively, and response speed of weeds to glyphosate was slower than that to glufosinate. ED90 values of these weeds to 41% glyphosate isopropylammonium AS and 18% glufosinate-ammonium SL were 5.12-6.05 kg/hm2 and 2.49-2.87 kg/hm2, respectively. Weeds displayed less sensitive to 41% glyphosate isopropylammonium AS were Echinochloa crusgalli L. (resistant and sensitive to quinclorac), three biotypes of Oryza sativa f. spontanea, Cyperus difformis L., C. iria L., and Ludwigia prostrate Roxb.. Weeds displayed less sensitive to 18% glufosinate-ammonium SL were E. crusgalli L. (resistant and sensitive to quinclorac), E. glabrescens Munro ex Hook f.（resistant to quinclorac), E. colonum L., E. caudata Roshev., Cyperus difformis L., C. iria L., Ammannia arenaria H. B. K and A. multiflora Roxb.. Therefore, these weeds which demonstrated less sensitive to glyphosate and glufosinate should be paid more attention to their population dynamics in the commercial production of glyphosate-resistant and glufosinate-resistant rice.

参考文献/References:

[1]中国海关. 2016年中国稻谷种植面积、产量、进口量及进口金额分析[EB/OL]．(2017-03-09)
[2018-04-10]. http://www.chyxx.com/industry/201703/502224.html.
[2]强胜,宋小玲,戴伟民. 抗除草剂转基因作物面临的机遇与挑战及其发展策略[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2010, 18(1): 114-125.
[3]吴声敢,赵学平,吴长兴,等. 我国长江中下游稻区稗草对二氯喹啉酸的抗药性研究[J]. 杂草学报, 2007, 27(3): 25-26.
[4]杨彩宏,田兴山,冯莉,等. 牛筋草对草甘膦的抗药性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(10): 2093-2098.
[5]刘洋. 水稻田耐抗性杂草发生趋势及防治策略[J]. 农药市场信息, 2014(18): 26-28.
[6]刘兴林,孙涛,付声姣,等. 水稻田除草剂的应用及杂草抗药性现状[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(7): 115-126.
[7]PATHER T S, DITOMASO J M, HOLT J S. History, mechanisms, and strategies for prevention and management of herbicide resistant weeds[J]. Proceedings of the California Weed Science Society, 2000, 52: 155-163.
[8]刘召华. 杂草稻的发生原因及防控措施[J]. 中国农业信息, 2015 (1): 30.
[9]朱祯,曲乐庆,张磊. 转基因技术的应用研究-水稻转基因研究及新品种选育[J]. 生物产业技术, 2010, 3(3): 27-34.
[10]杨益善,唐俐,蔡卫青,等. 不同草铵膦用量对耐除草剂水稻秧苗素质及产量的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2012, 33(6): 736-740.
[11]崔荣荣,戴伟民,强胜,等. 抗草铵膦转基因杂交水稻Ⅱ优 86B 及其恢复系 86B 向杂草稻的基因漂移[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(4): 708-714.
[12]吴发强,王世全,李双成,等. 抗除草剂转基因水稻的研究进展及其安全性问题[J].分子遗传育种, 2006, 4(6): 846-852.
[13]李黎红,叶卫军,郭龙彪. 我国转基因水稻研究进展和商业化前景分析[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(6): 1-4.
[14]肖国樱,陈芬,孟秋成,等. 我国转基因抗除草剂水稻的生态风险与控制[J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2015, 23(1): 1-11.
[15]TANG W, CHEN H, XU C G, et al. Development of insect-resistant transgenic indica rice with a synthetic cry1C gene[J]. Mol Breed, 2006, 18: 1-10.
[16]LU Z B, TIAN J C, HAN N S, et al. No direct effects of two transgenic Bt rice lines, T1C-19 and T2A-1, on the arthropod communities[J]. Environmental Entomology, 2014, 43(5): 1453.
[17]SCHABENBERGER O. Response of annual weed species to glufosinate and glyphosate[J]. Weed Technology, 1999, 13(3): 542-547.
[18]EVERMAN B, WESLEY J. Influence of environmental and physiological factors on glufosinate and glyphosate weed management[J]. Rural Society, 2014, 15(52): 915-918.
[19]刘小龙，李香菊． 藜、铁苋菜和苘麻对草甘膦的耐受性及其与莽草酸含量的关系[J]． 杂草学报，2016，34(2):34-37．
[20]孙光辉,强胜,戴伟民,等. 抗草铵膦转基因水稻‘Y0003’直播田除草剂施用技术研究[J]. 植物保护, 2014, 40(5): 176-180.
[21]费云燕，盖钧镒，赵团结．南京大豆田间耐草甘膦杂草的种类与特性鉴定[J]．江苏农业科学，2016,44(11):154-156.
[22]陈景超,张朝贤,黄红娟,等. 抗草甘膦杂草及其检测方法发展现状[J]. 植物保护, 2011, 37(6): 44-47.
[23]费云燕,盖钧镒,赵团结. 南京大豆田间耐草甘膦杂草的种类与特性鉴定[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(11): 154-156.
[24]SONG X L, WU J J, ZHANG H J, et al. Occurrence of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) population in China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2011, 10(7):1049-1055.
[25]余柳青,渠开山,周勇军,等. 抗除草剂转基因水稻对稻田杂草种群的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(1): 68-73.
[26]SCURSONI J A, FORCELLA F, GUNSOLUS J. Weed escapes and delayed emergence in glyphosate-resistant soybean[J]. Crop Protection, 2007, 26(3):212-218.
[27]NEVE P. Challenges for herbicide resistance evolution and management: 50years after Harper[J]. Weed Research, 2007, 47(5):365-369.
[28]HEAP I. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds[DB/OL]．(2018-04-13)
[2018-04-13]. http://www.weedscience.org.
[29]KUK Y I, BURGOS N R, SHIVRAIN V K. Natural tolerance to imazethapyr in red rice (Oryza sativa) [J]. Weed Science, 2008, 56:1-11.
[30]杨浩娜,柏连阳. 棉田反枝苋和马齿苋对草甘膦的抗药性[J]. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(6): 492-498.
[31]JALALUDIN A, NGIM J, BAKAR B H J, et al. Preliminary findings of potentially resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica) to glufosinate-ammonium in Malaysia[J]. Weed Biology and Management, 2010, 10(4): 256-260.
[32]COLLAVO A, SATTIN M. First glyphosate-resistant Lolium spp. biotypes found in a European annual arable cropping system also affected by ACCase and ALS resistance[J]. Weed Research, 2014, 54(4): 325-334.
[33]王永崇. “一封二杀三补”已成我国稻田抗药性杂草防除技术的主推方案[J]. 农药市场信息, 2016(17): 61-63.
[34]余柳青,渠开山,周勇军,等. 抗除草剂转基因水稻对稻田杂草种群的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(1): 68-73.
[35]张斌,董立尧. 水稻田杂草群落演化原因及趋势浅析[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2009, 37(2): 58-60.
[36]GAINES T A, ZHANG W, WANG D, et al. Gene amplification confers glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010, 107: 1029-1034.
[37]凌进. 草铵膦、百草枯、草甘膦对非耕地杂草的防效比较[J]. 农药, 2014, 53(8):613-615.

相似文献/References:

[1]王玉琦,朱昌华,夏凯,等.磷酸脲缓解锰离子拮抗草甘膦的除草功效[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1029.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.012]
　WANG Yu-qi,ZHU Chang-hua,XIA Kai,et al.Alleviation effect of urea phosphate on antagonism of manganese against glyphosate[J].,2016,(06):1029.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.012]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2018-04-13 基金项目：转基因生物新品种培育重大专项课题(2016ZX08011-001) 作者简介：张玉池（1989-），男，山东潍坊人，硕士研究生，研究方向为转基因作物安全性评估。(E-mail)1099564360@qq.com 通讯作者：宋小玲，(E-mail)sxl@njau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-28