[1]张应鹏,王莉,叶小梅,等.粪肥还田模式对麦田温室气体和氨排放及土壤固碳的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(09):1643-1652.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.09.008]
　ZHANG Yingpeng,WANG Li,YE Xiaomei,et al.Effects of manure returning methods on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions and soil carbon sequestration in wheat fields[J].,2024,(09):1643-1652.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.09.008]
点击复制

粪肥还田模式对麦田温室气体和氨排放及土壤固碳的影响()
分享到：

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年09期
页码:
1643-1652
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2024-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of manure returning methods on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions and soil carbon sequestration in wheat fields
作者:
张应鹏1; 王莉1; 叶小梅1; 朱飞1; 徐芳2; 杨梁洁2
(1.江苏省农业科学院畜牧研究所/农业农村部种养结合重点实验室,江苏南京210014；2.高邮市农业技术综合服务中心,江苏高邮225600)
Author(s):
ZHANG Yingpeng1; WANG Li1; YE Xiaomei1; ZHU Fei1; XU Fang2; YANG Liangjie2
(1.Institute of Animal Science, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/ Key Laboratory of Crop and Animal Integrated Farming, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing 210014, China;2.Gaoyou Center of Agricultural Technology Comprehensive Service, Gaoyou 225600, China)
关键词:
粪肥还田; 温室气体排放; 氨排放; 固碳
Keywords:
manure returning; greenhouse gas emissions; ammonia emission; carbon sequestration
分类号:
S181
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.09.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为明确不同类型粪肥还田和水稻秸秆还田对麦田温室气体和氨排放及土壤固碳量的影响,本研究设置化肥+水稻秸秆还田、堆肥配施化肥+水稻秸秆还田、沼液配施化肥+水稻秸秆还田、粪浆配施化肥+水稻秸秆还田和沼液配施化肥+水稻秸秆离田5种处理,分析不同粪肥还田模式对麦田碳氮气体排放、全球增温潜势(GWP)、净全球增温潜势(NGWP)和土壤固碳量的影响。结果表明：粪肥还田处理的累积CO2、CH4、N2O、NH3排放量较化肥+水稻秸秆还田处理基本都有不同程度的增加。不同处理麦田GWP均以N2O排放为主,贡献率为67.4%～74.9%,其中粪浆配施化肥+水稻秸秆还田处理的GWP最高。堆肥配施化肥+水稻秸秆还田处理的麦田NH3累积排放量和气态氮(NH3-N和N2O-N)排放总量最大。沼液配施化肥+水稻秸秆还田处理麦田的GWP和耕层土壤固碳量分别比沼液配施化肥+水稻秸秆离田处理增加20.6%和2.87倍,NGWP由正转负。与化肥+水稻秸秆还田处理相比，粪肥配施化肥+水稻秸秆还田处理可以大幅提高麦田耕层土壤固碳量,且NGWP为负值,其中,粪浆配施化肥+水稻秸秆还田模式的效果最好。本研究结果可为粪肥利用和农田减排固碳提供依据。
Abstract:
In order to clarify the effects of different types of manure returning and rice straw returning on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions and soil carbon sequestration in wheat fields, five treatments were set up in this study, including chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning, compost combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning, biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning, manure slurry combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning and biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer + off-site utilization of rice straw. The effects of different manure returning modes on carbon and nitrogen gas emissions, global warming potential (GWP), net global warming potential (NGWP) and soil carbon sequestration in wheat fields were analyzed. The results showed that the cumulative CO2, CH4, N2O and NH3 emissions of manure returning treatment were basically increased to different degrees compared with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning treatment. The GWP of wheat fields under different treatments was dominated by N2O emission, with a contribution rate of 67.4%-74.9%, and the GWP of manure slurry combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning was the highest. The cumulative emission of NH3 and the total emission of gaseous nitrogen ( NH3-N and N2O-N ) were the highest in the wheat field treated with compost combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning. The GWP and the carbon sequestration of topsoil in wheat field under the treatment of biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning were 20.6% and 2.87 times higher than those in the treatment of biogas slurry combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw leaving the field, respectively, and the NGWP changed from positive to negative. Compared with the treatment of chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning, the treatment of manure combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning could significantly increase the amount of carbon sequestration in the topsoil of wheat field, and the NGWP was negative. Among them, the effect of manure slurry combined with chemical fertilizer + rice straw returning method was the best. The results of this study provide a basis for manure utilization, emission-reduction and carbon sequestration in farmland.

参考文献/References:

[1]丁也璐,赵娜娜,黎明,等. 陕北农田作物生产碳源/汇及碳足迹空间特征[J].生态学报,2024,44(11):4574-4583.
[2]张慧,张力文,何正弘. 东北农区农业净碳汇时空分布及驱动因素[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2024,41(3):505-517.
[3]刘伯顺,黄立华,黄金鑫,等. 我国农田氨挥发研究进展与减排对策[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文),2022,30(6):875-888.
[4]程琨,潘根兴. 农业与碳中和[J]. 科学,2021,73(6):8-12,4.
[5]United States Environmental Protection Agency. Global anthropogenic non-CO2 greenhouse gas emissions:1990-2030[R]. Washington,DC.：Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, USEPA,2012.
[6]MA R, ZOU J, HAN Z, et al. Global soil-derived ammonia emissions from agricultural nitrogen fertilizer application:a refinement based on regional and crop-specific emission factors[J]. Global Change Biology,2021,27(4):855-867.
[7]PIAO S L, FANG J Y, CIAIS P, et al. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China[J]. Nature,2009,458(7241):1009-1013.
[8]王小彬,武雪萍,赵全胜,等. 中国农业土地利用管理对土壤固碳减排潜力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2011,44(11):2284-2293.
[9]TAO F, PALOSUO T, VALKAMA E, et al. Cropland soils in China have a large potential for carbon sequestration based on literature survey[J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2019,186:70-78.
[10]韩冰,王效科,逯非,等. 中国农田土壤生态系统固碳现状和潜力[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(2):612-619.
[11]国务院办公厅. 国务院办公厅关于加快推进畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用的意见[EB/OL].(2017-05-31)
[2024-04-07]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2017/content_5204889.htm.
[12]农业农村部,财政部. 农业农村部办公厅财政部办公厅关于开展绿色种养循环农业试点工作的通知[EB/OL]. (2021-05-26)
[2024-04-07]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/xw/bmdt/202105/t20210526_6368443.htm.
[13]董红敏,左玲玲,魏莎,等. 建立畜禽废弃物养分管理制度促进种养结合绿色发展[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2019,34(2):180-189.
[14]XIA L, LAM S K, YAN X, et al. How does recycling of livestock manure in agroecosystems affect crop productivity, reactive nitrogen losses, and soil carbon balance?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology,2017,51(13):7450-7457.
[15]马文林,吴淑勋,朱法江,等. 玉米田长期施粪肥的温室气体排放研究[J]. 中国农机化学报,2020,41(10):168-175.
[16]李燕青,唐继伟,车升国,等. 长期施用有机肥与化肥氮对华北夏玉米N2O和CO2排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2015,48(21):4381-4389.
[17]翟振,王立刚,李虎,等. 有机无机肥料配施对春玉米农田N2O排放及净温室效应的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2013,32(12):2502-2510.
[18]黄容,高明,黎嘉成,等. 有机物料等氮量施用对紫色土氮形态及温室气体排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2018,51(21):4087-4101.
[19]DONG W X, HU C S, ZHANG Y M, et a1. Ammonia volatilization from urea incorporation with wheat and maize straw on a loamy soil in China[EB/OL]. UC Davis:The Proceedings of the International Plant Nutrition Colloquium XVI,2009. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8db6h5cr.
[20]YANG Q L, LIU P, DONG S T, et al. Combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers mitigates ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions in a maize field[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2020,117(1):13-27.
[21]MATSUSHIMA M, LIM S S, KWAK J H, et al. Interactive effects of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer and composted manure on ammonia volatilization from soils[J]. Plant and Soil,2009,325:187-196.
[22]靳红梅,常志州,郭德杰,等. 追施猪粪沼液对菜地氨挥发的影响[J]. 土壤学报,2012,49(1):86-95.
[23]杨润,孙钦平,赵海燕,等. 沼液在稻田的精确施用及其环境效应研究[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2017,36(8):1566-1572.
[24]王小非,沈仕洲,尹高飞,等. 沼液灌溉对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作农田CO2、N2O排放规律的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2017,36(4):783-792.
[25]孙国峰,郑建初,陈留根,等. 沼液替代化肥对麦季CH4、N2O排放及温室效应的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2012,31(8):1654-1661.
[26]王海候,金梅娟,陆长婴,等. 秸秆还田模式对农田土壤碳库特性及产量的影响[J]. 自然资源学报,2017,32(5):755-764.
[27]ZHAO Y C, WANG M Y, HU S J, et al. Economics-and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2018,115(16):4045-4050.
[28]LU F. How can straw incorporation management impact on soil carbon storage? A meta-analysis[J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,2015,20:1545-1568.
[29]靳红梅,沈明星,王海候,等. 秸秆还田模式对稻麦两熟农田麦季CH4和N2O排放特征的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报,2017,33(2):333-339.
[30]LIU C, LU M, CUI J, et al. Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils:a meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology,2014,20(5):1366-1381.
[31]潘飞飞,唐蛟,孙壮,等. 沼液替代化肥对冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志,2022,38(3):174-180.
[32]薛鹏英. 肉鸭粪肥对果蔬质量及土壤环境的影响研究[D]. 北京：中国农业科学院,2022.
[33]高尚洁,刘杏认,李迎春,等. 施用生物炭和秸秆还田对农田温室气体排放及增温潜势的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2024,57(5):935-949.
[34]WANG S, WANG W, CUI Y, et al. Impacts of liquid fractions from two solid-liquid separation technologies on the soil porosity, ammonia, and greenhouse gas emissions[J]. Agronomy,2024,14(1):186.
[35]王晓娇,张仁陟,齐鹏,等. Meta分析有机肥施用对中国北方农田土壤CO2排放的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2019,35(10):99-107.
[36]李新华,朱振林,董红云,等. 玉米秸秆不同还田方式下麦田温室气体排放特征[J]. 农业资源与环境学报,2016,33(2):176-181.
[37]盛海君,牛东,张莀茜,等. 稻秸秆还田与腐熟剂对小麦当季温室气体排放的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2018,39(2):29-34.
[38]李新华,董红云,朱振林,等. 秸秆还田方式对黄淮海区域小麦-玉米轮作制农田土壤周年温室气体排放的影响[J]. 土壤与作物,2019,8(3):280-287.
[39]张玉铭,胡春胜,张佳宝,等. 农田土壤主要温室气体(CO2、CH4、N2O)的源/汇强度及其温室效应研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2011,19(4):966-975.
[40]赵培华. 河南省农业碳排放与经济增长的脱钩分析[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51 (22):245-249.
[41]李圆圆,何平,茅桁. 稻田水肥管理研究进展及思考[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2023,41(8):825-832.
[42]何振嘉,贺伟,罗林涛,等. 基于碳中和背景的耕地质量提升路径[J]. 排灌机械工程学报,2023,41(7):723-730.
[43]贾明军,夏鹏亮,黄勇,等. 农业碳排放研究进展及烟草农业碳计量研究展望[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(16):9-17.
[44]谢晴,饶旭东,周聪,等. 夜间增温条件下施硅稻田N2O还原对外源氮的响应[J]. 江苏农业学报,2022,38(1):87-93.
[45]国家发展和改革委员会应对气候变化司. 省级温室气体清单编制指南(试行)[EB/OL]. 2011
[2021-12-11]. http://www.cbcsd.org.cn/sjk/nengyuan/standard/home/20140113/download/shengjiwenshiqiti.pdf.
[46]HUIJSMANS J F M, HOL J M G, HENDRIKS M M W B. Effect of application technique, manure characteristics, weather and field conditions on ammonia volatilization from manure applied to grassland[J]. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences,2001,49(4):323-342.
[47]VANDERZAAG A, AMON B, BITTMAN S, et al． Ammonia abatement with manure storage and processing techniques［M］//REIS S, HOWARD C, SUTTON M A. Costs of ammonia abatement and the climate co-benefits． Dordrecht,Netherlands:Springer,2015:75-112．
[48]刘高远,和爱玲,杜君,等. 有机肥替代化肥对砂姜黑土区小麦-玉米轮作系统N2O排放的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2023,56(16):3156-3167.
[49]谢立勇,叶丹丹,张贺,等. 旱地土壤温室气体排放影响因子及减排增汇措施分析[J]. 中国农业气象,2011,32(4):481-487.
[50]SMITH P, MARTINO D, CAI Z, et al. Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,2007,118(1):6-28.
[51]杨小兵,江波,殷寒旭,等. 冬小麦田间控水对土壤CH4和N2O排放的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2015,46(2):471-476.
[52]LI L, LI F, DONG Y. Greenhouse gas emissions and global warming potential in double-cropping rice fields as influenced by two water-saving irrigation modes in south China[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition,2020,20(4):2617-2630.
[53]WRAGE N, VELTHOF G L, BEUSICHEM M L V, et al. Role of nitrifier denitrification in the production of nitrous oxide[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2001,33(12):1723-1732.
[54]ZHAO Y, ZHANG Y, LIU X, et al. Carbon sequestration dynamic, trend and efficiency as affected by 22-year fertilization under a rice-wheat cropping system[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,2016,179(5):652-660.
[55]常乃杰. 气候变化背景下施肥管理措施对环渤海区域主要粮食作物产量和固碳减排的影响[D]. 北京：中国农业科学院,2020.
[56]万小楠,赵珂悦,吴雄伟,等. 秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米农田土壤固碳、氧化亚氮排放和全球增温潜势的影响[J]. 环境科学,2022,43(1):569-576.

相似文献/References:

[1]吴文丽,谢英添,董晓鸣,等.塑料中棚番茄有机肥与化肥配施能耗与温室气体排放评估[J].江苏农业学报,2021,(06):1516.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.021]
　WU Wen-li,XIE Ying-tian,DONG Xiao-ming,et al.Evaluation of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions under combined application of organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer in plastic greenhouse tomato production[J].,2021,(09):1516.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.05.021]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2024-07-16基金项目：江苏省农业科技自主创新基金项目[CX22(3009)]；江苏现代农业产业技术体系建设专项[JATS(2023)397]作者简介：张应鹏(1991-),男,安徽寿县人,硕士,助理研究员,主要从事养殖污染控制与资源化利用研究。(E-mail)793379912@qq.com通讯作者：叶小梅,(E-mail)yexiaomei@jaas.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-11-17