[1]欧阳家风,刘峙嵘,邹翔.水稻秸秆在土壤-水体系中的腐解性能[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(03):546-551.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.010]
　OUYANG Jia-feng,LIU Zhi-rong,ZOU Xiang.Decomposition property of rice straw in soil solution[J].,2018,(03):546-551.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.010]
点击复制

水稻秸秆在土壤-水体系中的腐解性能()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
546-551
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2018-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Decomposition property of rice straw in soil solution
作者:
欧阳家风; 刘峙嵘; 邹翔
(东华理工大学化学生物与材料科学学院，江西南昌330013)
Author(s):
OUYANG Jia-feng;  LIU Zhi-rong;  ZOU Xiang
(College of Chemical, Biological and Material Science, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China)
关键词:
水稻秸秆; 腐解; 尼龙袋法; 腐解率; 养分释放率
Keywords:
rice straw; decomposition; nylon bag method; decomposition rate; nutrient release rate
分类号:
S141.4;X712
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以水稻秸秆为代表性秸秆，探索水稻秸秆在不同条件下的腐解规律。采用尼龙袋法处理秸秆样品，研究在不同腐解时间、腐解温度、水土比和腐秆剂用量下秸秆的腐解特征，及其腐解过程中养分的释放规律。结果表明，秸秆样品腐解前3 d腐解速率非常快，腐解9 d后速率由快速变为平缓，在腐解第15 d时腐解率达到24.9%。腐解温度、水土比、腐秆剂用量的增加均能促进秸秆腐解，但不呈正相关性，超过最优值则会下降，最佳腐解条件为腐解温度为30 ℃，水土比为 3∶1（质量比），腐秆剂用量为0.5 g。最优条件下碳、氮、磷、钾的累积释放率均总体表现为前6 d释放迅速，之后变缓并趋于稳定，不同营养元素的累积释放率按从大到小顺序依次为钾>磷>氮≈碳。通过一级动力学方程拟合得到碳、氮、磷、钾的降解半衰期分别为16.120 d、16.120 d、15.753 d、5.415 d。
Abstract:
The rice straw was studied to illuminate the law of decomposition under different conditions. The decomposition characteristics of rice straw under different time, temperature, water-soil ratio and straw-decomposing inoculant content were investigated by adapting the nylon bag method, and nutrient release characteristics were also studied in the process of decay. The decomposition rate of straw in the first three days was very fast. After nine days, the decomposition rate changed from rapid to flat and reached 24.9% on the 15th day of decomposition. The increase of temperature, water-soil ratio and straw-decomposing inoculant content all promoted the decomposition of straw, but it was not positively correlated. It would decrease if the optimal value was exceeded. The optimum decomposition conditions were as follows: the temperature was 30 ℃, soil-water ratio was 3∶1, and the straw-decomposing inoculant content was 0.5 g. Under the optimum condition, the cumulative release rates of C, N, P and K were rapid in the first six days, then became slower and stabilized, followed by K> P> N≈C. The half-lives of C, N, P and K acquired by first order kinetics equation were 16.120 d, 16.120 d, 15.753 d and 5.415 d, respectively.

参考文献/References:

［1］PALMIERI N, FORLEO M B, GIANNOCCARO G, et al. Environmental impact of cereal straw management: An on-farm assessment[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142: 2950-2964.
[2］石金明,范敏,席细平,等. 江西省秸秆资源量分析[J]. 能源研究与管理, 2012(1):1-4.
[3]常志州，靳红梅，黄红英，等． “十三五” 江苏省秸秆综合利用策略与秸秆产业发展的思考[J]. 江苏农业学报，2016,32(3):534-541.
[4］杨振兴,周怀平,关春林,等. 秸秆腐熟剂在玉米秸秆还田中的效果[J]. 山西农业科学, 2013, 41(4):354-357.
[5]高大响，黄小忠，王亚萍．秸秆还田及腐熟剂对土壤微生物特性和酶活性的影响[J].江苏农业科学，2016,44(12):468-471.
[6]宋朝玉，宫明波，高倩，等. 长期玉米秸秆还田模式下氮肥用量对玉米生长发育及土壤养分的影响[J].山东农业科学，2017，49(10)：55-59.
[7］张成喜,孙国强. 尼龙袋技术在动物饲料营养价值评定中的研究进展[J]. 饲料博览, 2016(7):20-23.
[8］谢朝怀,李进,罗彬,等. 对失重法测定秸秆腐熟度方法修改的探讨[J]. 南方农业, 2012, 6(9):57-58.
[9］陈帅,刘峙嵘,曾凯. 腐秆剂对水稻秸秆腐解性能的影响[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016, 10(2):839-844.
[10］张薇,付昀,李季芳,等. 基于凯氏定氮法与杜马斯燃烧法测定土壤全氮的比较研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(35):172-175.
[11］杨艳华. 土壤解磷微生物的分离鉴定[D]. 郑州：河南农业大学, 2014.
[12］侯淑艳,窦森,刘建新,等. 温度对玉米秸秆腐解期间腐殖质消长动态的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 44(4): 87-92.
[13］李忠义,唐红琴,蒙炎成,等. 不同还田方式下拉巴豆秸秆腐解及养分释放特征[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017 (2): 130-135.
[14］牛怡. 两种耕作方式下黄土高原旱作农田还田玉米秸秆腐解特征与养分释放研究 [D]. 兰州：甘肃农业大学, 2014.
[15］戴志刚,鲁剑巍,李小坤,等. 不同作物还田秸秆的养分释放特征试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(6):272-276.
[16］武际,郭熙盛,鲁剑巍,等. 不同水稻栽培模式下小麦秸秆腐解特征及对土壤生物学特性和养分状况的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(2):565-575.

相似文献/References:

[1]付广青,杜静,叶小梅,等.青贮水稻秸秆厌氧发酵产沼气特性[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.014 ]
　FU Guang-qing,DU Jing,YE Xiao-mei,et al.Characterization of biogas production by anaerobic digestion of ensiled rice straw[J].,2016,(03):90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.014 ]
[2]马贤武,王凯,刘轩,等.揉搓与稀碱联合预处理对水稻秸秆酶解产糖率及结构的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1294.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.013]
　MA Xian-wu,WANG Kai,LIU Xuan,et al.Study on the effects of rubbing-alkali pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis reducing sugar yield and structure of rice straw[J].,2018,(03):1294.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.013]
[3]季诗域,王旭东,石思博,等.稻秆还田与化肥配施对稻茬麦田土壤肥力和小麦产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(05):1181.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.015]
　JI Shi-yu,WANG Xu-dong,SHI Si-bo,et al.Effects of rice-straw returning to the field and fertilizer application on soil fertility and wheat yield in rice stubble wheat field[J].,2020,(03):1181.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.015]
[4]刘蓓一,韦青,田吉鹏,等.羊瘤胃液中产阿魏酸酯酶乳酸菌的筛选及对水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1306.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.018]
　LIU Bei-yi,WEI Qing,TIAN Ji-peng,et al.Screening of ferulic acid esterase-producing lactic acid bacteria from rumen fluid of sheep and their effects on silage quality of rice straw[J].,2022,38(03):1306.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.018]
[5]杜光辉,张琳,丁丽,等.紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田配合氮肥减施对水稻产量及氮素营养平衡的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(06):1012.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.06.007]
　DU Guanghui,ZHANG Lin,DING Li,et al.Effects of co-incorporation of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen nutrition balance[J].,2024,(03):1012.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.06.007]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2018-02-28 基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（11375043）；江西省主要学科学术和技术带头人资助项目（20172BCB22020 ） 作者简介：欧阳家风(1995-)，男，江西吉安人，硕士研究生，主要从事环境化学研究。(E-mail)1152543375@qq.com 通讯作者：刘峙嵘，(Tel)0791-83897967；(E-mail)zhrliu@ecit.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-04