[1]卢瑜,向平安.中国有机农业发展的空间效应及影响因素[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(06):1583-1591.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.028]
 LU Yu,XIANG Ping-an.Spatial effects and influencing factors of organic agriculture in China[J].,2021,(06):1583-1591.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.028]
点击复制

中国有机农业发展的空间效应及影响因素()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2021年06期
页码:
1583-1591
栏目:
农业经济·农业信息
出版日期:
2021-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Spatial effects and influencing factors of organic agriculture in China
作者:
卢瑜12向平安1
(1.湖南农业大学商学院,湖南长沙410028;2.长沙民政职业技术学院,湖南长沙410004)
Author(s):
LU Yu12 XIANG Ping-an1
(1.Business School, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410028, China;2.Changsha Social Work College, Changsha 410004, China)
关键词:
有机农业空间效应影响因素空间面板模型
Keywords:
organic agriculturespatial effectsinfluencing factorsspatial panel model
分类号:
S345
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.028
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为探究中国有机农业发展的空间影响机制,提出了区域有机农业发展的分析框架,然后构建空间计量模型,基于省级面板数据考察有机农业发展的空间效应及影响因素,并将空间效应进一步分解,以确定各影响因素的作用路径。结果显示:① 中国有机农业发展既存在空间异质性也存在空间依赖性,西部处于热点区域,冷点区域在中东部。② 居民收入水平、有机认证企业数量、具有高速出口的乡镇占比、草地面积占农用田面积份额、自然保护区面积占辖区面积份额、乡村劳动力资源总数、农业合作社数量和有机认证示范(创建)区数量等因子正向影响有机农业发展,而耕地质量和劳动力文化程度负向影响有机农业发展。③ 有机农业发展主要源于当地区位因素的直接效应,但邻域的空间溢出效应不容忽视,居民收入水平、有机认证企业数量、有机认证示范(创建)区数量和乡村劳动力资源数量等因子的溢出效应显著。为推进有机农业发展,建议公共部门以发展具有外部规模经济特征的有机农业集群为导向,设计和实施与有机农业相关的基础平台建设、支持有机农业合作组织发展、支持有机认证示范(创建)项目等为重点的支持政策。
Abstract:
In order to explore the influencing mechanism of organic agriculture development in China, the analytical framework of regional development was proposed, and then a spatial econometric model was constructed. Based on provincial panel data, the spatial effects and influencing factors of organic agriculture were investigated. Moreover, the spatial effect was further decomposed to determine the action path of each influencing factor. The results showed that there were spatial heterogeneity and spatial auto-correlation in the development of organic agriculture. A hot/cold map revealed that the western of China was of very high shares of organic agriculture, whereas the middle-eastern indicated the converse situation. Income level of residents, number of organic certification enterprises, proportion of villages and towns with high-speed export, grassland area shares, area proportion of natural reserve, total rural labor resources, number of agricultural cooperatives and number of organic certification demonstration areas were positive to the development of organic agriculture, whereas the effects of cultivated land quality and educational level of labor force were negative. Direct effect of local location factors was the main explanation of organic agriculture development, but the spatial spillover effect of neighborhood areas could not be ignored, especially income level of residents, the number of organic certification demonstration areas, number of organic certification enterprises and number of rural labor force. Potential policy implications include the formation of organic agriculture cluster, and the key supporting measures include strengthening the construction of infrastructure platform related to organic agriculture, the development of organic agriculture cooperation organization, and the establishment of organic certification demonstration projects.

参考文献/References:

[1]REGANOLD J P, JACKSON-SMITH D, BATIE S S, et al. Transforming US agriculture[J]. Science, 2011, 332: 670-671.
[2]WILLER H, TRVNICEK J, MEIER C, et al. The world of organic agriculture —— Statistics and emerging trends[M]. Nürnberg: Fibli and Foam, 2021.
[3]国家认证认可监督管理委员会,中国农业大学. 中国有机产品认证与有机产业发展[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2020:1-36.
[4]BURTON M, RIGBY D, YOUNG T.Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1999, 50(1): 48-63.
[5]ANDERSON J B, JOLLY D A, GREEN R. Determinants of farmer adoption of organic production methods in the fresh-market produce sector in California: a logistic regression analysis[R]. San Francisco, California: Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, 2005.
[6]GENIUS M, PANTZIOS C J, TZOUVELEKAS V. Information acquisition and adoption of organic farming practices[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2006, 31(1): 93-113.
[7]BEST H. Environmental concern and the adoption of organic agriculture[J]. Society and Natural Resources, 2010, 23(5): 451-468
[8]王奇,陈海丹,王会. 农户有机农业技术采用意愿的影响因素分析[J].农村经济,2012(2):99-103.
[9]KALLAS Z, SERRA T, GIL J M. Farmer’s objectives as determinant factors of organic farming adoption:the case of Catalonian vineyard production[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2010, 41: 409-423.
[10]KARKI L, SCHLEENBECKE R, HAMM U. Factors influencing a conversion to organic farming in Nepalese tea farms[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in The Tropics and Subtropics, 2011, 112(2): 113-123.
[11]KOMAREK A M, SHI X P, HEERIN N. Household-level effects of China’s sloping land conversion program under price and policy shifts[J]. Land Use Policy, 2014, 40: 36-44.
[12]OELODSE M, HGH-JENSEN H, ABREU L S, et al. Certified organic agriculture in China and Brazil: Market accessibility and outcomes following adoption[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 1785-1793.
[13]SCHMIDTNER E, LIPPER C, ENGLER B, et al. Spatial distribution of organic farming in Germany: does neighborhood matter?[J]. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2012, 39 (4): 661-683.
[14]HATTAM C E, LACOMBE D J, HOLLOWAY G. Organic certification, export market access and the impacts of policy[J]. Agricultural Economics, 2012, 43(4): 439-455.
[15]HUI-JU K. The socioeconomic geography of organic agriculture in the United States[D]. Ames:Iowa State University Capstones, 2015.
[16]NICOLAI V K, ADA W. Why isn’t more US farmland organic?[J]. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2010, 61(2): 240-258.
[17]LPPLE D, KELLEY H. Understanding the uptake of organic farming: accounting for heterogeneities among Irish farmers[J]. Ecological Economics,2013,88:11-19.
[18]王小楠,朱晶,薄慧敏. 家庭农场有机农业采纳行为的空间依赖性[J].资源科学, 2018, 40(11): 2270-2279.
[19]BJRKHAUG H, BLEKESAUNE A. Development of organic farming in Norway: a statistical analysis of neighbourhood effects[J]. Geoforum, 2013, 45(1): 201-210.
[20]LEWIS D J, BARHAM B L, ROBINSON B. Are there spatial spillovers in adoption of clean technology?The case of organic dairy farming[J]. Land Economics, 2011, 87 (2):250-267.
[21]WOLLNI M, ANDERSSON C. Spatial patterns of organic agriculture adoption: Evidence from Honduras[J]. Ecological Economics,2014(97): 120-128.
[22]卢瑜,向平安,余亮. 中国有机农业的集聚与空间依赖性[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2021,29(3):440-452.
[23]BEST H. Organic farming as a rational choice: empirical investigations in environmental decision making[J]. Rationality and Society, 2009, 21(2):197-224.
[24]LESSAGE J P, PACE R K. Introduction to spatial econometrics[M]. Boca Raton :CRC Press,2009.
[25]COLEMAN J. Foundations of Social Theory[M]. London:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1998.
[26]耿宇宁,郑少锋,王建华. 政府推广与供应链组织对农户生物防治技术采纳行为的影响——基于陕西省猕猴桃主产区的调查[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,17(1):116-122.
[27]PARKE D C, MUNROE D K. The geography of market failure: edge-effect externalities and location and production patterns of organic farming[J]. Ecological Economics, 2007,60: 821-833.
[28]谢玉梅. 有机农业发展: 基于外部性视角的分析[J].农业经济问题,2013(5): 8-12.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2021-07-09基金项目:湖南省自然科学基金项目(2021JJ30369);湖南农业大学“双一流”学科建设项目(SYL201802017);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(19YBA092)作者简介:卢瑜(1982-),女,江西九江人,博士研究生,主要从事有机农业和生态农业研究(E-mail)634279803@qq.com通讯作者:向平安, (E-mail)xpa830@126.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-01-07