[1]胡子贤,许慧,邓鹏飞,等.结香患根腐病植株根际土壤微生物群落组成与多样性[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(12):2254-2265.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.12.008]
 HU Zixian,XU Hui,DENG Pengfei,et al.Composition and diversity of microbial community in rhizosphere soil of Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl. with root rot disease[J].,2024,(12):2254-2265.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.12.008]
点击复制

结香患根腐病植株根际土壤微生物群落组成与多样性()
分享到:

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年12期
页码:
2254-2265
栏目:
植物保护
出版日期:
2024-12-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Composition and diversity of microbial community in rhizosphere soil of Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl. with root rot disease
作者:
胡子贤许慧邓鹏飞王佳琪杜子滔徐小牛
(安徽农业大学林学与园林学院,安徽合肥230036)
Author(s):
HU ZixianXU HuiDENG PengfeiWANG JiaqiDU ZitaoXU Xiaoniu
(School of Forestry & Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)
关键词:
结香根腐病根际土壤高通量测序细菌真菌多样性
Keywords:
Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl.root rotrhizosphere soilhigh-throughput sequencingbacteriafungidiversity
分类号:
S435.671
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.12.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
根腐病是影响结香产业可持续发展的重要病害之一,为了探明结香根腐病的发病机制,筛选潜在病原菌,研发有效防治药剂,本研究以安徽省潜山市根腐病高发的结香林作为研究对象,采用高通量测序技术(Illumina MiSeq),分析和比较了结香健康植株和患病植株根际土壤理化性质、细菌和真菌的群落结构及多样性。结果表明,患病植株根际土壤细菌和真菌丰富度指数(Chao1指数)分别较健康植株显著降低13.74%和45.83%,细菌多样性(Shannon指数)没有显著变化,但真菌多样性(Shannon指数)显著高于健康植株。与健康植株根际土壤相比,患病植株根际土壤黏细菌属(Byssovorax)相对丰度显著增加(P<0.05),真菌葡萄座腔菌属(Botryosphaeria)和蜡壳耳目(Sebacinales)未定属相对丰度极显著增加(P<0.01)。患病植株根际土壤有机碳含量显著高于健康植株根际土壤。综上,结香在感染根腐病后,根际土壤细菌和真菌丰富度下降,真菌群落多样性升高,初步确定黏细菌属菌、葡萄座腔菌属菌和蜡壳耳目未定属菌可能是引起结香患根腐病的病原菌,本研究结果为后续开展结香致病菌的分离和培养提供了候选菌群。
Abstract:
Root rot is one of the important diseases affecting the sustainable development of Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl. industry. To explore the pathogenesis of root rot of Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl., screen potential pathogens, and develop effective control agents, this study took the Edgeworthia chrysantha Lindl. forest with high incidence of root rot in Qianshan City, Anhui province as the research object, and used high-throughput sequencing technology (IlluminaMiSeq) to analyze and compare the rhizosphere soil physical and chemical properties, bacterial and fungal community structure and diversity of healthy plants and diseased plants. The results showed that compared with healthy plants, the bacterial richness index (Chao1 index) and fungal richness index (Chao1 index) in rhizosphere soil of diseased plants were significantly reduced by 13.74% and 45.83%, respectively, and the bacterial diversity (Shannon index) did not change significantly, but the fungal diversity (Shannon index) was significantly increased. Compared with the rhizosphere soil of healthy plants, the relative abundance of Byssovorax in the rhizosphere soil of diseased plants increased significantly (P<0.05), and the relative abundance of Botryosphaeria and Sebacinales_unclassified increased significantly (P<0.01). The organic carbon content in rhizosphere soil of diseased plants was significantly higher than that of healthy plants. In summary, after the infection of root rot, the richness of bacteria and fungi in rhizosphere soil decreased, and the diversity of fungal community increased. It was preliminarily determined that Byssovorax, Botryosphaeria and Sebacinales_unclassified may be the pathogens causing root rot. The results of this study provide a candidate flora for the subsequent isolation and culture of pathogenic bacteria.

参考文献/References:

[1]陈银华,吴华芬,曹鹏飞,等. 结香多糖的提取工艺[J]. 浙江农业科学,2022,63(3):592-598.
[2]华文礼. 优良经济植物结香的栽培和效益分析[J]. 经济林研究,2000,18(3):45-46.
[3]CORRADO C, MINCUZZI A, SCHENA L,et al. First report of collar and root rot caused by Phytophthora nicotianae on Lycium barbarum[J]. Journal of Plant Pathology,2018,100:361.
[4]李晖,李国英,付建红,等. 新疆枸杞烂根病病原的鉴定[J]. 植物保护学报,1998,25(3):253-257.
[5]陈玉涵,马心瑶,田夏夏,等. 陕西榆林山药根腐病病原菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 西北农业学报,2022,31(11):1521-1533.
[6]骆丹,田慧,张彩霞,等. 植物立枯丝核菌根腐病研究进展[J]. 中国植保导刊,2020,40(3):23-31.
[7]DAGUERRE Y, SIEGEL K, EDEL-HERMANN V, et al. Fungal proteins and genes associated with biocontrol mechanisms of soil-borne pathogens:a review[J]. Fungal Biology Reviews,2014,28(4):97-125.
[8]何子康,张纪利,聂锦瑶,等. 土壤中青枯病菌快速检测方法的建立与应用[J]. 中国植保导刊,2022,42(8):5-9,14.
[9]支旭欣,张帆,杨青川,等. 紫花苜蓿镰刀菌根腐病抗病种质资源筛选[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(4):104-112.
[10]周锋,周育栋,张艳彤,等. 花生白绢病菌的生物学特性及其对杀菌剂敏感性研究[J]. 中国植保导刊,2022,42(9):19-23.
[11]马娅楠,李继平,郑果,等. 赤芍根腐病病原菌鉴定及生物学特性[J]. 西北农业学报,2023,32(9):1486-1494.
[12]孟静静,崔文宁,王茜,等. 衡水湖黄顶菊对丹参根腐病菌的抑制效应研究[J]. 现代农业科技,2023(17):104-106,112.
[13]宋雨萌,刘文杰,宗茂,等. 青岛胶州大白菜根腐病病原菌鉴定及其生物防治[J]. 山东农业科学,2023,55(9):148-153.
[14]姬俊华,杨瑞先,刘萍,等. 牡丹根腐病病株和健株根内微生物菌群的差异[J]. 河南农业科学,2022,51(11):98-108.
[15]韩凤,章文伟,李巧玲,等. 多花黄精根腐病对根际土壤细菌微生态的影响[J]. 现代中药研究与实践,2022,36(5):6-11.
[16]赵卫松,郭庆港,苏振贺,等. 马铃薯健株与黄萎病株根际土壤真菌群落结构及其对碳源利用特征[J]. 中国农业科学,2021,54(2):296-309.
[17]赵林艳,官会林,向萍,等. 白及根腐病植株根际土壤微生物群落组成特征分析[J]. 生物技术通报,2022,38(2):67-74.
[18]刘艳,卢圣鄂,卓维,等. 毛黄堇根腐病根际土壤微生物群落结构及多样性[J]. 中国野生植物资源,2023,42(4):50-55,69.
[19]YANG H, LI J, XIAO Y, et al. An integrated insight into the relationship between soil microbial community and tobacco bacterial wilt disease[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2017,8:2179.
[20]BAKKER M G, GLOVER J D, MAI J G, et al. Plant community effects on the diversity and pathogen suppressive activity of soil Streptomycetes[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2010,46(1):35-42.
[21]文永均,黄璜,马中刚,等. Illumina高通量测序分析健康三七与患根腐病三七根际土和根内生真菌多样性[J]. 食品与发酵科技,2020,56(6):22-30.
[22]余妙,蒋景龙,任绪明,等. 西洋参根腐病发生与根际真菌群落变化关系研究[J]. 中国中药杂志,2018,43(10):2038-2047.
[23]FABIOLA B, LAMIA B, BERNARD N, et al. Impact of wheat straw decomposition on successional patterns of soil microbial community structure[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,41(2):262-275.
[24]朱斌. 黏细菌NUST03的生物学特性和吸附重金属性质及其胞外活性物质的研究[D]. 南京:南京理工大学,2003.
[25]孙丽. 水稻蔗糖转化酶GIF1调控抗病性的机制研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2012.
[26]林马水,张媚,柴莺飞,等. 干腐病发病与健康山核桃树体pH值、养分与细菌多样性差异[J]. 农业生物技术学报,2019,27(2):248-259.
[27]SLIPPERS B, WINGFIELD M J. Botryosphaeriaceae as endophytes and latent pathogens of woody plants:diversity, ecology and impact[J]. Fungal Biological Reviews,2007,21:90-106.
[28]王璠,黄俊斌,李国怀. 葡萄座腔菌属(Botryosphaeria)引起的果树病害及研究进展[J]. 植物保护,2013,39(6):7-13.
[29]唐燕静,郭顺星,陈娟. 兰科植物与菌根真菌专一性研究进展[J]. 首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(3):63-74.
[30]卢圣鄂,肖波,任风鸣,等. 基于Illumina Miseq分析黄精根腐病根际土壤真菌群落结构及多样性[J]. 世界科学技术——中医药现代化,2021,23(1):13-19.
[31]王芳,于璐,齐泽铮,等. 大豆镰刀菌根腐病拮抗菌的筛选及生防效果[J]. 生物技术通报,2024,40(7):216-225.
[32]杨瑾,文艺,高素霞,等. 河南产区丹参根腐病病原鉴定[J]. 河南农业科学,2021,50(10):92-98.
[33]LAUBER C L, HAMADY M, KNIGHT R, et al. Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,2009,75(15):5111-5120.
[34]高鑫媛,赵红玲,白茹玥,等. 北苍术根腐病植株根际土壤真菌群落多样性分析[J]. 西南农业学报,2022,35(4):812-821.
[35]GAITNIEKS T, KLAVINA D, MUIZNIEKS I, et al. Impact of Heterobasidion root-rot on fine root morphology and associated fungi in Picea abies stands on peat soils[J]. Mycorrhiza,2016,26(5):465-473.
[36]HARTMAN W H, R ICHARDSON C J, VILGALYS R, et al. Environmental and anthropogenic controls over bacterial communities in wetland soils[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2008,105(46):17842-17847.
[37]刘钺. 甘蔗根腐病对根际微生态的影响及其病原菌的拮抗细菌筛选鉴定[D]. 南宁:广西大学,2022.

相似文献/References:

[1]闫强,刘欢,王瑞敏,等.绿豆腐霉根腐病抗性鉴定技术体系构建及抗病资源筛选[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(03):510.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.03.010]
 YAN Qiang,LIU Huan,WANG Ruimin,et al.Establishment of resistance identification technology system for mung bean Pythium myriotylum root rot and screening of resistant resources[J].,2025,(12):510.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.03.010]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2023-12-28基金项目:安庆市科技攻关项目(KJ2021119);潜山市林业科技创新项目(KJ20200439)作者简介:胡子贤(1993-),男,安徽马鞍山人,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林培育。(E-mail)344106912@qq.com通讯作者:徐小牛,(E-mail)xnxu2007@ahau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-01-23