[1]王玉琦,朱昌华,夏凯,等.磷酸脲缓解锰离子拮抗草甘膦的除草功效[J].江苏农业学报,2016,(05):1029-1036.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.012]
 WANG Yu-qi,ZHU Chang-hua,XIA Kai,et al.Alleviation effect of urea phosphate on antagonism of manganese against glyphosate[J].,2016,(05):1029-1036.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.012]
点击复制

磷酸脲缓解锰离子拮抗草甘膦的除草功效()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
1029-1036
栏目:
植物保护
出版日期:
2016-11-22

文章信息/Info

Title:
Alleviation effect of urea phosphate on antagonism of manganese against glyphosate
作者:
王玉琦朱昌华夏凯甘立军
南京农业大学生命科学学院,江苏南京210095
Author(s):
WANG Yu-qiZHU Chang-huaXIA KaiGAN Li-jun
College of Life Science,Nanjing Agricultural University,Nanjing 210095,China
关键词:
草甘膦Mn2+磷酸脲拮抗
Keywords:
glyphosateMn2+urea phosphateantagonism
分类号:
Q945
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.05.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
随着抗草甘膦转基因作物种植面积的不断扩大,草甘膦已经成为世界上用量最大的除草剂之一。为了节约成本,人们通常将微肥和草甘膦混合喷施,但是当含有Mn2+的微肥(硫酸锰)与草甘膦混用时会显著降低草甘膦的除草功效,因此探索能够减轻或消除Mn2+对草甘膦拮抗效应的方法具有重要意义。本试验采用磷酸脲、草甘膦、硫酸锰三者的混合液喷施高羊茅,探索不同浓度(166 mg/L、500 mg/L、833 mg/L)的磷酸脲缓解Mn2+对草甘膦的拮抗作用。结果表明,在草甘膦和硫酸锰混合溶液中添加3种不同浓度的磷酸脲可以缓解甚至消除Mn2+对草甘膦的拮抗作用,与草甘膦、硫酸锰混合喷施处理组相比,磷酸脲和硫酸锰、草甘膦混合喷施降低高羊茅叶片的含水量和叶绿素含量,提高莽草酸和丙二醛(MDA)含量。磷酸脲浓度越高,三者混合喷施处理的除草效果越好,其中833 mg/L磷酸脲与硫酸锰、草甘膦混合喷施处理与单独喷施草甘膦处理的除草效果一样。单独喷施磷酸脲提高了高羊茅的株高和鲜质量。
Abstract:
With the acreage's enlargement of transgenic crop resistant to glyphosate,glyphosate have become one of the largest herbicides in dosages in the world. In order to save the cost of weeding and fertilizing, people usually mix micronutrient fertilizer and glyphosate spraying.But the mixture of glyphosate and manganese fertilizer sabotage weed control. Therefore, it is of great significance to reduce or eliminate the antagonistic effect of Mn2+ against glyphosate. In this experiment, the mixtures of urea phosphate, glyphosate and manganese sulfate were applied to ryegrass. The alleviated effect on the antagonism of manganese against glyphosate under different concentrations (166 mg/L, 500 mg/L and 833 mg/L) of urea phosphate (UP) was explored. The mixture of glyphosate and manganese sulfate added with all three concentrations of UP relieved and even eliminated the antagonism of Mn2+ against glyphosate. Compared to the mixture of glyphosate and manganese sulfate, the mixture of glyphosate, manganese sulfate and urea phosphate decreased the contents of water and chlorophyll, and increased the contents of shikimic acid and malondialdehyde. The higher the UP concentration, the better the efficacy of the mixture.

参考文献/References:

[1]苏少泉. 草甘膦述评[J]. 农药, 2005, 44(4): 145-149.
[2]苏少泉. 抗草甘膦作物的发展与草甘膦使用中若干问题[J]. 农药研究与应用, 2007, 11(4): 1-3.
[3]BERNARDS M L, THELEN K D, PENNER D. Glyphosate efficacy is antagonized by manganese [J]. Weed Technology, 2005,19(1):27-34.
[4]BERNARDS M L, THELEN K D, PENNER D, et al. Glyphosate interaction with manganese in tank mixtures and its effect on glyphosate absorption and translocation [J].Weed Science, 2005,53(6):787-794.
[5]BAILEY W A, POSTON D H, WILSON H P, et al. Glyphosate interactions with manganese [J]. Weed Technology, 2002, 16:729-799. 
[6]SHEA P J, TUPY D R. Reversal of cation-induced reduction in glyphosate activity with EDTA [J]. Weed Science, 1984,32:802-806.
[7]张茹, 李桂俊, 李小艳, 等. 赤霉素缓解 Mn2+ 对草甘膦拮抗效应的研究[J]. 农药学学报, 2014, 16(3): 281-286.
[8]潘华藻. 磷酸脲的用途[J]. 化肥工业, 1991, 18(6): 50-51.
[9]刘键, 杜建卫, 张卫星. 磷酸脲对膜下滴灌棉花品质和产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2006(4): 37-40.
[10]宋小玲, 马波, 皇甫超河, 等. 除草剂生物测定方法[J]. 杂草科学, 2004(3): 1-5.
[11]吕斑, 王学江. 除草剂防效计算方法的讨论[J]. 植保技术与推广, 1998, 18(1): 31-32.
[12]邹琦.植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2000:115-117.
[13]张宪政. 植物叶绿素含量测定——丙酮乙醇混合液法[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1986(3): 26-28.
[14]邓渊钰. 草甘膦药害的检测及其应用[J]. 杂草科学, 2000(2): 37-38.
[15]娄远来, 邓渊钰, 沈晋良, 等. 甲磺隆和草甘膦对空心莲子草乙酰乳酸合酶活性和莽草酸含量的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2005, 32(2): 185-188.
[16]赵世杰, 许长成. 植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1994, 30(3): 207-210.
[17]李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2000:164-165,260-261.
[18]THELEN K D, JACKSON E P, PENNER D. The basis for the hard-water antagonism of glyphosate activity [J]. Weed Science, 1995,43:541-548.
[19]BARRETT K A, MCBRIDE M B. Oxidative degradation of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonate by manganese oxide [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(23): 9223-9228.
[20]BUHLER D D, BURNSIDE O C. Effect of water quality, carrier volume, and acid on glyphosate phytotoxicity [J]. Weed Science, 1983,31:163-169.
[21]SPRANKLE P, MEGGITT W F, PENNER D. Rapid inactivation of glyphosate in the soil [J]. Weed Science, 1975,23:224-228.
[22]NALEWAJA J D, DEVILLIERS B, MATYSIAK R. Surfactant and salt affect glyphosate retention and absorption [J]. Weed Research, 1996, 36(3): 241-247.
[23]SHANER D L. Role of translocation as a mechanism of resistance to glyphosate [J]. Weed Science, 2009, 57(1): 118-123.
[24]SUWUNNAMEK U, PARKER C. Control of Cyperus rotundus with glyphosate: the influence of ammonium sulphate and other additives [J]. Weed Research, 1975, 15(1): 13-19.
[25]许景伟. 草甘膦混用灭茅试验研究[J]. 河南林业科技, 2005(3): 13-15.
[26]李永旗,夏绍南,李鹏程,等.花铃期叶施不同浓度尿素对棉株氮素吸收分配及生理生化特性的影响[J]. 核农学报,2016, 30(3):580-587.
[27]陈虎保, 陈国海. 草甘膦的作用机理及部位[J]. 林业科技通讯, 1997(1): 23-25.
[28]STEINRUCKEN H C, AMRHEIN N. The herbicide glyphosate is a potent inhibitor of 5-enolpyruvylshikimic acid-3-phosphate synthase [J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1980, 94(4): 1207-1212.

相似文献/References:

[1]张玉池,刘琪,相世刚,等.稻田杂草对草甘膦和草铵膦的敏感性差异[J].江苏农业学报,2018,(06):1260.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.009]
 ZHANG Yu-chi,LIU Qi,XIANG Shi-gang,et al.Sensitivity difference of weeds in rice field to glyphosate and glufosinate[J].,2018,(05):1260.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2018.06.009]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2016-02-21 作者简介:王玉琦(1990-),男,山东聊城人,硕士研究生,主要从事植物激素生理和生物技术研究。(Tel)18761869560;(E-mail)805285255@qq.com 通讯作者:甘立军,(E-mail)ganlj@ njau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-22