[1]金梅娟,王海候,李冬梅,等.施用生石灰对稻-羊肚菌轮作模式生产效应及土壤肥力的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(11):2181-2191.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.011]
　JIN Meijuan,WANG Haihou,LI Dongmei,et al.Effects of quicklime application on production efficiency and soil fertility in the rice-Morchella esculenta rotation system[J].,2025,(11):2181-2191.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.011]
点击复制

施用生石灰对稻-羊肚菌轮作模式生产效应及土壤肥力的影响()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2025年11期
页码:
2181-2191
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2025-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of quicklime application on production efficiency and soil fertility in the rice-Morchella esculenta rotation system
作者:
金梅娟; 王海候; 李冬梅; 宋英; 董明辉
(江苏太湖地区农业科学研究所/国家土壤质量相城观测实验站,江苏苏州215106)
Author(s):
JIN Meijuan; WANG Haihou; LI Dongmei; SONG Ying; DONG Minghui
(Jiangsu Taihu Lake Region Institute of Agricultural Sciences/National Soil Quality Observation and Experimental Station in Xiangcheng, Suzhou 215106, China)
关键词:
稻-羊肚菌轮作; 生石灰; 产量; 土壤肥力; 含氮量
Keywords:
rice-Morchella esculenta rotation; quicklime; yield; soil fertility; nitrogen content
分类号:
S143.91
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
施用生石灰是调控羊肚菌生产过程中土壤环境、保障羊肚菌稳产的重要措施,为明确稻-羊肚菌轮作模式中适宜生石灰施用量,本研究以六妹羊肚菌、南粳46水稻为试验对象,设置了4 个处理[生石灰施用量0 kg/hm2(C1)、375 kg/hm2(C2)、750 kg/hm2(C3)、1 125 kg/hm2(C4)],分析了在羊肚菌播种前施用生石灰对羊肚菌产量、水稻产量及其构成、水稻含氮量及农田土壤肥力等指标的影响。结果表明,施用生石灰明显降低了羊肚菌受病原真菌感染的风险,C3处理的羊肚菌产量达3 385 kg/hm2,显著高于其他处理。与未施用生石灰处理相比(C1处理),施用生石灰对水稻产量无显著影响,但高生石灰施用量(C4处理)显著降低了水稻有效穗数,而适宜的生石灰施用量(C3处理)则显著提高了水稻每穗总粒数。土壤肥力指标分析结果显示,适宜的生石灰施用量提高了土壤pH值,但高生石灰施用量(C4处理)的土壤氮素供应能力显著下降,表现为对应的水稻秸秆含氮量及土壤碱解氮含量均显著降低；施用生石灰对水稻季土壤磷含量、钾含量无显著影响。综上,在试验区域首年开展稻-羊肚菌轮作时,750 kg/hm2是兼顾六妹羊肚菌与南粳46水稻稳产效果的生石灰建议施用量。
Abstract:
The application of quicklime is a critical measure for regulating the soil environment and ensuring stable yields during Morchella esculenta cultivation. To determine the appropriate quicklime application rate in the rice-Morchella esculenta rotation system, this study used Morchella sextelata and the rice cultivar Nanjing 46 as test subjects. Four treatments were established based on quicklime application rates: 0 kg/hm2 (C1), 375 kg/hm2 (C2), 750 kg/hm2 (C3) and 1 125 kg/hm2 (C4). The effects of pre-sowing quicklime application on Morchella esculenta yield, rice yield and its components, rice nitrogen content, and farmland soil fertility were analyzed. The results indicated that quicklime application significantly reduced the risk of pathogenic fungal infection in Morchella esculenta. The yield under the C3 treatment reached 3 385 kg/hm2, which was significantly higher than that of other treatments. Compared to the non-quicklime treatment (C1), the application of quicklime showed no significant impact on rice yield. A high application rate (C4 treatment) significantly reduced the number of productive panicles, whereas an appropriate rate (C3 treatment) notably increased the total grains per panicle. Ana-lysis of soil fertility indicators revealed that an appropriate quicklime application rate increased soil pH, while the high application rate (C4 treatment) significantly reduced soil nitrogen supply capacity, as evidenced by markedly decreased nitrogen content in rice straw and soil alkaline hydrolysable nitrogen. Quicklime application showed no significant effects on soil phosphorus content and potassium content during the rice season. In conclusion, for the initial year of implementing the rice-Morchella esculenta rotation in the experimental area, an application rate of 750 kg/hm2 is recommended as it effectively balances the stable yield outcomes for both Morchella sextelata and the rice cultivar Nanjing 46.

参考文献/References:

[1]胡启良,杨滨娟,黄国勤. 紫云英与油菜混播对水稻产量、土壤活性有机碳及其组分的影响[J]. 生态科学,2024,43(3):161-168.
[2]王守红,张诚信,马林杰,等. 稻虾共作模式下利于水稻产量稻米品质协同的适宜栽插密度[J]. 江苏农业学报,2023,39(8):1668-1679.
[3]王昂,戴丹超,马旭洲,等. 稻蟹共作模式对土壤微生物量氮和酶活性的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2019,35(1):76-84.
[4]陈华,姜建新,徐代贵,等. “稻-稻-菌” 轮作技术及其示范成效[J]. 食用菌,2023,45(5):58-59,61.
[5]罗喜秀. 稻菌(菇)模式生态足迹和经济效益评估[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学,2022.
[6]郝心怡,张江,白瑞,等. 长江中下游地区耕地复种指数时空特征及驱动机制研究[J]. 国土资源科技管理,2021,38(4):15-27.
[7]彭博,边银丙,龚钰华,等. 大田栽培羊肚菌的病害及其综合防控技术[J]. 食药用菌,2024,32(2):129-135.
[8]赵琪. 我国羊肚菌产业发展现状、前景及建议[J]. 食药用菌,2018,26(3):148-151,156.
[9]张勇,李青,李云霞,等. 暖棚栽培羊肚菌的营养及土壤环境分析[J]. 中国食用菌,2023,42(6):74-79.
[10]贺新生,伍永华,王光礼,等. 羊肚菌生产大面积绝收的原因分析与对策[J]. 食用菌,2021,43(6):5-8.
[11]苏干光,邹晓霞,徐肖平,等. 浙西地区羊肚菌菌种制作及大田设施高产栽培技术[J]. 食药用菌,2024,32(1):72-76.
[12]金梅娟,王海候,顾俊荣,等. “稻-羊肚菌” 轮作下稻田消纳羊肚菌废弃物的减氮效应研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2024,40(20):92-98.
[13]刘红江,郭智,张岳芳,等. 不同类型有机肥对水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2024,40(4):645-651.
[14]刘梦竹,王锐,冯源,等. 控释尿素释放周期对水稻产量和氮肥利用的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2024,40(5):827-834.
[15]鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,2000.
[16]李银双,李倩,杨梅,等. 栽培羊肚菌土壤及其消毒方式比较试验[J]. 食用菌,2022,44(4):55-57,69.
[17]李汉燕,王日新,李海涛,等. 设施大棚土壤改良对羊肚菌产量及效益的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯,2023(2):102-105.
[18]董明辉,谢春芹,金梅娟,等. 水稻-羊肚菌轮作模式与技术[M]. 苏州:苏州大学出版社,2023:38-39.
[19]刘力,刘跃鹏. 桑枝粉屑栽培羊肚菌技术[J]. 蚕桑茶叶通讯,2024(5):8-10.
[20]王浩东,赵锐,吴亮亮,等. 羊肚菌生物学特性及栽培技术研究进展[J]. 中国野生植物资源,2024,43(2):91-95.
[21]刘鑫,尹泽润,盛浩,等. 水稻土微生物群落、酶活性及理化性质对有机肥、石灰连续施用的响应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2024,30(1):63-73.
[22]何琳华,徐蕊,嵇伟彬,等. 苏南地区不同羊肚菌菌株稻田栽培试验[J]. 中国食用菌,2018,37(4):30-33,39.
[23]徐仁扣,李九玉,周世伟,等. 我国农田土壤酸化调控的科学问题与技术措施[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2018,33(2):160-167.
[24]HOLLAND J E, BENNETT A E, NEWTON A C, et al. Liming impacts on soils,crops and biodiversity in the UK:a review[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2018,610:316-332.
[25]刘磊,廖萍,邵华,等. 施石灰和秸秆还田对双季稻田土壤钾素表观平衡的互作效应[J]. 作物学报,2022,48(1):226-237.
[26]罗祥英,李文芝,李健,等. 羊肚菌人工栽培过程中外援氮素营养的运输机制[J]. 食用菌学报,2022,29(3):28-31.
[27]TAN H, KOHLER A, MIAO R Y, et al. Multi-omic analyses of exogenous nutrient bag decomposition by the black morel Morchella importuna reveal sustained carbon acquisition and transferring[J]. Environmental Microbiology,2019,21(10):3909-3926.
[28]朱坚,彭华,李尝君,等. 生石灰施用增加了酸性双季稻田氮素氨挥发损失[J]. 湖南农业科学,2017(7):32-36.
[29]沈其荣. 土壤肥料学通论[M]. 2版.北京:高等教育出版社,2021:196-201.
[30]牛帅帅,郭大勇,杜鹃,等. 磷肥种类及施磷水平对冬小麦生长发育和土壤磷库的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2024,44(8):1048-1055.
[31]陈竹君,王益权,周建斌,等. 日光温室栽培土壤供钾状况及K-Ca吸附交换特性研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2009,15(5):1078-1084.
[32]李帅,刘昆,李思宇,等. 直播方式对水稻根系形态生理和产量影响的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学,2024,52(24):11-16.
[33]赵文举,曹伟,吴克倩,等. 盐碱地水肥耦合对基质栽培番茄生长与产量品质的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2024,42(6):619-626.
[34]刘香凝,脱云飞,王昭仪,等. 水肥耦合对土壤碳氮储量、理化性质及三七产量和皂苷含量的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2023,54(10):2888-2900.
[35]周振鹏,叶含春,王振华,等. 降解膜覆盖下磁化水滴灌对加工番茄产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2023,41(12):1268-1275.
[36]王文鹏,叶昌焕,黄振懿,等. 不同种植方式对土壤细菌群落结构及魔芋生长的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2024,55(11):3255-3264.
[37]张健利,王振华,刘茹华,等. 水肥互作对滴灌红枣耗水及产量的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2023,41(6):597-604,613.
[38]侬文莲,李秀芳,吴世清,等. 咸水灌溉下生物炭对玉米光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2023,41(6):605-613.
[39]杨梦乐,彭嘉宇,桂意云,等. 不同蔗叶生物炭施用量对甘蔗产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2024,55(3):803-811.
[40]赵坤. 羊肚菌栽培土壤及营养需求分析[D]. 南充:西华师范大学,2023.
[41]宋金枝,于剑瑞,夏广清,等. 长白山区野生羊肚菌与其土壤成分的相关性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2016,44(12):258-260.
[42]张龙辉,李源环,邓小华,等. 施用石灰和绿肥及生物有机肥后的酸性土壤pH和理化性状动态变化[J]. 中国烟草学报,2019,25(3):60-66.
[43]柳开楼,韩天富,黄晶,等. 中国稻作区土壤速效钾和钾肥偏生产力时空变化[J]. 土壤学报,2021,58(1):202-212.

相似文献/References:

[1]王婷,曾科,丁武汉,等.有机肥与无机肥配施+生石灰对酸性土壤改良及水稻产量提升的机制[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(09):1729.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.09.008]
　WANG Ting,ZENG Ke,DING Wuhan,et al.Mechanisms of combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers with quicklime on acidic soil improvement and rice yield increase[J].,2025,(11):1729.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.09.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-12-15基金项目:江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX(23)3009]；江苏省亚夫科技服务项目[KF(23)1102]；苏州市姑苏人才项目(24062)作者简介:金梅娟(1989-),女,江苏常熟人,硕士,副研究员,主要从事生态循环农业模式及技术研究。(E-mail)jinmei1989@126.com通讯作者:董明辉,(E-mail)mhdong@yzu.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-12-18