[1]李兆鹏,徐延平,王官隆,等.沼肥与化肥配施对生姜产量、品质及抗逆性的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(04):683-691.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.04.007]
　LI Zhaopeng,XU Yanping,WANG Guanlong,et al.Effects of combined application of biogas fertilizer slurry with chemical fertilizers on yields, quality and stress resistance of ginger[J].,2025,(04):683-691.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.04.007]
点击复制

沼肥与化肥配施对生姜产量、品质及抗逆性的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2025年04期
页码:
683-691
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2025-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of combined application of biogas fertilizer slurry with chemical fertilizers on yields, quality and stress resistance of ginger
作者:
李兆鹏1; 徐延平1; 王官隆1; 张鹏2; 张燕1; 张苗苗1; 朱晓利1; 李乃成1
(1.潍坊理工学院现代农业与环境学院,山东潍坊261000；2.山东省土地集团潍坊有限公司,山东潍坊261000)
Author(s):
LI Zhaopeng1; XU Yanping1; WANG Guanlong1; ZHANG Peng2; ZHANG Yan1; ZHANG Miaomiao1; ZHU Xiaoli1; LI Naicheng1
(1.College of Modern Agriculture and Environment, Weifang Institute of Technology, Weifang 261000, China；2.Shandong Tudi Group-Weifang Co.,Ltd., Weifang 261000, China)
关键词:
生姜; 沼液; 沼渣; 产量; 品质; 抗逆性
Keywords:
ginger; biogas slurry; biogas residue; yield; quality; stress resistance
分类号:
S632.5
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.04.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了给将沼肥（沼液、沼渣）与化肥配施应用于生姜种植技术提供依据,本研究以山农1号为试验材料,设置只施用化肥(CK)、20%沼液+80%化肥(T1处理)、50%沼液+50%化肥(T2处理)、80%沼液+20%化肥(T3处理)及50%沼液+50%化肥+沼渣替代基肥(T4处理)等处理,分析其对生姜产量、品质及旺盛生长期抗逆性的影响。结果表明,除T3处理外,所有处理产量均显著高于CK,其中又以T2处理产量最高。沼渣基施对生姜品质的改善最为明显,其中T4处理生姜块茎可溶性糖、抗坏血酸及姜辣素含量均较CK显著提高。随着沼肥施用比例的增加,T4处理生姜块茎内硝酸盐含量显著下降。除T3处理外,所有处理均可提高生姜旺盛生长期的抗逆性,表现为超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化氢酶活性显著升高及类黄酮类物质大量积累。但是沼液施用比例达到80%时,生姜叶片丙二醛含量显著升高,谷胱甘肽含量及过氧化氢酶活性显著下降,表明生姜发生膜脂过氧化反应,抗逆性下降。综上所述,施用50%沼液+50%化肥可获得最佳生姜产量,50%沼液+50%化肥+沼渣替代基肥栽培的生姜品质最佳。
Abstract:
To provide a basis for the application of combined use of biogas fertilizer (biogas slurry and biogas residue) and chemical fertilizers in ginger cultivation technology, Shannong No.1 ginger was selected as the experimental material, and treatments were set as follows: CK (chemical fertilizers only), T1 treatment (20% biogas slurry + 80% chemical fertilizers), T2 treatment (50% biogas slurry + 50% chemical fertilizers), T3 treatment (80% biogas slurry + 20% chemical fertilizers), and T4 treatment (50% biogas slurry + 50% chemical fertilizer + biogas residue as a substitute for base fertilizer). These treatments were designed to evaluate the effects of biogas slurry and biogas residues on the yield, quality, and stress resistance during the vigorous growth stage of ginger. The results showed that the yields of all treatments (except for T3 treatment) were significantly higher than that of CK, with the highest yield observed in T2 treatment. The application of biogas residues as a base fertilizer had the most obvious impact on ginger quality. In T4 treatment, the contents of soluble sugar, ascorbic acid, and gingerol in ginger rhizomes were significantly higher than those in CK. As the proportion of biogas slurry increased, the nitrate content in ginger rhizomes decreased significantly under T4 treatment. Except for T3 treatment, all the other treatments could improve the stress resistance of ginger during its vigorous growth stage, characterized by increased activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), as well as the accumulation of flavonoids. However, when the proportion of biogas slurry reached 80%, the content of malondialdehyde (MDA) in ginger leaves increased significantly, while the content of glutathione (GSH) and the activity of CAT declined, indicating that lipid peroxidation occurred in ginger and the stress resistance reduced. In summary, the optimal application method for maximizing ginger yield was 50% biogas slurry + 50% chemical fertilizer (T2). For improving ginger quality and stress resistance, the best application method is 50% biogas slurry + 50% chemical fertilizer + biogas residue as a substitute for base fertilizer.

参考文献/References:

[1]温云杰,张纪涛,李琳,等. 沼液配施化肥对大葱产量和土壤养分、微生物及酶活性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文),2024,32(1):95-105.
[2]LI N H, YANG X Y, LIU J Q, et al. Effect of raw material and application rate of biogas slurry on cucumber growth,Fusarium wilt suppression,and soil properties[J]. Environmental Technology & Innovation,2023,32:103396.
[3]陆国弟,杨扶德,王惠珍,等. 沼液浸种对蒙古黄芪种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2019(5):155-162.
[4]褚晋,闫晗,韩涛,等. 沼液对稻瘟病的防治效果及内生拮抗细菌筛选与鉴定[J]. 中国生物防治学报,2022,38(6):1516-1525.
[5]YU X Y, ZHU Y J, JIN L, et al. Contrasting responses of fungal and bacterial communities to biogas slurry addition in rhizospheric soil of poplar plantations[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2022,175:104427.
[6]张纪涛,史向远,王林,等. 沼液配肥对砂培西瓜生长、品质及重金属累积的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2023(17):47-53.
[7]张青青,黄璐璐,金海洋,等. 沼渣替代草炭的栽培基质特性及其对番茄生长的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学,2024,52(2):132-135.
[8]韩春叶,王崇华,田春丽,等. 沼液与微肥配合喷施对大棚黄瓜产量及品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2017(3):61-65.
[9]辛格,高亚茹,陈国松,等. 沼液成分与重金属含量分析[J]. 化工时刊,2018,32(1):9-16.
[10]董颐玮,梁栋,李丹阳,等. 沼液主要养分含量特征分析[J]. 江苏农业学报,2021,37(5):1206-1214.
[11]杨建霞,王秀文,宁海军,等. 沼肥不同施肥量对大棚甜瓜生长发育及果实品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2020(22):60-65.
[12]徐坚,叶波,顾艳红,等. 施用不同沼液对杨梅土壤及果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学,2023,64(6):1496-1499.
[13]ZHENG J, QI X Y, YANG S H, et al. Effects and evaluation of biogas slurry/water integrated irrigation technology on the growth,yield and quality of tomatoes[J]. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering,2022,15(5):123-131.
[14]杨建,王晶,杨祎程,等. 尾菜沼渣对土壤改良及白菜品质的影响[J]. 现代农业科技,2024(2):103-106.
[15]YOU L, YU S Q, LIU H Y, et al. Effects of biogas slurry fertilization on fruit economic traits and soil nutrients of Camellia oleifera Abel[J]. PLoS One,2019,14(5):e0208289.
[16]邵海南,刘雲祥,咸文荣. 施肥水平对生姜产量和品质的影响[J]. 青海大学学报,2021,39(5):51-56.
[17]潘万勇. 生姜大田追施沼肥的效果[J]. 农技服务,2009,26(1):47,96.
[18]AHMAD R, AZEEM M, AHMED N. Productivity of ginger (Zingiber officinale) by amendment of vermicompost and biogas slurry in saline soils [J]. Pakistan Journal of Botany,2009,41:3107-3116.
[19]肖静. 沼肥部分替代化肥对生姜产量与品质的影响[J]. 农业工程技术,2020,40(5):23,25.
[20]赵世杰. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,1998:106-120.
[21]陈建勋,王晓峰. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 广州:华南理工大学出版社,2002:69-71.
[22]郭晓斐,杜爱琴,杜爱玲. 生姜中姜辣素含量的测定[J]. 山东化工,2007,36(4):34-36,40.
[23]凌育赵. 水蒸气蒸馏提取沙姜中特性组分-沙姜油的研究[J]. 中国调味品,2005,30(8):28-31.
[24]李合生,孙群,赵世杰,等. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 2版. 北京:高等教育出版社,1999:167-169.
[25]王馨笙,徐坤,杨天慧,等. 氮磷钾配施对生姜产量和品质的影响[C]//中国植物营养与肥料学会.中国植物营养与肥料学会2010年学术年会论文集. 银川:中国植物营养与肥料学会,2010:169-178.
[26]黄惠珠. 沼肥营养成分与污染物分析研究[J]. 福建农业学报,2010,25(1):86-89.
[27]INSAM H, GMEZ-BRANDN M, ASCHER J. Manure-based biogas fermentation residues-Friend or foe of soil fertility?[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2015,84:1-14.
[28]杨月,宫少硕,靳红梅,等. 奶牛场沼液施用对小麦及青贮玉米植株产量和品质的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报,2023,39(2):264-272.
[29]WANG Z C, SANUSI I A, WANG J D, et al. Biogas slurry significantly improved degraded farmland soil quality and promoted Capsicum spp. production[J]. Plants,2024,13(2):265.
[30]KUMAR A, VERMA L M, SHARMA S, et al. Overview on agricultural potentials of biogas slurry (BGS):applications,challenges,and solutions[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery,2023,15:13729-13769.
[31]HUANG L N, CHENG S M, LIU H L, et al. Effects of nitrogen reduction combined with organic fertilizer on growth and nitrogen fate in banana at seedling stage[J]. Environmental Research,2022,214:113826.
[32]李文龙,赵猛,顾万荣,等. 沼肥与钾肥配施对玉米叶片抗氧化酶及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南方农业学报,2024,48(10):1782-1788.
[33]汪建旭,王晶,卢秀霞,等. 尾菜沼液配比对土壤质量及花椰菜产量和品质影响[J]. 中国农机化学报,2024,45(9):278-284.
[34]韩晓飞,李潇然,王俊伟. 沼液替代化肥对露地萝卜产量、品质和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2023,39(22):34-39.
[35]隋好林,陈晓峰,秦娜,等. 沼液滴灌对番茄产量、品质和土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 山东农业科学,2016,48(2):80-84.
[36]RAHAMAN M A, ZHANG Q W, SHI Y L, et al. Biogas slurry application could potentially reduce N2O emissions and increase crop yield[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,778:146269.
[37]TANG Y F, LUO L M, CARSWELL A, et al. Changes in soil organic carbon status and microbial community structure following biogas slurry application in a wheat-rice rotation[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2021,757:143786.
[38]岳树枝,刘变,黄洁,等. 尾菜发酵沼液还田对土壤理化性质和娃娃菜产量及品质的影响[J/OL]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2024:1-14
[2024-09-01]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1055.S.20240603.1436.002.
[39]徐培智,黄继川,彭智平,等. 施用沼液对白菜产量、品质和养分吸收的影响[J]. 广东农业科学,2014,41(7):71-73.
[40]ABUBAKER J,RISBERG K,PELL M. Biogas residues as fertilisers-effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities[J]. Applied Energy,2012,99:126-134.
[41]陈燕,蔡同一,付力,等. 用改进的高效液相色谱法(HPLC)测定姜中姜辣素[J]. 食品科学,2001,22(4):60-63.
[42]周洁,王艳红,刘德麒,等. 生姜主栽品种枯萎病抗性评价及抗病性鉴定指标筛选[J]. 南方农业学报,2022,53(9):2557-2567.
[43]SALEEM M H, WANG X K, PARVEEN A, et al. Alleviation of drought stress by root-applied thiourea is related to elevated photosynthetic pigments,osmoprotectants,antioxidant enzymes,and tubers yield and suppressed oxidative stress in potatoes cultivars[J]. PeerJ,2022,10:e13121.
[44]高伟,席克勇,尹军良,等. 外源SiNPs对盐胁迫下生姜幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2023,51(9):1-10.
[45]李佳慧,姜爱丽,胡文忠,等. 生姜不同切割后的抗氧化成分及其活性的变化[J]. 食品工业科技,2015,36(3):340-344.
[46]LI N C, TONG M M, GLIBERT P M. Effect of allelochemicals on photosynthetic and antioxidant defense system of Ulva prolifera[J]. Aquatic Toxicology,2020,224:105513.
[47]闫志鹏,仪慧兰,张艾英,等. 谷子对黑粉菌侵染的生物学响应[J]. 山西农业科学,2019,47(10):1700-1704.

相似文献/References:

[1]强姝婷,国慧,熊浩荣,等.生姜多类型化学物质与药理作用及药食同源研究进展[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(01):259.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.033]
　QIANG Shu-ting,GUO Hui,XIONG Hao-rong,et al.Research progress on chemical substances, pharmacological action, homology of medicine and food of Zingiber officinale Rosc.[J].,2021,(04):259.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.01.033]
[2]董颐玮,梁栋,李丹阳,等.沼液主要养分含量特征分析[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(05):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.016]
　DONG Yi-wei,LIANG Dong,LI Dan-yang,et al.Characteristic analysis of main nutrient content in biogas slurry[J].,2021,(04):1206.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.016]
[3]何咏梅,王俊文,白鹏,等.沼液部分替代化肥及钾肥减量对西葫芦果实品质和土壤性质的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(01):161.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.01.018]
　HE Yongmei,WANG Junwen,BAI Peng,et al.Effects of partial replacement of chemical fertilizers by biogas slurry and reduction of potassium fertilizer on zucchini fruit quality and soil characteristics[J].,2025,(04):161.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.01.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2024-09-18基金项目：山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2023QC326)；山东省重点研发计划项目(2023TZXD028)；山东土地集团横向项目(2022-KJHX-03)作者简介：李兆鹏(1994-),男,山东潍坊人,硕士,讲师,主要研究方向为植物保护。(E-mail)15666085797@163.com通讯作者：李乃成, (E-mail)linaicheng23@163.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-05-26