[1]刘红江,陈虞雯,张岳芳,等.不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1206-1211.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
 LIU Hong-jiang,CHEN Yu-wen,ZHANG Yue-fang,et al.Effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice[J].,2016,(06):1206-1211.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002]
点击复制

不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性及产量的影响()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年06期
页码:
1206-1211
栏目:
遗传育种·生理生化
出版日期:
2017-02-07

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and yield of rice
作者:
刘红江1陈虞雯2张岳芳1郭智1孙国峰1陈留根1郑建初1
(1.江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所,江苏南京210014;2.南京农业大学农学院,江苏南京210095)
Author(s):
LIU Hong-jiang1CHEN Yu-wen2ZHANG Yue-fang1GUO Zhi1SUN Guo-feng1CHEN Liu-gen1ZHENG Jian-chu1
(1. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environments, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China;2.College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)
关键词:
播栽方式水稻叶片光合特性产量
Keywords:
planting patternriceleafphotosynthetic characteristicsyield
分类号:
S511
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
采用大田小区试验,以粳稻品种南粳5055为供试材料,设置水直播、旱直播、手栽秧、机插秧等4个处理,研究不同播栽方式对水稻叶片光合特性的影响及其与产量形成的关系。结果表明:(1)水稻抽穗期和抽穗后20 d 叶片叶绿素含量均以手栽秧和机插秧较高,旱直播最低。其中,抽穗期旱直播水稻叶片叶绿素含量显著小于其他播栽方式水稻。(2)水稻抽穗期叶片光合速率、气孔导度、胞间CO2浓度、蒸腾速率以手栽秧和机插秧较高,旱直播较低;抽穗后20 d不同播栽方式间叶片光合速率、气孔导度、胞间CO2浓度、蒸腾速率差异相对较小。(3)水稻产量以手栽秧最高,旱直播最低,但手栽秧和机插秧差异不显著。直播稻特别是旱直播稻虽然穗数较多,但每穗粒数、结实率和千粒质量均最低,因此其产量最低。而手栽秧稻虽然穗数较少,但每穗粒数、结实率和千粒质量均最高,因此其产量最高。(4)水稻产量与抽穗后光合能力呈正相关关系,手栽秧和机插秧水稻抽穗后较高的光合能力是获得高产的主要原因。
Abstract:
A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of planting pattern on leaf photosynthetic characteristics of rice, and the relationship between photosynthetic characteristics and yield formation of rice. The japonica rice cultivar of nanjing 5055 was field-grown in field plot scale. Four planting pattern such as water direct-seeding, dry direct-seeding, manual transplanting and mechanical transplanting were designed. The results showed that the chlorophyll content in the leaves of rice grown by manual transplanting and mechanical transplanting were higher at the heading stage and 20 d after heading, and that of dry direct seeding were the lowest. The chlorophyll content in the leaves of rice of dry direct seeding was significantly lower than those of other planting patterns. The photosynthetic rate, stoma conduction, intercellular CO2 concentration, transpiration rate of rice leaves were lower for dry direct seeding, but higher for manual transplanting and mechanical transplanting at heading stage. There were no significant differences of photosynthetic physiological indices of rice leaves in different planting patterns at 20 d after heading. The yield of dry direct seeding rice was the lowest, that of manual transplanting rice was the highest, but there were no significant differences between manual transplanting and mechanical transplanting. In terms of the yield components of rice, in spite of the more effective panicle number, but the grain number per panicle, seed setting rate and 1 000 grain weight were all lowest for direct seeding, especially in dry direct seeding, so its yield was the lowest. And regardless of the less effective panicle number, the grain number per panicle, seed setting rate and 1 000 grain weight were all the highest for manual transplanting, so its yield was the highest. The photosynthetic physiological indices of rice at heading stage were positively correlated with the yield of rice. The higher photosynthetic physiological index of manual transplanting and mechanical transplanting at heading stage resulted in the higher rice yield.

参考文献/References:

[1]HILL J E, MORTIMER A M, NAMUCO O S, et al. Water and weed management in direct-seeded rice: Are we headed in the right direction[C]// PENG S, MARDY B. Rice research for food security and poverty alleviation. Manila: IRRI, 2001:491-510.
[2]HORIE T, SHIRAIWA T, HOMMA K, et al. Can yields of lowland rice resume the increases that showed in the 1980s[J]. Plant Production Science, 2005, 8: 259-274.
[3]BRAR A S, BUTTAR G S, JHANJI D, et al. Water productivity, energy and economic analysis of transplanting methods with different irrigation regimes in Basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) under north-western India[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2015, 158: 189-195.
[4]BHATTACHARYYA R, DAS T K, SUDHISHRI S, et al. Conservation agriculture effects on soil organic carbon accumulation and crop productivity under a rice-wheat cropping system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plains[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2015, 70: 11-21.
[5]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2013[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2013.
[6]张洪程.直播稻种植科学问题研究[M].北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2009.
[7]邓建平.对江苏省实现水稻亩产跨越600 kg的思考[J].中国农技推广,2011, 27(10): 6-7, 17.
[8]马义虎,杨祥田,杨子峰,等. 机插连作晚稻品种筛选及其生育特性研究[J]. 江苏农业科学,2015,43(2):58-62.
[9]程建平,罗锡文,樊启洲,等.不同种植方式对水稻生育特性和产量的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2010, 29 (1): 1-5.
[10]叶靖,董立强,王术,等.种植方式对水稻产量及相关性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2015,43(6):73-75.
[11]刘红江,陈留根,郑建初,等.不同播栽方式对水稻产量形成和经济效益的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2014, 30 (3): 474-479.
[12]刘红江,蒋银涛,陈留根,等. 不同播栽方式对水稻根系生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2015,31(2):310-316.
[13]JABRAN K, ULLAH E, HUSSAIN M, et al. Water saving, water productivity and yield outputs of fine-grain rice cultivars under conventional and water-saving rice production systems[J]. Experimental Agriculture, 2015, 51: 567-581.
[14]霍中洋,李杰,张洪程,等.不同种植方式下水稻氮素吸收利用的特性[J].作物学报,2012, 38 (10): 1908-1919.
[15]李小艳,孙宇,贺建荣,等. 水稻旱直播田全程草害化除技术[J]. 杂草科学,2015,33(4):51-54.
[16]SINGH V P, DHYANI V C, SINGH S P, et al. Effect of herbicides on weed management in dry-seeded rice sown under different tillage systems[J]. Crop Protection, 2016, 80: 118-126.
[17]孙国才,陆彦,殷茵. 水稻机械移栽与化学除草一体化技术初探[J]. 杂草科学,2014,32(2):64-66.
[18]LIN F F, QIU L F, DENG J S, et al. Investigation of SPAD meter-based indices for estimating rice nitrogen status [J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2010, 71 : 60-65. 
[19]魏颖娟,赵杨,PREEYANAT H,等.不同穗型水稻品种灌浆期剑叶光合特性对籽粒灌浆速率的影响[J].中国稻米,2013, 19 (4): 149.
[20]贺帆,黄见良,崔克辉,等.实施实地氮肥管理对不同杂交水稻氮肥利用率的影响[J].中国农业科学,2008, 41 (2): 470-479.
[21]杨虎,戈长水,应武,等.遮荫对水稻冠层叶片SPAD值及光合、形态特征参数的影响[J].中国稻米,2014, 20 (3): 580-587.
[22]ACRECHE M M, BRIEENO-FELIX G, MARTIN S J A, et al. Radiation interception and use efficiency as affected by breeding in Mediterranean wheat[J]. Field Crops Research, 2009, 110: 91-97.
[23]凌启鸿.作物群体质量[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2000:85-91.
[24]翟虎渠,曹树青,万建民,等.超高产杂交稻灌浆期光合功能与产量的关系[M].中国科学(C辑),2002, 32 (3): 211-217.
[25]KOURILL R, ILIKL P, NAUSL J, et al. On the limits of applicability of spectrophotometric and spectrofluormietric methods for the determination of chlorophyll a/b ratio[J]. Photosynth Res, 1999, 62: 107-116.
[26]裴鹏刚,张均华,朱练峰,等.秸秆还田耦合施氮水平对水稻光合特性、氮素吸收及产量形成的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2015, 29 (3): 282-290.
[27]赵黎明,李明,郑殿峰,等.灌溉方式与种植密度对寒地水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015, 31 (6): 159-169.
[28]DAI X B, CAO S Q, XU X M, et al. Study on a mutant with low content chlorophyll a in a high yielding rice and its photosynthes is properties[J]. Acta Bot Sin, 2000, 42 (12): 1289-1294.
[29]朱聪聪,张洪程,郭保卫,等.钵苗机插密度对不同类型水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响[J].作物学报,2014, 40 (1): 122-133.
[30]罗锡文,谢方平,区颖刚,等.水稻生产不同栽植方式的比较试验[J].农业工程学报,2004, 20(1): 136-139.
[31]程建平,罗锡文,樊启洲,等.不同种植方式对水稻生育特性和产量的影响[J].华中农业大学学报,2010, 29(1): 1-5.
[32]霍中洋,李杰,张洪程,等.不同种植方式下水稻氮素吸收利用的特性[J].作物学报,2012, 38 (10): 1908-1919.

相似文献/References:

[1]王士磊,丁正权,黄海祥.水稻隐性早熟突变体ref早熟性的遗传分析和基因定位[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):721.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.001]
 WANG Shi-lei,DING Zheng-quan,HUANG Hai-xiang.Inheritance and gene mapping of recessive earliness in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J].,2016,(06):721.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.001]
[2]王在满,郑乐,张明华,等.不同播种方式对直播水稻倒伏指数和根系生长的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.002]
 WANG Zai-man,ZHENG Le,ZHANG Ming-hua,et al.Effects of seeding manners on lodging index and root growth of directseeded rice[J].,2016,(06):725.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.002]
[3]易能,薛延丰,石志琦,等.微囊藻毒素对水稻种子萌发和幼苗生长的胁迫作用[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(04):729.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.003]
 YI Neng,XUE Yan-feng,SHI Zhi-qi,et al.Inhibitory effect of microcystins on seed germination and seedling growth of rice[J].,2016,(06):729.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.100-4440.2016.04.003]
[4]刘凯,王爱民,严国红,等.一个水稻显性矮秆突变体的遗传特性与降株高能力[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):968.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.002]
 LIU Kai,WANG Ai-min,YAN Guo-hong,et al.Genetic analysis and plant height reduction of a dominant dwarf mutant of rice[J].,2016,(06):968.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.002]
[5]王红,杨镇,裴文琪,等.功能性微生物制剂对镉胁迫下水稻生长及生理特性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):974.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.003]
 WANG Hong,YANG Zhen,PEI Wen-qi,et al.Growth and physiological characteristics of cadmium-stressed rice influenced by functional microorganism agent[J].,2016,(06):974.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.003]
[6]孙玲,单捷,毛良君,等.基于遥感和Moran's I指数的水稻面积变化空间自相关性研究[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.017]
 SUN Ling,SHAN Jie,MAO Liang-jun,et al.Spatial autocorrelation of changes in paddy rice area based on remote sensing and Moran’s I index[J].,2016,(06):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.017]
[7]张晓忆,李卫国,景元书,等.多种光谱指标构建决策树的水稻种植面积提取[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.018]
 ZHANG Xiao-yi,LI Wei-guo,JING Yuan-shu,et al.Extraction of paddy rice area by constructing the decision tree with multiple spectral indices[J].,2016,(06):1060.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.018]
[8]裔传灯,李玮,王德荣,等.水稻GW5基因的1212-bp Indel变异对粒形的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1201.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.001]
 YI Chuan-deng,LI Wei,WANG De-rong,et al.Effect of 1212-bp Indel variation of gene GW5 on rice grain shape[J].,2016,(06):1201.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.001]
[9]郭保卫,许轲,魏海燕,等.钵苗机插水稻茎秆的抗倒伏能力[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1280.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.014]
 GUO Bao-wei,XU Ke,WEI Hai-yan,et al.Culm lodging resistance characteristics of bowl seedling mechanical-transplanting rice[J].,2016,(06):1280.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.014]
[10]董海霞,赵明柳,唐守寅,等.石灰对土壤中Cd 和Zn 形态及对水稻有效性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(06):1320.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.020]
 DONG Hai-xia,ZHAO Ming-liu,TANG Shou-yin,et al.The effects of liming on the fraction and bioavailability to rice of Cd and Zn in a contaminated soil[J].,2016,(06):1320.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.020]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-05-31 基金项目:国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD04B08);江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(15)1004] 作者简介:刘红江(1979-),男,江苏建湖人,博士,副研究员,主要从事农业生态和水稻栽培生理生态研究。(E-mail) Liuhongjiang2004@sohu.com 通讯作者:郑建初,(E-mail)zjc@jaas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-07