[1]袁丽,刘彦爱,程金金,等.上海青对土壤邻苯二甲酸二丁酯的富集及毒性响应特征[J].江苏农业学报,2019,(01):204-210.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.01.029]
 YUAN Li,LIU Yan-ai,CHENG Jin-jin,et al.Enrichment characteristics and ecotoxic responses of Brassica chinensis L. to di-n-butyl phthalate[J].,2019,(01):204-210.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.01.029]
点击复制

上海青对土壤邻苯二甲酸二丁酯的富集及毒性响应特征()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
204-210
栏目:
加工贮藏·质量安全
出版日期:
2019-02-26

文章信息/Info

Title:
Enrichment characteristics and ecotoxic responses of Brassica chinensis L. to di-n-butyl phthalate
作者:
袁丽12刘彦爱12程金金2余向阳2朱宏2孙星2
(1.江苏大学食品与生物工程学院,江苏镇江212013;2.江苏省农业科学院农产品质量安全与营养研究所,江苏南京210014)
Author(s):
YUAN Li12LIU Yan-ai12CHENG Jin-jin2YU Xiang-yang2ZHU Hong2SUN Xing2
(1.School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China;2.Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China)
关键词:
邻苯二甲酸二丁酯上海青富集抗氧化酶丙二醛
Keywords:
di-n-butyl phthalateBrassica chinensis L.enrichmentantioxidant enzymesmalondialdehyde
分类号:
S636.9
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2019.01.029
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本研究以上海青为研究对象,通过盆栽试验分析土壤中邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)在上海青可食部位的富集情况及其对上海青抗氧化酶活性及丙二醛(MDA)含量的影响,以揭示土壤DBP对上海青的食品安全风险及生态毒性效应。结果表明:上海青可食部位DBP含量随土壤DBP质量浓度增加而增加,其富集系数为 3.47~5.48,对DBP具有较强的生物富集作用;根据美国国家环保局规定的人体经口摄入DBP的参考剂量,当土壤DBP质量浓度高于1.22 mg/kg时,种植的上海青存在潜在的食品安全风险;此外,DBP胁迫导致上海青的MDA含量,过氧化物酶(POD)和总超氧化物歧化酶(T-SOD)活性不同程度地升高。其中,上海青的POD活性受DBP影响最大,其10%效应质量浓度值(EC10)和50%效应质量浓度值(EC50)值分别为0.32 mg/kg和0.71 mg/kg。
Abstract:
In order to reveal the food safety risks and ecotoxic effects of soil di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) on Brassica chinensis L., the pot experiment was conducted to analyze the accumulation of soil DBP in the edible part of Brassica chinensis L. and the effects of soil DBP on antioxidant enzyme activities and malondialdehyde (MDA) content of Brassica chinensis L.. The results showed that DBP concentration in the edible part of Brassica chinensis L. increased with the increase of soil DBP concentration. The bioaccumulation factors (BCF) of DBP in the edible part of Brassica chinensis L. ranged from 3.47 to 5.48. According to the reference dose for intake of DBP set by the US EPA, when the concentration of DBP in the soil was higher than 1.22 mg/kg, the Brassica chinensis L. had potential food safety risks for human health. In addition, the MDA content, peroxidase(POD) activity and total superoxide dismutase(T-SOD) activity of Brassica chinensis L. increased in varying degrees under all DBP treatments. Soil DBP showed the greatest ecotoxic effect on POD activity of Brassica chinensis L., the 10% effect concentration (EC10) and 50% effect concentration (EC50) values for the POD activity were 0.32 mg/kg and 0.71 mg/kg, respectively.

参考文献/References:

[1]DU J B, TANG Y L, LONG Z W, et al. Theoretical calculation of spectra of dibutyl phthalate and dioctyl phthalate [J]. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2014, 88 (5): 819-822.
[2]PEIJNENBURG W J G M, STRUIJS J. Occurrence of phthalate esters in the environment of the Netherlands [J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2006, 63 (2):204-215.
[3]杜斌,龚娟,李佳乐. 太原市污水灌溉对水土环境的有机污染研究[J].人民长江, 2010, 41 (17) :58-61.
[4]CAI Q Y, MO C H, WU Q T, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phthalic acid esters in the soil-radish (Raphanus sativus) system with sewage sludge and compost application [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99 (6):1830-1836.
[5]蔡全英,莫测辉,吴启堂,等. 水稻土施用城市污泥盆栽通菜土壤中邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)的残留[J]. 环境科学学报, 2003, 23 (3):365-369.
[6]MO C H, CAI Q Y, ZENG Q Y, et al. Occurrence of priority organic pollutants in the fertilizers, China [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 152(3):1208-1213.
[7]于立红,高玉梅,吴亚铭,等. 地膜中酞酸酯类化合物对土壤-玉米的污染及其模型模拟[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017, 24 (5):347-351.
[8]崔明明,王凯荣,王琳琳,等. 山东省花生主产区土壤和花生籽粒中邻苯二甲酸酯的分布特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(12):3523-3530.
[9]HE L, GIELEN G, BOLAN N S, et al. Contamination and remediation of phthalic acid esters in agricultural soils in China: a review [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35 (2):519-534.
[10]XU G, LI F S, WANG Q H. Occurrence and degradation characteristics of dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in typical agricultural soils of China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2008, 393(2/3):333-340.
[11]MOC H, CAI Q Y, TANG S R, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phthalic acid esters in vegetables from nine farms of the Pearl River Delta, South China [J].Archives of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology, 2009, 56 (2):181-189.
[12]NIU L L, XU Y, XU C, et al. Status of phthalate esters contamination in agricultural soils across China and associated health risks [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2014, 195:16-23.
[13]GIBSON R, WANG M J, PADGETT E, et al. Analysis of 4-nonylphenols, phthalates, and polychlorinated biphenyls in soils and biosolids [J]. Chemosphere, 2005, 61 (9):1336-1344.
[14]VIKELSOE J, THOMSEN M, CARLSEN L. Phthalates and nonylphenols in profiles of differently dressed soils [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2002, 296 (1-3): 105-116.
[15]CHEN H L, YAO J, WANG F. Soil microbial and enzyme properties as affected by long-term exposure to phthalate esters [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 726-731:3653-3656.
[16]WANG Z G, LIU S, XU W H, et al. The microbiome and functions of black soils are altered by dibutyl phthalate contamination [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2016, 99:51-61.
[17]YIN R, LIN X G, WANG S G, et al. Effect of DBP/DEHP in vegetable planted soil on the quality of capsicum fruit [J]. Chemosphere, 2003, 50(6):801-805.
[18]MA T T, TENG Y, CHRISTIE P, et al. Phytotoxicity in seven higher plant species exposed to di-n-butyl phthalate or bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate [J]. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9 (2):259-268.
[19]VAN W A, VAN V, P0STHUMUS R, et al. Enviromental risk limits for two phthalates, with special emphasis on endocrine disruptive properties [J]. Ecotoxico Environ Safety, 2000, 46 (3):305-321.
[20]杨慧丽,段舜山. 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯对三角褐指藻的生态毒性效应[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(9):2155-2159.
[21]WANG J, LUO Y, TENG Y, et al. Soil contamination by phthalate esters in Chinese intensive vegetable production systems with different modes of use of plastic film [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2013,180 (3): 265-273.
[22]曾巧云,莫测辉,蔡全英,等. 菜心对邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)吸收途径的初步研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(8):137-140.
[23]曾巧云,莫测辉,蔡全英,等. 萝卜对邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)吸收累积特征及途径的初步研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2006, 26 (1):10-16.
[24]曾巧云,莫测辉,蔡全英,等. 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯在不同品种菜心-土壤系统的累积[J]. 中国环境科学, 2006, 26 (3):333-336.
[25]吴山,李彬,梁金明,等. 汕头市蔬菜产区土壤-蔬菜中邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)污染分布特征研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34 (10):1889-1896.
[26]李彬,吴山,梁金明,等. 中山市农业区域土壤-农产品中邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)污染特征[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(6):2283-2291.
[27]李彬,吴山,梁金明,等. 珠江三角洲典型区域农产品中邻苯二甲酸酯(PAEs)污染分布特征[J]. 环境科学, 2016, 37 (1):317-324.
[28]黄慧娟,蔡全英,吕辉雄,等. 土壤-蔬菜系统中邻苯二甲酸酯的研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38 (9):50-53.
[29]郭倩,胡晓钧,李玉双,等. 邻苯二甲酸酯的土壤生态毒理学研究进展[J].北方园艺, 2016 (21):196-199.
[30]杜娜. 黄瓜对邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)的毒性响应[D].哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2014.
[31]曾晨,李元跃,陈融斌,等. DBP对秋茄幼苗光合作用和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 集美大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 19 (4) :253-258.
[32]徐敦明,马志卿,冯俊涛,等. 毒死蜱和鬼臼毒素胁迫对蔬菜上海青抗氧化酶系及丙二醛的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2004 , 23 (6) :1089-1092.
[33]王兴明,涂俊芳,李晶,等. 镉处理对油菜生长和抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(1):102-106.
[34]林啸,高素萍,雷霆,等. 镉胁迫下外源钙对白菜氧化应激和NO含量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2014, 33(9):1699-1705.
[35]魏丽琼,呼世斌,刘书慧,等. QuEChERS-高效液相色谱法测定土壤中邻苯二甲酸酯[J]. 环境工程, 2016, 34(5):148-151.
[36]李晓贝,张腾,周昌艳,等. 四种蔬菜对DBP 和DEHP 及其代谢物的吸收累积研究[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2018, 35(1):87-94.
[37]WANG P, WANG S L, FAN C Q. Atmospheric distribution of particulate and gas-phase phthalic esters(PAEs)in a Metropolitan City, Nanjing, East China[J]. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(10): 1567-1572.
[38]CAI Q Y, MO C H, ZENG Q Y, et al. Potential of Ipomoea aquatic cultivars in phytoremediation of soils contaminated with di-n-butyl Phthalate [J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2008, 62 (3): 205-211.
[39]张腾,周昌艳,陈珊珊,等. 青菜对邻苯二甲酸酯类物质的积累和代谢初探[J]. 上海农业学报, 2017, 33(3):86-90.
[40]宋广宇. 邻苯二甲酸酯在土壤-植物系统中的生物有效性研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2010.
[41]CAI Q Y, XIAO P Y, CHEN T, et al. Genotypic variation in the uptake, accumulation, and translocation of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate by twenty cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety, 2015, 116:50-58.
[42]曹国洲,肖道清,朱晓艳. 食品接触制品中邻苯二甲酸酯类增塑剂的风险评估[J]. 食品科学, 2010,31(5):325-327.
[43]GAO M, DONG Y, ZHANG Z, et al. Growth and antioxidant defense responses of wheat seedlings to di-n-butyl phthalate and di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate stress [J]. Chemosphere, 2017, 172: 418-428.
[44]赵杰. 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯及Cr(Ⅵ)复合作用对小白菜生理生化指标的影响研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015.
[45]胡芹芹,熊丽,田裴秀子,等. 邻苯二甲酸二丁酯(DBP)对斜生栅藻的致毒效应研究[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2008, 3 (1): 87-92.
[46]陈意良. DEHP高/低累积水稻品种的根际环境差异及土壤吸附研究[D]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2016.
[47]曾晨. 增塑剂DBP和DEP对秋茄幼苗生长的生理生态效应研究[D]. 厦门: 集美大学, 2014.
[48]薛银刚,王晓蓉,顾雪元,等. 四溴双酚A对赤子爱胜蚓的急性毒性及抗氧化防御系统酶的影响[J]. 生态毒理学报, 2009, 4 (1): 93-100.
[49]GILL S S, TUTEJA N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants [J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2010, 48(12):909-930.
[50]ALSCHER R G, ERTURK N, HEATH L S. Role of superoxide dismutases (SODs) in controlling oxidative stress in plants [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2002, 53 (372): 1331-1341.
[51]陈意良,鲁磊安,莫测辉,等. DEHP胁迫对高/低累积邻苯二甲酸酯品种水稻抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37 (8): 1484-1488.

相似文献/References:

[1]程金金,孙星,田莉莉,等.不同邻苯二甲酸二丁酯污染方式对其降解和土壤细菌群落的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1248.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.011]
 CHENG Jin-jin,SUN Xing,TIAN Li-li,et al.Impact of different pollution patterns of dibutyl phthalate on its degradation and bacterial community in soil[J].,2022,38(01):1248.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.011]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-05-09 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(41601542) 作者简介:袁丽(1978-),女,山东青州人,硕士,副教授,从事食品加工与营养研究。(E-mail)yuanli24@163.com 通讯作者:余向阳,(E-mail)yuxy@jaas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-02-27