[1]刘嘉斌,田军仓,杨振峰,等.不同砂滤料暗管排水对水稻生长及土壤盐分的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2023,(01):65-72.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.01.008]
　LIU Jia-bin,TIAN Jun-cang,YANG Zhen-feng,et al.Effects of subsurface drainage with different sand filters on rice growth and soil salinity[J].,2023,(01):65-72.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.01.008]
点击复制

不同砂滤料暗管排水对水稻生长及土壤盐分的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年01期
页码:
65-72
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2023-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of subsurface drainage with different sand filters on rice growth and soil salinity
作者:
刘嘉斌1; 田军仓1; 2; 3; 杨振峰1; 李丹丹1
（1.宁夏大学土木与水利工程学院，宁夏银川750021；2.宁夏节水灌溉与水资源调控工程技术研究中心，宁夏银川750021；3.旱区现代农业水资源高效利用教育部工程研究中心，宁夏银川750021)
Author(s):
LIU Jia-bin1; TIAN Jun-cang1; 2; 3; YANG Zhen-feng1; LI Dan-dan1
(1. School of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China;2.Engineering Technology Research Center of Water-Saving and Water Resource Regulation in Ningxia, Yinchuan 750021, China;3.Engineering Research Center for Efficient Utilization of Modern Agricultural Water Resources in Arid Regions, Ministry of Education, Yinchuan 750021, China)
关键词:
盐碱地; 暗管排水; 砂滤料; 水稻
Keywords:
saline-alkali land; pipe drainage; sand filter material; rice
分类号:
S156.4+6
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2023.01.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究盐碱地不同砂滤料暗管排水对水稻生长和土壤盐分的影响，以水稻秋优88为试验材料，设细砂粒（F1）、细砂粒和细碎石1∶2(质量比)混合（F2）、细碎石（F3）3种暗管砂滤料，分析不同暗管砂滤料处理对水稻生长、产量、水分利用效率、肥料偏生产力及土壤电导率的影响。结果表明，F2处理有利于0～60.0 cm土壤排盐，改善水稻根系环境，对水稻生长及产量促进效果最为明显。F2处理下，水稻拔节期叶片SPAD值较F1、F3处理分别提高10.24%、8.67%，抽穗期叶片净光合速率、蒸腾速率均高于F1、F3处理，稻谷产量较F1、F3处理分别提高21.82%、15.29%；在试验末期，F2处理0～60.0 cm各土层电导率均显著低于F1、F3处理，其中 F2处理0～20.0、20.1～40.0、40.1～60.0 cm的土壤脱盐率分别为68.72%、58.82%、45.96%，脱盐率显著高于F1、F3处理。所以，在土壤重度盐碱化地区，选用细砂粒和细碎石1∶2（质量比）混合作为暗管排水砂滤料有利于降低土壤盐分,提高水稻产量。
Abstract:
In order to explore the effects of subsurface drainage with different sand filter materials on rice growth and soil salinity in saline-alkali soil, Qiuyou 88 was used as the experimental material, and three kinds of subsurface drainage sand filter materials were designed, including fine sand (F1), fine sand and fine gravel 1∶2 mixture (F2) and fine gravel (F3). The effects of different subsurface drainage sand filter materials on rice growth, yield, water use efficiency, fertilizer partial productivity and soil conductivity were analyzed. The results showed that the stable filter layer of F2 treatment was beneficial to 0-60.0 cm soil desalinization, improved rice root environment, and promoted rice growth and yield. Under F2 treatment, the SPAD value of rice leaves at jointing stage was 10.24% and 8.67% higher than that of F1 and F3 treatments, respectively. The net photosynthesis rate and transpiration rate of leaves at heading stage were higher than those of F1 and F3 treatments, and rice yield was 21.82% and 15.29% higher than that of F1 and F3 treatments, respectively. At the end of the experiment, the electrical conductivity of 0-60.0 cm soil layers in F2 treatment was significantly lower than that in F1 and F3 treatments, the soil desalination rates of 0-20.0 cm, 20.1-40.0 cm and 40.1-60.0 cm in F2 treatment were 68.72%, 58.82% and 45.96%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in F1 and F3 treatments. Therefore, in areas with severe soil salinization, the use of 1∶2 mixture of fine sand and fine gravel as subsurface drainage sand filter is conducive to reducing soil salinity and improving rice yield.

参考文献/References:

[1]张智猛,戴良香,慈敦伟,等. 种植密度和播种方式对盐碱地花生生长发育、产量及品质的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(10):1328-1338.
[2]杨劲松. 中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望[J].土壤学报,2008,45(5):837-845.
[3]赵广兴,李王成,贾振江,等. 盐碱复合胁迫对白茎盐生草种子萌发的影响[J].草业科学,2021,38(8):1469-1476.
[4]史海滨,杨树青,李瑞平,等. 内蒙古河套灌区水盐运动与盐渍化防治研究展望[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(8):1-17.
[5]魏征,屠乃美,易镇邪. 盐碱地对水稻的胁迫效应及其改良与高效利用的研究进展[J].湖南生态科学学报,2019,6(4):45-52.
[6]张薇. 平罗县水稻生产现状及产业发展对策[J].宁夏农林科技,2016,57(11):49-50.
[7]徐友信,于淑会,石磊. 高水位盐碱地暗管控制性排水的降盐抑碱作用研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(3):164-169.
[8]于丹丹,史海滨,李祯,等. 暗管排水与节水灌溉条件下盐渍化农田水盐分布特征[J].水资源与水工程学报,2020,31(4):252-260.
[9]DARZI-NAFTCHALI A,SHAHNAZARI A.Influence of subsurface drainage on the productivity of poorly drained paddy fields[J].European Journal of Agronomy,2014,56（1）：1-8.
[10]刘玉国,杨海昌,王开勇,等. 新疆浅层暗管排水降低土壤盐分提高棉花产量[J].农业工程学报,2014,30(16):84-90.
[11]张洁,常婷婷,邵孝侯. 暗管排水对大棚土壤次生盐渍化改良及番茄产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(3):81-86.
[12]JAFARI-TALUKOLAEE M,SHAHNAZARI A,AHMADI M Z,et al. Drain discharge and salt load in response to subsurface drain depth and spacing in paddy fields[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering,2015,141(11):04015017.
[13]周利颖,李瑞平,苗庆丰,等. 排盐暗管间距对河套灌区重度盐碱土盐碱特征与肥力的影响[J].土壤,2021,53(3):602-609.
[14]冯根祥,张展羽,方国华,等. 暗管排水条件下微咸水灌溉对土壤盐分动态及夏玉米生长的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2018,36(9):880-885.
[15]杨玉辉,周新国,李东伟,等. 暗管排水对南疆高水位膜下滴灌棉田盐分淋洗效果的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2021,40(11):137-144.
[16]DARZI-NAFTCHALI A, MOTEVALI A, KEIKHA M. The life cycle assessment of subsurface drainage performance under rice-canola cropping system[J].Agricultural Water Management,2022,266.DOI: 10.1016/J.AGWAT.2022.107579.
[17]柳宪布,吴丽萍,陈洁,等. 炉渣为暗管包敷滤料对土壤含盐量的影响[J].环境卫生工程,2012,20(4):5-7.
[18]王苏胜,周明耀,刘璐嘉. 排水暗管外包材料渗透性与除氮效果试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2013,32(3):21-23.
[19]韦本辉,申章佑,周佳,等. 粉垄改造利用盐碱地效果初探[J].中国农业科技导报,2017,19(10):107-112.
[20]刘祖汀,王丽萍,屈忠义,等. 引黄春灌对盐碱土区地下水动态及理化性质的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2022,41(2):101-108.
[21]强小嫚,张凯,米兆荣,等. 黄淮海平原地区深松和灌水次数对冬小麦-夏玉米节水增产的影响[J].中国农业科学,2019,52(3):491-502.
[22]石佳,田军仓,朱磊. 暗管排水对油葵地土壤脱盐及水分生产效率的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(11):46-50.
[23]刘润梅,范茂攀,付云章,等. 云南省马铃薯施肥量与化肥偏生产力的关系研究[J].土壤学报,2014,51(4):753-760.
[24]刘清霞,翟国亮,李景海,等. 微灌石英砂颗粒表面滞纳能力计算与分析[J].节水灌溉,2020(7):28-31.
[25]曹雪松,李和平,郑和祥,等. 加气灌溉对根区土壤肥力质量与作物生长的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2020,38(1):183-189.
[26]邱峰,景元书. 不同灌溉方式对稻田微气象特征及水稻生长的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2022,50(5):72-80.
[27]吴思佳,李仁英,谢晓金,等. 抽穗期高温对水稻叶片光合特性、叶绿素荧光特性和产量构成因素的影响[J].南方农业学报,2021,52(1):20-27.
[28]董京铭,刘瑞翔,马晨晨,等. 利用主成分回归方法预估连云港地区水稻气象产量[J].江苏农业学报,2021,37(3):606-612.
[29]周东雪,娄运生,杨蕙琳,等. 夜间增温下品种混栽对水稻叶片光合特性和荧光特性的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2021,49(1):64-72.
[30]赵玉国,王新忠,吴沿友,等. 高温胁迫对拔节期水稻光合作用和蒸腾速率的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2012,40(1):41-43.
[31]战吉宬,黄卫东,王秀芹,等. 弱光下生长的葡萄叶片蒸腾速率和气孔结构的变化[J].植物生态学报,2005,29(1):26-31.
[32]贾宏涛,赵成义,盛钰,等. 干旱地区紫花苜蓿光合日变化规律研究[J].草业科学,2009,26(7):56-60.
[33]张中典,张大龙,李建明,等. 黄瓜气孔导度、水力导度的环境响应及其调控蒸腾效应[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(6):139-147.
[34]陶园,王少丽,许迪,等. 改进暗管排水技术淤堵防护措施试验研究[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(6):187-192.
[35]胡玲玲,杨树青,梁志航,等. 河套灌区下游排水暗管外包料筛选试验研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2022,41(4):141-148.
[36]王世斌,高佩玲,赵亚东,等.微咸水对生物炭作用下盐碱土水盐运移特征的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2022,40(2):181-187.
[37]文利军,史文娟,何子建,等.不同措施对土壤脱盐及棉花生理特征的影响[J].排灌机械工程学报,2021,39(8):851-858.
[38]衣政伟,林佩佩,袁红,等. 江苏省淮南小麦品种农艺性状与产量指标相关性研究[J].农学学报,2021,11(12):17-23.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2022-05-26基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目（51869024）；宁夏重点研发计划重大项目（2018BBF02022）；宁夏高等学校一流学科建设项目（NXYLXK2021A03）作者简介：刘嘉斌（1996-），男，山西朔州人，硕士研究生，主要从事节水灌溉理论与技术研究。（E-mail）540917057@qq.com通讯作者：田军仓，（E-mail）slxtjc@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-03-21