[1]马贤武,王凯,刘轩,等.揉搓与稀碱联合预处理对水稻秸秆酶解产糖率及结构的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1294-1299.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.013]
　MA Xian-wu,WANG Kai,LIU Xuan,et al.Study on the effects of rubbing-alkali pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis reducing sugar yield and structure of rice straw[J].,2018,(06):1294-1299.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.013]
点击复制

揉搓与稀碱联合预处理对水稻秸秆酶解产糖率及结构的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
1294-1299
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2018-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the effects of rubbing-alkali pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis reducing sugar yield and structure of rice straw
作者:
马贤武; 王凯; 刘轩; 荣昭强; 李晓林; 刘玉涛
（南京农业大学工学院/江苏省智能化农业装备重点实验室，江苏南京210031）
Author(s):
MA Xian-wu; WANG Kai; LIU Xuan; RONG Zhao-qiang; LI Xiao-lin; LIU Yu-tao
(College of Engineering/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Intelligent Agricultural Equipment, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China）
关键词:
水稻秸秆; 联合预处理; 硅质; 产糖率; 结构
Keywords:
rice straw; rubbing-alkali pretreatment; silicon layer; sugar yield; structure
分类号:
S38
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了提高水稻秸秆中木质纤维素的利用率,尽可能减少预处理过程中化学物质的使用量，开展了揉搓与稀碱联合预处理对水稻秸秆酶解产糖率及结构影响的研究，并通过正交试验获得最佳预处理效果的条件。研究采用3,5-二硝基水杨酸法测定不同预处理酶解还原糖的含量，并通过硅含量测定,傅立叶变换红外光谱(FTIR),X射线衍射(XRD)和秸秆成分测定对预处理后的水稻秸秆进行成分和结构分析。结果表明，揉搓预处理不能明显提升水稻秸秆的酶解产糖率，但能够加强稀碱的作用效果，揉搓与稀碱联合预处理后的秸秆酶解产糖率达3363%，明显高于原始秸秆和单独稀碱预处理秸秆；揉搓预处理能够去除秸秆表面3340%的硅，与原始秸秆及单独稀碱预处理秸秆之间差异显著，但与揉搓和稀碱联合预处理之间差异不明显；FTIR、XRD和成分测定结果显示，揉搓和稀碱联合预处理能够有效去除秸秆中的木质素，使纤维素的结晶度提升；正交试验发现氢氧化钙质量浓度6%、反应温度40 ℃，反应时间6 d时，联合预处理酶解产糖率最佳。研究结果将为秸秆高效资源化利用提供理论依据和指导。
Abstract:
In order to increase the utilization ratio of lignocellulose in rice straw and reduce the amount of chemicals used in pretreatment process, the effects of combined pretreatment with rubbing and dilute alkali on the sugar yield and structure of rice straw were studied, and the optimum pretreatment conditions were obtained through orthogonal experiment. 3,5- two nitro salicylic acid method was used to determine the content of enzymatic hydrolysis reducing sugar in different pretreatments, and the composition and structure of the pretreated rice straw were analyzed by silica content determination, Flourier transformation infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X ray diffraction (XRD) and composition determination. The results showed that the rubbing pretreatment did not significantly increase the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis sugar of rice straw, but it could enhance the effect of dilute alkali. The enzymatic hydrolysis sugar rate of straw pretreated with rubbing-alkali was 33.63%, which was significantly higher than that of the original straw and straw pretreated with dilute alkaline alone. Rubbing pretreatment could remove 3340% of the surface silicon of straw, which was significantly higher than that of the original straw and the straw pretreated with dilute alkali alone, but there was no obvious difference between straw pretreated with rubbing and rubbing-alkali. The results of FTIR, XRD and composition determination showed that the combined pretreatment could dissolve lignin efficiently, and increase the crystallinity of cellulose. The orthogonal experiment results showed that the yield of reducing sugar was highest when the concentration of calcium hydroxide was 6%, the reaction temperature was 40 ℃ and the reaction time was six days. The results would provide a theoretical basis and guidance for efficient utilization of straw.

参考文献/References:

[1]常志州，靳红梅，黄红英，等． “十三五” 江苏省秸秆综合利用策略与秸秆产业发展的思考[J]．江苏农业学报，2016,32(3):534-541.
[2]PALMOWSKI L M, MLLER J A. Influence of the size reduction of organic waste on their anaerobic digestion[J]. Water Science & Technology, 2000, 41(3):155-162.
[3]HENDRIKS A T, ZEEMAN G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(1): 10-18.
[4]ARIUNBAATAR J, PANICO A, ESPOSITO G, et al. Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 123(3): 143-156.
[5]粟学俐,贺飞. 纤维素酶水解纤维素还原糖的测定[J].化学与生物工程, 1999, 16(1): 43-44.
[6]戴伟民,张克勤,段彬伍,等. 测定水稻硅含量的一种简易方法[J].中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(5): 460-462.
[7]贾雨薇,杨瑞林,张洋,等. 一种优化的测定水稻硅含量的方法[J].植物学报, 2016, 51(5): 679-683.
[8]SEGAL L, CREELY J J, JR A E MARTIN, et al. An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-Ray diffractometer[J].Textile Research Journal, 2016, 29(10): 786-794.
[9]SLUITER A, HAMES B, RUIZ R, et al. Laboratory analytical procedure ‘determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass’[M]. Colorado, USA: National Laboratory of the U S Department of Energy, 2012.
[10]赵晶,张福蓉,陈明,等. NaOH预处理对玉米秸秆纤维结构特性和酶解效率的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(7): 1407-1412.
[11]陈晓浪,胡书春,周祚万. 改性处理对水稻秸秆纤维结构和性能的影响[J].功能材料, 2010, 41(S2): 275-277.
[12]LEE J M, JAMEEL H, VENDITTI R A. A comparison of the autohydrolysis and ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) pretreatments on the subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis of coastal Bermuda grass[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(14): 5449-5458.
[13]张超. 氨水循环爆破法对玉米秸秆预处理效果的研究[D].天津：天津大学, 2010.
[14]ZHU L, ODWYER J P, CHANG V S, et al. Structural features affecting biomass enzymatic digestibility[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(9):3817-3828.
[15]HEISS-BLANQUET S, ZHENG D, LOPES F N, et al. Effect of pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw on cell wall composition, hydrophobicity and cellulase adsorption[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(10):5938-5946.
[16]唐洪涛,王锋,李伟明,等. γ射线辐照与NaOH溶液协同预处理对玉米秸秆酶解产糖率及微观结构的影响 [J].核农学报, 2012, 26(3): 535-542.
[17]张婷. 超声波与稀碱法联合预处理对秸秆厌氧发酵产沼气的影响[D]. 武汉：湖北工业大学, 2009.

相似文献/References:

[1]付广青,杜静,叶小梅,等.青贮水稻秸秆厌氧发酵产沼气特性[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(01):90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.014 ]
　FU Guang-qing,DU Jing,YE Xiao-mei,et al.Characterization of biogas production by anaerobic digestion of ensiled rice straw[J].,2016,(06):90.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.01.014 ]
[2]欧阳家风,刘峙嵘,邹翔.水稻秸秆在土壤-水体系中的腐解性能[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(03):546.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.010]
　OUYANG Jia-feng,LIU Zhi-rong,ZOU Xiang.Decomposition property of rice straw in soil solution[J].,2018,(06):546.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.03.010]
[3]季诗域,王旭东,石思博,等.稻秆还田与化肥配施对稻茬麦田土壤肥力和小麦产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2020,(05):1181.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.015]
　JI Shi-yu,WANG Xu-dong,SHI Si-bo,et al.Effects of rice-straw returning to the field and fertilizer application on soil fertility and wheat yield in rice stubble wheat field[J].,2020,(06):1181.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2020.05.015]
[4]刘蓓一,韦青,田吉鹏,等.羊瘤胃液中产阿魏酸酯酶乳酸菌的筛选及对水稻秸秆青贮品质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2022,38(05):1306.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.018]
　LIU Bei-yi,WEI Qing,TIAN Ji-peng,et al.Screening of ferulic acid esterase-producing lactic acid bacteria from rumen fluid of sheep and their effects on silage quality of rice straw[J].,2022,38(06):1306.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.05.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2018-04-05 基金项目：南京市科技发展项目（201608039）；江苏省苏北科技专项（SZ-YC2017002）；国家自然科学基金项目（41301261）；南京农业大学大学生科研训练计划项目（1730A37） 作者简介：马贤武（1998-），男，安徽宣城人，本科，研究方向为生物能源。（Email）1720272922@qq.com 通讯作者：刘玉涛，（E-mail）ytliu@njau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-12-28