[1]汪燕,廖凯,喻武鹃,等.苦荞耐低磷力鉴定及其产量和品质分析[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(03):503-510.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.004]
 WANG Yan,LIAO Kai,YU Wu-juan,et al.Identification of low-phosphorus tolerance and analysis of yield and quality in tartary buckwheat[J].,2018,(03):503-510.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.004]
点击复制

苦荞耐低磷力鉴定及其产量和品质分析()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
503-510
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2018-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Identification of low-phosphorus tolerance and analysis of yield and quality in tartary buckwheat
作者:
汪燕1廖凯1喻武鹃1黄娟1邓娇1霍冬敖1孙艳红2王鹏程3梁成刚1
(1.贵州师范大学荞麦产业技术研究中心,贵州贵阳550001;2.贵州中科项目数据分析师事务所有限公司,贵州贵阳550008;3.贵州百世佳科技集团有限公司,贵州贵阳550003)
Author(s):
WANG Yan1LIAO Kai1YU Wu-juan1HUANG Juan1DENG Jiao1HUO Dong-ao1SUN Yan-hong2WANG Peng-cheng3LIANG Cheng-gang1
(1.Guizhou Normal University, Research Center of Buckwheat Industry Technology, Guiyang 550001, China;2.Guizhou Zhongke Project Data Analyst Office Co.,Ltd., Guiyang 550008, China;3.Guizhou Baishijia Technology Group Co.,Ltd., Guiyang 550003, China)
关键词:
苦荞耐低磷产量蛋白质组分总黄酮
Keywords:
tartary buckwheatlow phosphorus toleranceyieldprotein componentflavonoids
分类号:
S517
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
选用20个苦荞审定品种为试验材料,进行苦荞品种的耐低磷力鉴定及其农艺性状、产量与品质性状对低磷处理的响应研究。结果表明,与对照相比,低磷下苦荞单株粒数、单株籽粒质量和产量呈下降趋势,种子总黄酮含量呈上升趋势;4种蛋白质组分含量在品种间差异大,且对低磷的响应不一致。耐低磷力鉴定发现,3个品种生物产量耐低磷力达到1级,5个品种籽粒产量耐低磷力和5个品种的耐低磷力综合值达到2级;1个品种适应性达到1级。综合分析发现,六苦3号为高产耐低磷品种、适应性达到1级,晋荞麦2号为高产磷敏感品种。
Abstract:
Using 20 tartary buckwheat varieties as material, the resistance to low phosphorus the main traits of agronomic, yield and quality were investigated. The results indicated that the grain number per plant, the yield per plant and yield of tartary buckwheat under the treatment of low phosphorus showed a downward trend, but the flavonoids content showed an upward trend, compared with the control. The content of four protein components varied among the varieties, and the responses to low phosphorus were inconsistent. The resistance to low-phosphorus stress in biological yield of three testing varieties reached level 1. The resistance to low-phosphorus stress in grain yield of five testing varieties reached level 2. The comprehensive value of five testing varieties reached level 2 and the adaptability of one testing variety reached level 1. The results of comprehensive analysis showed that Liukuqiao 3 was a high yield variety and had good low-phosphorus tolerance and adaptability(level 1), and Jinqiaomai 2 was a high yield variety and was sensitive to phosphorus.

参考文献/References:

[1]张云霞,雷鹏,许宗奇,等. 一株高效解磷菌Bacillus subtilis JT-1的筛选及其对土壤微生态和小麦生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,32(5):1073-1080.
[2]吕睿,贾凤安,刘晨,等.无机磷降解菌株的分离、鉴定及解磷能力[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(20):295-298.
[3]VENEKLAAS E,LAMBERS H,BRAGG J,et al. Opportunities for improving phosphorus-use efficiency in crop plants[J]. New Phytologist,2012,95(2):306-320.
[4]刘露,李丽,闫洪雪,等. 一株高效解磷菌的筛选、鉴定及解磷特性研究[J]. 山东农业科学,2016,48(11):69-71,75.
[5]程明芳,何萍,金继运. 我国主要作物磷肥利用率的研究进展[J].作物杂志, 2010 (1):2-14.
[6]ROTHSTEIN S J. Returning to our roots:making plant biology research relevant to future challenges in agriculture[J]. Plant Cell,2007,19(9):2695-2699.
[7]林汝法. 苦荞举要[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2013:9.
[8]陈庆富. 荞麦属植物科学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012:50,220-226.
[9]任长忠,赵钢. 中国荞麦学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2015:30-51.
[10]常庆涛,焦庆清,刘荣甫,等.荞麦新品种苏荞1号的选育与栽培技术[J].江苏农业科学,2017,45(18):79-80.
[11]侯鹏霞,眭丹,周玉香,等. 荞麦各部位营养成分分析[J].饲料研究,2013(6):82-83.
[12]刘迎春,乌朝鲁门,李永娟,等. 荞麦氮、磷、钾肥的效应研究[J].作物杂志,2014(6):95-98.
[13]宋毓雪,胡静洁,孔德章,等. 不同氮,磷,钾水平对苦荞产量和品质的影响[J].安徽农业大学学报,2014,41(3):411-415.
[14]邢承华,朱美红,张淑娜,等. 磷对铝胁迫下荞麦根际土壤铝形态和酶活性的影响[J].生态环境学报,2009,18(5):1944-1948.
[15]朱美红,蔡妙珍,吴韶辉,等. 磷对铝胁迫下荞麦元素吸收与运输的影响[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(2):183-187.
[16]王宁,郑怡,王芳妹,等. 铝毒胁迫下磷对荞麦根系铝形态和分布的影响[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):168-171.
[17]潘凡,石桃雄,陈其皎,等. 苦荞种质主要农艺性状的变异及其对单株粒重的贡献研究[J].植物科学学报,2015,33(6):829-839.
[18]刘鸿雁,黄建国,魏成熙,等. 磷高效基因型玉米的筛选研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2004(5):25-29.
[19]汪燕,梁成刚,孙艳红,等. 不同苦荞品种的产量与品质及其对低氮的响应[J].贵州师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,35(6):66-73.
[20]徐宝才,丁霄霖. 苦荞黄酮的测定方法[J].无锡轻工大学学报(食品与生物技术),2003,22(2):98-101.
[21]王涛,段淑敏. 超声波提取苦荞麦总黄酮的工艺探索[J].食品工程,2012(4):27-30.
[22]刘三才,李为喜,刘方,等. 苦荞麦种质资源总黄酮和蛋白质含量的测定与评价[J].植物遗传资源学报,2007,8(3):317-320.
[23]FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS.Agricultural market information system market database(AMIS):China,2014,total cereal yield.[R/OL] (2016-07-06)
[2018-01-18]. http://statistics.amis-outlook.org.
[24]李莉,张锡洲,李廷轩,等. 高产磷高效水稻磷素吸收利用特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(7):1963-1970.
[25]兰忠明,钟少杰,何春梅,等. 紫云英磷素养分高效利用品种筛选[J].中国土料肥料,2014(6):67-70.
[26]石玉,张永丽,于振文. 小麦籽粒蛋白质组分含量及其与加工品质的关系[J].作物学报,2009,35(7):1306-1312.
[27]刘拥海,俞乐,肖迪. 荞麦种子蛋白质组分分析[J].种子,2006,25(12):31-33.
[28]COUCH J,NAGHSKI J,KREWSON C. Buckwheat as a source of rutin[J].Science,1946,103(2668):197-198.
[29]李喜焕,常文锁,张彩英. 中国大豆磷素营养及磷高效品种筛选最新进展[J].大豆科学,2011,30(2):322-327.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-12-11 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31660366、31760419);贵州省科技厅合作计划项目[黔科合LH字(2017)7359号、黔科合LH字(2015)7770号、黔科合LH字(2016)7205];贵州省科学技术基金计划项目[黔科合基础(2016)1107];贵州省教育厅青年科技人才成长项目[黔教合KY字(2016)131号];贵州师范大学资助博士科研项目 作者简介:汪燕(1985-),女,重庆人,博士,讲师,主要从事荞麦生理与分子生物领域研究。(Tel)0851-86780646;(E-mail)yanwanguf@163.com。廖 凯为共同第一作者。 通讯作者:梁成刚,(Tel)0851-86780646;(E-mail): jesselcg@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-07-04