[1]李智,郭明月,朱文昊,等.淹水和适水条件下不同磷肥对稻麦轮作土壤磷库的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2024,(09):1633-1642.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.09.007]
　LI Zhi,GUO Mingyue,ZHU Wenhao,et al.Effects of different phosphorus fertilizers on phosphorus pool in rice-wheat rotation soil under flooding and suitable water conditions[J].,2024,(09):1633-1642.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.09.007]
点击复制

淹水和适水条件下不同磷肥对稻麦轮作土壤磷库的影响()

江苏农业学报[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年09期
页码:
1633-1642
栏目:
耕作栽培·资源环境
出版日期:
2024-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effects of different phosphorus fertilizers on phosphorus pool in rice-wheat rotation soil under flooding and suitable water conditions
作者:
李智1; 郭明月1; 朱文昊1; 罗来超1; 王智1; 张朝春1; 2; 叶新新1
(1.安徽农业大学资源与环境学院,安徽合肥230036;2.中国农业大学资源与环境学院,北京100193)
Author(s):
LI Zhi1; GUO Mingyue1; ZHU Wenhao1; LUO Laichao1; WANG Zhi1; ZHANG Chaochun1; 2; YE Xinxin1
(1.College of Resources and Environment,Anhui Agricultural University,Hefei 230036,China；2.College of Resources and Environment, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)
关键词:
磷肥; 磷组分; 磷库变化; 不同水分处理
Keywords:
phosphate fertilizers; phosphorus component; changes in phosphorus pools; different moisture treatments
分类号:
S147.5
DOI:
doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2024.09.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
本研究以巢湖稻麦轮作区沙壤土和水稻土为研究对象,探究淹水和适水条件下施用不同磷肥对稻麦轮作土壤磷库动态变化的影响,为合理施用磷肥提供理论依据。2种土壤均设置适水处理和淹水处理,同时设3个施肥处理:不施磷肥(CK)、单施过磷酸钙(SSP)和单施控释活化磷酸二铵(LC-DAP),共12个处理。在恒温培养后第5 d、10 d、30 d、60 d采集土样,分析土壤磷库变化。结果表明:沙壤土中淹水处理下LC-DAP处理的活性磷库整体上最高,适水处理下SSP处理在10 d、60 d时的活性磷库最高,2种水分处理下，SSP处理的中等活性磷库整体上均最高；而在水稻土中SSP处理的活性磷库和中等活性磷库整体上均最高。沙壤土占比最大的磷组分是HCl-P,水稻土占比最大的磷组分是NaOH-Pi。培养开始后,2种土壤的NaOH-Po含量明显下降,表明施用磷肥促进NaOH-Po矿化。淹水处理NaHCO3-Pi、NaHCO3-Po、NaOH-Pi和Residual-P与H2O-P存在显著或极显著相关关系,而适水处理NaHCO3-Po、NaOH-Po和Residual-P与NaHCO3-Pi存在显著或极显著相关关系。施用磷肥显著增加活性磷库和中等活性磷库,而磷肥品种和水分处理仅影响活性磷库,不影响中等活性磷库和残余态磷库。
Abstract:
In this study, sandy loam and paddy soil in Chaohu rice-wheat rotation area were used as the research objects to explore the effects of different phosphorus (P) fertilizers on the dynamic changes of soil P pool in rice-wheat rotation areas under flooding and suitable water conditions, so as to provide theoretical basis for rational application of P fertilizer in the given region. Suitable water treatment and flooding treatment were set for two soils, and three fertilization treatments were set, such as no P fertilizer (CK), single application of calcium superphosphate (SSP) and single application of lost-controlled diammonium phosphate (LC-DAP). There were 12 treatments in total. Soil samples were collected five days, ten days, 30 days and 60 days after constant temperature culture, and the changes of soil P pool were analyzed. The results showed that the labile P pool in sandy loam was the highest on the whole in LC-DAP treatment under flooding condition, and under suitable water condition, the labile P pool was the highest after ten days and 60 days by SSP treatment. The moderate labile P pool was the highest on the whole in SSP treatment under two water conditions, while the labile P pool and moderate labile P pool were the highest on the whole under SSP treatment in paddy soil. HCl-P took the largest proportion of P component in sandy loam, and NaOH-Pi took the largest proportion of P component in paddy soil. NaOH-Po contents in the two soils decreased obviously after cultivation, which indicated that the application of P fertilizer promoted mineralization of NaOH-Po. Under the condition of flooding, NaHCO3-Pi, NaHCO3-Po, NaOH-Pi and Residual-P exhibited significant or highly significant correlations with H2O-P, while under the condition of suitable water, NaHCO3-Po, NaOH-Pi and Residual-P exhibited significant or highly significant correlations with NaHCO3-Pi. Application of P fertilizer significantly increases the labile P pool and the moderate labile P pool, while P fertilizer varieties and water treatment only affect the labile P pool, do not affect the moderate labile P pool and residual P pool.

参考文献/References:

[1]闫金垚,郭丽璇,王昆昆,等. 长江流域稻-油轮作区土壤磷库现状及环境风险分析[J]. 土壤学报,2023,60(1):247-257.
[2]MEDINSKI T, FREESE D, REITZ T. Changes in soil phosphorus balance and phosphorus-use efficiency under long-term fertilization conducted on agriculturally used Chernozem in Germany[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science,2018,98(4):650-662.
[3]联合国粮食及农业组织. 联合国粮食及农业组织数据库[DB/OL].
[2023-10-15]. https://www. fao. org/faostat/zh/#data/RFN .
[4]肖敏,郭浪,崔璨，等. 磷肥运筹对机插双季稻产量构成与养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物杂志,2024(2):178-188.
[5]吴庚福,黄振瑞,陈迪文,等. 不同类型磷肥对土壤磷素形态和烟草生长的影响[J]. 中国烟草科学,2021,42(6):1-7.
[6]顾惠敏,陈波浪,王庆惠. 施用磷肥对不同质地棉田土壤磷素有效性及磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2019(3):100-108.
[7]王晓红,柳小琪,吴璐璐,等. 3种磷肥在北方6种土壤中的吸持固定特点[J]. 河南科技大学学报(自然科学版),2020,41(4):75-81,9.
[8]王箫璇,张敏,张鑫尧,等. 不同磷肥对砂姜黑土和红壤磷库转化及冬小麦磷素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学,2023,56(6):1113-1126.
[9]徐雅婷,景建元,李虹颖,等. 不同新型磷肥对黄瓜产量、品质及磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报,2023,50(4):603-610.
[10]吉冰洁,李文海,徐梦洋,等. 不同磷肥品种在石灰性土壤中的磷形态差异[J]. 中国农业科学,2021,54(12):2581-2594.
[11]王利,高祥照,马文奇,等. 中国低浓度磷肥的使用现状与发展展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2006，12(5):732-737.
[12]邹茸,王秀斌,霍文敏,等. 不同磷肥品种对苋菜镉累积的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2018(1):37-42.
[13]冯尚善,崔荣政,王臣. 我国新型肥料产业发展现状及展望[J]. 磷肥与复肥,2020,35(10):1-3.
[14]王修康,王学江,李峰,等. 新型磷肥在玉米上的应用效果研究[J]. 磷肥与复肥,2019,34(4):39-40.
[15]闫凤超,王安东,李鹏,等. 不同形态的磷对水稻产量影响的研究[J]. 现代化农业,2017(6):56-57.
[16]蔡冬清,吴正岩,吴丽芳,等. 化肥与农药控失技术研发及产业化[J]. 科技促进发展,2019,15(4):351-356.
[17]景建元,袁亮,张水勤,等. 腐殖酸磷肥中的腐殖酸对磷迁移的影响及机理[J]. 中国农业科学,2021,54(23):5032-5042.
[18]冯文来,赵平. 控制释放技术发展及展望[J]. 化学工业与工程,1996(1):49-52,66.
[19]刘永红,郑文涛,张晋天,等. 缓/控释肥研究进展及其应用[J]. 华中农业大学学报,2023,42(4):167-176.
[20]田文涛,党程成,郝蓉蓉,等. 缓释肥一次性施肥在水稻上增产增效的农学基础研究[J]. 江苏农业科学,2023,51(4):71-77.
[21]田帅,单旭东,程启鹏,等. 巢湖流域典型稻麦轮作区大气氮磷沉降及对巢湖影响的分析[J]. 江苏农业学报,2022,38(4):958-966.
[22]合肥市统计局. 合肥市统计年鉴[M]. 北京:中国统计出版社,2022.
[23]ZHANG L, FANG Y, CAI H, et al. Spatio-temporal heterogeneities in water quality and their potential drivers in Lake Chaohu (China) from 2001 to 2017[J]. Ecohydrology,2021,14(7):e2333.
[24]ZHOU L, SU L Z, ZHANG L Y, et al. Effect of different types of phosphate fertilizer on phosphorus absorption and desorption in acidic red soil of Southwest China[J]. Sustainability,2022,14(16): 9973.
[25]HEDLEY M J, STEWART J W B, CHAUHAN B S. Changes in inorganic and organic soil phosphorus fractions induced by cultivation practices and by laboratory incubations[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1982,46(5):970-976.
[26]SUI Y, THOMPSON M L, SHANG C. Fractionation of phosphorus in a Mollisol amended with biosolids[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,1999,63(5):1174-1180.
[27]张林,吴宁,吴彦,等. 土壤磷素形态及其分级方法研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报,2009,20(7):1775-1782.
[28]王飞,李清华,林诚,等. 长期不同供磷水平下南方黄泥田生产力及磷组分特征[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2020,28(7):960-968.
[29]YUAN J H, WANG L, CHEN H, et al. Responses of soil phosphorus pools accompanied with carbon composition and microorganism changes to phosphorus-input reduction in paddy soils[J]. Pedosphere,2021,31(1):83-93.
[30]蔡成,王擎运,王慧,等. 含铁秸秆腐熟物对砂姜黑土和潮土磷形态及有效性的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2023,54(3):662-672.
[31]CHEN G L, YUAN J H, CHEN H, et al. Animal manures promoted soil phosphorus transformation via affecting soil microbial community in paddy soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2022,831: 154917.
[32]冒辛平,刘汝亮,赵营,等. 施肥措施对水旱轮作条件下灌淤土磷素形态的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2022,53(6):1447-1452.
[33]刘玉洁,林诚,王飞,等. 冷浸田水稻施用不同磷肥品种试验[J]. 福建农业科技,2016,47(4):14-15.
[34]赵隽宇,潘波,覃祚玉,等. 长期施用袋控缓释肥对南方红壤中磷素形态及有效性的影响[J]. 农学学报,2022,12(11):14-19.
[35]BOSCHETTI N G, QUINTERO C E, GIUFFRE L. Phosphorus fractions of soils under Lotus corniculatus as affected by different phosphorus fertilizers[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2009,45:379-384.
[36]韩梅,李东坡,武志杰,等. 持续六年施用不同磷肥对稻田土壤磷库的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2018,49(4):929-935.
[37]TIAN L Y, GUO Q J, YU G R, et al. Phosphorus fractions and oxygen isotope composition of inorganic phosphate in typical agricultural soils[J]. Chemosphere,2020,239:124622.
[38]李季,张桥,张嘉欣,等. 秸秆还田对稻田土壤磷素形态及磷循环微生物功能基因的影响[J]. 福建农业学报,2023,38(10):1230-1241.
[39]穆晓慧,李世清,党蕊娟. 黄土高原石灰性土壤不同形态磷组分分布特征[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2008,12(6):1341-1347.
[40]苏贵锐,荣飞龙,张薇,等. 减磷施肥配施生物炭对南方酸性稻作土壤磷素形态的影响[J/OL]. 中国土壤与肥料,2024(1):19-27.
[41]MARTINENGO S, SCHIAVON M, SANTORO V, et al. Assessing phosphorus availability in paddy soils:the importance of integrating soil tests and plant responses[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2023,59(4):391-405.
[42]WANG Y, ZHANG W, MLLER T, et al. Soil phosphorus availability and fractionation in response to different phosphorus sources in alkaline and acid soils:a short-term incubation study[J]. Scientific Reports,2023,13(1):5677.
[43]王海龙,张民,刘之广,等. 多年定位试验条件下不同施磷水平对土壤无机磷分级的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2018,32(5):318.
[44]LEE C H, PARK C Y, DO PARK K, et al. Long-term effects of fertilization on the forms and availability of soil phosphorus in rice paddy[J]. Chemosphere,2004,56(3):299-304.
[45]CHEN Y L, CHEN X J, ZHANG C L, et al. Conversion of ammonium polyphosphate (APP) in acidic soil and its effect on soil phosphorus[J]. Applied Ecology & Environmental Research,2020,18:4405-4415.
[46]孙桂芳,金继运,石元亮. 土壤磷素形态及其生物有效性研究进展[J]. 中国土壤与肥料,2011(2):1-9.
[47]刘津,李春越,邢亚薇等. 长期施肥对黄土旱塬农田土壤有机磷组分及小麦产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2020,31(1):157-164.
[48]张教林,陈爱国,刘志秋. 定植3,13,34年热带胶园的土壤磷素形态变化和有效性研究[J]. 土壤,2000,32(6):319-322.
[49]滕泽琴,李旭东,韩会阁,等. 土地利用方式对陇中黄土高原土壤磷组分的影响[J]. 草业学报,2013,22(2):30-37.
[50]REHMAN O U, MEHDI S M, SARFRAZ M, et al. Phosphorus dynamics in Rasulpur soil series (Typic Camborthid) under rice based cropping system[J]. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences,2013,23(2):480-486.
[51]张建伟,石孝均,徐文静,等. 果园绿肥对土壤磷组分及磷素有效性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2021,35(6):336-342.
[52]刘双凤,杨德志,王凤,等. 施肥对我国农田土壤磷素形态影响的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中国土壤与肥料,2023:1-13
[2023-12-19]. http://kns. cnki. net/kcms/detail/11. 5498. S. 20231219. 1018. 004. html.

相似文献/References:

[1]何晓菊,付为国.不同磷肥施用量对新疆冬小麦种植区土壤微生物群落结构和冬小麦产量的影响[J].江苏农业学报,2025,(12):2350.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.008]
　HE Xiaoju,FU Weiguo.Effects of different phosphorus fertilizer application rates on soil microbial community structure and winter wheat yield in winter wheat growing areas of Xinjiang[J].,2025,(09):2350.[doi:doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2025.11.008]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期：2023-11-15基金项目：安徽省科技重大专项(202103a06020012)作者简介：李智(1999-),男,河南鹤壁人,硕士研究生,主要从事养分资源综合管理研究。(E-mail)1207344132@qq.com通讯作者：张朝春,(E-mail)zhangcc@cau.edu.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-11-17